Despeckle Filtering in Medical Ultrasound Imaging

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation of Reconstruction Techniques
Advertisements

Spatial Filtering (Chapter 3)
Image Processing Lecture 4
CS & CS Multimedia Processing Lecture 2. Intensity Transformation and Spatial Filtering Spring 2009.
EE 4780 Image Enhancement. Bahadir K. Gunturk2 Image Enhancement The objective of image enhancement is to process an image so that the result is more.
Digital Image Processing
Digital Image Processing
Digital Image Processing In The Name Of God Digital Image Processing Lecture3: Image enhancement M. Ghelich Oghli By: M. Ghelich Oghli
5. 1 Model of Image degradation and restoration
6/9/2015Digital Image Processing1. 2 Example Histogram.
Digital Image Processing
7th IEEE Technical Exchange Meeting 2000 Hybrid Wavelet-SVD based Filtering of Noise in Harmonics By Prof. Maamar Bettayeb and Syed Faisal Ali Shah King.
Dept. Elect. Eng. Technion – Israel Institute of Technology Ultrasound Image Denoising by Spatially Varying Frequency Compounding Yael Erez, Yoav Y. Schechner,
SUSAN: structure-preserving noise reduction EE264: Image Processing Final Presentation by Luke Johnson 6/7/2007.
Introduction to Wavelets
Rayleigh Mixture Model and its Application for Ultrasound-based Plaque Characterization José Seabra, Francesco Ciompi, Oriol Pujol, Petia Radeva and João.
Lecture 2. Intensity Transformation and Spatial Filtering
ECE 472/572 - Digital Image Processing Lecture 4 - Image Enhancement - Spatial Filter 09/06/11.
Department of Biophysical and Electronic Engineering (DIBE)- Università di Genova- ITALY QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF DESPECKLED SAR IMAGES Elena Angiati, Silvana.
Comparison of Ventricular Geometry for Two Real-Time 3D Ultrasound Machines with Three-dimensional Level Set Elsa D. Angelini, Rio Otsuka, Shunishi Homma,
Medical Image Analysis Image Enhancement Figures come from the textbook: Medical Image Analysis, by Atam P. Dhawan, IEEE Press, 2003.
Ping Zhang, Zhen Li,Jianmin Zhou, Quan Chen, Bangsen Tian
Ultrasound Introduction SRAD Filter Wiener Filter SNR comparison
BMME 560 & BME 590I Medical Imaging: X-ray, CT, and Nuclear Methods Introductory Topics Part 2.
Digital Image Processing
Rajeev Aggarwal, Jai Karan Singh, Vijay Kumar Gupta, Sanjay Rathore, Mukesh Tiwari, Dr.Anubhuti Khare International Journal of Computer Applications (0975.
Filtering and Enhancing Images. Major operations 1. Matching an image neighborhood with a pattern or mask 2. Convolution (FIR filtering)
Lecture 03 Area Based Image Processing Lecture 03 Area Based Image Processing Mata kuliah: T Computer Vision Tahun: 2010.
Review of Ultrasonic Imaging
EDGE DETECTION IN COMPUTER VISION SYSTEMS PRESENTATION BY : ATUL CHOPRA JUNE EE-6358 COMPUTER VISION UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON.
School of Computer Science Queen’s University Belfast Practical TULIP lecture next Tues 12th Feb. Wed 13th Feb 11-1 am. Thurs 14th Feb am. Practical.
Image Restoration Chapter 5.
Digital Image Processing Lecture 10: Image Restoration March 28, 2005 Prof. Charlene Tsai.
23 November Md. Tanvir Al Amin (Presenter) Anupam Bhattacharjee Department of Computer Science and Engineering,
Machine Vision ENT 273 Image Filters Hema C.R. Lecture 5.
Digital Image Processing Lecture 10: Image Restoration
8-1 Chapter 8: Image Restoration Image enhancement: Overlook degradation processes, deal with images intuitively Image restoration: Known degradation processes;
Image Subtraction Mask mode radiography h(x,y) is the mask.
Intelligent Vision Systems ENT 496 Image Filtering and Enhancement Hema C.R. Lecture 4.
A 5-Pulse Sequence for Harmonic and Sub-Harmonic Imaging
APPLICATION OF A WAVELET-BASED RECEIVER FOR THE COHERENT DETECTION OF FSK SIGNALS Dr. Robert Barsanti, Charles Lehman SSST March 2008, University of New.
Digital Image Processing Image Enhancement in Spatial Domain
Adaptive Filter Based on Image Region Characteristics for Optimal Edge Detection Lussiana ETP STMIK JAKARTA STI&K Januari-2012.
WAVELET NOISE REMOVAL FROM BASEBAND DIGITAL SIGNALS IN BANDLIMITED CHANNELS Dr. Robert Barsanti SSST March 2010, University of Texas At Tyler.
Image Restoration. Image restoration vs. image enhancement Enhancement:  largely a subjective process  Priori knowledge about the degradation is not.
Lecture 22 Image Restoration. Image restoration Image restoration is the process of recovering the original scene from the observed scene which is degraded.
Feature Matching and Signal Recognition using Wavelet Analysis Dr. Robert Barsanti, Edwin Spencer, James Cares, Lucas Parobek.
Filters– Chapter 6. Filter Difference between a Filter and a Point Operation is that a Filter utilizes a neighborhood of pixels from the input image to.
Lecture 10 Chapter 5: Image Restoration. Image restoration Image restoration is the process of recovering the original scene from the observed scene which.
Image Enhancement Band Ratio Linear Contrast Enhancement
A New Approach of Anisotropic Diffusion: Medical Image Application Valencia 18th-19th 2010 Y. TOUFIQUE*, L.MASMOUDI*, R.CHERKAOUI EL MOURSLI*, M. CHERKAOUI.
Spatial Filtering (Chapter 3) CS474/674 - Prof. Bebis.
Chapter 10 Digital Signal and Image Processing
PERFORMANCE OF A WAVELET-BASED RECEIVER FOR BPSK AND QPSK SIGNALS IN ADDITIVE WHITE GAUSSIAN NOISE CHANNELS Dr. Robert Barsanti, Timothy Smith, Robert.
Medical Image Analysis
Image Subtraction Mask mode radiography h(x,y) is the mask.
Digital Image Processing Lecture 10: Image Restoration
Compression for Synthetic Aperture Sonar Signals
Impact of SAR data filtering on crop classification accuracy
ECE 692 – Advanced Topics in Computer Vision
Practical TULIP lecture next Tues 12th Feb. Wed 13th Feb 11-1 am.
Digital Image Processing
IMAGE PROCESSING INTENSITY TRANSFORMATION AND SPATIAL FILTERING
Spatially Varying Frequency Compounding of Ultrasound Images
Image Analysis Image Restoration.
Review of Ultrasonic Imaging
Image Enhancement in the Spatial Domain
Ultrasound Despeckling for Contrast Enhancement
Adaptive Filter A digital filter that automatically adjusts its coefficients to adapt input signal via an adaptive algorithm. Applications: Signal enhancement.
Image Enhancement in the Spatial Domain
Presentation transcript:

