HEARING AID HEURISTICS ANALYSIS. Objective: To conduct usability and human factors testing on hearing aid device to assess if the required specifications.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MarkeTrak VI: Measurement Drives Success – Consumer Feedback on Needs, Benefit, Satisfaction & Value Sergei Kochkin, Ph.D. Better Hearing Institute.
Advertisements

Site Visits Interviews and observations. Site visits What we see and do for ourselves is more memorable, more real, more true than what someone else tells.
Logitech Harmony Ultimate Universal Remote By: Joshua Servian Thomas Sharman Robert Sloan Jeffrey Wong.
Presenting Your Work (plus odds & ends) November 20, 2007.
BOWLING GREEN CITIZEN CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY Fall 2010 – National Citizen Survey.
Asking Users and Experts
Satisfacts Customer/Employee Evaluation Program Do you want to learn about what your clients, customers, members and employees are really thinking?
SE 450 Software Processes & Product Metrics Survey Use & Design.
Usability presented by the OSU Libraries’ u-team.
Selecting Your Evaluation Tools Chapter Five. Introduction  Collecting information  Program considerations  Feasibility  Acceptability  Credibility.
Research Ethics Levels of Measurement. Ethical Issues Include: Anonymity – researcher does not know who participated or is not able to match the response.
Heuristics  Basis  Evaluators –Qualifications –Training  Preparation –Scenario  Results –List of problems –Severity –Group synthesis.
Heuristic Evaluation IS 485, Professor Matt Thatcher.
Evaluation Through Expert Analysis U U U
Is the iPhone Usable? IM360 Final Presentation By: Kelly Rand & Blake Bassett 2.
Heuristic Evaluation.
Usability 2004 J T Burns1 Usability & Usability Engineering.
Marketing Research Ch. 28 ME. Marketing Information Systems Section 28.1.
Review an existing website Usability in Design. to begin with.. Meeting Organization’s objectives and your Usability goals Meeting User’s Needs Complying.
Customer Satisfaction with Hearing Instruments in the Digital Age September 2005 Hearing Journal.
Software Measurement and Analysis Team Assignment ===== K15T2 - Team ===== K15T2 - Team =====
MSD P13038 Hearing Aid Design System Design Review January 11, 2012.
Report of findings prepared for: FGI Research, Inc. May 2007 The Impact of CSR on the General Public A Nationwide Poll on Corporate Social Responsibility.
SUNIL GAHLAWAT LU GAN MIYA SYLVESTER YIRAN WANG Usability and Utility of TopicLens a Visualization System for the Exploration of Topic Models.
1 Usability evaluation and testing User interfaces Jaana Holvikivi Metropolia.
UNDERSTANDING CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS
CMUA 2004 Statewide Survey of California Residential Customers Served by Municipal Utilities City of Palo Alto Public Utilities April 2005.
MAC Fall Symposium: Learning What You Want to Know and Implementing Change Elizabeth Yakel, Ph.D. October 22, 2010.
Part 1-Intro; Part 2- Req; Part 3- Design  Chapter 20 Why evaluate the usability of user interface designs?  Chapter 21 Deciding on what you need to.
Chapter 11 Chi-Square Procedures 11.3 Chi-Square Test for Independence; Homogeneity of Proportions.
Formative Evaluation cs3724: HCI. Problem scenarios summative evaluation Information scenarios claims about current practice analysis of stakeholders,
Usability Expert Review Anna Diubina. What is usability? The effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction with which specified users achieve specified goals.
Usability Evaluation June 8, Why do we need to do usability evaluation?
CS2003 Usability Engineering Seminar Group 7 Nishanth Chandradas Humza Ahmad Mariam Michael Max Mohammed Ali Fatima.
Heuristic Evaluation and Discount Usability Engineering Taken from the writings of Jakob Nielsen – inventor of both.
©2011 Elsevier, Inc. Heuristic Evaluation of MealpayPlus website Ruidi Tan Rachel Vilceus Anant Patil Junior Anthony Xi Li Kinberley Seals Niko Maresco.
Viking Survey Results Report Team Assignment 11 Team 2-1.
Usability Testing & Web Design by Alex Andujar. What is Usability? Usability measures the quality of a user's experience when interacting with a Web site,
Level 2 Prepared by: RHR First Prepared on: Nov 23, 2006 Last Modified on: Quality checked by: MOH Copyright 2004 Asia Pacific Institute of Information.
System Analysis-Gathering Requirements.  System analysis is the process of gathering info about existing system, which may be computerized or not, while.
Usability Assessment Methods beyond Testing Chapter 7 Evaluating without users.
HEARING AID HEURISTICS ANALYSIS. Objective: To conduct usability and human factors testing on hearing aid device to assess if the required specifications.
Chapter 15: Analytical evaluation. Inspections Heuristic evaluation Walkthroughs.
Chapter 15: Analytical evaluation Q1, 2. Inspections Heuristic evaluation Walkthroughs Start Q3 Reviewers tend to use guidelines, heuristics and checklists.
Evaluating a UI Design Expert inspection methods Cognitive Walkthrough
Usability 1 Usability evaluation Without users - analytical techniques With users - survey and observational techniques.
Chapter 13 CHI-SQUARE AND NONPARAMETRIC PROCEDURES.
March 22,2007Lisa A. Lauxman, Ph.D On-Line Surveys Arizona Cooperative Extension Professional Development Workshop.
Savannah, GA FIE 2004 Work In Progress - Using User Experience Research to Develop Needs Assessment Skills of Undergraduates Laura Moody & Joan Burtner.
FINCA Bank GEORGIA Customer satisfaction Survey and satisfaction Index (CSI)
Oct 211 The next two weeks Oct 21 & 23: Lectures on user interface evaluation Oct 28: Lecture by Dr. Maurice Masliah No office hours (out of town) Oct.
Ten Usability Heuristics with Example.. Page 2 Heuristic Evaluation Heuristic evaluation is the most popular of the usability inspection methods. Heuristic.
COGNITIVE WALKTHROUGH Vigneshwar Poojar. The cognitive walkthrough is a formalized way of imagining people’s thoughts and actions when they use an interface.
UCI Library Website Chris Lee Archana Vaidyanathan Duncan Tsai Karen Quan.
Overview of System or Process Design and Improvement 1.
SpecificationCriteriaTest descriptionTest ResultActionResponsible BRACELET Retail price Must be below £100 Complete a sales report in order to confirm.
Asking Users and Experts Li Zhang (Jacey) Yuewei Zhou (Joanna)
Heuristic Evaluation May 4, 2016
MSD P13038 Hearing Aid Design
SIE 515 Design Evaluation Lecture 7.
DL Interfaces & Users LIS 5472 Digital Libraries Week 12
Imran Hussain University of Management and Technology (UMT)
Heuristic Evaluation August 5, 2016
Members: Iwan Sofean Ahmad Syazwan Shamilawanie Nur Anisah
IENG 451 / 452 Voice of the Customer: Analysis (KANO, CTQ)
Survey Design & Use.
Chapter 26 Inspections of the user interface
Evaluation.
COMP444 Human Computer Interaction Evaluation
Wearable Interface 3.
Presentation transcript:

