Overview Minimum required classifiers for mapping vegetation cover at global scale using the FAO-LCCS tool GLC 2000 - LEGEND hjs/30-Apr-01.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EXCHANGE FORMAT Ialina Vinci EXCHANGE FORMAT Ialina Vinci Osservatorio Regionale Suolo - ARPAV Ispra 3-4 February 2005.
Advertisements

Working with Profiles in IX1D v 3 – A Tutorial © 2006 Interpex Limited All rights reserved Version 1.0.
GLC 2000 – “FIRST RESULTS” WORKSHOP JRC – Ispra, March 2002 GLC 2000 – South America map Presented by H.Eva E. E. de Miranda C. di Bella V. Gond.
Configuration Management
Marking Schema question1: 40 marks question2: 40 marks question3: 20 marks total: 100 marks.
Has EO found its customers? Global Vegetation Monitoring Unit GLC2000 GLOBAL LEGEND GLC 2000 – “FIRST RESULTS” WORKSHOP JRC – Ispra, March 2002.
Global Vegetation Monitoring Unit GLC 2000 Project Partners in Asia & Oceania GLC 2000 – “FIRST RESULTS” WORKSHOP JRC – Ispra, March 2002.
A Land Cover Map of Eurasia’s Boreal Ecosystems S. BARTALEV, A. S. BELWARD Institute for Environment and Sustainability, EC Joint Research Centre, Italy.
Production of land cover map of Asia, Central Asia, and Middle East with emphasis of the development of ground truth database Ryutaro Tateishi, Hiroshi.
VEGETATION MAPPING FOR LANDFIRE National Implementation.
Spatial analysis tools for biodiversity indicators on habitats and ecosystems Expert meeting on multi-scales mapping and integrated analysis of landscape.
Wetland Critical Areas - Draft Ordinance Overview 18.20: Definitions Many new definitions added for clarity when used in the regulations and several unnecessary.
Characteristics of a good SRS
C-CAP The Coastal Change Analysis Program Overview of C-CAP Products, Vision, Status, and Related Tools from the Coastal Services Center.
Has EO found its customers? Global Vegetation Monitoring Unit GLC2000 Land Cover Classification.
Radar, Lidar and Vegetation Structure. Greg Asner TED Talk.
1 Has EO found its customers? GLC 2000 Workshop ‘Methods’ Objectives F. Achard Global Vegetation Monitoring Unit.
1.2 Row Reduction and Echelon Forms
Linear Equations in Linear Algebra
The Coeur d'Alene Tribe is learning the remote sensing methodology developed by LANDFIRE, and will be attempting to apply the methods to higher resolution.
Time series – spatial information ESPON workshop, 6 th May 2010 Oscar Gomez, EEA.
Global Vegetation Monitoring Unit 1 Towards a global Land Cover 2000 product: the preliminary version of the global product and how it can be improved.
Has EO found its customers? 1 GVM G lobal V egetation M onitoring Unit GLC – 2000 Product Format and Data management Cesar CARMONA-MORENO.
The use of Remote Sensing in Land Cover Mapping and Change Detection in Somalia Simon Mumuli Oduori, Ronald Vargas Rojas, Ambrose Oroda and Christian Omuto.
GLC 2000 First Result Workshop March 2002 Spectral separability of Land cover classes in Southern Africa. An application of LCCS. Ana Cabral 1, Maria.
Land Cover Classification System Class A Liaison Seminar of ISO TC 211 LCCS : An Approach to the Global Harmonisation of Land Cover John S. Latham and.
Joint Research Centre GLC2000 First Results Workshop Ispra 18 th to 22 nd March 2002 Project overview.
Has EO found its customers? 1 Space Applications Institute Directorate General Joint Research Centre European Commission Ispra (VA), Italy
Microsoft Office Word 2013 Expert Microsoft Office Word 2013 Expert Courseware # 3251 Lesson 4: Working with Forms.
Definition Land cover is the observed (bio)physical cover on the earth’s surface on the earth’s surface. It includes vegetation and man-made features as.
Module 2.1 Monitoring activity data for forests using remote sensing REDD+ training materials by GOFC-GOLD, Wageningen University, World Bank FCPF 1 Module.
Dichotomous Phase The initial Dichotomous Phase of LCCS Classification Module Click one option of each pair of buttons. Or immediately identify to which.
GLC Baltic Sea Basin Metria Indata: SPOT VGT 10-day composites from to and several SPOT VGT S- 1 composite data for June and.
LAND COVER MAPPING AND LAND COVER CHANGES Project financed by the World Resources Institute (WRI) carried out by FAO Food and Agriculture Organization.
F.A.O. Land Cover/Remote Sensing Specialist
JULES: Joint UK Land Environment Simulator A community land surface scheme.
Senegal Change Assessment Ugo Leonardi GLCN Land Cover/Remote Rensing Expert
Lu Liang, Peng Gong Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley And Center for Earth System Science,
Has EO found its customers? Results of GLC2000 Legend Workshop November 2000 JRC / Ispra.
An Adaptive Management Model for the Red River Basin of the North.
EEA 2006 Accounts Update Tables. PART 1 Table 1.1: Classifying land cover and land cover change for land accounting.
Land cover mapping of Asia , Central Asia, and Middle East for GLC2000 project Ryutaro Tateishi, Hiroshi Sato, and Zhu Lin Center for Environmental Remote.
Assessment of CCI Glacier and CCI Land cover data for hydrological modeling of the Arctic ocean drainage basin David Gustafsson, Kristina Isberg, Jörgen.
Land Cover Classification System L C C S A guide to utilization of concepts and software application.
Roger Sayre, PhD Senior Scientist for Ecosystems Land Change Science Program U.S. Geological Survey and GEO Task Lead GI-14 Commonalities in Global Land.
CSC 480 Software Engineering Test Planning. Test Cases and Test Plans A test case is an explicit set of instructions designed to detect a particular class.
Remote sensing survey Distribution of forests Trend statistics.
GLC 2000 – “FIRST RESULTS” WORKSHOP JRC – Ispra, March 2002 GLC 2000 land cover map of the desert locust recession area First results E. Bartholomé,
GE 3128: Geographical Research Methods Mr. Idrissa Y. H. Assistant Lecturer In Geography Department of Social Sciences State University of Zanzibar Friday22.
GLC 2000 Workshop March 2003 Land cover map of southern hemisphere Africa using SPOT-4 VEGETATION data Ana Cabral 1, Maria J.P. de Vasconcelos 1,2,
UNCEEA NYC June 2009 Land Cover and Land Use Classifications in the SEEA Revision Xiaoning Gong (FAO) & Jean-Louis Weber (EEA) Fourth Meeting of.
What is GIS? “A powerful set of tools for collecting, storing, retrieving, transforming and displaying spatial data”
Space Applications Institute Global Vegetation Monitoring Unit GLC 2000 Legend Workshop: General conclusions Alan S. Belward.
1 1.2 Linear Equations in Linear Algebra Row Reduction and Echelon Forms © 2016 Pearson Education, Ltd.
26. Classification Accuracy Assessment
Analysis Manager Training Module
Classifications (Level 1)
Paraguay Landscape Analysis
Unit Six: Labels In this unit… Review Adding Text to Maps
David Gustafsson, Kristina Isberg, Jörgen Rosberg
Ecological Succession
GLC-2000-Continental Southeast Asia
Linear Equations in Linear Algebra
Image Information Extraction
Agreement on Domestic Sinks in the Kyoto Protocol (Bonn Agreement)
Paraguay Landscape Analysis
Ladder Diagram Design: Huffman Method
Web-based Imaging Management System Working Group - WIMS
Linear Equations in Linear Algebra
LUCAS long term perspective
Presentation transcript:

Overview Minimum required classifiers for mapping vegetation cover at global scale using the FAO-LCCS tool GLC LEGEND hjs/30-Apr-01

Remarks to the ‘minimum set of classifiers’ for the use with the FAO-LCCS tool1/3 Following the recommendations of the GLC 2000 ‘Legend’ meeting in November 2000 at the JRC / Ispra a ‘minimum set of classifiers’ was defined for the use with LCCS. It is desirable to have this minimum set of classifiers further tested by the regional users and to receive their feedback. The FAO-LCCS tool is used for establishing the legend and the class codes by the regional users in a standardized way. LCCS would guarantee compatibility of class codes for building a ‘global legend’ from the regional vegetation cover classes. It is indispensable to check carefully the procedures and conventions in the LCCS manual provided by FAO A vegetation cover consists of one or of a mixture of several life forms which can be described by further classifiers and attributes. The classifiers listed hereafter are considered as minimum and must be present when describing the single classes or life-forms: for example when describing a forest cover starting from the ‘Life-form’=“Trees”, a statement on ‘Cover’, ‘Spatial distribution’ and ‘Leaf type’ has to be made. Minimum is not at all meant as what should be achieved– in fact a more detailed description of vegetation classes is expected from the users by adding LCCS classifiers and attributes. For the class ‘agriculture’ it was decided to stop as ‘minimum’ directly after the dichotomous phase. It might be too ambitious to ask at the ‘minimum’ level for further separation between ‘trees’, ‘shrubs’ and ‘graminoids’, keeping in mind the 1km resolution of the data. However, this separation should be done whenever possible. The single class ‘woody’ offered for describing natural terrestrial and aquatic vegetation should only be used if further specification is not possible. In general it is expected that ‘trees’ or ‘shrub’ classifiers are specified and further described.

Remarks to the ‘minimum set of classifiers’ for the use with the FAO-LCCS tool2/3 Man-made forests should be interpreted as ‘semi-natural’ vegetation and would therefore not belong to ‘cultivated’ lands. This would include also forest plantations intended for wood production (e.g. Pine, Eucalyptus, Teak, Poplar). It is proposed to leave also rubber under forests as one can find rotation periods up to 40 years and also wood production as one objective. Oil palm plantations, coconut palms or fruit trees would however remain under agriculture / tree. If different vertical layers are present it is the dominant life form which has to be described first - not necessarily the upper layer (please refer to manual). When using the classifier ‘fragmented’ for a tree cover (fragmented forest) the LCCS software expects ‘mixed’ life-forms, i.e. one has to define the life-form for the proportion of the class not covered by trees. For this second component one could stop as ‘minimum’ at the dichotomous phase of LCCS and specify only ‘natural terrestrial vegetation’. In case one has to remain with the minimum set of classifiers for certain life-forms (e.g. shrubs or herbaceous) one will have use the skip option for some classifiers (e.g. spatial distribution or leaf type) in order to reach the next required classifier. For the class ‘herbaceous’ one should specify whether there is a sparse tree or shrub layer. In case one does not have any ancillary information on additional layers the ‘layering’ classifier could be dropped. Using the mix option one could also specify a sparse layer of ‘shrubs and/or trees’. The class ‘lichens and mosses’ should only be used in case the cover is at least 25%. At present the LCCS tool does not foresee a second layer. If a sparse cover of ‘woody vegetation’, ‘trees’ or ‘shrubs’ characterizes the main vegetation layer no further classifiers were requested as a ‘minimum’. In any case there could be nothing else than another sparse layer of a different life-form, otherwise the latter would become the dominant life-form.

Remarks to the ‘minimum set of classifiers’ for the use with the FAO-LCCS tool3/3 LCCS allows specifying different vertical layers of a vegetation cover. Apart from that the expression ‘mixed’ refers to a mixture of spatially separated life-forms within a mapping unit. This would be coded by the LCCS tool as ‘life-form1 / life-form2’. A ‘thematic’ mix of life-forms or classifiers in one location - also in the sense ‘one “or” the other’ life-form - is foreseen but not yet programmed in the LCCS tool. The present proposal is to proceed for the time being with the normal ‘mix’ option and to modify the class code in the exported version of the legend by replacing manually ‘/’ by ‘//’. It is important however to immediately add an annotation in the ‘Users label’ when creating such a class, because LCCS does not allow direct editing in the legend in use, but only in the exported version. This is important for describing e.g. a vegetation cover as ’closed to open’: a forest cover with a density from % (‘dense to open’) requires presently a mix of the life-form ‘trees, closed’ and ‘trees, open’. However, in order to indicate that this class should not describe two spatially separated sub-units one has to replace manually ‘/’ by ‘//’ in a final exported version of the legend. In the case of a ‘thematic’ mix (‘//’) it is for the time being recommended to repeat sub-sequential classifiers for both components. For ‘water bodies’ the classifiers ’standing’ and ‘flowing’ were removed from the minimum set. The expected main source of information is indicated as the follows: based on SPOT VGT added ancillary data based SPOT VGT or ancillary data

LCCS  Entry Example of on-screen sequence for agricultural lands: crop type = Herbaceous based on SPOT VGT added ancillary data based SPOT VGT or ancillary data LCCS  Entry

based on SPOT VGT added ancillary data based SPOT VGT or ancillary data LCCS  Entry Example of on-screen sequence for forest cover

Minimum required classifiers for mapping vegetation cover at global scale for GLC2000 using the FAO-LCCS tool

LCCS  Entry based on SPOT VGT added ancillary data based SPOT VGT or ancillary data Minimum requirements for describing life-forms No further classifiers obligatory as ‘minimum’ (agricultural cropland) LCCS  Entry

1 Minimum requirements for describing life-forms based on SPOT VGT added ancillary data based SPOT VGT or ancillary data LCCS  Entry 1 / 2 Note: In case of missing ancillary information on additional sparse layers the classifier ‘layering’ could be dropped. LCCS  Entry

2 based on SPOT VGT added ancillary data based SPOT VGT or ancillary data LCCS  Entry Minimum requirements for describing life-forms 2 / 2 LCCS  Entry

based on SPOT VGT added ancillary data based SPOT VGT or ancillary data LCCS  Entry Minimum requirements for describing life-forms No further classifiers obligatory as ‘minimum’

based on SPOT VGT added ancillary data based SPOT VGT or ancillary data LCCS  Entry Minimum requirements for describing life-forms Note: In case of missing ancillary information on additional sparse layers the classifier ‘layering’ could be dropped. LCCS  Entry

based on SPOT VGT added ancillary data based SPOT VGT or ancillary data LCCS  Entry Minimum requirements for describing life-forms No further classifiers obligatory as ‘minimum’ (more information could be derived from ancillary layers) LCCS  Entry

Surface aspect Consolidated Bare rock Hardpan Unconsolidated Bare Soil Loose and shifting sand based on SPOT VGT added ancillary data based SPOT VGT or ancillary data LCCS  Entry Minimum requirements for describing life-forms LCCS  Entry

No further classifiers obligatory as ‘minimum’ (more information could be derived from ancillary layers) based on SPOT VGT added ancillary data based SPOT VGT or ancillary data LCCS  Entry Minimum requirements for describing life-forms LCCS  Entry

Physical Status Water Snow Ice based on SPOT VGT added ancillary data based SPOT VGT or ancillary data LCCS  Entry Minimum requirements for describing life-forms LCCS  Entry