Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk Deception and lies Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Morality: constitutive of or overcoming self-interest?
Advertisements

Higher RMPS Lesson 4 Kantian ethics.
What is deontology?.
Philosophers on why be moral Michael Lacewing
Categorical Imperative
KANTIAN ETHICS IN FIVE EASY (?) STEPS. Sandel’s Classification of Normative Ethical Theories 1.Core concept: maximizing happiness – Utilitarianism (morality,
Kantian Ethics (Duty and Reason)
Ethical Theory.
Kant. Kant desire Kant desire impulse Kant desire impulse incentive.
Phil 160 Kant.
Kant’s Categorical Imperative and Euthanasia
Euthanasia Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Practical ethics: applying theory Michael Lacewing
ETHICAL THEORIES: OVERVIEW. Universal Moral Theories Utilitarianism Egoism Deontology Rules-based Rights-based Virtue ethics.
Mill on conscience and justice
© Michael Lacewing Can war be just? Michael Lacewing
Ethics & Computers Sources: “The Right Thing to Do”, P. Aarne Vesilind, Lakeshore Press, 2004, (ISBN ) “Ethics for the Information Age”, Michael.
Ethics in Policy Making
Ethical Theories: Deontology and Teleology
Kant’s deontological ethics
Aristotle’s virtue ethics: three issues
© Michael Lacewing Three theories of ethics Michael Lacewing
Michael Lacewing Crime and punishment Michael Lacewing
The treatment of animals Michael Lacewing
MORALITY AND ETHICS (cont.). Debate Teams 1) “Cigarette Smoking Should be Banned in Public Areas” Support:Oppose: FishIda JuliusLok Kit 2) “It is wrong.
Kant’s Ethics of Duty 3 insights form the basis for his theory  An action has moral worth if it is done for the sake of duty. (DUTY)  An action is morally.
Deontological & Consequential Ethics
What is the right thing to do?
Rule utilitarianism Michael Lacewing
Deontological Ethics Is saving someone from drowning a morally praiseworthy act? Do motives play any role in whether an act is morally praiseworthy?
THEORIES OF ETHICS PART 2 OF CHAPTER 12 (ETHICS).
An introduction to Ethics. Important Vocabulary/Concepts Philosophy Ethics Motive Act Consequence Culpable Consequentialism Utilitarianism The Principle.
Consequentialism Is it OK to inflict pain on someone else? Is it OK to inflict pain on someone else? What if it is a small amount of pain to prevent a.
Categorical and Practical Imperative
Immanuel Kant Duty Ethics The moral worth of an action depends on motive (do the right thing for the right reason)
Kantian Ethics Introduction.
Objectives: SWBAT  Identify Immanuel Kant  Analyze Kantian Rationality  Identify and discuss the Categorical Imperative.
Ethical Theories Unit 9 Ethical Awareness. What Are Ethical Theories? - Explain what makes an action right or wrong - Have an overview of major ethical.
MORALITY AND ETHICS. Where does morality come from?
EECS 690 Critiques of Deontology 31 January 2010.
Truthtelling and the “Liar’s Paradox” Epimenides the Cretan once stated: “All Cretans are liars!” (Was he telling the truth?) Mark Twain: “None of us could.
Traditional Ethical Theories. Reminder Optional Tutorial Monday, February 25, 1-1:50 Room M122.
Aristotle Human beings have a function
© Michael Lacewing Abortion and persons Michael Lacewing
From Last Time The good will is the only good thing in an ‘unqualified way” Acting from duty vs. acting in accord with duty Categorical vs. hypothetical.
© Michael Lacewing Kant’s Categorical Imperative Michael Lacewing
AIT, Comp. Sci. & Info. Mgmt AT02.98 Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues in Computing September Term, Objectives of these slides: l to describe an.
Ethics Overview: Deontological and Teleological ( Consequentalist) Systems.
Objections to Kant’s ethics Michael Lacewing
Utilitarianism Utilitarians focus on the consequences of actions.
Basic Framework of Normative Ethics. Normative Ethics ‘Normative’ means something that ‘guides’ or ‘controls’ ‘Normative’ means something that ‘guides’
Utilitarianism.
Utilitarianism: objections Michael Lacewing
Immanuel Kant (1724 – 1804) Influenced Secular Moral Thought. Raised in a Protestant Household. No formal Church Structure. Morality ground in reason,
KANTIAN ETHICS Immanuel Kant ( ).
Michael Lacewing Ethical naturalism Michael Lacewing
Michael Lacewing Rule utilitarianism Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Theory of Formalism.
Michael Lacewing Stealing Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Kant’s Categorical Imperative
Kant: the good will, duty and the Categorical Imperative
Kant’s Categorical Imperative
What is a crime? Write a brief definition.
Happiness, pleasure and preferences
Act utilitarianism, partiality and integrity
Euthanasia and applying ethical theories
Higher RMPS Lesson 4 Kantian ethics.
Kantian Ethics.
The rights and wrongs about morals
Presentation transcript:

Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk Deception and lies Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk

Utilitarianism Simple act utilitarianism: if telling a lie creates more happiness than telling the truth (or keeping silent), then telling a lie is morally right Mill: wider consequences Being truthful is of great benefit, and society, civilization and virtue only works on the assumption of truthfulness Hence weakening our own truthfulness or another’s trust is very serious Therefore, lying for convenience is wrong

Utilitarianism Mill: Lying can be permissible, e.g. when it is the only way to withhold information from someone who intends harm Rule utilitarianism: ‘never lie’ will not maximize happiness But it is hard to formalize the best rule

Kant Lying violates the Categorical Imperative: Deceiving another requires that they believe us, which requires that deceiving is not universal Kant argues that lying is always wrong The axe murderer But one’s maxim might be more specific, and so pass the Categorical Imperative, e.g. ‘lie to save a life’ But could we still deceive the axe murderer?

Kant If we lie, we are responsible for the consequences of our lie But aren’t we equally responsible for the consequences of doing our duty? Lying violates the formula of humanity The deceived person can’t freely choose whether to adopt our end Kant seems to allow that lying is a ‘weapon of defence’ against someone who intends harm

Aristotle ‘falsehood is in itself mean and culpable, and truth noble and worthy of praise’ Does this imply that lying has no mean, it is already a vice? Alternatively, truth is a final end – but that doesn’t mean that we should always pursue it (cp. Pleasure)

Aristotle Aristotle mainly discusses boastfulness – lying about oneself This is ‘futile rather than bad’ It can be done for better or worse motives (e.g. to gain reputation vs. gain money) This indicates that lying is never virtuous But if there are few rules in ethics, it is unlikely that lying is always wrong If we lie, we must do so at the right time, with the right motive, about the right truths, and in the right way