Facilities & Administrative Costs and Sponsored Programs at Chico State March 27, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FACILITIES AND ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS (F&A) Understanding Indirect Costs.
Advertisements

Indirect Costs CALS RESEARCH DIVISION April 24, 2008 Website: Meredith Luschen,
Prepared by Office of Sponsored Programs Spring 2011.
Understanding F&A Rates Caroline Beeman February 28, 2007.
The Mysteries of Indirect Costs Revealed Lee Williams Vice-President for Research Faculty Brown-Bag Seminar November 14, 2006.
DIRECT BENEFITS OF AN INDIRECT COST RATE
Research Administration 101 Beth Ridenour Office of the Comptroller Facilities & Administrative Cost Rate Proposal.
The University of Texas at Arlington Office of Research and Office of Accounting and Business Services Brown Bag Training Session Two: Indirect Costs.
MARCH 26,2013 PRE-AWARD MATTERS THAT AFFECT POST-AWARD COMPLIANCE MODULE SERIES 3, SESSION III AAPLS (APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES)
Budget 101 Overview of a typical grant budget Erin Scott, CRA.
Facilities & Administrative (F&A) Cost Recovery Report April 22, 2009 Carol Hollingsworth, Director, Grants & Contracts Financial Services & Janet Parker,
Presented by Ginger Baker Eileen Campbell. Cost Principles for Educational Institutions found in 2 CFR Part 220  The Federal Government guidelines for.
Oregon State University AN INTRODUCTION TO FACILITIES & ADMINISTRATIVE RATES November 2008.
Office of the Vice President for Research Research Trends Richard O. Buckius Vice President for Research Academic Leadership Forum March 31, 2010.
CREATING AND UNDERSTANDING BUDGETS Office of Research and Sponsored Programs Jack Gelfand, Director Maria Nakamura, Associate Director
University of Colorado Denver Facilities and Administrative (F&A) Rate Proposal Overview F&A PROPOSAL TIMELINE July 1, 2009July 1, 2010December 31, 2010.
The University of Texas at Arlington Office of Research and Office of Accounting and Business Services Brown Bag Training Session Three: The 1,2,3’s of.
Facilities and Administrative Rates- What does this really mean? Louis Guin, Manager, Bearing Point Anne Feuerborn, Manager, Arizona State University April.
Facilities & Administrative Cost Space Survey. Agenda  Discuss why a sponsored program space survey is required.  Terminology and Examples of Facilities.
Facilities & Administrative (F&A) Cost Recovery March 5, 2009.
Overview of Rate Calculation TWO COST GROUPS: DIRECT COSTS INDIRECT COSTS FACILITIES ADMINISTRATION.
Facilities & Administrative Costs (F&A) F&A Rate Process and Timeline F&A Definitions: Direct, Indirect, and Unallowable Costs FY2011 F&A Rate Proposal.
INDIRECT COSTS Aka: General Operating Funds, Administrative Overhead, F&A (Facilities and Administrative), Overhead Costs.
HOW TO WRITE A BUDGET…. The Importance of Your Budget Preparation of the budget is an important part of the proposal preparation process. Pre-Award and.
Presented by the Office of Research Development & Services and Sponsored Programs Administration.
9/25/2013. AGENDA  Introduction & General Overview  F&A Definition and Category Application  Application of F&A Cost Rates  The Distribution Basis.
1 Facilities and Administrative (Indirect) Costs at The Ohio State University Administrative Research Council April 15, 2008 Tom Ewing, Associate University.
Managing Your Grant Roberta Teliska Vice President for Sponsored Programs Operations The Research Foundation of SUNY October 6, 2008.
“Grants Boot Camp” Workshop Series January 9, 2014 Creighton University Sponsored Programs Administration 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE  Phone:
Short-Form Proposals A Review Primer
Science & Engineering  New Faculty Orientation Research at Rice Nancy Nisbett, Director Office of Sponsored Research.
© Huron Consulting Services LLC. All rights reserved. © Huron Consulting Group Inc. All rights reserved. Neither Huron Consulting Group Inc. nor any of.
U N I V E R S I T Y OF F L O R I DA Building Realistic Budgets Judy Harris, Proposal Processing Division of Sponsored Research.
What Every Departmental Administrator Needs to Know about F&A Proposals Diane Winter, University of Michigan Julie Jarvis, University of Illinois.
Sponsored Programs Services (SPS) PROPOSALS. What is the PI’s role in the proposal?  Contact the central pre-award center,
Cost Sharing on Contracts and Grants October 16, 2001.
Cost Principles provide guidance for determining eligible costs and whether those costs are direct or indirect. Outlined in detail in OMB Circular A-21.
Understanding F&A Costs Facilities and Administrative Costs 1 Revised April 2015.
10/16/2015 Roles and Responsibilities of Principal Investigators/ Program Directors/ Project Directors.
 The Facilities and Administrative Rate (F&A Rate) is the mechanism used to reimburse the University for the infrastructure support costs associated.
Current Facilities & Administrative (F&A) Distribution Faculty Senate January 19, 2011 Jim Rankin.
Understanding Facilities & Administrative (F&A) Costs.
Facilities and Administrative Costs Presentation by Grants & Contracts Accounting.
2006 Department Administrators Training Emory University School of Medicine Finances.
Kuali Financial Systems – Financial Administrator Development Series - October, 2006 Indirect Cost Facilities and Administrative (F&A) Costs.
Budgets 101 Tina Cunningham, CRA
Operating Budget Funding Sources State Appropriations - General Revenue Formula Funding, Special Items, Benefit Cost Sharing THECB Transfers TX Grant,
1 February 23, 2015 Teresa A. Costantinidis Budget and Resource Management UCSF Facilities & Administration Presentation.
What’s MTDC Mean To Me? Alexia Lewis Office of Research & Sponsored Programs September, 2006.
1 Office of Grants and Contracts Accounting (OGCA) ROOM 530 – NORTH DECATUR BUILDING MAIN TEL MAIN FAX
+ Departmental Research Administrator Training Series FS 204 Jean Cody Assistant Director, Post-Award Office of Sponsored Programs.
Office of Academic Grants and Sponsored Research Phone: Fax:
Indirect Cost Calculations: Beyond the Basics Jim Carter Huron Consulting Tuesday March 12, :45 – 3:30 PM 1.
Office of Sponsored Programs All rights reserved GTRC Budgeting, Budget Justification, & Templates Jonathon Jeffries Grants & Contracts Accounting Candice.
IUP Research Institute University Square 1179 Grant Street, Suite One Indiana, PA Telephone: (724) Fax: (724)
12/11/20071 Indirect Cost Study Facilities and Administrative (F&A) Costs Indiana University Sally Link Cost Accounting Manager Financial Management Services.
Building A Budget Jenn Garye, Office of the VP for Research
Project Budgeting.
Understanding Facilities and Administration (F&A) Costs
UIC 2008 Bringing Administrators Together Conference
Sponsored Programs at Penn
F&A Rate Practices, Concepts and Calculations
Overview of a typical grant budget
Introduction to Indirect Costs Claiming Your “Fair Share”
Faculty Grant Writing FLC (Faculty Learning Community)
Overview of a typical grant budget
University at Buffalo Facilities & Administrative Cost Space Survey
The U.S. System for Paying Facilities and Administrative Costs of Research The Basics - What are F&A Costs and How are Rates Calculated and Negotiated?
Office of Sponsored Programs
Agenda Why a sponsored program space survey is required.
Presentation transcript:

Facilities & Administrative Costs and Sponsored Programs at Chico State March 27, 2012

Sponsored Programs Supporting the Scholarship of Discovery

Sponsored Programs Supporting Professional Development

The Enterprise of Sponsored Research $650,000,000 in the CSU system in Supports research projects otherwise unpaid for by general fund Allows faculty to build professional development dossier, enrich teaching Engages students in real-world, hands-on learning Provides resources to campus

Supporting Sponsored Projects Prior to WWII, federal government only provided funding for the direct costs of University research Since the war, federal agencies recognize the benefit received from university research warrants supporting the F&A (indirect) on research costs Federal regulations prescribe the process for establishing the F & A rate for each university

Direct vs. F&A Costs  Direct costs are readily assignable to a specific project or activity.  F&A costs are incurred for common or joint objectives, e.g., shared services.

Examples of direct costs Salaries and fringe benefits Travel Operating expenses ◦ Materials and supplies ◦ Expendable equipment (under $5000) ◦ Postage/shipping ◦ Printing Equipment (over $5000) Subcontracts Student support: stipends or tuition

Examples of F & A costs F = Facilities Costs  Depreciation on buildings & equipment  Interest on debt  Repairs & maintenance  Utilities  Custodial costs  Library costs

Examples of F & A costs A= Administration  Institution-wide administration Business & Finance HR President Provost and Deans  Departmental administration Chairs  Sponsored projects administration RESP Foundation Administration

Who determines the federal F & A rate? Federal regulations prescribe calculations University and Foundation work together to prepare rate proposal to federal Department of Health/Human Services every 4 years to 5 years Based on audited financial statements and supporting documentation DHHS reviews proposal and negotiates rates

How does DHHS calculate the rate? F & A Rate = Facilities + Administrative Costs ÷ Modified Total Direct Costs (MTDC)

What is MTDC ? Total direct costs (TDC) less: - Equipment at $5000/item and over - Amount of subcontracts over $25,000 - Student support (i.e., stipends, scholarships, tuition remission) - Capital improvements - Off-campus rent/utilities

What was Chico’s proposal? Total F & A Costs = $70 million ◦ CSU, Chico = $66.2 million ◦ Research Foundation = $3.8 million Total MTDC = $127 million ◦ CSU, Chico = $104 million ◦ Research Foundation = $23 million

Chico’s Rate Calculation F & A= $70 Million = 55% MTDC $127 Million Eventually negotiated with DHHS 44% on campus 23% off campus

What are the current Chico State rates? Federal on-campus projects – 44% MTDC* Federal off-campus projects – 23% MTDC State/local government/NPOs – 30% MTDC Agency published rates – capped Not allowed by sponsor *MTDC = Modified Total Direct Costs

In general, proposals to for-profit entities should utilize a rate of 44% MTDC.

How much F&A is collected? Research Foundation – FY 09/10 ◦ Total grant & contract expenses = $27.5 M ◦ Total direct costs = $24.8 M ◦ Total F & A recovered = $2.7 M ◦ Average “recovery rate” = 10.8% ◦ Chico is in the lower half of CSU system for percentage of F & A recovery

CSU Auxiliary Organization Association Data Warehouse – Comparisons FY 09/10 CSU Campus On Campus Rate Off Campus Rate Base Direct Expenditures F & A Recovered Effective Rate San Jose43.40%26%MTDC$47,886,442$7,829, % San Luis Obispo40%22%MTDC$23,910,077$3,762, % San Diego49.50%26%MTDC$145,931,765$22,875, % San Marcos48%28%MTDC$6,895,092$1,040, % Long Beach44.50%26%MTDC$30,239,804$4,539, % Northridge45%26%MTDC$16,940,049$2,442, % Sonoma48%22.70%S & W$10,739,422$1,456, % San Francisco53.50%26%MTDC$48,955,137$6,397, % Monterey Bay44%26%MTDC$10,246,155$1,332, % Los Angeles45%26%MTDC$22,855,281$2,961, % Sacramento38%22%MTDC$47,130,403$5,488, % San Bernardino43%15%MTDC$25,153,064$2,757, % Chico38%18%MTDC$24,800,069$2,676, % Humboldt40%18%MTDC$13,979,379$1,404, % Pomona42%26%MTDC$13,520,263$1,292, % Fullerton35.10%14.80%MTDC$16,408,490$1,547, % Dominguez Hills42%19%MTDC$10,845,342$906, % Stanislaus47%21%S & W$5,905,727$444, % Fresno38.40%17.30%MTDC$27,955,776$1,990, % Chancellors Office17.10%8.40%MTDC$4,693,619$129, %

How is F & A Spent? Research Foundation General Fund Operations 25/35 Main Debt Service & O/M Incentive Awards to Units & PIs Capacity Awards to Units IRG Foundation Scholars Grants Outstanding Professor/Scholar Awards Emergency Equipment Fund President’s Discretionary Fund Reimbursement to Campus for Facilities Use* *Effective 7/1/12

The Research Foundation: Auxiliary with Fiduciary Responsibility Foundation Administration Office Human resources Risk management Property management Enterprise management Office of Research and Sponsored Programs Internal Research Grants Training & faculty professional development Pre-award support to Principal Investigators Contract review and negotiation Post-award management of grants/contracts Post-award audits & close outs Foundation’s cost of doing business ~17.9 %

C ost of Business vs. F & A FY 10/11 G & C direct expenditures = $24.8M G & C w F& A < 17.9% = $19.6M Only 21% of G & C expenditures recovered the Foundation’s cost of business Unrecovered F& 17.9% = $2.1 M

Resources Provided by Foundation 14 Years of Support to the Campus Summer Scholars $ 644,664 New Faculty Support $ 384,000 Unit Incentive $ 2,593,813 Unit Capacity Building $ 500,000 PI Incentive $ 918,574 Faculty Professional Development $ 277,209 Replace CSU Research & Creative Activity $ 61,829 Research Mentor Program $ 15,619 Infrastructure $ 75,604 Total $ 5,471,312

F&A Recovery at Chico State Opportunity = 44% Reality = 10.8% Minimum Goal = 18% campus average

What’s Next? As state funding for the campus continues to decline, funds from sponsored research projects is more important than ever. RESP will work in partnership with faculty and staff to help sponsors understand the importance of F & A recovery.

Questions? Comments? Handouts available at: