Live oil – surfactant phase behavior Aparna Sagi, Maura Puerto, Clarence Miller, George Hirasaki April 23, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 02 Microemulsions for Cleaning Applications 1Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Advertisements

Alkali/Crude Oil Phase Behavior, IFT, and Soap Partitioning Lei Ding Jose Lopez Salinas Maura Puerto Clarence Miller George Hirasaki Presentation.
Surfactant-Enhanced Spontaneous Imbibition in Oil-Wet, Heavy Oil Bearing Carbonate Formations Amir Amini Maura Puerto Clarence Miller George Hirasaki April.
Synthesis and Application of High Molecular Weight Surfactants Surfactants Bringing Chemical IOR TO THE NEXT GENERATION 104 th AOCS Annual Meeting & Expo.
Surfactant/Polymer Flood of Midland Farms Dolomite Core D6
CPGE Surfactant-Alkali Phase Behavior Adam Jackson Larry Britton Gary Pope David Levitt Varadarajan Dwarakanath Taimur Malik The University of Texas at.
EFFECTIVE & ECONOMIC SURFACTANTS FOR IOR Oil Chem Technologies, Inc. Sugar Land, TX EFFECTIVE & ECONOMIC SURFACTANTS FOR IOR Oil Chem Technologies, Inc.
Properties of Solutions
Well Control Gas Solubility.
Evaluation of Betaine as Foam Booster Leyu Cui Presentation in Consortium Meeting, April 26 th 2011.
11 18 th Annual Consortium Meeting April 21, 2014 MAURA PUERTO JOSE LOPEZ SALINAS CLARENCE MILLER GEORGE HIRASAKI Most of the Work Done by HAO HELEN ZENG.
Topic: EQUILIBRIUM Do Now:. VIDEO CLIP Equilibrium = Balance Not necessarily equal 1 man and 1 man equal but not balanced.
July 29, Bench Top Tests for Surfactant Selection Ayantayo Ajani The University of Tulsa.
Petroleum & Natural Gas Eng. Dept.
Cellular Respiration Sita M Damaraju (Fellow). 6 H 12 O 6 + 6O 2 → 6CO 2 + 6H 2 O + ATP Glucose + Oxygen → Carbon dioxide + Water + Energy (ATP)
Aim : How can equilibrium be shifted? Do Now: 1.Take out a calculator and reference tables. 2.What can change the equilibrium of a phase change?
Introducing the Geochemical Cycles (it is necessary to understand & use these if you want to design a Mars Colony or any ecosystem…) Water cycle Carbon.
Chemical reactions: an introduction
Consortium on Process in porous Media Foam experiments at high temperature And high salinity José López Maura Puerto Clarence Miller George Hirasaki 03/14/2011.
Bottlebrush Polymer & Surfactant Blends for Low IFT
Evaluation of an ASP Prospect Lei Ding José López Salinas Maura Puerto Clarence A. Miller George J. Hirasaki 17 th Annual Meeting Consortium for Processes.
Rheology of Viscoelastic surfactants and foam in homogeneous porous media Aarthi Muthuswamy, Clarence Miller, Rafael Verduzco and George Hirasaki Chemical.
13.48 Calculate the number of moles of solute present in each of the following aqueous solutions: 185 mL of 1.50 M HNO mg that is 1.25 m NaCl.
Properties of Oilfield Waters Lectures # 30 – 31 PETE 310.
Tor Austad University of Stavanger, Norway
Alkali-Surfactant-Polymer Process
NACE Corpus Christi, TX – Nace Section Meeting May 20, 2014
SPE Laboratory Studies for Surfactant Flood in Low-Temperature, Low-Salinity Fractured Carbonate Reservoir Aparna Raju Sagi, Maura Puerto, Yu.
Factors Affecting Solubility. Molecular Structure “Like dissolves like” Polar substances dissolve well in polar solvents Non-polar substances dissolve.
Solutions The Solution Process.
Chapter 12 Preview Objectives
Low salinity water flooding Experimental experience and challenges
Concentration II Factors Affecting It Chapter 12 Unit 10.
Chemistry: An Introduction to General, Organic, and Biological Chemistry, Eleventh Edition Copyright © 2012 by Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 10 Introduction.
Correlation between phase behavior and IFT Leslie Zhang.
Parts per Million Concentration. Parts per Million (ppm) is the ratio of the number of grams of solute for every one million grams of solution. parts.
EOR in Fractured Carbonate Reservoirs – low salinity low temperature conditions By Aparna Raju Sagi, Maura C. Puerto, Clarence A. Miller, George J. Hirasaki.
CHEM 1210 FINAL REVIEW JEOPARDY. NomenclatureDimensional Analysis Predicting Products Periodic Trends Miscellaneous
Monday January 7, 2013 (Introduction to Chemical Reactions and Equations)
Ch. 8 - Solids, Liquids, & Gases III. Behavior of Gases (p )  Pressure  Boyle’s Law  Charles’ Law MATTER.
8.1 The Importance of Water pp. 370 – 375. SubstanceMolecular Mass (u) Melting Point (°C) State at Room Temperature Lewis Structure Reason for Compound’s.
Saturated solution – no more solute will dissolve solubility product constant – equilibrium constant for ionic compounds that are only slightly soluble.
Karst Chemistry II. Conductivity – Specific Conductance Conductance – the electrical conductivity of aqueous solution, and is directly related to the.
Sodium Ions for Optimal Salinity of ASP Lei Ding Maura C. Puerto Clarence A. Miller George J. Hirasaki Presentation for the Rice University.
SOLUTIONS Chapter 13 and 14.
Properties of Ionic and Covalent Compounds Section 4.3 Pages
Effect of Surfactant Synergism on Foam Rheology
Adsorption and Surfactant Transport in Porous Media Shunhua Liu George J. Hirasaki Clarence A. Miller
Solutions Solutions * ‘homogeneous mixtures’
1 Properties of Solutions Chapter Learning Objectives? What solubility is and how it is determined Recognize various levels of saturation and.
Chemistry Notes 11/17 Introduction to Chemical Equations.
Chapter 12 Preview Objectives
CO 2 Mobility Control in Carbonate Cores Consortium Meeting Apr. 29 th 2013 Presented by Leyu Cui Kun Ma, Ramesh Pudasaini, Maura Puerto and George Hirasaki.
 Predict the products and write a balanced equation for the following: BaCl 2 + MgSO 4 
Agenda Demonstration  Water Vapor in a Can Demonstration Discussion Introduction to Gasses Ideal Gas Laws.
Chapter 18 Notes, part III Colligative Properties.
Non-classical phase behavior and partitioning of Anionic surfactant
Surfactant System Selection to Generate foam for EOR Application AmirHosein Valiollahzadeh Maura Puerto Jose Lopez Astron Liu Lisa Biswal George Hirasaki.
SURFACTANT SYSTEMS FOR EOR IN HIGH-TEMPERATURE HIGH-SALINITY ENVIRONMENTS Maura Puerto, George J. Hirasaki, Clarence A. Miller, Rice University Julian.
Green Oil Recovery (GRO) UAE Innovation on Oil Recovery
EFFECTIVE & ECONOMIC SURFACTANTS FOR IOR Oil Chem Technologies, Inc
Ultra-Low IFT Using Surfactants
Oil and water properties
Reactive transport of CO2 in a brine cavity
SPE IMPROVED ASP PROCESS USING ORGANIC ALKALI
Modelling Chemical Reactions
Quiz 2 09/04/08.
EVENT 1: Formation of the UNIVERSE
Ocean Water Chapter 21.
Presentation transcript:

