CO-I KNTM/K i CzS M. Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center-Institute of Oncology Medical University of Warsaw; Warsaw, POLAND Medical University of Gdansk;

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pre-operative Imatinib for metastatic, recurrent and locally advanced GISTs E. Efthimiou, S Mudan E. Efthimiou, S Mudan On behalf of the Sarcoma Group.
Advertisements

FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) vs FOLFIRI plus bev
Highligths in management of gastrointestinal cancer April 11, 2008 CONTROVERSIES IN THE CONTROVERSIES IN THE ADJUVANT THERAPY ADJUVANT THERAPY OF GASTRIC.
Pathologic Response to Preoperative Chemotherapy in Colorectal Liver Metastases: Fibrosis, not Necrosis, Predicts Outcome Ann Surg Oncol (2012) 19:2797–2804.
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors Elizabeth Shurell, M.D., M.Phil. UCLA General Surgery Resident Research Fellow, Division.
GIST Research at Fox Chase Cancer Center Margaret von Mehren, MD.
Management of colorectal cancer with liver metastasis Dr. Vivian Lee Department of Surgery, UCH.
IMPACT OF CHEMOTHERAPY IN UTERINE SARCOMA (UTS): REVIEW OF 12 CLINICAL TRIALS FROM EORTC INVOLVING ADVANCED UTS COMPARED TO OTHER SOFT TISSUE SARCOMA (STS)
Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Predictors of Outcomes in Patients with Primary Retroperitoneal Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma Undergoing Surgery Emily.
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor GIST New Therapeutic Approaches Prof. Mohamed Abdulla A. Professor of Clinical Oncology Kasr El-Aini School of Medicine.
Major sites of GIST metastases:
Whom to treat and how long to treat after resection of GIST Professor John R Zalcberg Chief Medical Officer & Director, Division of Cancer Medicine Peter.
Surgical Management of Advanced GIST Following KIT- Directed Therapy Chandrajit P. Raut, Jayesh Desai, Jeffrey A. Morgan, Suzanne George, Matthew Posner,
Neoadjuvant Imatinib, Surgery and then ? Seattle 2007 Neoadjuvant Imatinib, Surgery and then ? Department of Surgery 1 and Medical Oncology 2 Netherlands.
Management of GIST Dr Kwan Ming Wa Tuen Mun Hospital.
Surgical resection of metastatic GIST on imatinib delays recurrence and death: results of a cross- match comparison in the EORTC Intergroup study.
Joint Hospital Surgical Grand Round (25 Jan 2014) Lok Hon Ting (Prince of Wales Hospital)
Synovial sarcoma- which patients don’t need adjuvant treatment? Khan M, Rankin KS, Beckingsale TB, Todd R, Gerrand CH North of England Bone and Soft Tissue.
References 1.Salazar R, Roepman P, Capella G et al. Gene expression signature to improve prognosis prediction of stage II and III colorectal cancer. J.
Surviving GIST: Connecting the Dots Life Fest 2006 Norman Scherzer & Jerry Call.
EORTC – ISG - AGITG Prognostic factors for initial and late resistance to Imatinib in patients with advanced GIST Martine Van Glabbeke, Jaap Verweij, Paolo.
PREOPERATIVE HYPOFRACTIONED RADIOTHERAPY IN LOCALIZED EXTREMITY/TRUNK WALL SOFT TISSUE SARCOMAS EARLY STUDY RESULTS Hanna Kosela; Milena Kolodziejczyk;
Pulmonary Metastasis From Osteosarcoma Multi-factorial analysis of survival at first lung involvement Ali Aljubran, Martin Blackstein for the University.
A REVISIT TO MANAGEMENT OF GASTROINTESTINAL STROMAL TUMOUR (GIST) Joint Hospital Surgical Grand Round 17 Jan 2015 Grace Liu Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern.
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Ca Breast CY Choi UCH.
4% of all female cancers 25% of all gynecologic cancers life time risk: 1/70 ¾ advanced stage most lethal Epithelial Ovarian Cancer:
Challenging Cases in Cancer: Integration of Findings from ASCO 2007 Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Charles D. Blanke, MD, FACP Associate Professor of.
Choice of chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal. Eng C1, Rogers J2, Chang GJ3, You N3, Das P4, Rodriguez-Bigas.
Definition of oxaliplatin sensitivity in pts with advanced colorectal cancer previously treated with oxaliplatin-based therapy A. de Gramont, B. Chibaudel,
1 Phase II trial of sequential gemcitabine and carboplatin followed by paclitaxel as first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma Presented by.
SARC015: Phase II study of R1507 in wild-type GIST Margaret von Mehren, Fox Chase Cancer Center Katie Janeway, Dana Farber Cancer Institute.
Lymphadenectomy in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
Multimodality therapy for locally advanced thymomas: a cohort study of prognostic factors from a European multicentric database Dr. GIOVANNI LEUZZI Department.
Discontinuation of Imatinib in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Who Have Maintained Complete Molecular Response: Updated Results of the STIM 1 Discontinuation.
