Doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0560r0 Submission May 2009 Allan Thomson, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 Time Features Date: 2009-05-11 Authors:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /1521r2 Submission January 2012 Marc Emmelmann, FOKUSSlide 1 AP and Network Discovery Enhancements Date: Authors:
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0665r1 Submission May 2012 Anh Tuan Hoang et al (I2R) Slide 1 Prioritized PS-Polls Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0497 r0 Submission May 2008 Allan Thomson, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 D2.0 Location Changes Summary Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1357r3 Nov Slide 1 Dynamic TIM and Page Segmentation Date: Authors: Weiping Sun, Seoul National University.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0076r0 January 2013 Reachable Address Message for Relay Date: Authors: Jafarian, Qualcomm Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1323r0 November 2012 Submission Relays for ah Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0329r1 March 2012 Chittabrata Ghosh, Nokia Slide 1 Date: Authors: Group Synchronized DCF.
Doc.: IEEE /0130r0 Submission January 2012 Seunghee Han, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Beacon Reception of Long Sleeper Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1054r0 Submission Sep Santosh Pandey (Cisco)Slide 1 FILS Reduced Neighbor Report Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0089r0 Submission Listen interval update Jan 2013 Slide 1 Date: Authors: Jinsoo Choi, LG Electronics.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0877r0 July 2014 SK Yong et.al., AppleSlide 1 Generic Service Discovery Proposal: Dynamic Bloom Filter Operation Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0897r0 SubmissionJae Seung Lee, ETRISlide 1 Active Scanning considering Operating Status of APs Date: July 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /700r1 Submission July 2013 RYU Cheol, ETRISlide 1 Discovery Modes and Discovery Proxy of Web Services Discovery Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1120r0 Submission Buffer Status Report Slide 1 Date: Authors: Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al. September 2015.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0877r2 July 2014 SK Yong et.al., AppleSlide 1 Generic Service Discovery Proposal: Dynamic Bloom Filter Operation Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1034r4 September 2012 Jeongki Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Enhanced scanning procedure for FILS Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /162 January 2014 RYU Cheol, ETRISlide 1 Possible Agreements for the Design Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0071r0 January 2013 Submission Channel indication in RAW/TWT Date: Authors: Merlin, Qualcomm Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1128r1 Submission Nov 2009 Allan Thomson, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 BSS Transition with Bearing Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/ ak May 2013 Finn and Hart, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 P802.1Qbz + P802.11ak Proposed Division of Work Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1378r0 Submission November 2008 Darwin Engwer, Nortel NetworksSlide 1 Improving Multicast Reliability Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/0761r0 July 2012 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 1 Operating Channels Information Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0079r0 Submission Interference Signalling Enhancements Date: xx Mar 2010 Allan Thomson, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 Authors:
Doc.:IEEE /0476r1 Submission Apr Santosh Pandey, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 Management Frame Policy Definition Authors: Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0100r2 Submission January 2010 Kazuyuki Sakoda, Sony CorporationSlide 1 MAC beaconing sync comment resolution Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /2229r0 Submission July 2007 R. Roy, SRASlide 1 Timing Reference Information Element Proposal Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0409r6 Submission July 2012 Shoukang Zheng et. al, I2R, SingaporeSlide 1 Channel Access Supporting Low Power Operation Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0896r0 SubmissionJae Seung Lee, ETRISlide 1 Probe Request Filtering Criteria Date: July 2012.
Doc.:IEEE /0129r1 January 2012 S.Abraham, Qualcomm Inc Short Beacon Slide 1 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1299r0 Submission Dec 2009 Allan Thomson, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 BSS Transition Improvements Date: xx Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1034r0 Submission September 2015 Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM Notification of Operating Mode Changes Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Synchronization of HCCA APs in OBSS
FILS Reduced Neighbor Report
PAD and Probe Request/Response frames
Data Function Frames Date: Authors: Jan 2009 Month Year
Time Features Date: Authors: May 2009 Month Year
WUR Synchronization Date: Authors: September 2017
Service discovery architecture for TGaq
Wake Up Frame to Indicate Group Addressed Frames Transmission
FILS Reduced Neighbor Report
Beacon Protection Date: Authors: July 2018 July 2018
Beacon Protection Date: Authors: May 2018 January 2018
Providing Faster GAS Response
CID#102 - Channel Allocation
Synchronization of HCCA APs in OBSS
AP Power Down Notification
AP Power Down Notification
CID#89-Directed Multicast Service (DMS)
Channel Allocation March 2008 Authors: Date: Month Year
Broadcast Service Advertisements
WAVE without beacons Date: Authors: May 2007 Month Year
Beacon Protection Date: Authors: July 2018 July 2018
MAC beaconing sync comment resolution overview
Time Features Date: Authors: May 2009 Month Year
CR for CID 1115 Date: Authors: May 2019
Interference Signalling Enhancements
FILS Frame Content Date: Authors: February 2008
Beacon Protection Date: Authors: May 2018 January 2018
Timing Measurement Date: Authors: July2008 November 2007
MBCA and Beacon Timing element clean up
Timing Measurement Date: Authors: Jan 2010 November 2007
Dynamic TIM and Page Segmentation
Cooperative AP Discovery
BSS Transition with Bearing
Timing Measurement Date: Authors: Jan 2010 November 2007
TGu/TGv Joint Meeting Date: Authors: May 2008 Month Year
Broadcast Service Advertisements
Providing Faster GAS Response
CR for CID 1115 Date: Authors: May 2019
E911 Bits Date: Authors: May 2007 Month Year
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /0560r0 Submission May 2009 Allan Thomson, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 Time Features Date: Authors:

doc.: IEEE /0560r0 Submission May 2009 Allan Thomson, Cisco SystemsSlide 2 Abstract TGp LB144 CID#110 raised an issue around the introduction of time advertisement features in TGp that overlaps somewhat with similar features in TGv and TGu This presentation attempts to provide an overview of each of the features to facilitate further discussion on how to possibly align these features

doc.: IEEE /0560r0 Submission May 2009 Allan Thomson, Cisco SystemsSlide 3 Summary TGv – Provides general scheme to distribute external time reference (UTC) wrt TSF to non-AP STAs –Motivated by timestamping of events but is a general scheme TGu – Provides scheme to distribute external timestamp (UTC & Time Zone) for local time at the AP TGp – Provides scheme to distribute external time reference wrt TSF between STAs

doc.: IEEE /0560r0 Submission May 2009 Allan Thomson, Cisco SystemsSlide 4 TGp – Additional Information Courtesy Richard Roy: “In a mobile environment where one might want to coordinate switching of physical channels so that the STAs were on the same RF channel at the same time, one could use GPS UTC time as the “external clock” that everyone would use for aligning channel switches. Now imagine that NOT all STAs have a source of UTC time. How should they get such a reference. Answer: the TA frame with a TIE provides, in a single frame, information from a STA with UTC time to a STA w/o UTC time that allows the second STA to align an “external” clock to UTC and then can proceed to engage in aligned channel switches. Note the big difference between this mechanism and the one in TGu. The extension of 1) is for deployment of a TDMA scheme for channel assignments, eg. a logical MESH channel mapped to a physical channel which is a time slot on a given RF carrier … you get the idea. Note that in highly mobile environments, alignment (i.e., TSF synchronization) using beacons is not viable for many reasons. An external well-defined source of time is required. Higher layer security mechanisms often use accurate time to prevent replay and other similar attacks on the system. The higher layer protocols the ITS community is developing (IEEE 1609, ETSI TC ITS WG5) are examples of such use of accurate time. Generally, any scenario one can dream up that makes use of/relies on “aligned time sources/clocks” on distinct (i.e., physically separate) physical devices (STAs) can make use of the TA frame to distribute time to those STAs that don’t have the agreed upon external time reference. “