Despeckle Filtering in Medical Ultrasound Imaging Hairong Shi (1) Xingxing Wu (2) (1)    Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison (2)    Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison

Introduction The medical Ultrasound B-scan image is acquired by summation of the echo signals from locally correlated scatterers in beam range. Locally correlated multiplicative noises from small scatterers corrupt ultrasound image. These noises are commonly called “speckles”. In many cases the speckle noise degrades the fine details and edge definition, limits the contrast resolution, limits the detect ability of small, low contrast lesions in body. And it should be filtered out.

Noise Statistics For research purpose,Radio-frequency (RF) data are collected. To show B-mode image, RF data are first envelope detected, and then logarithm compressed. The multiplicative speckle is converted into additive noise after logarithm compression, the noise is spatially correlated, and has a Rayleigh amplitude PDF: For fully developed speckle magnitude, the mean to standard deviation-pointwise SNR=1.9 (5.58dB)

Filtering Methods In this project, we implement 4 filtering methods: (1) Wiener Filter; (2) Anisotropic Diffusion Filter; (3) Wavelet Filter; (4) Adaptive Filter;

Test Images We use the following test images to evaluate the performance of the filters. (1) 4 simulated inclusion phantoms with different contrast. Center frequency 3MHz, band width 40%, no attenuation. Contrast 10dB, 5dB, -5dB and -10dB.

Test Images (Cont’d) (2) An in-vitro B-mode image for a plaque from human carotid artery. The plaque is embedded in gelatin. From Aloka SSD2000 Medical Ultrasound system.

Method 1: Wiener Filter Since the input filter g=1 in frequency domain, the Wiener filter is: The power spectrum of the underlying image is modeled as: Where σs2 can be replaced by the mean variance of the noised image σx2. μx and μy are frequency coordinators, the range is [-π, π).

Wiener Filter: Noise Power Spectrum The Power Spectrum of speckle pattern Sww is averaged from 12 simulated speckle patterns with image size 128*128.

Wiener Filter Results 10dB 5dB -5dB -10dB The restored images by Wiener filter are excellent: Most speckles are removed; Inclusions are clearly seen. even for 5dB contrast cases The background is uniform as we simulated. The main reason is that the averaged power spectrum of the noise is very close to the noise power in the noised images, so we can restore images well. 10dB 5dB -5dB -10dB

Wiener Filter Results (Cont’d) Plaque Sample

Wiener Filter Results (Cont’d) The power spectrum of simulated noise can be applied well onto the real B-mode images: (1) The speckles are also removed efficiently (2)The structure of the materials are restored. There are still some speckles in restored images, which means the simulated noise power spectrum is not perfectly matched with the real ones. The rest speckles can be removed by median filters. The image qualities can be improved by unsharp mask and histogram stretch.

Method 2: Anisotropic Diffusion Filter Anisotropic diffusion is an efficient nonlinear technique for simultaneously performing contrast enhancement and noise reduction. It smoothes homogeneous image regions and retains image edges. The main concept of Anisotropic diffusion is diffusion coefficient. Perona and Malik (1990) proposed 2 options: Or

Method 2: Anisotropic Diffusion Filter (Cont’d) The anisotropic diffusion method can be iteratively applied to the output image: Parameter k~[20,100], step sizeλ<=0.25.

Anisotropic Diffusion Results: The anisotropic diffusion filter can restore noised image well: Speckles are removed and inclusions show clearly. In Anisotropic diffusion method, we don’t need know the noise pattern or power spectrum, this is the advantage over Wiener filter. The anisotropic diffusion method needs more computation time than Wiener Filter method. Parameter selection, iteration loop selection all affect the final results. 10dB 5dB -5dB -10dB

Anisotropic Diffusion Results: (Cont’d) Plaque Sample

Anisotropic Diffusion Results: (Cont’d) The anisotropic diffusion method gives better contrast while removing speckles effectively. In fact, because the parameters in anisotropic diffusion method are adjustable, we can control parameters and choose the best image.

Comparison of Image Profile Image profiles before and after Wiener filter, and anisotropic diffusion are plotted. Image becomes smoother after filtering.

Method 3: K-distribution Based Adaptive Filter The K distribution model is a model for speckle statistics of ultrasound echo speckle. The K distribution is a good model for the echo envelope signal statistics when the scatter number densities are low. The model can accurately predict variations in the statistics with varying scatterer number.

K Distribution K distribution pdf The K distribution as a function of a

Adaptive filter for uncompressed images The restored image Y can be calculated by Where X is the original image, is the image averaged value

Adaptive filter for log-compressed images The restored image Y can be calculated by Where X is the original image, is the image averaged value. is the compensation coefficient.

Adaptive Filter results: Original image for 5dB inclusion phantom Image of 5dB inclusion Phantom after filtering

Adaptive Filter results: (Cont’d) The filter can smooth image locally based on some local statistics. This filter is easy to implement and the statistics is easy to estimate. There is no need to find an optimal solution.

Method 4: Wavelet Filter The wavelet techniques are widely used in the image processing, such as the image compression, image denoising. The wavelet filter has good image processing performance. We use thresholding method to despeckle.

Wavelet Filter Image decomposition Equation: Decomposed image

Wavelet Filter Results: Original image for Carotid Artery Plaque Image of plaque After filtering

Wavelet Filter Results: (Cont’d) Original image for 5dB inclusion phantom Image of 5dB inclusion Phantom after filtering

Comparison of Filter Performance To evaluate the performance of 4 different filters, we we take the same small region with pixel size 64*64, and calculate the mean-standard deviation ratio, i.e. pixel-wised SNR. Original Wiener Anisotropic diffusion Adaptive filter Wavelet SNR 4.295 26.885 16.841 18.866 4.655 Wiener filter, Anisotropic diffusion filter and k distribution based adaptive filter improve the SNR. Wavelet filter doesn’t improve the SNR very much.

Conclusion The Wiener filter can improve the image qualities well and simulated power spectrum of speckle can be applied on many situations. The Anisotropic diffusion filter can also despeckle well as long as we choose reasonable parameters, and it doesn’t need extra information of noise pattern. The K-distribution based adaptive filter can improve the image quality, the method is easy to implement and the statistics is easy to estimate and characterize. The wavelet filter is not highly suitable for removing the speckle in ultrasound images.