HIV Partner Notification in the U.S.: A National Survey of Program Coverage and Outcomes Matthew Golden MD, MPH Assistant Professor of Medicine, UW Medical.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beyond the Pouch: DIS in the 21 st Century Dawn Broussard, MPH Sr. Public Health Advisor Chicago Department of Public Health STD/HIV Prevention and Care.
Advertisements

National Online HIV/STI Partner Notification Service Presented by Dónal Heath – Project Manager, GMFA.
National STD Prevention Conference Philadelphia, PA March 8, 2004 What Do Physicians Know and Want to Learn about STD/HIV Partner Notification?
Factors Associated with Potential Exposure to and Transmission of HIV in a Probability Sample of Men Who Have Sex with Men Devon D. Brewer Matthew R. Golden.
Risk Factors for Early Syphilis Among Men Who Have Sex With Men Seen in an STD Clinic – San Francisco, STD Prevention Conference: March 10, 2004.
Impact of Age and Race on New HIV Infections among Men who have Sex with Men in Los Angeles County Shoshanna Nakelsky, MPH Division of HIV and.
Version 11Page 1 of 6 Improving Identification of Patients Infected with HIV Using Rapid Testing in the Emergency Department: A Systems-Based Approach.
PMTCT FAILURE: THE ROLE OF MATERNAL AND FACILITY –RELATED FACTORS ICASA Presentation 8 th to 12 th Dec 2013 Onono Maricianah 1, Elizabeth A. Bukusi 1,
STD Screening in HIV Clinics: Value and Implications Thomas Farley, MD MPH Tulane University Deborah Cohen, MD MPH RAND Corporation.
Legal Status of Patient Delivered Partner Therapy (PDPT) in the U.S.: a National Survey of State Pharmacy Boards and Boards of Medical Examiners Uzoeshi.
Starting Internet Partner Services: The New York State Experience – Kelly Firenze – NYS DOH Bureau of STD Control – Judi Bulmer – NYS DOH Bureau of STD.
Recent Trends in Gonorrhea in the United States Lori M. Newman, MD Division of STD Prevention CDC Jacksonville, FL May 9, 2006.
Patient-Delivered Partner Therapy for STD: Evidence and Prospects for Implementation National STD Conference 2004 Matthew Hogben, CDC Matthew R Golden,
Enhancing HIV/AIDS Surveillance in California California Department of Public Health Office of AIDS Guide for Health Care Providers.
1 Syphilis Among Men Who Have Sex with Men: Limitations of Traditional Case and Partner Services, San Diego, CA, Robert A.Gunn, MD, MPH Azi.
Wisconsin Department of Health Services
Using surveillance data to initiate public health outreach to persons out of care and assist with re-engagement with care and partner services Chi-Chi.
Concurrent STD Morbidity in Sexual Contacts to Persons with STD’s: Implications for Patient-Delivered Partner Therapy (PDPT) Joanne Stekler, Laura Bachmann,
Routine HIV Screening in Health Care Settings David Spach, MD Clinical Director Northwest AIDS Education and Training Center Professor of Medicine, Division.
Bernard M. Branson, M.D. Associate Director for Laboratory Diagnostics Divisions of HIV/AIDS Prevention National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis,
STOP HIV/AIDS Rolando Barrios, MD, FRCPC Assistant Director BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS Assistant Medical Director HIV/AIDS Program Providence.
Darren A. DeWalt, MD, MPH Division of General Internal Medicine Maihan B. Vu, Dr.PH, MPH Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention University.
Unit 1: Overview of HIV/AIDS Case Reporting #6-0-1.
San Francisco Department of Public Health HIV Partner Services Update 2011 San Francisco STD Prevention and Control Services May 2011.
The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease.
Racial Disparities in Antiretroviral Therapy Use and Viral Suppression among Sexually Active HIV-infected Men who have Sex with Men— United States, Medical.
STD Control Branch Working With HIV Care Providers: The California/San Diego Experience Jessica Frasure-Williams, MPH Syphilis Elimination Coordinator,
THE BODY PRO The HIV Resource for Health Care Professionals Copyright © 2009 The HealthCentral Network, Inc. All rights reserved. This activity is jointly.
ABSTRACT Introduction: HIV infection is growing relatively fast among seniors. Among the clinical implications are that older patients have less ability.
Using HIV Surveillance to Achieve High Impact Prevention Irene Hall, PhD, FACE AIDS 2012 High-Impact Prevention: Reducing the HIV Epidemic in the United.
John W. Hogan, M.D Howard University College of Medicine.
Gonorrhea Increases In Washington State: Gonorrhea Increases In Washington State: Analyses for intervention planning May 2011 Mark R. Stenger Infectious.
Routine HIV Screening in Health Care Settings David Spach, MD Clinical Director Northwest AIDS Education and Training Center Professor of Medicine, Division.
SSuN: MSM prevalence monitoring and HIV Testing in STD Clinics Kristen Mahle & Lori Newman SSuN Call #3 Oct 30, 2008.
Confidentiality and Laws on HIV/AIDS Fresno County Department of Public Health Norma Sanchez CDS II County of Fresno.
Access to Primary and Preventive Care Services Among Immigrant Women in the District of Columbia Justice Armattoe, MHA, MPH Justice Armattoe, MHA, MPH.
Gonorrhea Morbidity, Missouri, 2008 In 2008, there were 8,014 reported gonorrhea cases. Of these, 57% were in females, 65% were among Black, non-Hispanic.
Routine Opt-Out HIV Testing Texas STD Clinics James H. Lee, Senior Public Health Advisor HIV/STD Program Texas Department of State Health Services.
VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION Future of HIV in VA Office of Public Health Department of Veterans Affairs Maggie Czarnogorski, MD Deputy Director, HIV,
Effectiveness of a Highly Mobile, Incidence-Based, Community Outreach Screening Program Chris Serio-Chapman, BS STD/HIV Outreach Coordinator Baltimore.
Introduction to OraQuick Rapid HIV Testing William F. Ryan Community Health Center School Based Health Program.
Evaluating the Use of HIV Surveillance Data for Initiating Partner Services in Houston, Texas, US 2012 International AIDS Conference Washington, D.C. Shirley.
The California Gonorrhea Surveillance System California Department of Public Health STD Control Branch Contact info: Rain Mocello, MPH
Barriers to Providing Health Services for HIV/AIDS, Hepatitis C Virus Infection, and Sexually Transmitted Infections in Substance Abuse Treatment Programs.
HIV and STI Department, Health Protection Agency - Colindale HIV and AIDS Reporting System The threshold for an ART secondary prevention effect on HIV.
Streamlined HIV Screening in a Municipal STI Clinic Kees Rietmeijer, MD, PhD Denver Public Health Department 2006 National STD Prevention Conference Jacksonville,
Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2013 Division of STD Prevention.
HIV Testing in Acute Care Settings Rich Rothman, MD, PhD, FACEP CDC, DHHS, OraSure Technologies, Abbott  Historical.
Expedited Partner Therapy The Denver Experience Cornelis A. Rietmeijer, MD, PhD Denver Public Health Department.
National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention Division of Sexually Transmitted Disease Prevention.
Internet Partner Notification: Outcomes from a Community- Based DIS Program Beau Gratzer 1,2, Daniel Pohl 1, Laurie Anderson 3,4 1 Howard Brown Health.
If you build it, will they come? The APICHA HIV Primary Care Clinic: From inception to strategic expansion Victor K. Inada, MD—Medical Director, APICHA.
REPORTED SYPHILIS CASES WITH AND WITHOUT HIV CO-INFECTION*, WISCONSIN 2015 Created by the State of Wisconsin STD Control Section *All syphilis cases are.
CONCLUSIONS New Jersey’s Emergency Department HIV testing sites report higher seroprevalence than non-ED testing sites. Since University Hospital began.
Demographic and Behavioral Differences between Latino and non-Latino Patients Attending Baltimore City STD Clinics, Renee M. Gindi 1, Kathleen.
#IAS2017 Increasing HIV test uptake & case finding through assisted HIV partner notification 25 July, 2017 Shona Dalal Department of.
State Office of AIDS Update
Strategies for Linkage to and Engagement in Care
Psychosocial and behavioral predictors of partner notification for STD and HIV exposure among MSM Matthew J. Mimiaga, ScD, MPH, Sari L. Reisner, MA,
GYT Awareness and STD Testing Behaviors Among Youth and Young Adults
Amanda D. Castel, MD, MPH Assistant Research Professor
Believed discrimination occurred because of their:
Testing and linking different key population groups in Ukraine
Poster WP41; Contact: David A. Katz,
Poster THP 55; Contact: David Katz,
Conclusions/Implications
Review of Recommendations for Partner Services
MSM Attending STD Clinics HIV Testing More Frequently: Implications for HIV Prevention and Surveillance D Helms1, H Weinstock1, K Mahle1, A Shahkolahi1,2,
M. Jacques Nsuami, MD, MPH Stephanie N. Taylor, MD
Division of STD Prevention Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Presentation transcript:

HIV Partner Notification in the U.S.: A National Survey of Program Coverage and Outcomes Matthew Golden MD, MPH Assistant Professor of Medicine, UW Medical Director, PHSKC STD Clinic

Background New CDC HIV prevention initiatives emphasize HIV partner notification, or PCRS. Current data on HIV PCRS are limited & mostly anecdotal Several health departments reported success in identifying new cases of HIV in the 1980s & early 1990s A RCT of 74 people found that provider referral was more successful than patient referral Recent, single center studies reported conflicting results San Francisco – virtually no one accepted PCRS North Carolina – 11 index patients interviewed to identify one new case HIV No national data on PN outcomes

Methods Survey of health departments in cities reporting >200 cases AIDS in 2001 Directed to HIV program directors If local health department indicated states managed PCRS, survey was forwarded to the state Survey – 2 page instrument Organization of PCRS Aggregate PCRS outcomes – number index patients interviewed, number requesting assistance, disposition of partners

Methods Primary outcomes Proportion of persons with HIV/AIDS interviewed Number needed to interview to identify one new case of HIV NNTI= # interviewed / # new HIV cases identified Brought to treatment index=1/NNTI

Outcomes: Participation 39 jurisdictions >200 AIDS cases jurisdictions contacted 11 no data 28 (72%) provided data Participating jurisdictions reported 24,006 cases of AIDS in % AIDS cases nationally 69% AIDS cases in metropolitan areas >500,000

Participating Jurisdictions Person completing survey Surveillance supervisor DIS supervisor HIV/AIDS pgrm director Region Northeast Midwest South West Number AIDS cases < >1000 N (%) 13 (48) 5 (18) 9 (33) 5 (18) 3 (11) 13 (48) 6 (22) 10 (44) 8 (35) 5 (22)

Outcomes: Program Coverage* Aggregate Coverage Median Range 32% 55% 2-100% * Restricted to 22 areas reporting numbers of cases of HIV. Among 20,353 HIV cases reported

Program Coverage of PCRS Percentage of jurisdictions providing routine PCRS services in public & private counseling & testing sites Percentage of jurisdictions that restrict routine PCRS to public health testing sites by number of AIDS cases in area P=.04 P=.0001 _

Percentage of persons with HIV accepting assistance to notify at least one partner* Aggregate Median Range 41% 57% * Among 19 jurisdictions providing information

Association of proportion of MSM among AIDS cases & proportion of persons with HIV accepting assistance notifying at least one partner % accepting PCRS assistance Proportion AIDS cases in MSM r=-.44 p=.04

HIV PCRS Outcomes Among 6,394 Partners of Persons with HIV in 23 U.S. Public Health Jurisdictions Percent Outcome defined 61% partners

Outcomes: NNTI* Aggregate Median Range * Among 8,349 index cases interviewed in 26 jurisdictions

Association of percentage MSM among AIDS cases & number of persons needs to interview to find a new case of HIV NNI to find a new case of HIV Percent AIDS cases in MSM r=.46 p=.02

Conclusions HIV PCRS currently affects a minority of persons diagnosed with HIV in the U.S. – Lowest coverage in areas with the most cases Process outcomes suggest PCRS is often successful in identifying new cases –Uncertain how many of these persons would have been referred in the absence of a PCRS program –Success is highly variable –Aggregate data suggest efforts are less successful among MSM

Implications Reasonable case finding yields suggest that HIV PCRS is effective & should be expanded Nationally, program coverage is low & areas with the largest number of cases have the greatest need to expand –New, probably federal, resources will be needed PCRS may be less effective in MSM –Data from North Carolina suggests failure is not universal –Future studies should look at individual level data and PCRS success –New models of PCRS may be needed for MSM The inability of large numbers of health departments to provide basic statistics on their PCRS program coverage & outcomes suggests PCRS supervision and data management need improvement

University of Washington & PHSKC H. Hunter Handsfield Contributors CDC Matthew Hogben Colorado Springs John Potterat