HEARING AID HEURISTICS ANALYSIS

Objective: To conduct usability and human factors testing on hearing aid device to assess if the required specifications are met. Specifications : Spe c #SourceSpecification Directio n Units of measureMarginalIdealNotesDRI S9 CN2, CN4, CN11 Range of adult ear size accommodated maxpercentile 25th to 75th 10th to 90th Use ANSUR database to obtain dimensions corresponding to theses percentiles ISE S10 CN4, CN6, CN10, CN11 Weight of earpieceming<15<12 marginal values will depend on ergonomic info ISE S14CN3 Percent of surveyed people who identify a picture of the device as something other than a hearing aid. maxpercent>60>80 team should conduct surveys ID S15CN3 Percent of surveyed hard of hearing people who prefer the form of the new device to standard behind the ear hearing aids maxpercent>50>75 team should conduct surveys ID S16CN3 Percent of surveyed hearing people who would use the device for Bluetooth or music listening maxpercent>50>70 team should conduct surveys ID S17CN11 Percent of surveyed people who feel the device is comfortable to wear maxpercent>60>80 team should conduct surveys ID

Specifications 9, 10 Range of adult ear size accommodated Final design will be measured to ensure dimensions fall with in the 5%-95% percentile Weight of earpiece Final prototype will be weighed to ensure it’s weight is below 15 grams

Specification #9 ANSUR Database provided 5 th percentile Female and 95 th percentile Male ear dimensions All units in mm 5% Female95% Male

Statistical Analysis Results Designing for small ears: 17 mm for Ear Protrusion 54 mm Ear length Designing for Medium to Large ears: 30 mm for Ear Protrusion 72 mm Ear length

SPECIFICATIONS Two Surveys: Small Group Imagine-RIT

Small Group Survey Small heuristics study of 5-6 students between the ages of Evaluators can be either Hearing or Hard of Hearing students Incentive for participating in survey will be granted to evaluators (Javas Tokens) Data collected will be confidential

Procedure Conduct one on one interview with each participant for a maximum of 20 minutes Each participate will be ask to wear a non-functional prototype and perform a set of tasks such as walking with device, adjusting volume etc. A Likert system will be used to rank satisfaction of each question

ImagineRIT Survey ImagineRIT visitors who are at least 18 or older will be allowed to participate in this survey Each participate will be ask to wear a non-functional prototype and perform a set of tasks such as adjusting volume/profiles etc. A Likert system will be used to rank their response for each question.

Survey Questions Each question will reference a function on the device to evaluate basic usability standards: Flexibility and efficiency of use Aesthetic and minimalist design User Control and freedom Recognition rather than recall

Sample Questions Please mark how satisfied you are with the hearing aid device for each situation: Overall comfort/fit Very satisfied, Satisfied, Neutral, Dissatisfied, Very Dissatisfied Ease of adjusting volume Very satisfied, Satisfied, Neutral, Dissatisfied, Very Dissatisfied Visibility of hearing aid Very satisfied, Satisfied, Neutral, Dissatisfied, Very Dissatisfied Main Menu Home Our People History Process Benefits Consumer Page Customer Survey Testimonials News Presentations Pricing Purchase Contact Us Visit us on Facebook Ear Trak

Statistics For Analyzing Data Ordinal data will be tested for independence and association using the following methods: At an α= 0.05 Frequency Distribution/Cross Tabulation Kendall tau B or C Chi-square test for Association