Live oil – surfactant phase behavior Aparna Sagi, Maura Puerto, Clarence Miller, George Hirasaki April 23, 2012

Introduction Surfactants  ultra low IFT  EOR Optimal salinity (ultra-low IFT) for a surfactant system dependent on –Oil composition: dead vs live oil –Temperature, pressure, WOR, etc Objective: Determine and compare surfactant optimal salinity for dead and live crude oil (CO 2, CH 4,C 2 H 6 ) 2

System description Temperature: 30ºC Surfactant: S13D/S2 (90/10 wt.) 1wt% (aq.) –S13D: iC PO sulfate –S2: C internal olefin sulfonate Brine: 11,000ppm (incl. Ca 2+, Mg 2+ ) – TB2 Crude oil: 28º API (dead) with –No dissolved gas (dead oil) 600psi 50psi, 95psi –Carbon 60psi, 600psi 3

Experimental procedure – dead oil Optimal salinity Winsor Type - I Winsor Type - II Varying salinity Winsor Type - III micro Pipette (bottom sealed) Brine + surfactant Oil Initial interface Seal open end 24 hr 4

Experimental procedure – live oil P Gas Make live oil P Gas Oil Purge cell of airInject surf. solution P Surf. soln. Inc. temp. to 30°C P Hand mix sampleObserve phases P 5

Results – dead oil 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 120% Salinity (% TB2) Type I Type II Type I OIL MICRO EMULSION WATER MACRO EMULSION V o /V s ~ 6 Optimal Initial w/o interface 6

Results – 600psi 50% 70% 90% 110% Salinity (% TB2) Type I Type II OIL MICRO EMULSION WATER MACRO EMULSION Optimal Initial w/o interface 7

Results – 50psi 50% 60% 70% 80% Salinity (% TB2) Type I Type II OIL/ OIL+MACRO MICRO EMULSION WATER MACRO V o /V s ~ 13 Optimal Initial w/o interface 8

Results – 95psi 9 30% 40% 50% 60% Salinity (% TB2) Type I ??Type II OIL MICRO EMULSION WATER MACRO Optimal Initial w/o interface

Results – CO 60psi 70% 80% 90% 100% Salinity (% TB2) Type I Type II OIL MICRO EMULSION WATER MACRO Optimal Initial w/o interface 10

Results –CO 600psi 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Salinity (% TB2) Type I Type II OIL MICRO EMULSION WATER MACRO Optimal Initial w/o interface 11

Consolidated results Methane CO 2 Ethane 12

Conclusions The effect of dissolved gas (upto 600psi) on surfactant optimal salinity (C Ø ) has been demonstrated –Methane Slight decrease in optimal salinity –Carbon dioxide Decrease in the optimal salinity –Ethane Substantial decrease in optimal salinity 13

QUESTIONS 14

P 15