Carotid Stenting Review Renan Uflacker, MD Interventional Radiology Medical University of South Carolina.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Learn neurology “stroke by stroke.” C.M.Fisher. History Wepfer was the first in 1658, to recognize the significance of carotid obstruction and its relationship.
Advertisements

Eric Hager, MD Assistant Professor of Surgery Division of Vascular surgery University of Pittsburgh Medical Center 1.
St Luke’s- Hospital Carotid Intervention Position Statement1.
Is Carotid Stenting an Option for Treatment of Carotid Stenosis? Joint Hospital Surgical Grand Round WH WONG Queen Mary Hospital.
Indications for CAS vs Surgical_Medical Marianne Brodmann Division of Angiology Graz.
Stenting and Angioplasty with Protection in Patients at High-Risk for Endarterectomy Presented by Jay Yadav, MD on behalf of the SAPPHIRE Investigators.
Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial ACST-2 Collaborators Meeting 2014 Pembroke College, Oxford Is recent coronary stenting a problem (or an opportunity)
Stenting with or without Protection in High-Risk Patients with Moderate to High-Grade Carotid Stenosis Presented at ACC 2003 Late Breaking Clinical Trials.
Journal Club Ani Balmanoukian and Peter Benjamin November 9, 2006 Journal Club Ani Balmanoukian and Peter Benjamin November 9, 2006.
Carotid Endarterectomy versus Stenting: Where do we stand today? Vascular Conference March 23, 2010.
Mohammad Mahdi Daei Interventional Cardiologist CAROTID ARTERY STENTING.
Superficial Femoral Artery Stents - Bare, Covered, or Drug-Coated – “The Data and The HYPE” Dennis F. Bandyk, MD Division of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery.
Endovascular Management of Intracranial and Extracranial Atherosclerosis Rishi Gupta, MD Associate Professor of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Radiology.
Simultaneous Coronary Artery Bypass and Carotid Endarterectomy Ye zhidong, Liu Peng Department of Cardiovascular Surgery China-Japan Friendship Hospital.
Rashad MAHMUDOV Central Hospital of Oilworkers, Baku-Azerbaijan
What Is Peripheral Vascular Disease? Daniel B. Walsh, M.D. Professor of Surgery, Section of Vascular Surgery Vice-Chair, Department of Sugery Dartmouth-Hitchcock.
Carotid Artery Stenosis: Stenting vs. Endarterectomy Városmajor Study. L. Entz,, E.Dósa, K. Hüttl. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Semmelweis University,
Endarterectomy versus Stenting in Patients with Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis Dr. Quan, Dr. Mirhashemi, Dr. Chiang N Engl J Med 2006; 355:
Epidemiology in HK  Stroke is major cause of morbidity and mortality around the world  4th cause of mortality in HK resulting in >3000 deaths every.
Carotid Stenting: St. Mary’s Hospital 2002 A clinical case.
Patch, Bypass or Stent for Restenosis following Carotid Endarterectomy Th. Hölzenbein 1, M. Aspalter 1, K. Linni 1, N. Mader 1, W. Hitzl 2, A. Ugurluoglu.
The Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery: The SYNTAX Study One Year Results of the PCI and CABG Registries.
Vascular D&C M. Uchiyama02/01/2013. Introduction  Complication  R MCA distribution embolic stroke  Procedure  R carotid angiography with planned,
ProximAl pRotection with the MO.MA device dUring caRotid stenting proximAl pRotection with the MO.MA device dUring caRotid stenting Barry T. Katzen MD.
UPDATE IN CAROTID ARTERY STENTING & STROKE MANAGEMENT Dr. Nikolaos Melas, PhD Vascular and Endovascular Surgeon Military Doctor Associate in 1st department.
Atherosclerotic Disease of the Carotid Artery Atherosclerosis is a degenerative disease of the arteries resulting in plaques consisting of necrotic cells,
Endovascular treatment on tandem lesions of cranial arteries Xiao-Long Zhang, MD, PhD Department of Radiology Huashan Hospital,Fudan University Shanghai.
CHU C A E N EVA-3S Inferences and future directions Jacques Theron, MD Martial Hamon, MD.
