Updated NCRP Population Exposure Information and Implications to RETS-REMP Issues Ken Sejkora Entergy Nuclear Northeast – Pilgrim Station Presented at.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Natural and Man-Made Radiation Sources Health Physics Society - Power Reactor Section Radiation Science Education.
Advertisements

Natural and Man-Made Radiation Sources
Radiation Benefit and Risk Assessment ©Health Physics Society.
Sejkora: What is RETS-REMP?
Implications of Tritium Dose Conversion Factors in Deriving Regulatory Limits for Drinking Water and Effluent Compliance Ken Sejkora Entergy Nuclear Northeast.
Understanding Radioactivity The Basics. This Course  This course is intended to provide a very basic understanding of radiation, radioactivity, and interacting.
11 April th International High-Energy Physics Technical Safety Forum 1 Radiation Protection and Safety in High-Energy Physics Kenneth R. Kase, Ph.D.
Presented to TEPRSSC October 1, 2003 Security Products that Use Ionizing Radiation.
SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Protection of the environment from ionising radiation - views of a regulator.
Biological response and radiation safety practices
Radiation Dose Limits for Adult Subjects Henry D. Royal, M.D. Associate Director Division of Nuclear Medicine Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology Professor.
Maximum Permissible Dose (MPD)
A Radiation Primer radiation … radioactive material What are they? exposure … contamination Are they the same?
Derivation of Dose-Based Detection Limits for Drinking Water and Effluent Compliance Ken Sejkora Entergy Nuclear Northeast – Pilgrim Station Presented.
Tritium in The Demin Water System -- An IE Bulletin Challenge Ken Sejkora Entergy Nuclear Northeast – Pilgrim Station Presented at the 12 th Annual.
Knowledge of radiation exposure in common radiological examinations amongst radiology department staff AL Chang, LH Cope, DH Keane, S Wood Presented by.
Radiophamaceuticals in Nuclear Cardiac Imaging Vasken Dilsizian, M.D. Professor of Medicine and Radiology Director of Cardiovascular Nuclear Medicine and.
Thomas S. Tenforde NCRP President 67 th Meeting of the NEA Committee on Radiation Protection and Public Health Paris, France May 12-14, 2009 Overview of.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency PGEC Part IV The International System of Radiation Protection and the Regulatory Framework Module IV 2 Conceptual.
1 Module 2 Health and Medical Effects. 2 Health and Medical Effects Terminal Objective: DESCRIBE the indicators, signs, and symptoms of exposure to radiation.
Current and Planned Reports and Conferences of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements Thomas S. Tenforde President Presentation.
Impact of License Extension on Radionuclide Buildup Assumptions Ken Sejkora Entergy Nuclear Northeast – Pilgrim Station Presented at the 18 th Annual RETS-REMP.
Summary of Current and Planned Reports and Conferences of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements Thomas S. Tenforde President Interagency.
1 RG-1.21 & RG-4.1 Steve Garry and Richard Conatser Presented at the RETS-REMP Workshop South Bend, IN 22-Jun-2009.
Dr. Antone Brooks Washington State University Tri-cities Richland, Washington Linear-No-Threshold Hypothesis- Scientific Evidence?
Health Physics 1a: Sources of Radiation. Introduction Scientists have studied radiation for over 100 years and we know a great deal about it. Radiation.
Products to X-ray People for Security Presented to the : Technical Electronic Product Radiation Safety Standards Committee May 22, 2002.
Dose Consequence of Environmental Water LLD Values and Implications to Derivation of Revised Values Ken Sejkora Entergy Nuclear Northeast – Pilgrim Station.
1 WEEK 7 RADIATION BIOLOGY & PROTECTION Part 1 FINAL.
56th Regular Session of the IAEA General Conference
Use of Effective Dose as an RDRC Study Limit
What is a Public Health Assessment? “The evaluation of data and information on the release of harmful substances into the environment in order to assess.
FUKISHIMA Nuclear Reactors Radiological Assessment Air Measurement Surveillance AMS March 22,
Radiological Assessment March 22, AMS Summary 2 Ops Summary – Aerial Measurement Systems totaled more than 40 hours of flying Plot interpretation.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Regulations Part III: Radiation Protection Performance Requirements Day 8 – Lecture 5(3)
Radiation Protection Procedures
Radioactivity Chapter 9 Nuclear Changes. Radioactivity  Radioactive materials have unstable nuclei.  They emit particles/energy to become stable. 
Radiation: How to address the confusion Jill Anderson Washington Internships for Students of Engineering & The American Nuclear Society.
DOE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP BIOTA PROTECTION Stephen L. Domotor (202)
Diagnostic reference levels in Medical Imaging. Concept and practice
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency PGEC Part IV The International System of Radiation Protection and the Regulatory Framework Module IV 1.3. The role.
FP 6 - Radiation Protection Main objectives u underpin European policy/standards u resolve uncertainties in the risk from low and protracted exposures.
Radiological Assessment - of effects from - Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant April 7, 2011.
Radiological Assessment - of effects from - Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant April 18, 2011.
RER/9/111: Establishing a Sustainable National Regulatory Infrastructure for Nuclear and Radiation Safety TCEU School of Drafting Regulations November.
THE RADIATION SAFETY IN A “DAILY LIFE” Introduction Volodymyr Berkovskyy.
1 Health Safety & Radiation Protection (RAD453) Course : بسم الله الرّحمن الرّحيم Chapter 3: Sources of Radiation Omrane KADRI, Ph.D.
X-Ray Personnel Security Screening Systems Update Presented to TEPRSSC October 1, 2003 Gaithersburg, MD.
LOW LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE FORUM--FALL 2014 MEETING
PAG Manual Revision Update and Next Steps
Update on EPA Regulatory and Guidance Activities
Introduction and setting the scene to the 9th EAN Workshop on “Occupational exposure to natural radiation” C. Lefaure (CEPN), P. Shaw (HPA-RPD) 9th EAN.
Vesa Tanner European Commission Directorate-General Energy
WEEK 7 RADIATION BIOLOGY & PROTECTION Part 1
Radiation in Everyday Life – an Irish Perspective
Rad T 110 Introduction to Radiation Protection and Interaction of X-ray and Matter Sherer Ch 1 and Ch 2.
Nuclear Chemistry Radiation in Your Life Background Radiation
Background Radiation.
Principles of Radiation Protection
TOPICAL TRAINING SESSION TENORM
Radiation Protection Procedures
Allen Chan U.S. Government Accountability Office October 2, 2018
Rational Basis for Updating the Recommended Limit on Radiation Dose to the Public Darrell R. Fisher Pasco, Washington September 30-October.
Members of the Public and Other Organizational Personnel Working in Proximity to RASP Controlled Areas.
Nuclear Chemistry Radiation in Your Life Background Radiation
Answers to Common Questions About the Use and Safety of CT Scans
Radiological Assessment March 22, 2011
Optimisation in Operational Radiological Protection
College of Dental Medicine
16th Annual City Tech Poster Session
Presentation transcript:

Updated NCRP Population Exposure Information and Implications to RETS-REMP Issues Ken Sejkora Entergy Nuclear Northeast – Pilgrim Station Presented at the 19 th Annual RETS-REMP Workshop South Bend, IN / June 2009

NCRP Report 93 Published in 1987 Assessment of the average exposure of members of the United States population from all sources of ionizing radiation Considered six main source categories: Natural radiation Occupational (radiation workers) Nuclear fuel cycle Consumer products Miscellaneous environmental sources Medical diagnosis and therapy

NCRP Report 93 - Method For each source type, the product of the estimated number of people exposed and the average effective dose equivalent received from that source is expressed as the collective dose from that source -- man-mRem, man-Sv Collective dose from each source is then divided by the entire United States population to obtain the contribution from that source to the average effective dose equivalent for a member of the United States population – mrem, Sv

NCRP Report 93 - Method Dose for each exposure type was then divided by total to determine relative fraction from each type Resulting Pie-chart has been used by radiation protection personnel to emphasize importance of natural sources to an individual’s exposure… helps place things into perspective

From NCRP Report No. 093, “Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of United States” (1987)

NCRP Report 93 - Summary Average dose to individual was 360 mrem/yr Approximately 54% of dose was attributed to radon An additional 27% attributed to other natural sources (cosmic, terrestrial, internal) Total ~83% attributed to natural sources Medical comprised ~15% Dose from nuclear power was grouped into a category comprising <1%

NCRP Report 160 Published in 2009, based on data from 2006 NCRP felt it necessary to re-assess population exposure and sources due to increase in medical applications over the past two decades New report provides a more detailed delineation of medical exposure Similar approach to NCRP 93, where collective population dose is divided by total population size Pie-chart similar to that in NCRP 93

From NCRP Report No. 160, “Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States” (2009)

NCRP Report Summary Average dose to individual is 620 mrem/yr Approximately 37% of dose was attributed to radon An additional 13% attributed to other natural sources (cosmic, terrestrial, internal) Total ~50% attributed to natural sources Medical comprised ~48% Dose from nuclear power was grouped into a category comprising <0.1%

From NCRP Report No. 160, “Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States” (2009)

Why is this Important to RETS-REMP? RETS-REMP personnel are recognized as radiation protection professionals! We need to understand the importance of natural radiation’s contribution to overall exposure We should discuss & emphasize the contribution of natural radiation exposure in our Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Reports We need to place the dose impact from plant operations into overall perspective to other sources of exposure

“Good” Radiation vs. “Bad” Radiation In the public’s eye, there are two types of radiation “Good” radiation benefits humans… any medical exposure is “good” radiation “Bad” radiation is detrimental to humans… any industrial/commercial exposure is “bad” radiation; many even include natural exposure in this category Unfortunately, some professionals (medical doctors) subscribe to the above delineation Cranial CT scan ~3300 mrem, Abdominal CT ~8000 mrem

Dose vs. Risk Recognize that dose is dose, and a mrem carries the same risk whether it occurs from medical exposure or natural exposure or from power plant operation We need to initiate change by encouraging the professional community to adopt a risk-based approach to radiation protection and standards, and compare risk from commonly-accepted activities Regulations and regulatory guidance need to be shifted to a risk-based approach… EPA does this to a certain extent for non-radiological contaminants in drinking water

Summary NCRP has revised its assessment of radiation exposure to the general public… we need to use new information to our advantage The average American’s dose has increased from 360 mrem/yr in 1986 to 620 mrem in 2006, mostly from medical exposure Dose from natural sources of radiation account for ~300 mrem/yr, compared to less than 1 mrem/yr from nuclear power

Summary The radiation protection and medical professions need to recognize any detrimental effects of radiation are equal regardless the source of radiation… no more acceptance of “good” vs. “bad” dose We need to advocate regulators to adopt risk-based approaches to radiation protection standards and guidelines

Questions?