Section 7: Conducting Surveys along the Texas Coast.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Deep Creek Lake Sediment Summary DCL Policy Review Board Meeting July 23, 2012 Deep Creek Lake Phase II Sediment Study: Progress Report.
Advertisements

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Water budget and integrated flow model of Walker Lake, Nevada In cooperation with Bureau of Reclamation.
Lonnie G. Harper & Associates, Inc. Lonnie G. Harper, PE & PLS (LGH) David Minton, PE (LGH) Dr. Joseph Suhayda (Coastal Oceanographic Consultant) Dr. Roy.
Airborne LiDAR Compliance and Quality Assurance Tool (ComQAT)
The Effects of Starting Wave Conditions on Coastal Flood Hazards: A Sensitivity Analysis for the Texas Coast Katrina Myers, PE, CFM Guillermo Simón, PE,
2-3 November 2009NASA Sea Level Workshop1 The Terrestrial Reference Frame and its Impact on Sea Level Change Studies GPS VLBI John Ries Center for Space.
Coastal Zone Module Tiffany L. Hepner Bureau of Economic Geology John A. and Katherine Jackson School of Geosciences The University of Texas at Austin.
Matthew Wight Pennsylvania State University - Master of Geographic Information Systems - GEOG 596A – Fall 2014 Enhancing Coastal Conservation Planning.
2015 Height Modernization Partner Meeting April 14, 2015.
Comparison of LIDAR Derived Data to Traditional Photogrammetric Mapping David Veneziano Dr. Reginald Souleyrette Dr. Shauna Hallmark GIS-T 2002 August.
Section 10: Lidar Point Classification. Outline QExample from One Commercial Data Classification Software Package QUniversity of Texas at Austin Center.
= 9 = 8 = 12 = 19 = 2 = 3 = 17 = 5 = 11 = 5.
NRCS Global Positioning Systems (GPS) & Geographic Information Systems (GIS) RESOURCE INVENTORY  Soil Survey  National Resources Inventory (NRI)  Wetlands.
GPS Survey Equipment GPS Trimble R6 or R8 Legs+Bipod Controller* Base Station or VRS Competencies #1-5.
Tide coordinated shoreline mapping using THEOS /ALOS imagery Apisit Kongprom Geo-Informatics Scientist Geo-Informatics and Space Technology Development.
FIELDWORK AT TEIGNMOUTH, UK Overview of the characteristics of the May 2003 Campaign (Phase II 12/05/03 – 30/05/03)
Planning for airborne LIDAR survey Dr.Lamyaa Gamal El-deen.
W Y O M I N G 2014 School Health Profiles Report Weighted Lead Health Education Teacher Survey Results.
Hurricane Mitch – October 1998
A PRESENTATION ON SEA-LEVEL RISE AND COASTAL SUBMERGENCE ALONG THE SOUTH –EAST COAST OF NIGERIA BY SAVIOUR P. UDO-AKUAIBIT INSTITUTE OF NATURAL RESOURCES,
Vukovar, December , 2012 EAEMDR Status Report Bulgaria.
ARSF Data Processing Consequences of the Airborne Processing Library Mark Warren Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, UK RSPSoc 2012 – Greenwich, London.
A study of 2 sites along the Hat Pran Khiri stretch of coastline whereby coastal management has taken place and one whereby no management has been used.
The Texas Shoreline Change Project: The Texas Shoreline Change Project: Combining Lidar, Historical Photography, and Ground Surveys to Measure Shoreline.
SHADED-RELIEFS MATCHING AS AN EFFICIENT TECHNIQUE FOR 3D GEO-REFERENCING OF HISTORICAL DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELS Research Project RNM 3575: Multisource.
Comparison of Inertial Profiler Measurements with Leveling and 3D Laser Scanning Abby Chin and Michael J. Olsen Oregon State University Road Profile Users.
Use of High-Rate CORS for Airborne Positioning Theresa M. Damiani NOAA- National Geodetic Survey, Geosciences Research Division CGSIC 2013, Nashville 1b.
A bestiary of lidar errors The following images illustrate some of the defects that may be found in lidar-derived bare-earth models. The images also illustrate.
Tiffany L. Caudle, Thomas A. Tremblay, Jeffrey G. Paine, John R. Andrews, Kutalmis Saylam, and Aaron Averett Bureau of Economic Geology Jackson School.
Sediment Transport Through Kelp, Rocks, and Currents Karsten Turrey, North Olympic Peninsula Skills Center Natural Resources Introduction: The physical.
Powers and roots. Square each number a) 7 b) 12 c) 20 d) 9 e) 40 a) 49 b) 144 c) 400 d) 81 e) 1600.
More on Wind Shear Statistics: Intercomparison of Measurements from Airborne DWL and Ground-based Sensors S. Greco and G.D. Emmitt Simpson Weather Associates.
Estimating Groundwater Recharge in Porous Media Aquifers in Texas Bridget Scanlon Kelley Keese Robert Reedy Bureau of Economic Geology Jackson School of.
Gravity Lidar Study for 2006: A First Look D.R. Roman, V.A. Childers, D.L. Rabine, S.A. Martinka, Y.M. Wang, J.M. Brozena, S.B. Luthcke, and J.B. Blair.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Steve Helterbrand, USGS Bryan Christensen, SAIC at USGS EROS Digital Aerial Data Provider Certification.
SIO Waves & Beaches Core Observations & Predictions of  Nearshore waves  Surfzone currents  Beach change Regional Coastal Ocean Observing Systems Integrated.
Section 6: Conducting the Lidar Survey. Outline QGPS base station operation QAircraft operations mapping survey area calibration QPreliminary processing.
Mapping Greenland Using NASA’s Full- Waveform, Medium/High-Altitude, LVIS Lidar System: Potential 2009 Coverage and Expected Performance Michelle Hofton.
October 02, st IHOP_2002 Water Vapor Intercomparison Workshop Status of intercomparisons and the next steps  Characterize moisture measuring techniques.
Surveying Using data recorders coupled with total stations Advantages
Section 9: Extracting a Shoreline from Lidar Data.
Central Valley Flood Protection Board Meeting – Agenda Item No. 8A Informational Briefing Presented By Board Staff and CH2MHill Consultants Model Funded.
How to detect the change of model for fitting. 2 dimensional polynomial 3 dimensional polynomial Prepare for simple model (for example, 2D polynomial.
UC-12 L1 Flight Track over Ground Sites.
Bureau of Economic Geology The University of Texas at Austin.
Bureau of Economic Geology John A. and Katherine G. Jackson School of Geosciences The University of Texas at Austin.
GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons M. Kavaya & G. Koch NASA/LaRC D. Emmitt & S. Wood SWA Lidar Working Group Meeting Sedona, AZ January 2004.
Building vs. Weathering and Erosion of Coastal Environments.
Use a survey design Yes11 No3 Skipped4 Random designs for choosing transects –Random drift, towed gear, ROV Stratified to spread out sampling Habitat basis.
Swans of the Sequim-Dungeness Valley Results of surveys by Olympic Peninsula Audubon Society Volunteers, 2011 to 2015.
I N D I A N A 2014 School Health Profiles Report Weighted Lead Health Education Teacher Survey Results.
1 Research on laser tracker measurement accuracy and data processing Liang Jing IHEP,CHINA
Indicate the length up to one estimated value…. A. B. C.
Integrated spatial data LIDAR Mapping for Coastal Monitoring Dr Alison Matthews Geomatics Manager Environment Agency Geomatics Group.
Regression Models for Predictions of Water Levels in the Shallow Waters of the Gulf of Mexico Kelly Torres Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi.
Southeast strategic regional coastal monitoring programme Phase 2 Current phase ends in 2007Current phase ends in 2007 Need to maintain.
Waves How are waves connected to our big idea of weathering, erosion, and deposition?
Galveston Bay 100 km Tide range = 0.65 m Wave ht. = 1.1 m.
UAV Vision Landing Motivation Data Gathered Research Plan Background
Section 11: Select Application
CHANGES IN BARRIER ISLAND ENVIRONMENTS DURING SEA-LEVEL RISE
مراجعة عامة.
Water level observations from Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) for improving probabilistic estimations of interaction between rivers and groundwater Filippo.
Solving Radical Equations
GALVESTON ISLAND GEOHAZARDS MAP
Section 3.2 The Graph of a Function
ADCP Referenced Geostrophic Velocities and Transport Part II: Along-Shore LT Eric Macdonald Line 85.
Roots and Stem Station.
Types of Errors And Error Analysis.
R. Gutierrez, J. Gibeaut, R. Smyth, T. Hepner, J. Andrews, J. Bellian
Presentation transcript:

Section 7: Conducting Surveys along the Texas Coast

Coastal GPS Network

Following the Shoreline Using Video Camera

Shoreline Flight Lines

Water Level During Survey

Matagorda Peninsula Cars and People on the Beach

Flight Lines from 5 Survey Flights

Calibration Target Ground Survey Same GPS base station used for ground and lidar surveys

Lidar Point Accuracy Comparison with points measured by ground survey on paved runway Flight (Julian Day in 2002) Bias, mRMSE **, m 80, first flight , second flight , first flight , second flight , third flight , transects Average ** Root Mean Square Error

Ground Surveys Needed to aid interpretation

Beach Profile

Vegetation measured by lidar