doc.: IEEE /0560r0 Submission May 2009 Allan Thomson, Cisco SystemsSlide 5 TGv – UTC TSF Offset Provides an offset between the AP’s TSF counter and UTC to non-AP STAs Distributed via an IE in Probe Response and Beacon frames Two fields UTC TSF Offset & UTC TSF Offset Accuracy UTC Time is represented as follows: Same format is used by TGu

doc.: IEEE /0560r0 Submission May 2009 Allan Thomson, Cisco SystemsSlide 6 TGu – AP Date, Time and Time Zone Information Provides the AP Date, Time and Time Zone for the AP to non-AP STAs Distributed via an IE in Native GAS Query Response Two fields Timestamp & Time Zone Timestamp uses TGv format without millisecond granularity Time Zone specified using

doc.: IEEE /0560r0 Submission May 2009 Allan Thomson, Cisco SystemsSlide 7 TGp – Timing Advertisement Provides a method for a STA to synchronize to an external time standard distributed by another STA Introduces a new management frame, Timing Advertisement, frame containing the following elements

doc.: IEEE /0560r0 Submission May 2009 Allan Thomson, Cisco SystemsSlide 8 TGp – Timing Advertisement Cont’d Timing IE defined as: Timing Capabilities defined as a set of bits that indicate whether the external time source is available…etc TTOE (TSF Timer Offset Estimate) TTOE-STD (TTOE Standard Deviation)

doc.: IEEE /0560r0 Submission May 2009 Allan Thomson, Cisco SystemsSlide 9 Observations TGvTGuTGp On Demand Distribution Periodic Update of time Distribution of time from AP to non-AP STA Distribution of time from any STA to any STA Distribution of external time pre-association Distribution of external time post-association Defines offset between TSF and external time Defines time zone GranularitymSecSecnSec

doc.: IEEE /0560r0 Submission May 2009 Allan Thomson, Cisco SystemsSlide 10 Straw Poll Do you agree the time advertisement features in TGv, TGu and TGp should be aligned? –Yes (all or part of): –No: –Don’t Care:

doc.: IEEE /0560r0 Submission May 2009 Allan Thomson, Cisco SystemsSlide 11 Solutions Proposed Solution #1: Combine TGv &TGu Proposed Solution #2: Modify TGv and combine with TGu Proposed Solution #3: Add TGp missing items to Solution #1 or Solution #2

doc.: IEEE /0560r0 Submission May 2009 Allan Thomson, Cisco SystemsSlide 12 Proposed Solution #1: Combine TGv &TGu TGv - Add Time Zone field to UTC TSF Offset IE TGu - Remove AP Date, Time & Time Zone from Native GAS Query TGp – leave as is Continue to use Probe Response and Beacon frames to communicate time advertisement

doc.: IEEE /0560r0 Submission May 2009 Allan Thomson, Cisco SystemsSlide 13 Proposed Solution #2: Modify TGv & combine with TGu TGv - Add Time Zone field to UTC TSF Offset IE TGv – Remove IE from Beacon and add to (Re)association response frames TGu - Remove AP Date, Time & Time Zone from Native GAS Query TGp – leave as is Use Probe Response & (Re)Association Response frames to communicate time advertisement

doc.: IEEE /0560r0 Submission May 2009 Allan Thomson, Cisco SystemsSlide 14 Proposed Solution #3: Add TGp missing items to Solution #1 & Solution #2 -TGp – Remove Timing Advertisement frame -TGp - Add new combined UTC TSF Offset (and associated frames) including Timing Capabilities to TGp -TGv – Remove UTC TSF Offset

doc.: IEEE /0560r0 Submission May 2009 Allan Thomson, Cisco SystemsSlide 15 Straw Poll If you agreed that time advertisement should be aligned what is your preferred solution? –Option #1: –Option #2: –Option #3: –Other: