C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER PDR Mechanical Design Mechanical Design, CRaTER Assembly and Electronics Assembly Preliminary.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GLAST LAT ProjectMarch 24, 2003 HPS Tracker Peer Review, WBS Section 2-D 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Tracker Subsystem WBS Structural.
Advertisements

C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER Pre-Ship Review (I-PSR) Qalification/Functional Testing Bob Goeke January 3-4, 2008.
Mechanical Systems Analysis Branch/Code 542 Goddard Space Flight Center Analysis of Damping Treatments Applied to the MAP Spacecraft Scott Gordon Code.
Analysis of thermal failure of electronic components
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Mechanical Systems Peer Review, March 27, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-0XXXX Section 7.1 Stress Analysis 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Circuit Board Fatigue Response to Random Vibration Part 2
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Peer Critical Design Review, March 19-20, 2003 D. Nelson 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Electronics, Data Acquisition & Instrument.
Spacecraft Structure Development - Vibration Test - (60 minutes)
WBS & AO Controls Jason Chin, Don Gavel, Erik Johansson, Mark Reinig Design Meeting (Team meeting #10) Sept 17 th, 2007.
April 7, 2008University of Minnesota PDR Satellite Structure Subsystem Structural and Vibrational Stress Analysis Presented By: Chris Matthews.
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER Pre-Ship Review (I-PSR) MISSION ASSURANCE Brian Klatt January 3-4, 2008.
Student Satellite Project University of Arizona Team Goals Design, Fabricate, and Analyze a Structure that will Support the Payload –Space Allocation of.
1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center 2005/4/14 LRO/CRaTER Technical Interchange Meeting LRO Mechanical Systems Giulio Rosanova / /
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation Telescope Mechanical Design Albert Lin The Aerospace Corporation Mechanical Engineer (310)
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO Integration and Test Joanne Baker GSFC Code 568 August 16-17, 2005.
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER Pre-Ship Review (I-PSR) R. Foster January 3-4, 2008.
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER Pre-Environmental Review (I-PER) MISSION ASSURANCE ACTIVITIES Brian Klatt September 10-11,
STARLight PDR 3 Oct ‘01 F.1.1 Rashid STARLight STARLight Mechanical Tahir Rashid STARLight Mechanical Engineer (734)
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Mechanical Systems Peer Review, March 27, 2003 Section Mechanical Systems X-LAT Assy1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Mechanical.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Mechanical Systems Peer Review, March 27, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-0XXXX Section 5.1 Grid Box Design 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope:
LATLAT Beam Test Workshop 20th March GLAST Program Beam Test Workshop CU Outer Shipping Container Michele Pinchera
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Mechanical Systems Peer Review, March 27, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-0XXXX Section 6.0 Subsystem Verif. Test Plan 1 GLAST Large Area.
1 PFP Peer iCDR /9-11 Particles and Fields Package (PFP) Peer Instrument Critical Design Review SWIA Mechanical Gregory Dalton Gregory Johnson UCB-SSL.
Structures and Mechanisms Subsystems AERSP 401A. Introduction to Structural Estimation Primary Structure: load-bearing structure of the spacecraft Secondary.
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation PERFORMANCE ASSURANCE BRIAN KLATT MISSION ASSURANCE MANAGER.
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation 6/27/06 Telescope Mechanical Design1 Albert Lin The Aerospace Corporation (310)
1 Structure (STR) Subsystem Overview Jonah White – STR Co-Lead.
1 衛星結構設計 祝飛鴻 10/26/ Pre-Class Assignment: 1.What are the main functions of spacecraft structure? 2.What factors need to be considered for spacecraft.
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation Mechanical Design CRaTER and the Electronics Assembly Matthew Smith Mechanical Engineer (617)
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER Pre-Environmental Review (I-PER) Environmental Test Planing Bob Goeke September 10-11, 2008.
1 SPP FIELDS MEP Main Electronics Package Preliminary Design Review Bill Donakowski UCB/SSL 13/14 NOVEMBER 2013 MAVEN PFDPU Flight.
Sept. 2008EFW INST+SOC PDR IDPU Chassis Mechanical Design and Development Bill Donakowski Mechanical Engineer UCB/SSL
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER Pre-Environmental Review (I-PER) Project and Independent Review Activity R. Foster September.
Vibrationdata 1 Unit 32 Circuit Board Fatigue Response to Random Vibration.
1 衛星結構設計 祝飛鴻 5/25/  What are the main functions of structure subsystem?  Provide support all other subsystems and attach the spacecraft to launch.
THEMIS IDPU PDR I&T REQUIREMENTS- 1 UCB, October 16, 2003 I&T REQUIREMENTS Ellen Taylor University of California - Berkeley.
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun March 2015 Instrument Suite Name Presenter's Name.
LAT Transport Container1 GLAST LAT Project8 September 2005 LAT Transport Container Design Review 8 September 2005 LAT Transport Container Design Review.
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation June 27, 2005Larry Kepko - Data ProcessingPage 1 CRaTER Characterization Data Products & Production.
1 PFP Peer iCDR 2011/5/11 Particles and Fields Package (PFP) Peer Instrument Critical Design Review STATIC Mechanical Gregory Dalton Gregory Johnson UCB-SSL.
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER Pre-Environmental Review (I-PER) Spacecraft I&T Mike Golightly September 10-11, 2008.
109-IDPU-Chassis-Donakowski 1 30 Sep – 01 Oct 2009DRAFT RBSP EFW ICDR 109-IDPU-Chassis-Donakowski IDPU Chassis Mechanical Design and Development Bill Donakowski.
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER Thermal Analysis Huade Tan 6/27/05.
STEREO IMPACT SEP Critical Design Review 2002-Nov-21/22 TvR1 SEP Mechanical Design Sandy Shuman, GSFC ) Tycho.
LAT Design Integration and Analysis1 GLAST LAT Project24 May 2005 LAT Monthly Status Review 24 May 2005 Design Integration and Analysis LAT Monthly Status.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1 535 IDPU Chassis Bill Donakowski Mechanical Engineer UCB/SSL.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1 Thermal Design Christopher Smith RBSP Thermal Engineer Space.
Cloudland Instruments Hawkeye Mechanical Design Snapshot Compiled April 8th, 2016.
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CDR v1 Telescope Mechanical Design Albert Lin The Aerospace Corporation Mechanical Engineer (310)
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER Pre-Ship Review (I-PSR) Thermal Analysis Christine Cottingham LM/GSFC 545 Hume Peabody GSFC.
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER Pre-Environmental Review (I-PER) Calibration Test Planning Justin C Kasper Smithsonian Astrophysical.
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER Pre-Environmental Review (I-PER) Environmental Test Planing Bob Goeke September 10-11, 2007.
Telescope - Mechanical
Double Star: Table of Contents
Double Star: Table of Contents
Bill Donakowski Mechanical Engineer UCB/SSL
CRaTER Pre-Environmental Review (I-PER) Engineering Requirements/Design Updates Bob Goeke September 10-11, 2007.
Preliminary Design Review
Hawkeye Mechanical Design Snapshot
University of California, Berkeley
Matthew Smith (617) June 27, 2006 Mechanical Design, CRaTER Assembly and Electronics Assembly Critical Design Review Matthew.
Peer Review Agenda (Suggested).
7E: Tower test plans GLAST Large Area Telescope: Tracker Subsystem
GLAST Large Area Telescope
Matthew Smith Mechanical Engineer (617)
Systems Engineering Bob Goeke.
Structures March 13, 2004.
CRaTER Pre-Environmental Review (I-PER) Engineering Requirements/Design Updates Bob Goeke September 10-11, 2008.
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
SNS PPU Cryomodule Instrumentation
Presentation transcript:

C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER PDR Mechanical Design Mechanical Design, CRaTER Assembly and Electronics Assembly Preliminary Design Review Matthew Smith Mechanical Engineer (617)

C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER PDR Mechanical Design Overview Instrument and Assembly Description Mechanical Environments and Requirements Mechanical Design Details Near Term Tasks Back-up slides

C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER PDR Mechanical Design Instrument and Assembly Description Crater integrates two main sub-assemblies: The Telescope Assembly and The Electronics Assembly. –The Telescope Assembly is being designed and built by The Aerospace Corporation –The Analog Board is being designed by Aerospace. The Flight Analog Boards will be built by MIT –The Digital Board and Electronics Enclosure Assembly are being designed and built by MIT. –MIT will integrate the sub-assemblies and perform all functional, environmental and acceptance testing.

C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER PDR Mechanical Design Instrument and Assembly Description

C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER PDR Mechanical Design Mechanical Environments From 431-RQMT , Environments Section 2. SectionDescriptionLevels 2.1.2Net cg limit load12 g 2.4.2Sinusoidal Vibration LoadsFrequency: Hz Protoflight/Qual: 8g Acceptance: 6.4g 2.5Acoustics Enclosed box without exposed thin surfaces OASPL Protoflight/Qual: dB OASPL Acceptance: dB 2.6.1Random VibrationSee Random Vibration slide 2.7Shock environment40 g at 100 Hz 2665g at 1165 to 3000 Hz. No self induced shock. 2.8VentingPer 431-SPEC LRO Thermal Subsystem spec.

C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER PDR Mechanical Design Mechanical Requirements and Verification From 431-RQMT , Verification Requirements Section 3. SectionDescriptionLevels Stowed fundamental Hz Deployed fundamental Frequency Freq >35 >3 Hz 3.2.1Factors of SafetySee FOS table 3.2.2Test factorsSee Test Factors table MEVR-10 Perform frequency verification test for Instruments with frequencies above 50 Hz.. MEVR-11 Report frequencies up to 200Hz Low level sine sweep We will be above 50Hz. 3.3Finite Element Model requirementsWe will be above 75Hz and will not be required to submit an FEM of CRaTER.

C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER PDR Mechanical Design General Thermal Subsystem Requirements from 431-Spec SectionDescription 4.1 Exterior facing MLI blankets shall have 3 mil Kapton with VDA in outer Coating. 4.2MLI Blanket Grounding: All blankets shall be grounded per 431-ICD MLI Blanket Documentation: The location and shape documented in as-built ICDs. 4.4Attachment to MLI Blankets: All exterior MLI blankets shall be mechanically constrained at least at one point.

C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER PDR Mechanical Design DESIGN DETAILS Electronics Assembly Natural Frequency Estimates –Based from Steinberg Vibration Analysis for Electronic Equipment- (Simply supported on 4 sides.) Top Cover~ 199 Hz Bottom Cover ~ 159 Hz Analog Board~ 138 Hz Digital Board~ 149 Hz –From SOLID WORKS model of E-Box frequency is 702Hz at the middle plate that holds the two Circuit Card Assemblies.

C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER PDR Mechanical Design DESIGN DETAILS Mechanical Environments, Random Vibration Random Vibration will drive most of the analysis For resonances in the Random Vibration Spec, Miles’ Equation shows 3 sigma loading on the order of g Assume Q=10 Overall 14.1 Grms 10.0 grms

C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER PDR Mechanical Design DESIGN DETAILS Stress Margins, Electronics Assembly Pieces Load levels are superceded by random vibration spec Factors of Safety used for corresponding material from 431-SPEC –Metals: 1.25 Yield, 1.4 Ultimate –Composite: 1.5 Ultimate Margin of Safety = (Allowable Stress or Load)/(Applied Stress or Load x FS) – 1 DescriptionMaterial Desc.MS YieldMS UltimateComments Top CoverAluminum Note 1 Bottom CoverAluminum Note 1 Digital BoardFR4brittle +1.5Note 1 Analog BoardFR4Brittle +0.2Note 1 E-box Structure Aluminum 7075> +2.8>+3.1Note 2 Note 1. From Steinberg, Vibration Analysis for Electronic Equipment Note 2. From SOLID WORKS, COSMOS excluding top and bottom covers in the model. All components have positive Margin of Safety

C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER PDR Mechanical Design Mechanical Design Details The first fundamental frequency is estimated to be 149 Hz. –Not required to produce an FEM since our predicted first frequency is >75 Hz. All positive margins of safety. Meet all factors of safety. No Fracture Critical Items.

C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER PDR Mechanical Design Internal Requirements for the Electronics Assembly Derived Internal Mechanical Requirements for Electronics Enclosure –Have adequate contact area (.5 in^2 min) to the spacecraft to support Thermal requirements. –Provide safe structure, within Factors of Safety specified, to support Telescope Assembly. –Provide for mounting 2 Circuit Card Assemblies. The Analog Board and Digital Board must be separated by an aluminum plate. –The Analog Board to provide direct linear path for electronics from the telescope interface to the Digital Board interface to reduce noise. –Provide means to route cable from telescope to the Analog side of the Electronics Enclosure. –Electrically isolate the electronics Enclosure from the Telescope, yet provide sufficient thermal conductance path. –Provide adequate surface area for mounting electrical components. –Interface to the Spacecraft to be on one side of the Electronics Enclosure. The interface connectors to be on the Digital side of the Electronics Enclosure (separate from the Analog side) –Provide GN2 purge interface inlet and outlet ports. –Follow the octave rule for natural frequency of the PWAs to the Electronics Enclosure. The Electronics Assembly meets all internal requirements except for … –Details need to be worked out for the GN2 design. –Electrical isolation of the E-box and Telescope needs more thought.

C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER PDR Mechanical Design DESIGN DETAILS Electrical/Mechanical Interface Interface Connectors J1 9 Pin D-Sub Male P-B-12 J2 9 Pin D-sub Female S-B-12 J3 1553, BJ3150 J4 1553, BJ3150 PART OF MID DRAWING NUMBER Mounting Hardware - Six #10-32 SHCS Surface roughness of 63 micro inches or better for interface surfaces. Mounting surfaces have Electrically Conductive finish (MIL-C-5541 Cl 3)

C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER PDR Mechanical Design NEAR TERM TASKS –Update MICD to reflect latest configuration. –Further develop analysis on natural frequencies and stresses using SOLID WORKS and COSMOS on the complete CRaTER Assembly. –Finalize interface between Telescope Assembly and Electronics Box Assembly. Specify the electrical isolation material between the telescope and the E-Box. –Identify the GN2 purge system (mechanical interface to the spacecraft, internal flow, pressure measurements…) –Complete the drawings for part and assembly fabrication. –Define attachment points and outline for thermal blankets.

C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER PDR Mechanical Design Backup Slides

C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER PDR Mechanical Design Factors of Safety

C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER PDR Mechanical Design BOARD ANALYSIS Analog Board Analysis an x 5.95 board separated into two parts Polyimide modulus of elasticityE (lb/in sq4.21E+05 Thicknessh (inches) poisson ratiou0.12 lengtha (in)4.215 widthb (in)5.95 weightW (lb) gin/secSq386 pi3.14 D=E*h^3/(12(1-u^2))D= density pmass/area=W/gab E E E E E E-05 for a a simply supported board on 4 sides f=pi/2((D/p)^.5)(1/a^2+1/b^2))^.5Frequency=(Hz) From Steinberg, vibration analysis for electronic equipment page 149 for a fixed beam on 4 sidesFrequency=(Hz) Average Frequency

C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER PDR Mechanical Design BOARD ANALYSIS Analog Board Analysis Cont’d STRESS Gin=peak load(g's)=125 Q=transmisibility=10 Gout=Gin*Q=1250 W=board weight(lb)= q=load intensity=W*Gout/ab My=bending moment at center= DYNAMIC BENDING STRESS Kt= stress concentration factor h=height Sb=6*Kt*My/h^2= lb/in^2Stress due to bending FACTORS OF SAFETY FOS Yield FOS Ultimate24000 psi NUMBER OF CYLES BEFORE FAILURE check S-N curve for board type Ch 12 to determine if board will fail number of cycles before failure10^4>10^8 MARGIN OF SAFETY MOS=(Allowable stress/applied stress*FS) For a composit Fs=1.5 Ultimate

C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER PDR Mechanical Design BOARD ANALYSIS Digital Board Analysis a x board two sections modulus of eleasticity Polyimide fiberglassE, psi4.21E+05 Thicknessh(inches) poisson ratiou0.12 lengtha (in)4.281 widthb (in)7.488 weightW (lb) gin/secSq386 pi D=E*h^3/(12(1-u^2))D= density pmass/area=W/gab E E E E E E-05 for a a simply supported board on 4 sides f=pi/2((D/p)^.5)(1/a^2+1/b^2))^.5Frequency, HZ = This is from an example by Steinberg, vibration analysis for electronic equipment page 149 for a fixed board on 4 sidesFrequency, HZ = Average Frequency

C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER PDR Mechanical Design BOARD ANALYSIS Digital Board Analysis Cont’d STRESS Gin=peak load(g's)=125 Q=transmisibility=10 Gout=Gin*Q=1250 W=board weight(lb)= q=load intensity=W*Gout/ab My=bending moment at center= DYNAMIC BENDING STRESS Kt= stress concentration factor h=height Sb=6*Kt*My/h^2= lb/in^ FOS Yield FOS Ultimate24kpsi check S-N curve for board type Ch 12 to determine if board will fail>10^8 MARGIN OF SAFETY MOS=(Allowable stress/applied stress*FS)-1MOS For a composite FS=1.5 (Ultimate)

C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER PDR Mechanical Design E-BOX COVERS, ANALYSIS Top CoverBottom Cover Elastic ModulusE(lb/in sq1.00E+07 Thicknessh(inches)0.063 Poisson ratiou0.33 lengtha (in) widthb (in) weightW (lb) gin/secSq386 pi G125 q D=E*h^3/(12(1-u^2)D= density pmass/area=W/gab E E-05 f=pi/2((D/p)^.5)(1/a^2+1/b^2))^.5frequency = Bending moment at center My= q(u/a^2=1/b^2)/(pi^2(1/a^2+1/b^2)^ dynamic bending stress Sb=6*My/h^2Stress= Check S-N curve at StressN=5.E+08 FOS Yield/StressTensile yield, psi Ultimate/StressTensile Ultimate, psi Margin of Safety (allowable stress/applied stress *FOS)-1Tensile yield, psi Tensile Ultimate, psi

C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER PDR Mechanical Design CURRENT BEST ESTIMATE, MASS PROPERTIES Electronics Assembly gramslbs Analog CCA Digital CCA Interconnect Cable, A/D Internal E-box Cables Mechanical Enclosure Top Cover Bottom Cover Hardware Purge system Electronics Assembly Sub-Total Detector Assembly Circuit Board Telescope Sub-Assy Detector Mechanical Enclosure Detector Assembly Sub- Total MLI and TPS Sub-Total Mounting Hardware Sub-Total40.09 CRaTER CBE Total

C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER PDR Mechanical Design Drawing List Drawing NumberDrawing TitleRev.Layout CompleteDrawing CreatedCheckedReleased CRaTER Assembly0% Electronics Assembly-25% Digital Electronics, PWA0250% Analog Electronics PWA0250% Electronics Enclosure 0195% Cover, Top Electronics Enclosure 0195% Cover, Bottom Electronics Enclosure -95%

C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER PDR Mechanical Design Material Properties 1.MIL-HDBK-5J 2.Efunda materials list via efunda.com