Phase II Presurgical Feasibility Study of Bevacizumab in Untreated Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Jonasch E et al. Journal of Clinical Oncology.
Insert Program or Hospital Logo Introduction Melanoma is notoriously resistant to chemotherapy. While surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy can.
Pfetin, as a Prognostic Biomarker of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Revealed by Proteomics Yoshiyuki Suehara 1 3 4, Kunihiko Seki 2, Kiyonaga Fujii 1,
RPS ZU. Mrs. Liliane D…., 72 year-old No past medical history Mai 2011 – Loss of weight (4kg in 6 months) – Asthenia Thoraco-abdomino pelvic.
*University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
The clinical role of PET scanning in GIST Seattle 2007 The clinical role of PET scanning in a consecutive series of GIST patients Department of Surgery.
Predicting toxicity for patients with advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) treated with imatinib mesylate : an EORTC/ISG/AGITG randomized trial.
11 One vs Three Years of Adjuvant Imatinib for Operable Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor A Randomized Trial Joensuu H, Eriksson M, Sundby Hall K, et al.
IMPROVED OVERALL SURVIVAL IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED SOFT-TISSUE OR BONE SARCOMAS WHO ACHIEVED A CLINICAL-BENEFIT RESPONSE WHEN TREATED WITH AP23573, A.
EARLY PROGRESSION IN PATIENTS WITH HIGH-RISK SOFT TISSUE SARCOMAS AN ANALYSIS FROM A PHASE III RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE TRIAL (EORTC 62961/ESHO) OF NEOADJUVANT.
KRAS status and efficacy in the first- line treatment of patients with mCRC treated with FOLFOX with or without cetuximab: The OPUS experience Carsten.
Cmab might have therapeutic benefit in Japanese patients with KRAS p.G13D mutant colorectal cancer. Limitations of this study are its retrospective design.
MEASURING CLINICAL EFFICACY IN PHASE II TRIALS Response: Karnofsky, WHO, RECIST Event rate: progression free/survival Time to event: progression/survival.
Cetuximab plus FOLFIRI in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: the influence of KRAS and BRAF biomarkers on outcome: updated data from the CRYSTAL.
Time to Secondary Resistance (TSR) After Interruption of Imatinib: Updated Results of the Prospective French Sarcoma Group Randomized Phase III Trial on.
Malignancy Grade and Histologic Subtype of Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma (RPS) are Predictive of Pattern of Recurrence: a Large Retrospective Study from.
Who can benefit from chemotherapy holidays after first-line therapy for advanced colorectal cancer ? N. Perez-Staub, B. Chibaudel, A. Figer, A. Cervantes,
The University of Texas - MD Anderson Cancer Center
Erlotinib Therapy in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients - Survival of Patients on Reduced Erlotinib Doses M. Pesek 1, J. Krejci 1, J. Skrickova 2, P.
What Factors Predict Outcome At Relapse After Previous Esophagectomy And Adjuvant Therapy in High-Risk Esophageal Cancer? Edward Yu 1, Patricia Tai 5,
HE-4 TRIAL Prospective phase II trial on the prognostic and predictive value of HE-4 regression during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian, Fallopian.
Surgical Approaches to GIST in the Era of Targeted Therapy Kevin G. Billingsley, M.D. Hedinger Professsor of Surgery Chief, Division of Surgical Oncology.
12 th Annual CTOS Meeting 2006 SINGLE AGENT DOXORUBICIN VS DOSE INTENSIVE COMBINATION THERAPY WITH EPIRUBICIN / IFOSFAMIDE IN PREVIOUSLY UNTREATED ADULT.
Short-term outcome of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy
Results of Definitive Radiotherapy in Anal Canal Carcinoma
ASPEN: Prolonged PFS With Sunitinib vs Everolimus in Nonclear-Cell RCC CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting* May 29 -
Metastatic/Recurrent Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (M/R-GIST): Does surgical resection improve survival?
KEYNOTE-012: Durable Efficacy With Pembrolizumab in PD-L1–Positive Gastric Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting*
Dr Monem Alshok Merjan Teaching Hospital GIT centre
Joensuu H et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract LBA1.
BRAF mutant mCRC patients – What would you recommend? FOLFIRINOX/Bev
Preoperative tyrosine kinase inhibitors risk bowel anastomotic healing of advanced primary and recurrent/ metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors Jin-Chiao.
Investigación en Sarcomas GEIS Spanish Sarcoma Research Group
Optimizing Outcomes in the Management of GIST
Surgical Approaches to GIST in the Era of Targeted Therapy
Surgical resection of metachronous liver metastases
Presentation transcript:

CO-I KNTM/K i CzS M. Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center-Institute of Oncology Medical University of Warsaw; Warsaw, POLAND Medical University of Gdansk; Gdansk, Poland The updated outcomes of metastatic and/or unresectable gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients treated surgically after the response to targeted therapy with imatinib (IM) P. Rutkowski, Z. Nowecki, P. Nyckowski, W. Dziewirski, U. Grzesiakowska, A. Nasierowska-Guttmejer, W. Michej, A. Woźniak, Z. Żurawski, M.Krawczyk, W. Ruka

CO-I KNTM/K i CzS AIM Analyze the outcomes of treatment of inoperable/metastatic GIST CD 117(+) patients, who initially responded to imatinib (IM) therapy in terms of the results of post-IM surgery.

CO-I KNTM/K i CzS MATERIAL AND METHODS 170 advanced CD117 (+) GIST patients (inoperable and/or metastatic) [from total number 228 pts we excluded 27 with primary resistance; 17 with SD – <10% tumor shrinkage and 14 with too short follow-up time)] September 2001 – June male (58%) and 72 female (42%); Median age: 56 years (range: 17-83) Imatinib therapy in the dose of mg/d At least minor response (>10% according to RECIST) Median follow-up time: 25 months (range: ) Last evaluation date: 29th September 2006 Primary tumor location: 59 - gastric (35%); small intestine – 78 (46%); large intestine – 14 (8%); others – 19 (11%). Mutational status known in 65 cases (70% c-KIT exon 11 mutations)

CO-I KNTM/K i CzS Results Group I: 41 patients (24%) - resections of residual disease as adjuvant treatment due to initially inoperable and/or metastatic GIST CD117(+) after radiological complete/partial/minor response (according to RECIST) and lack of further response to imatinib therapy [17 M, 24 F; median age 55] median duration of IM treatment before surgery - 13 months (4-32) Imatinib continued postoperatively in all cases 36 (88%) R0/R1 resections; no major complications (prolonged ileus in 3 cases) 5 PD (12%) & 1 DoD (2.4%) after 52 months from the IM start Mutational status: exon 11 Kit mutations 17/19 cases

CO-I KNTM/K i CzS Results Group II: 129 patients (76%) without resections of residual during imatinib therapy due to inoperable and/or metastatic GIST CD117(+) after complete/partial/minor response (according to RECIST) [81 M, 48 F; median age 56] 47 PD (36%) & 27 DoD (20.9%) Mutational status: exon 11 Kit mutations 28/46 cases

CO-I KNTM/K i CzS RESULTS: Overall Survival and Progression-Free Survival (from the date of start of imatinib therapy) in all patients

CO-I KNTM/K i CzS RESULTS: Overall Survival (from the date of start of imatinib therapy) in relation to surgery during IM treatment

CO-I KNTM/K i CzS Progression-Free Survival (from the date of start of imatinib therapy) in relation to surgery during IM treatment (median: group I- 49 m; group II – 39 months)

CO-I KNTM/K i CzS Progression-free survival (from date of surgery) of GIST patients operated during imatinib treatment: after CR/PR and continued imatinib therapy

CO-I KNTM/K i CzS

Viable GIST cells were not detected histologically in resection specimens in 5 patients (12%) only Immunohistochemistry positive staining for CD 117 of gastric GIST before imatinib treatment (diffuse staining) and of the specimen after partial gastrectomy after IM therapy (single cells)

CO-I KNTM/K i CzS Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for PFS Negative factor Risk ratio Wald P-value Baseline WHO performance status ≥ No surgical resection of residual disease Baseline high NE count Baseline low ALB level Low baseline HGB level Initially overtly malignant disease High risk primary tumor n.s. MI > 10/50HPF n.s. Genetic alterations vs. exon 11 KIT mutations n.s. GIST type other than spindle-cell n.s. Primary tumor size >10 cm n.s. CD34 positivity n.s. Male gender n.s. Primary location outside the stomach n.s. Age < 45 n.s. Liver metastases n.s

CO-I KNTM/K i CzS PFS according to baseline WHO performance status

CO-I KNTM/K i CzS PFS according to baseline neutrocyte count

CO-I KNTM/K i CzS Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for OS Negative factor Risk ratio Wald P-value No surgical resection of residual disease Baseline WHO performance status ≥ Baseline high NE count Baseline low ALB level Low baseline HGB level Initially overtly malignant disease High risk primary tumor n.s. MI > 10/50HPF n.s. Genetic alterations vs. exon 11 KIT mutations n.s. GIST type other than spindle-cell n.s. Primary tumor size >10 cm n.s. CD34 positivity n.s. Male gender n.s. Primary location outside the stomach n.s. Age < 45 n.s. Liver metastases n.s

CO-I KNTM/K i CzS Discussion Timing for operation? The plot of the response to imatinib therapy in time (years from the date of the first IM administration) in group of 72 patients responding to IM therapy (estimation of GEE model with gamma distribution and link function ln with empirical confidence interval) After maximal response; Before secondary resistance; Usually 6 – 18 months from imatinib start

CO-I KNTM/K i CzS Discussion Other published studies Hohenberger et al. ASCO 2003; ASCO 2006 Gronchi A et al. ASCO 2005 Antbacka et al. SSO 2005 Bauer et al. Int J Cancer 2005 Scaife et al. Am J Surg 2003 Bonvalot et al. Ann Surg Oncol Raut S.C. et al. J Clin Oncol 2006 Rutkowski et. al J Surg Oncol 2006 Conclusions: maintenance of imatinib therapy after surgery is crucial; final impact on survival and time of implementation of surgery is controversial Bias of this study? super-selection of the cases?

CO-I KNTM/K i CzS Conclusions: 1.Surgical removal of residual disease during imatinib treatment may allow for complete remission (approx. 20%) in selected GIST patients after response to therapy, probably prolonging durable remission. We are convinced that surgical downstaging of GIST patients during imatinib therapy is beneficial. The time of the implementation of surgical treatment warrants further studies. 2.For group of GIST patients responding to imatinib therapy besides lack of surgical treatment we found two additional independent negative predictive factors for PFS: baseline poor performance status and baseline high neutrocyte count.

CO-I KNTM/K i CzS All doctors participating of Polish Clinical GIST Registry and our patients; colleagues from EORTC STBSG for stimulating discussion ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

CO-I KNTM/K i CzS Cancer Center – Institute, Warsaw, Poland Thank you for your attention!