Local and/or organic: A study on consumer preferences for organic food and food from different origins C. Feldmann & U. Hamm.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Demographics and Market Segmentation: China and India
Advertisements

Satisfaction with the local grocery store mix: A consumer perspective
Mapping the WTP Distribution from Individual Level Parameter Estimates Matthew W. Winden University of Wisconsin - Whitewater WEA Conference – November.
Copyright 2005 ACNielsen Shopper Trends 1 March 2005 SHOPPER TRENDS 2004.
Rural Economy Research Centre Modelling taste heterogeneity among walkers in Ireland Edel Doherty Rural Economy Research Centre (RERC) Teagasc Department.
12. Random Parameters Logit Models. Random Parameters Model Allow model parameters as well as constants to be random Allow multiple observations with.
Consumer preferences towards biodiesel in Spain: A Choice Experiments Approach MILENA RMUŠ Master of Agriculture, Food and Environment Policy Analysis.
[Part 1] 1/15 Discrete Choice Modeling Econometric Methodology Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University 0Introduction.
Kidane Asmerom and Teh wei-Hu
Using the Choice Experiment Method to Estimate Non-Use Values of Wetlands: The Case of Cheimaditida, Greece Ekin Birol, Katia Karousakis, Phoebe Koundouri.
Food Accessibility in Wisconsin: Comparison of Self-Report, Direct Observation, and Mapping Data ResultsKey Findings Results Conclusions Background Results.
What determines student satisfaction with university subjects? A choice-based approach Twan Huybers, Jordan Louviere and Towhidul Islam Seminar, Institute.
The Theory of Consumer Choice
Evaluating Alternative Representations of the Choice Set In Models of Labour Supply Rolf Aaberge, Ugo Colombino and Tom Wennemo Workshop on Discrete Choice.
MARCON meeting Paris, 17/4/2015 Nutritional labelling and health warnings on wine: exploring regulatory options and consumers preference Annunziata A.,
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 7: Demand Estimation and Forecasting.
Understanding Factors Affecting Consumer Purchase Decisions for Functional Foods By Ratapol Teratanavat Dr. Neal H. Hooker Presented at the IFT Meeting,
Housing Demand in Germany and Japan Borsch-Supan, Heiss, and Seko, JHE 10, (2001) Presented by Mark L. Trueman, 11/25/02.
Chapter 2 – Tools of Positive Analysis
SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC VARIABLES IN PROFILING WELLNESS TOURISTS Ana Težak Damijanić Pavlo Ružić Institute of Agriculture and Tourism.
Wesley W. Wilson University of Oregon CONSUMER TELECOMMUNICATION CHOICES: EVOLUTION OF CELL PHONES.
Corinna Feldmann Agricultural and Food Marketing, University of Kassel | Consumers’ demand for local.
Rini Mukhopadhyay 1, Vicki McCracken 1, Joan Ellis 2 WSU School of Economic Sciences 1 WSU Department of Apparel Merchandising, Design and Textiles 2 Funded.
Meike Janssen and Ulrich Hamm Dept. of Agricultural and Food Marketing Seventh Framework Programme Grant Agreement No Organic Certification from.
PRESENTED BY: OLILA Dennis Opiyo 1 Nyikal Rose Adhiambo Otieno David Jakinda Presentation prepared for the African Economic Research Consortium (AERC)
The new HBS Chisinau, 26 October Outline 1.How the HBS changed 2.Assessment of data quality 3.Data comparability 4.Conclusions.
Mathews Madola University of Greenwich Natural Resources Institute.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Off-farm labour participation of farmers and spouses Alessandro Corsi University of Turin.
Chapter 6 Production. Chapter 6Slide 2 Topics to be Discussed The Technology of Production Isoquants Production with One Variable Input (Labor) Production.
Factors Impacting Colorado and Wyoming Landowners’ Conservation Easement Acceptance Graham H. McGaffin, Donald M. McLeod, Christopher T. Bastian University.
Tobacco Control Research Conference July 2014 Determinants of smoking initiation in South Africa Determinants of smoking initiation in South Africa.
B A R R I E R S T O E N E R G Y A D O P T I O N I N P O R T L A N D QUESTION METHODOLOGY BACKGROUND RESULTS What barriers exist that discourage consumers.
Poverty measurement: experience of the Republic of Moldova UNECE, Measuring poverty, 4 May 2015.
1/54: Topic 5.1 – Modeling Stated Preference Data Microeconometric Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University New York NY USA.
Discussion of “Inflation Experiences and Contract Choice – Evidence from Residential Mortgages” by Matthew J. Botsch and Ulrike Malmendier NBER SI 2015.
Estimation of the pass-through and welfare effects of the tariff reduction for yellow corn in Peru between 2000 and 2011 Cecilia Matta Jara & Ana Vera.
Valuing environmental, social, and ethical benefits using choice modeling: a comparison of the implicit price of food attributes for rural and urban consumers.
Statistics Division Beijing, China 25 October, 2007 EC-FAO Food Security Information for Action Programme Side Event Food Security Statistics and Information.
An assessment of farmer’s exposure to risk and policy impacts on farmer’s risk management strategy 4 September September th EAAE seminar.
Portraying Rural Canada1 Ray D. Bollman Statistics Canada Sylvie Michaud Statistics Canada Presentation to the Senate Standing Committee on Agriculture.
Contingent Valuation Methods See Boardman et al., Chapter 14 Interview individuals to elicit their preferences for different states of the world. Based.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. The labor concept & the related indicators Part 1 Concepts Produced in Collaboration between.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
1 Components of the Deterministic Portion of the Utility “Deterministic -- Observable -- Systematic” portion of the utility!  Mathematical function of.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
United Nations Workshop on Revision 3 of Principles and Recommendations for Population and Housing Censuses and Evaluation of Census Data, Amman 19 – 23.
14 Statistical Testing of Differences and Relationships.
A Spatial Analysis of the Beef Supply Response in Scotland Cesar Revoredo-Giha Montserrat Costa-Font Philip Leat SRUC-Food Marketing Research 150th EAAE.
Determinants of Changing Behaviors of NERICA Adoption: An Analysis of Panel Data from Uganda Yoko Kijima (University of Tsukuba) Keijiro Otsuka (FASID)
3-1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter Three Research Design.
Tax or No Tax? Preferences for climate policy attributes Lars Persson & Runar Brännlund Department of economics, Umeå university, Sweden Centre for Environmental.
How geographic characteristics affect farming practices Workshop on An African Green Revolution Tokyo December 7-8, 2008.
Group 2 Dung Nguyen Linh Nguyen Anh Nguyen Dung Tran Katarina Djakovic Devin Dorman.
Compensating for Lower Household Income: The Case of U.S. Farm Households Brian C. Briggeman Oklahoma State University Ken Foster Purdue University SAEA.
Jordy van Meerkerk, Gusta Renes & Geert Ridder (University of Southern California) 1 Greening the Dutch car fleet The role of the differentiated sales.
Evaluating a Product Line Extension Opportunity
Parves Khan Andrew Gostelow 7 October 2009 Tourist Information provision A national economic impact review Tourism Management Institute National Conference.
Improving the Residential Location Model for the New York Metropolitan Region Haiyun Lin City College of New York Project Advisors: Prof. Cynthia Chen,
Impact of hedonic evaluation on consumers’ preferences for beef enriched with Omega 3: A Generalized Multinomial Logit Model approach ID 371 Yasmina BABA.
Taking Part 2008 Multivariate analysis December 2008
Chuen-Khee PEK, Nottingham University Business School Malaysia
How may bike-sharing choice be affected by air pollution
William Greene Stern School of Business New York University
Willingness to Pay for Reliability in Road Freight Transportation:
Discrete Choice Models
A Logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data
Gunther Maier, Shanaka Herath
Econometric Analysis of Panel Data
Canadian Women’s Foundation Awareness Report
Presentation transcript:

Local and/or organic: A study on consumer preferences for organic food and food from different origins C. Feldmann & U. Hamm

Background Increasing discussions on organic and local food complementary trends or substitutional quality attributes? Gracia et al. (2014): both food quality attributes are substitutes (study on eggs in Spain) Costanigro et al. (2014): both food quality attributes are complementary (study on apples in the USA) Need for further research to clarify this discussion

Research objectives Consumers’ choices between products from different origins and production processes Differences between urban and rural consumers and differences between consumers in North, East, West, and South Germany (very different regions with regard to purchase power, organic consumption, and regional identity) Compare purchase preferences and WTP values for four different products Influences on consumer preferences (through e.g. habits, attitudes towards local and organic food, and socio-demographic data) Information on whether consumers face a trade-off when choosing between a local and an organic product

General information on study Combination of consumer survey and choice experiment 641 interviews of consumers in eight supermarkets in four regions of Germany (urban – rural; North – East – South – West) Computer-assisted self-interviewing (CASI) 631 responses, appropriate for analysis of choice experiment Four products: apples, butter, flour, and steak Design based on coefficients from pretest Four blocks (one for each product) à 16 choice sets 16 choice sets per respondent (four sets per product)

Sociodemographic data Compared to German average: More female than male shoppers Slightly lower mean age Slightly better education Similar income Higher average household size   All Gender N 631 Female 414 Male 217 Age 630 18-30 years 122 31-45 years 198 46-60 years 229 >60 years 88 Mean age (years) 44.5 Education No formal qualification 2 Secondary/Intermediate 255 College/University qualification 174 College/University degree 200 Household size Mean 2.7 Household net income (monthly) < 600 € 19 600 € to <1,200 € 59 1,200 € to<1,800 € 96 1,800 € to <2,400 € 91 2,400 € to <3,000 € 82 3,000 € to <3,600 € 54 3,600 € to <4,200 € 50 4,200 € to <4,800 € 29 4,800 € to <5,400 € 27 5,400 € to <6,000 € 21 6,000 € or more 25 No comment 78

Design of choice experiment Attributes: origin, type of production, price Origin: local, from Germany, from a neighbouring country, from a non-EU country Type of production: organic, non-organic Price: four levels Prices and importing countries for different products used in choice experiment Attribute level Apples Flour Butter Steak Price 1 2,49 0,69 1,29 3,49 Price 2 2,99 0,99 1,49 4,49 Price 3 1,69 5,49 Price 4 3,99 1,59 1,89 6,49 Neighb. countries Austria Italy Denmark France Non-EU countries Argentina Kazakstan New Zealand Australia

Example of a choice-set for apples (CASI)

Methodological approach Choice experiment Attribute-based survey method Consumer preferences and utility (consumers choose the most preferred alternative from a set of hypothetical products) Relevance of different product attributes in comparison Choice sets are composed of three product alternatives, varying in three attributes Including a no-buy option and a binding purchase decision Theoretical framework Characteristics theory of value (Lancaster 1966) Random utility theory (Thurstone 1922); basic form: Ui= Vi + Ɛi

Random parameters logit models (RPL) Better model fit than multinomial logit models (MNL) Individual models for all four products Halton draws, 1000 pts Fixed parameters, whenever standard deviations or standard errors were insignificant Price was treated as non-random

RPL models Apples Butter Flour Steaks Coefficient Standard error Price -1,4609 0,0958** -4,6950 0,2725** -3,3135 0,2924** -0,7601 0,0567** Local 4,7228 0,2349** 4,5067 0,2190** 6,4853 0,3505** 4,3746 0,2402** Germany 4,4463 0,2199** 3,6945 0,1881** 5,6878 0,3175** 3,0182 0,1847** Neighb. country 1,2556 0,2022** 1,2632 0,1759** 1,7050 0,2481** 0,3774 0,1617* Organic 2,6810 0,3748** 5,7365 0,4280** 0,7771 0,3440* 2,4015 0,2713** Non-organic 2,4467 0,3434** 5,5368 0,4234** 0,4633 0,3449 1,6207 0,2510** No. of ob-servations 2524   LL function -2.183,06 -2.191,96 -1.773,86 -2.381,18 Pseudo R² 0,376 0,374 0,493 0,319 Halton draws, Pts 1000 Statistical significance at level **<0.01, *<0.05 Fixed parameters are marked grey, random parameters are not marked.

Results ǀ Negative sign for price coefficients, relative importance of price varies between models Small impact of the parameter ‚organic‘, exception: steaks Order of origin parameters in all models: local > from Germany > from a neighbouring country > from a non-EU country Differences between coefficients for ‚local‘ and other origin attributes vary between models (e.g. local –Germany → very small for apples, larger for steaks) Product-specific differences in preference structures

RPL models for apples (rural versus urban) Rural: less than 30.000 inhabitants Urban: more than 30.000 inhabitants Apples Rural Urban Price -1,65168 0,1459** -1,37549 0,1316** Local 4,90898 0,3495** 4,82346 0,3485** German 4,67762 0,3308** 4,51133 0,3297** Neighbour 0,97724 0,2956** 1,44791 0,3162** Organic 3,27944 0,5408** 2,27805 0,5402** Non-organic 3,23781 0,5053** 1,89801 0,4932** Number of observations 1348 1176 Log Likelihood function -1153,666 -1019,257 Pseudo-R² 0,3826 0,3748 Halton draws Pts 1000 Statistical significance at level **<0.01, *<0.05 Fixed parameters are marked grey, random parameters are not marked.

Results ‖ Differences in preference structure due to places of origin Smaller positive influence of ‚organic‘ as compared to other coefficients for rural consumers Smaller positive influence of ‚from a neighbouring country‘ as compared to other coefficients for rural consumers Differences are reflected in survey responses Rural consumers regard ‚organic‘ as less important than urban consumers Rural consumers have significantly less trust in products from neighbouring countries than urban consumers Rural consumers stay significantly longer in one region than urban consumers → may influence attitude towards local food (cf. Wägeli & Hamm, 2013)

Discussion of further models Interactions, e.g. local x organic, local x non-organic or non-EU x organic (+ marginal effects) Comparison of four products Comparison of processed vs. unprocessed and animal vs. plant products Heterogeneity in means of random parameters to determine influences related to socio-demographic data and attitudes

Information on further research: http://www.uni-kassel.de/fb11agrar/en/sections/agricultural-and-food-marketing/research.html

Additional slides…

RPL models for butter (rural versus urban) Organic 4,98572 0,5289** 6,5205 0,6707** Non-organic 4,91511 0,5309** 6,24752 0,6699** Local 4,38265 0,2685** 4,60259 0,3530** German 3,67577 0,2371** 3,65195 0,2853** Neighbour 1,24755 0,2191** 1,44784 0,2406** Price -4,28014 -5,12133 0,4312** Number of observations 1348 1176 Log Likelihood function -1157,259 -1028,996 Pseudo-R² 0,3807 0,3688 Halton draws 1000

RPL models for flour (rural versus urban) Organic 0,81266 0,3839* 0,63776 0,4605 Non-organic 0,71378 0,3709 0,2988 0,4449 Local 4,97533 0,3280** 5,74872 0,4153** German 4,47022 0,3167** 5,04129 0,3989** Neighbour 1,01739 0,2746** 1,57733 0,3306** Price -2,66609 0,2989** -2,91443 0,3596** Number of observ. 1348 1176 Log Likelihood function -988,7 -842,032 Pseudo-R² 0,4709 0,4835 Halton draws, Pts 1000

RPL models for steaks (rural versus urban) Organic 1,89662 0,3586** 2,90169 0,4120** Non-organic 1,3174 0,3297** 1,89381 0,3811** Local 4,43875 4,14808 0,3363** German 3,00984 0,2375** 2,91984 0,2849** Neighbour -0,09191 0,2382 0,77762 0,2296** Price -0,64948 0,0744** -0,87497 0,0864** Number of observations 1348 1176 Log Likelihood function 1202,883 -1161,633 Pseudo-R² 0,3563 0,2875 Halton draws, Pts 1000

Interactions for apples Coefficient St. error Organic 2,8680 0,3968** 2,7256 0,3758** 1,7376 0,4696** Non-organic 2,4176 0,3646** 2,2780 0,3470** 1,5912 0,4380** Local 5,1285 0,2686** 4,4929 0,2440** 5,1681 0,3620** Germany 4,6284 0,2371** 4,4881 0,2231** 4,9413 0,3547** Neighbour 1,3039 0,2068** 1,2779 0,2026** 1,8688 0,3471** Organic x Local -0,6149 0,1730** Non-organic x Local 0,5515 0,1513** Organic x Non-EU 1,0331 0,4124** Price -1,5015 0,1040** -1,4417 0,0967** -1,3550 0,0867** No. of observations 2524 LL function -2169,867 -2174,6990 -2181,5690 Pseudo R² 0,3799 0,3785 0,3765 Halton draws, Pts 1000

Interactions for butter Coefficient St. error Organic 5,6016 0,4243** 5,8851 0,4552** 6,4956 0,4992** Non-organic 5,4110 0,4550** 5,6708 0,4820** 6,2260 0,4786** Local 4,4414 0,2173** 4,5242 0,2789** 4,0532 0,2576** Germany 3,6133 0,1792** 3,7054 0,1898** 3,1740 0,2403** Neighbour 1,3166 0,1596** 1,2327 0,1778** 0,6076 0,2697* Organic x Local -0,0364 0,2306 Non-organic x Local 0,0867 0,2423** Organic x Non-EU -0,8930 0,3008** Price -4,5797 0,2763** -4,7748 0,2985** -4,8244 0,2805** No. of observations 2524 LL function -2194,4120 -2189,7640 -2188,0090 Pseudo R² 0,3728 0,3742 0,3747 Halton draws, Pts 1000

Interactions for flour Coefficient St. error Organic 0,7695 0,2974** 0,4581 0,2795 0,1204 0,3236 Non-organic 0,4529 -0,0065 0,275 0,0628 0,3036 Local 5,5162 0,3066** 4,5793 0,2292** 4,4388 0,2613** Germany 4,7224 0,2492** 4,07922 0,1952** 3,8361 0,2511** Neighbour 1,2636 0,2109** 1,2499 0,2064** 1,2227 0,2620** Organic x Local -0,3142 0,2471 Non-organic x Local 0,857 0,3594* Organic x Non-EU 0,7197 0,3194* Price -2,7468 0,2313** -2,3075 0,2042** -2,2492 0,1734** No. of observations 2524 LL function -1833,248 -1873,961 -1949,038 Pseudo R² 0,4761 0,4644 0,443 Halton draws, Pts 1000

Interactions for steaks Coefficient St. error Organic 2,8578 0,3095** 3,2628 0,4349** Non-organic 1,6808 0,2763** 2,2695 0,3859** Local 5,013 0,3087** 4,3578 0,2696** 4,583 0,3580** Germany 3,1624 0,2002** 3,1575 0,3021** Neighbour -0,6979 0,3169* -0,8839 0,4025* Organic x Local -0,6552 0,2030** Non-organic x Local 0,6552 Organic x Non-EU -2,5564 0,6488** Price -0,8393 0,0654** -0,9157 0,0732** No. of observations 2524 LL function -2359,454 -2336,406 Pseudo R² 0,3257 0,3323 Halton draws, Pts 1000