EPIC Trial Evaluating the Use of the FiberNet ® Embolic Protection System In Carotid Artery Stenting Subbarao Myla, MD FACC Principal Investigator & Medical.
Columbia University Medical Center The Cardiovascular Research Foundation Temporal Improvement in Carotid Stent Outcomes: Achievement of AHA Target Goals.
Consensus of ICAD treatment after SAMMPRIS in China Zhujiang Hospital Zhujiang Hospital Nanfang Medical University Liu Yajie, MD Pros &Cons of PTAS in.
: PROFI : A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Proximal Balloon Occlusion vs. Filter Embolic Protection in Patients Undergoing Carotid Stenting Klaudija.
Distal protection devices Dr Donald Baim Director, Center for Innovative Minimally Invasive Therapy Brigham & Women’s Hospital Boston, MA.
ANGIOPLASTY & STENTING FOR EXTRACRANIAL & INTRACRANIAL ATHEROSCLEROTIC DISEASE 2010 UPDATE MICHEL E. MAWAD, M.D. PROFESSOR & CHAIR DEPARTMENT OF RADIOLOGY.
Vertebral PTA: Indications and Technique Patrick L. Whitlow, MD Director, Interventional Cardiology The Cleveland Clinic Foundation Patrick L. Whitlow,
Revascularization in Carotid artery stenosis EVIDENCE REVIEW.
Carotid Disease – Stent vs Surgery vs Medical Therapy? Mehdi H. Shishehbor, DO, MPH, PhD Director, Endovascular Services Interventional Cardiology & Vascular.
0 0 Lenox Hill Heart and Vascular Institute of New York SCAI 2005 CAROTID STENTING Clinical Trial Overview SRIRAM S. IYER Lenox Hill Hospital, New York.
VASIL VELCHEV ST. ANNA HOSPITAL, SOFIA. Conflict of interest:
CAROTID ARTERY ENDARTHERECTOMY &INTERVENTION
Faramarz Amiri MD IUMS.  Severe carotid disease (defined as >80%) 8–12%  Severe carotid disease (>70%) in those with three vessel or left main coronary.
Emerging Techniques For Management of Carotid and Brachiocephalic Occlusive Disease for Prevention of Stroke Brian Whang, Romeo Mateo, Anthony Pucillo,
Stents implantation to treat carotid lesions Lessons learned in the last 17 years Hugo Londero MD Córdoba-Argentina.
Dr. Quan, Dr. Mirhashemi, Dr. Chiang
(p for noninferiority = 0.01)
UPDATE IN CAROTID ARTERY STENTING & STROKE MANAGEMENT
Subclavian, Innominate & Vertebral Artery Treatment
CRT 2012 Venous Disease.
Medstar Washington Hospital Center
Prediction and Prevention of Stroke in Patients with Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: The High-risk Period and the High-risk Patient  P.M. Rothwell  European.
What’s new in carotid intervention?
Complex Ostial Disease of the Aortic Arch Vessels
Critical Appraisal of the European CAS Trials
CQC Amit Gossain.
Clinical need for determination of vulnerable plaques
Cardiovascular Research Technology Conference (CRT 17)
Rabih A. Chaer MD Assistant Professor of Surgery
Selecting Patients Best Suited for CEA
Carotid Artery Stenting for Stroke Prevention
Symptomatic Patients: When, How, and Why to Intervene?
PMA Analysis of the CREST Trial Approvability of the RX Acculink Carotid Stent System for Revascularization of Carotid Artery Stenosis in Standard Surgical.
Risk of Stroke or Death Is Associated With the Timing of Carotid Artery Stenting for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: A Secondary Data Analysis of the German.
Catheter-Based Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease
Cardiovacular Research Technologies
Current update of cerebral embolic protection devices
Carotid Artery Stenting for Stroke Prevention
Differential outcomes of carotid stenting and endarterectomy performed exclusively by vascular surgeons in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy.
The Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery: The SYNTAX Study One Year Results of the PCI and CABG Registries.
The Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery: The SYNTAX Study One Year Results of the PCI and CABG Registries.
Craig R. Narins, MD, Karl A. Illig, MD  Journal of Vascular Surgery 
Presentation transcript:

Carotid Stenting Review Renan Uflacker, MD Interventional Radiology Medical University of South Carolina

Carotid Stent IMPORTANCEOF CAROTID ARTERY DISEASE TREATMENT

Stroke: 3 rd cause of death in US 3 rd cause of death in US 500,000 cases/year 500,000 cases/year 2 milion/year handicaped people 2 milion/year handicaped people HIGH SOCIAL / ECONOMIC COST Mellière et al. J Mal Vasc, 1993 Carotid Stent

% of VCA are related to carotid occlusive disease % of VCA are related to carotid occlusive disease Increased incidence with age (33% 50 yrs) Increased incidence with age (33% 50 yrs) De Bakey et al. J Endovasc Surg, 1996

Carotid Stent Stenoses > 75% Stenoses > 75% risk of stroke in 1 st yr = 2-5% Roederer et al. Stroke, 1984 Roederer et al. Stroke, 1984 Hennereci et al. Brain, 1987 Hennereci et al. Brain, 1987 Ulceration = Iminent stroke Ulceration = Iminent stroke risk of stroke = 7,5% Autret et al. Lancet, 1987 Autret et al. Lancet, 1987

Carotid Stent Carotid stenosis + TIA Carotid stenosis + TIA Risk of stroke in 1 st yr = 12-13% 5 th yr = % Risk of stroke in 1 st yr = 12-13% 5 th yr = % Sundt et al., 1987 Sundt et al., 1987 Dennis et al. Stroke, 1990 Dennis et al. Stroke, 1990 CVA - risk in 1 st yr = 59% CVA - risk in 1 st yr = 59% 5 th yr = 25-45% 5 th yr = 25-45% Sacco et al. Stroke, 1982 Sacco et al. Stroke, 1982 Meissner et al. Stroke, 1988 Meissner et al. Stroke, 1988

Carotid Stent Heterogeneous and ulcerated lesions = Risk 2-4 x Heterogeneous and ulcerated lesions = Risk 2-4 x Langsfeld et al. J Vasc Surg, 1989 Langsfeld et al. J Vasc Surg, 1989 Sterpetti et al. Stroke, 1988 Sterpetti et al. Stroke, 1988

Carotid Stent SURGICAL TREATMENT

Carotid Stent ENDARTERECTOMY (1953) – risk of stroke –TIA = 1-2% / Yr –CVA = 2-3% / Yr

Carotid Stent Clinical Trials such as NASCET/ACAS established the patern of eficacy of surgical treatment in comparison to clinical treatment Clinical Trials such as NASCET/ACAS established the patern of eficacy of surgical treatment in comparison to clinical treatment Demonstrated the superiority of the method with defined statistical criteria Demonstrated the superiority of the method with defined statistical criteria Surgery is the ¨gold standard¨ for low risk pacients Surgery is the ¨gold standard¨ for low risk pacients

Carotid Stent 559 symptomatic patients / 2 anos 559 symptomatic patients / 2 anos Estenoses > 70% Estenoses > 70% Risk of CVA Risk of CVA Clinical treatment = 13,1% Clinical treatment = 13,1% Surgical treatment = 2,5% Surgical treatment = 2,5% P < 0,001 P < 0,001 N Engl J Med 1991;325:445 NASCET (North American Symptomatic Carotid Trial)

Carotid Stent NASCET (North American Symptomatic Carotid Trial) N Engl J Med 1991;325:445 Risk CVA/peri-operatory death = 5,8% Benefits of surgery evident after 3 months Benefits for lesions > 50%

Carotid Stent 778 symptomatic patients / 3 yrs 778 symptomatic patients / 3 yrs stenoses > 70% stenoses > 70% Risk of CVA Risk of CVA Clinical treatment = 16,8% Surgical treatment = 2,8% p < 0,001 p < 0,001 Risk CVA/peri-operatory deaths =7,5 % Risk CVA/peri-operatory deaths =7,5 % ECST (European Carotid Surgery Trials) Lancet 1991;337:1235

Carotid Stent 1662 asymptomatic patients / 5 yrs 1662 asymptomatic patients / 5 yrs stenoses > 60% stenoses > 60% Risks of CVA Risks of CVA Clinical treatment =10,6% Clinical treatment =10,6% Surgical treatment = 4,8% Surgical treatment = 4,8% P < 0,004 Risk CVA/peri-operatory death = 2,3 % Risk CVA/peri-operatory death = 2,3 % Stroke 1994; 25: ACAS (Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study)

Carotid Stent AHA Quality Standards Surgical Treatment CVA / Death Symptomatic Patients < 6% Symptomatic Patients < 6% Asymptomatic Patients < 3% Asymptomatic Patients < 3%

Carotid Stent NASCET (North American Syntomatic Carotid Trial) Cranial Nerve Lesion : 7,6% Hematoma : 5,5% Extensive list of exclusion criteria ! N Engl J Med 1991;325:445

Carotid Stent age > 79 anos age > 79 anos co-morbidity (cardiac/renal/hepatic/ca) co-morbidity (cardiac/renal/hepatic/ca) valvulophaty / arrithmias valvulophaty / arrithmias previous endarterectomy previous endarterectomy unstable angina / recent MI unstable angina / recent MI previous surgery (30 days) previous surgery (30 days) Exclusion Criteria - NASCET / ACAS

Carotid Stent Death incidence in patients treated with surgery followed by Medicare is higher in institutions participating in the NASCET/ACAS Death incidence in patients treated with surgery followed by Medicare is higher in institutions participating in the NASCET/ACAS NASCET0,6% ACAS0,1% 1,4% MEDICARE Variation in carotid endarterectomy mortality in the Medicare population: trial hospitals, volume and patient characteristics Wennberg DE, Lucas FL, Birkmeyer JD et al. JAMA 1998;279:1278

Carotid Stent Patients with high risk of stroke present also with high risk for surgical treatment Patients with high risk of stroke present also with high risk for surgical treatment Brown et al. J Vasc Surg, 2003; 37:32 Gasparis et al. J Vasc Surg 2003; 37:40 High risk patients Endovascular Treatment

Carotid Stent ENDOVASCULARTREATMENT

Carotid angioplasty is performed with incidence of CVA/death Carotid angioplasty is performed with incidence of CVA/death ranging 5,3-8,2%. ranging 5,3-8,2%. Diethrich et al. J Endovasc Surg,1996 Bergeron et al. Cardiovasc Surg,1996 Yadav et al. Circulation,1997 Henry et al. J Endovasc Surg,1997

Carotid Stent LEARNING CURVE: CLINICAL EXPERIENCE: 89/99 10 years N = 924(independent neurologic evaluation) #Angioplasties Complications #Angioplasties Complications 89/ ,8% 89/ ,8% 92/ ,8% 92/ ,8% 95/ ,0% 95/ ,0% K. Matias ISES Jan 2000

Carotid Stent Vitek et al. AJNR 2000 Incidence of complications:

Carotid Stent Antiplatelet therapy, before and after the procedure Antiplatelet therapy, before and after the procedure  Acute thrombosis of the stent  Embolism Vitek et al. AJNR 2000

Carotid Stent WALLSTENT TRIAL 219 patients 219 patients No protection No protection No antiplatelet therapy No antiplatelet therapy Surgical 4,5% Endovascular 12,1% Risk CVA/death Trial was interrupted Stroke 2001;32:325

