ICGFM Conference Miami May 3, 2005 Monitoring Public Financial Management System Performance: Lessons and Future Directions Bill Dorotinsky The World Bank.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mutual Accountability and Aid Transparency - Rwanda – IATI Partner Country Meeting, 4th July 2011 Paris, France Ronald NKUSI Director, External Finance.
Advertisements

1 The PEFA Program – and the PFM Performance Measurement Framework Washington DC, May 1, 2008 Bill Dorotinsky IMF.
1 PRSp Alignment Finnish Aid in a PRS Context Helsinki Workshop May 2003.
Third International Roundtable on Managing Results for Development Building Public Finance Systems to Achieve Planned Results – Building Capacity and Measuring.
Budget Execution; Key Issues
Workshop on the Strengthened Approach to Supporting PFM Reform PFM Performance Measurement Framework And Procurement Pamela Bigart World Bank.
Sketching a Strengthened Approach to Public Financial Management Work
Group 3 Financing EFA: Domestic resource mobilization and external support Facilitator: Robert Prouty, The World Bank.
Financial Reforms and Accountability in Albania Presented by Dr. Sherefedin Shehu MP, Budget & Finance Committee, Albania International Symposium on the.
Module 5.3 Measuring the performance of PFM systems.
Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability Introduction to the framework and lessons learned from its use in Mozambique Health Sector Tanzania, February.
Liberia – Duke University Program PFM reform strategy Duncan Last Public Financial Management Division March 4, 2011.
Resource Allocation in Canada Evaluation, Accountability and Control Brian Pagan Expenditure Operations and Estimates Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat.
BANGLADESH EXPERIENCE PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND PR OCUREMENT A presentation for Concurrent Session on Public Financial Management and Procurement.
The World Bank SBO Vilnius, Lithuania March 21, 2007 Bill Dorotinsky The World Bank Moving PFM reforms forward: A Strengthened Approach.
Module 5.2 Measuring the performance of PFM systems
SECTOR POLICY SUPPORT PROGRAMMES A new methodology for delivery of EC development assistance. 1.
The PEFA Program – and the PFM Performance Measurement Framework
Train4dev Training for Development September-December 2006SWAP Joint Learning Event1 Supporting Sector Programmes Senior Level Session Transport Sector.
SECTOR POLICY SUPPORT PROGRAMMES A new methodology for delivery of EC development assistance. 1.
IAOD Evaluation Section, the Development Agenda (DA) and Development Oriented Activities Julia Flores Marfetan, Senior Evaluator.
The World Bank Good Practice PEAM Work PEAM Core Course March 23, 2005 Planning for High Impact Bill Dorotinsky, PRMPS.
Moving PFM reforms forward: A Strengthened Approach PEM reforms in PRSP countries from Europe and Central Asia Warsaw, February 6-9, 2005 David Biggs DFID.
Strengthening Financial Scrutiny Les Kojima Senior Financial Management Specialist The World Bank 53 rd Commonwealth Parliamentary Conference New Delhi.
PACIFIC AID EFFECTIVENESS PRINCIPLES. Purpose of Presentation Provide an overview of Pacific Principles on Aid Effectiveness Provide an overview of Pacific.
INDONESIA BUDGET REFORM (Priorities and Challenges) International Conference Budgeting for Performance-Modernizing PFM in Indonesia May , Hotel.
IFMIS assessment for investment lending projects Gert van der Linde AFTFM Fiduciary Forum 2008.
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE AND FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY (PEFA)-PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT FRAMEWORK Module 4: The Assessment Process, Stakeholders Involvement & Quality.
Fiduciary Risk Management Evolving principles and practice in DFID DFID India - 15 January 2002.
INTRODUCTION TO PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT (PFM) Module 1.1 Definitions, objectives of PFM and its context.
Measuring PFM Performance The PEFA program and tool CReCER Managua, October 29-31, 2012 Charles Seibert, PEFA Secretariat.
1 Joint Donor Staff Training Activity Tanzania, June 2002 Partnership for Poverty Reduction Module 4 - Links between PRSP, Sector Programmes and.
The Strengthened Approach to Supporting PFM reforms Applying the PFM Performance Measurement Framework Washington, D.C., January 17-18, 2007 Bill Dorotinsky.
A short introduction to the Strengthened Approach to supporting PFM reforms.
Recent Developments of the PEFA Program Video-conference of the PEMPAL BCOP PEFA Working Group February 20, 2009 Frans Ronsholt Head of PEFA Secretariat.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Page 1 Budget Execution and Financial Accountability Course January 10-12, 2005 Country PFM Performance Measurement and Monitoring Nicola Smithers PEFA.
Selected Issues in PRSP Implementation The World Bank and The IMF Thessaloniki May 28, 2005.
Towards a Sector Wide Approach (SWAp) for water sector in Lesotho Prepared by T.W. Sepamo Principal Engineer Water and Sanitation. Prepared for EUWI –
Page 1 The PFM Performance Measurement Framework A Tool for PFM Performance Measurement and Monitoring Workshop on Applying the PFM Performance Measurement.
ADE’s 25 th anniversary Economic Governance: Key to Development ? Introduction Bruxelles – Bibliothèque Solvay – 5 October 2015.
Outcomes of the FMC review Vania Tomeva, PIFC consultant July 2013, Tbilisi 1.
Module 5.2: PFM diagnostic tools and the PEFA INTRODUCTION TO PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT.
MOH 2 February Identify needs Prioritize needs Finalize list of endorsed needs Submit needs to MOPAD Consult with donor Negotiation (intra- and.
Technology and Corruption: The Case of FMIS
Introduction/Background Aim of the assessment was to assess the impact of the 3 institutions MOHCDGEC, PO-RALG and MOFP in the flow of funds from national.
PFM Reform Programmes Presentation by Mary Betley
Moving PFM reforms forward: A Strengthened Approach
Towards Aid Effectiveness The Role of the Donor Community
Linking Public Expenditure work with Bank instruments: PRSPs and JSAs
Public Expenditure Management: Applications
Ivor Beazley, World Bank
A Tool for PFM Performance Measurement and Monitoring
Workshop on the Strengthened Approach to Supporting PFM Reform
PEFA 2016 Slides selected from the training materials of the PEFA secretariat.
Public Financial Management Performance Measurement Framework
and example of its recent application in Albania
Moving Forward in PFM for Sustainable Economic Growth and Development
Panel Discussion Remarks
Moving PFM reforms forward: A Strengthened Approach
Public Financial Management Performance Measurement Framework
PEFA 2016 Slides selected from the training materials of the PEFA secretariat.
Finding A Common Scale: An Overview of PFM Performance Indicators
Summarizing the Assessment
The Strengthened Approach to Supporting PFM reforms
PEFA Assessments - Analytics to Action
Moving Forward PFM reforms
2018 National PEFA Assessment Budget Community of Practice of PEMPAL
Financial Control Measures
Financial Control Measures
Presentation transcript:

ICGFM Conference Miami May 3, 2005 Monitoring Public Financial Management System Performance: Lessons and Future Directions Bill Dorotinsky The World Bank

2 Broad L essons from PFM assessment work to date A large amount of PFM assessment has been undertaken, mostly by development agencies and a good deal of knowledge generated. Limitations : In some cases, the duplication and lack of coordination in the work has led to a heavy burden on partner governments More focus on diagnostics, less on supporting implementation of reform of country systems With the exception of the HIPC benchmarks, it has been difficult to determine the extent of improvement in a country’s PFM performance over time.

The World Bank 3 Comparison of HIPC Expenditure Tracking Assessment Outcomes of 2001 & 2004 Some improvement in HIPC PEM systems performance since 2001, however a majority still require substantial upgrading. Source: Fund-Bank AAP database

The World Bank 4 Unhelpful donor practices Inadequate sequencing of reforms, due to donor pressure or difficulties for government to determine the path of reforms Fragmented approach to reforms and limited leadership in government -- PRSP and PEM reforms separate Limited monitoring of progress, mainly concentrated on inputs -> did not allow lessons learning and did not encourage focus on results on the ground Capacity constraints Technical reform versus systemic/institutional change BUT realism important on achievable pace of change Why hasn’t there been more progress?

The World Bank 5 The Way Forward: A Strengthened Approach 1.A country-led agenda – including a PFM reform strategy and action plan 2.A donor coordinated program of support – coordinated, coherent, multi-year program of PFM work that supports and is aligned with the government’s PFM strategy 3.A shared information pool – a common framework and information set for measuring and monitoring results over time

The World Bank 6 Planning and undertaking diagnostic work over time. Designing a prioritized and sequenced reform program. Implementing reforms Monitoring of progress over time. 1. A country-led PFM reform strategy and action plan The government-led reform program  Home-grown, country specific agenda.  Good practices suggest (i) sequence and priorities of reform activities and measures, (ii) holistic view of the PFM system, institutions and processes.  Informed by policy dialogue with donors.

The World Bank 7 2. Donor coordination around the PFM reform agenda of the government Coordinated policy dialogue between government and donors would facilitate sequencing and prioritization of reforms. The limited available external resources for analytical support, technical assistance, capacity-building and financing should be allocated to the reform priorities of the government. Multiple requirements of donors and competition between donors should not burden the limited capacities of government. Coordination may facilitate in the medium-term the development of aid modalities that are more supportive of government processes and institutions, e.g. multi-donor trust funds to support reform implementation, use of national procedures, SWAPs, etc.

The World Bank 8 3. Monitoring progress of PFM reforms 1.Reform measures/activities (training, new law, etc.). 2.Implemented institutional and system changes (IFMS, new budget calendar, etc.). 3.Changes in the performance of the PFM system over the years. -> requires a framework that ensures: Consistency over time; Precise, objective measurement of progress; Systematic coverage of the budget cycle. Monitoring progress enables decision-makers in government and donor agencies to assess the success and difficulties of the reform process and make decisions accordingly. Depending of the purpose and interest, different levels for monitoring progress:

The World Bank 9 A standard set of high level indicators Widely accepted but limited in number Broad measures of performance relative to the key PFM system characteristics Enabling credible monitoring of performance and progress over time. A PFM Performance Report Integrative, narrative report based on the indicators and assessing performance; based on observable, empirical evidence. Updated periodically, depending on country circumstances and operational needs Contributing to coordinated assessment Feeds into government-donor policy dialogue The Performance Measurement Framework An explicit performance measurement framework focuses on capacity- building and results on the ground. Current indicator set available at

The World Bank 10 Comprehensive fiscal risk oversight : Is oversight of fiscal risk arising from public enterprises and sub-national governments adequate? Comprehensive fiscal risk oversight : Is oversight of fiscal risk arising from public enterprises and sub-national governments adequate? Information: Is adequate fiscal, revenue and expenditure information produced and disseminated to meet decision-making and management purposes? Information: Is adequate fiscal, revenue and expenditure information produced and disseminated to meet decision-making and management purposes? Comprehensive, Policy-based, budget: Does the budget capture all relevant fiscal transactions, and is the process, giving regard to government policy? Comprehensive, Policy-based, budget: Does the budget capture all relevant fiscal transactions, and is the process, giving regard to government policy? Budget Realism: Is the budget realistic, and implemented as intended in a predictable manner? Budget Realism: Is the budget realistic, and implemented as intended in a predictable manner? Control : Is effective control and stewardship exercised in the use of public funds? Control : Is effective control and stewardship exercised in the use of public funds? The questions the PFM performance indicators seek to answer Accountability and Transparency : Are effective external financial accountability and transparency arrangements in place? Accountability and Transparency : Are effective external financial accountability and transparency arrangements in place? MEASURING WHAT PERFORMANCE? Six core objectives of PFM system

The World Bank 11 Credibility Structure of the indicator set A. PFM Out-turns Comprehensiveness Transparency B. Key cross-cutting features External Scrutiny and Audit Accounting and Reporting Budget Execution Policy- based budgeting C. Budget Cycle STRUCTURE AND CONTENT OF THE INDICATORS

The World Bank 12 Performance indicators

The World Bank 13

The World Bank 14

The World Bank 15

The World Bank 16 And three donor practice indicators

The World Bank 17 PI-1Aggregate expenditure out-turn compared to original approved budget Dimensions to be assessed: The difference between actual primary expenditure and primary budgeted expenditure (i.e. excluding debt service charges, but also excluding externally financed project expenditure).

The World Bank 18 PI-22. Timeliness and regularity of accounts reconciliation Dimensions to be assessed: Regularity of bank reconciliations Regularity of reconciliation and clearance of suspense accounts and advances.

The World Bank 19

The World Bank 20 Future Directions Indicators developed by Bank in collaboration with IMF, EC, DFID, France, Switzerland, Norway Indicators developed by Bank in collaboration with IMF, EC, DFID, France, Switzerland, Norway Consultations were held in OECD DAC JV on PFM, and with countries Consultations were held in OECD DAC JV on PFM, and with countries Under final review, with expected formal issuance in mid-May Under final review, with expected formal issuance in mid-May Within Bank, expected to be recommended as good practice in working with clients Within Bank, expected to be recommended as good practice in working with clients