Carotid Stent What to do with the plaque fragments

Carotid Stent Cerebral Protection

Carotid Stent There is considerable evidence of embolization during carotid angioplasty DeMonte et al. J Neurosurg. 1989;70:138 Ohki, T et al. J Vasc Surg. 1998;27:463

Carotid Stent Carotid artery stenting protected with an emboli containment system Whitlow PL, Lylyk P, Londero H, et al. Visible particles and debrís from plaques, cholesterol and calcific fragments # 22 to 667 particles with average size of 200 microns (range 3.6 to 5262) captured with cerebral protection system (PercuSurge) Stroke. 2002;33(5):

Embolic event is related to: Embolic event is related to: - Guidewire placement - Passage through the lesion - Dilation of the estenoses - Stent placement - Stent dilation (self or balloon expandable) Carotid Stent

J.Theron’s Technique Theron el al. AJNR, 1990 Carotid Stent

E.P.I. Carotid Stent

Risk factors for embolism: Risk factors for embolism: - Old age ( > 80 anos) - Arterial Hypertension - Recent stroke Al Mubarack et al. A J Cardiol, 1999

Carotid Stent Non contributing factors: Non contributing factors: - Gender - Neurologic symptoms - Coronary disease - Diabetes,  cholesterol, tabaco use - Bilateral lesion - Contralateral occlusion Matur et al. Circulation, 1998

Carotid Stent Clinical experience: Jacques TheronCVA/death = 2% Jacques TheronCVA/death = 2% Theron J. et al AJNR 1990;11: patientsCVA/death = 0 75 patientsCVA/death = 0 Whintlow P. CAFE study patientsCVA/death = 2,7% 167 patientsCVA/death = 2,7% Henry M. et al J Endovasc T 2002;9:1

Carotid Stent PTA/Stent NO/ cerebral protection (n=1596) 4,2% PTA/Stent WITH/ cerebral protection (n=771) 1,7% Global experience in cervical carotid artery stent placement. Wholey M H, Mathias K, et al. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent. 2000;50(2):160 CVA/death

Carotid Stent Early outcome of carotid angioplasty and stenting with and without cerebral protection devices. Review of literature Kastrup A, Groschel K, Kraft H et al. PTA NO/ PROTECTION 5,5% 3,7% 1,1% 0,8% PTA WITH/ PROTECTION 1,8% 0,5% 0,3% 0,8% GLOBAL cva minor cva major death P < P < 0.05 P = 0.6 Stroke 2003;34:813

Carotid Stent CAVATAS Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): A randomized trial. Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): A randomized trial. Lancet. 2001;357:

Carotid Stent CAVATAS 506 patients 506 patients 22 centers / 3 years 22 centers / 3 years Intervencionalists with small experience in carotid PTA. Intervencionalists with small experience in carotid PTA. Irregular use of stents Irregular use of stents No cerebralprotection No cerebralprotection Lancet. 2001;357:

Carotid Stent CAVATAS - RESULTS PTA Surgical CVA/death (30 days) 6,4% 5,9% CVA/death (30 days) 6,4% 5,9% CVA/death (> 7 days)10%9,9% CVA/death (> 7 days)10%9,9% Cranial nerve 08,7% Cranial nerve 08,7% Restenosis (1yr)14% 4% Restenosis (1yr)14% 4% No statistical differences in stroke risk between the two groups after 3 years. No statistical differences in stroke risk between the two groups after 3 years. Lancet. 2001;357:

Carotid Stent SAPPHIRE (Stenting and Angioplasty with Protection in Patients at High Risk for Endarterectomy) 334 patients symptomatic or not with high risk (excluded from NASCET criteria) 334 patients symptomatic or not with high risk (excluded from NASCET criteria) Randomized Randomized Degre stenoses Degre stenoses Symptomatic > 50% Symptomatic > 50% Asynptomatic > 85% Asynptomatic > 85% 413 patients not randomized (registry) 413 patients not randomized (registry) Sponsored by Cordis - angioguard + precise Sponsored by Cordis - angioguard + precise

Carotid Stent SAPPHIRE (Stenting and Angioplasty with Protection in Patients at High Risk for Endarterectomy) PTA/Stent technical success 95,6% Death, stroke, MI cummulative within 30 days or between 31 days and 1 year: PTA/Stent = 12.2% CEA = 20.1% Randomized group P = Yadav JS, et al. NEJM OCT 2004

Carotid Stent SAPPHIRE (Stenting and Angioplasty with Protection in Patients at High Risk for Endarterectomy) Stroke, death, MI < 30 days: PTA/Stent 4.8% CEA 9.8 % Stroke, death, MI Symptomatic at 1 yr PTA/Stent16.8 % CEA 16.5 %

Carotid Stent Technical Success = 95.9% % Technical Success = 95.9% % Particles in the filter (debrís) = 57% Particles in the filter (debrís) = 57% CVA/Death = 6,6% CVA/Death = 6,6% CVA/Death/MI = 7,8% CVA/Death/MI = 7,8% Degree of stenoses Degree of stenoses –Symptomatic > 50% –Asymptomatic > 80% ARCHeR TRIAL: Sponsored by Guidant: Accunet + Acculink

Carotid Stent ARCHeR 1 – Carotid Stent ARCHeR 1 – Carotid Stent – 158 patients ARCHeR 2 – Stent + Embolic Protection ARCHeR 2 – Stent + Embolic Protection – 278 patients ARCHeR 3 – Newer version Rapid exchange system + Embolic Protection ARCHeR 3 – Newer version Rapid exchange system + Embolic Protection –145 patients ARCHeR Trial – 581 combined patients Sponsored by Guidant: Accunet + Acculink

ARCHeR Trial – 581 combined patients 30 days combined end points

ARCHeR 1

ARCHeR 2

Carotid Stent TRIALS E REGISTERS

CREST CREST –2.500 Symptomatic patiens with low risk / 5 years –Randomized; 60 centers –Cerebral Protection –Sponsored by NIH / Guidant Carotid Stent

CARESS (Carotid Revascularization Using Endarterectomy or Stenting Systems) CARESS (Carotid Revascularization Using Endarterectomy or Stenting Systems) –439 patients –90% with >75% stenosis –68% asymptomatic –30-day mortality and stroke CEA 2% CEA 2% CSS 2% (with protection) CSS 2% (with protection) –30-day all-cause mortality, stroke, MI CEA 3% CEA 3% CSS 2% (with protection) CSS 2% (with protection)

Carotid Stent

Compreensive and proved experience in diagnostic cervico-cranial angiography (200 cases) Compreensive and proved experience in diagnostic cervico-cranial angiography (200 cases) Experience with PTA/stent Experience with PTA/stent Program Requirements for Residency Fellowship Education in Interventional Neuroradiology Higashida RT, Hopkins LN, Berenstein A et al. AJNR 2000; 21:

Carotid Stent Surgical treatment is still the “gold standard” for low risk patients Surgical treatment is still the “gold standard” for low risk patients More recent studies with cerebral protection devices are rapidly changing this concept. More recent studies with cerebral protection devices are rapidly changing this concept.

Carotid Stent In 2002 only 4% of carotid stenosis were treated by PTA and stents In 2002 only 4% of carotid stenosis were treated by PTA and stents Projections for year 2006 anticipate it will be 75% of all cases of carotid stenosis due to approval of the procedure/devices by the FDA in light of the clinical studies Projections for year 2006 anticipate it will be 75% of all cases of carotid stenosis due to approval of the procedure/devices by the FDA in light of the clinical studies Morgan & Stanley 2003

Carotid Stent Timing and frequency of complications after carotid artery stenting: What is the optimal period of observation? Tan KT, Cleveland TJ, Berczi V, et al. Safety criteria for same day discharge of patients 204 patients Incidence of complications = 5,4% 52,6% 6 hs 5,3% 6-12 hs 7,9%12-24 hs J Vasc Surg. 2003;38:236

Carotid Stent