Evaluating Cocaine Use Outcome Measures: Relationships with Long Term Cocaine Use and Functioning Brian D. Kiluk, Ph.D. Kathleen M. Carroll, Ph.D. Yale.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is the evidence for time limiting addiction treatment?
Advertisements

Background: The low retention rates among African Americans in substance abuse treatment (Milligan et al., 2004) combined with the limited number of treatments.
Drug and Alcohol Treatment Outcomes in Older Adults Derek D. Satre, Ph.D. Jennifer Mertens, M.A. Sujaya Parthasarathy, Ph.D. Constance Weisner, Dr.PH.,
Copyright Alcohol Medical Scholars Program1 Substance Use Disorders: Does Treatment Work? Christina M. Delos Reyes, MD Department of Psychiatry CWRU School.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence March–April 2014.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence September–October 2008.
1 Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence September–October 2010.
Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence July-August 2006.
Motivational Interviewing to Improve Treatment Engagement and Outcome* The effect of one session on retention Research findings from the NIDA Clinical.
Challenges and Successes Treating Adolescent Substance Use Disorders Janet L. Brody, Ph.D. Center for Family and Adolescent Research (CFAR), Oregon Research.
Treatment of Methamphetamine Dependence: Does Treatment Work? Mary Lynn Brecht, Ph.D. Richard A. Rawson, Ph.D Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human.
Evidence for twelve step facilitation in the medical literature Jonathan Chick HLO’s meeting, York, March 2014.
Research Strategies to Test Behavioral/Psychotherapy Treatments for Substance Use Disorders: Several Examples Richard A. Rawson, Ph.D UCLA ISAP Cairo,
Low-Cost Contingency Management in Community Settings
Practical Application of Contingency Management Michael J. McCann, MA Matrix Institute on Addictions.
SUBSTANCE USE DISORDERS GENERAL METHODS OF TREATMENT Inpatient Detoxification and Rehabilitation Outpatient Individual, Couple, or Family Counseling Self-help.
Exploratory Outcome Study of Ibogaine Therapy in 20 Subjects with Substance Addiction Valerie Mojeiko Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies.
A Meta-Analysis of Research on Motivational Interviewing Treatment Effectiveness (MARMITE) Jennifer Hettema Julie Steele William R. Miller Annual Review.
Attractive Addiction Treatment...? Can we make addiction treatment engaging?
Audrey J. Brooks, PhD University of Arizona CA-AZ node.
Kathleen Carroll & Brian Kiluk Division of Substance Abuse Yale University School of Medicine Supported by NIDA Supplement to R01 DA15969 and P50 DA09241,
Experience in developing a tool using the CSSA as a model Kyle M. Kampman M.D. Professor Department of Psychiatry Perelman School of Medicine University.
ILLINOIS STATEWIDE TREATMENT OUTCOMES PROJECT. Illinois Statewide Treatment Outcomes Project Largest evaluation of treatment outcomes by the State to.
NIDA Grants: U10DA015831, K24DA022288, U10DA020024, K23DA022297, U10DA Predictors of Outcome in the Multi-Site CTN Prescription Opioid Addiction.
Evidence-Based Practice: Psychosocial Interventions Maxine Stitzer, Ph.D. Johns Hopkins Univ SOM NIDA Blending Conference June 3, 2008 Cincinnati, Ohio.
1 Statistical Perspective Acamprosate Experience Sue-Jane Wang, Ph.D. Statistics Leader Alcoholism Treatment Clinical Trials May 10, 2002 Drug Abuse Advisory.
Does reduction in cocaine use represent psychosocial benefit? Ivan D. Montoya, M.D., M.P.H. Deputy Director, NIDA-DPMC.
METHODS Sample n=245 Women, 24% White, 72% Average age, 36.5 Never married, 51% Referral Sources (%) 12-Month DSM-IV Substance Dependence Prior to Entering.
Treatment fidelity in a multisite trial of Brief Strategic Family Therapy for adolescent drug abuse was poorest when youth had multiple arrests, high substance.
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for Substance Use Disorder | Qualitative Review Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for Substance Use Disorder.
Contingency Management Contingency management (CM) refers to the systematic application of basic principles delineated by workers in the field of the Experimental.
Criminal Justice Referral and Incentives in Outpatient Substance Abuse Treatment Anthony DeFulio 1, Paul Nuzzo 2, & Maxine Stitzer 1 1 – Johns Hopkins.
Relationship Power & Sexual Risk in a Sample of Drug-Involved Women Aimee Campbell, MSSW Columbia University School of Social Work Social Intervention.
Kathleen M Carroll PhD Yale University School of Medicine Dual Addictions Kathleen M Carroll PhD Yale University School of Medicine.
Retrospective evaluation of ASAM criteria in adolescents receiving weekly outpatient treatment for co-occurring psychiatric and substance use disorders.
Reducing adolescent cannabis abuse and co-occurring problems through family-based intervention Howard Liddle, Ed.D., Cynthia Rowe, Ph.D., Gayle Dakof,
Raymond F. Anton, MD for The COMBINE Study Research Group
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence May–June 2014.
Participants were recruited from 6 drug free, psychosocial treatment (PT) and 5 methadone maintenance (MM) programs (N = 628) participating in a NIDA Clinical.
Abstinence Incentives for Methadone Maintained Stimulant Users: Outcomes for Those Testing Stimulant Positive vs Negative at Study Intake Maxine L. Stitzer.
Patient and Staff Satisfaction in Outpatient Substance Abuse Treatment Programs A. Kulaga 1, B. McClure 1, J. Rotrosen 1, P. Crits-Christoph 2, S. Ring-Kurtz.
Exploratory Outcome Study of Ibogaine-Assisted Therapy in 20 Chemically-Dependent Persons Valerie Mojeiko Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic.
The COMBINE Study: Design and Methodology Stephanie S. O’Malley, Ph.D. for The COMBINE Study Research Group JAMA Vol. 295, , 2006 (May 3 rd.
Introduction Results and Conclusions On demographic variables, analyses revealed that ATR clients were more likely to be Hispanic and employed, whereas.
Methamphetamine: User Characteristics and Treatment Response Alice Huber, Ph.D. Steven Shoptaw, Ph.D. Richard A. Rawson, Ph.D. Paul Brethen, M.A. Walter.
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Enduring Effects and Mechanisms Bruce J. Rounsaville Yale University.
Abstinence Incentive Effects in Psychosocial Counseling Patients Testing Stimulant Positive vs Negative at Treatment Entry Maxine L. Stitzer Johns Hopkins.
Relational Discord at Conclusion of Treatment Predicts Future Substance Use for Partnered Patients Wayne H. Denton, MD, PhD; Paul A. Nakonezny, PhD; Bryon.
BUMI-CBT กับการช่วยเหลือผู้ป่วย ให้เปลี่ยนแปลง พฤติกรรมดื่ม แอลกอฮอล์ ดรุณี ภู่ขาว (Bsc. Nursing, MS (Mental heath), MN, PhD Candidate, Department of Psychiatry,
Effectiveness, Quality, Performance : What’s the Difference? & How do you use them?
TREATMENT OF SUBSTANCE USE DISORDERS TX myths 1. Nothing works 2. One approach is superior to all others (“one true light” tradition) 3. All treatment.
Combined Pharmacological and Behavioral Therapy and HIV Risk Reduction Jennifer Schroeder, David Epstein, Katherine Belendiuk, Jessica Willner-Reid, John.
1 Efficacy of Acamprosate: Clinical Issues Celia Jaffe Winchell, M.D. Medical Team Leader Addiction Drug Products.
Ten Years of Pharmacotherapy Trials in the CTN: An Overview.
 Is buprenorphine that good?  Is medical management (MM) that good?  Is counseling that ineffective for this population?  Have the studies been designed.
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy as Treatment for Cocaine Abuse and Dependency Bre Sullivan Dayton Latty.
BEHAVIORAL FAMILY COUNSELING AND NALTREXONE FOR MALE OPIOID-DEPENDENT PATIENTS William Fals-Stewart, Ph.D. Research Institute on Addictions.
Practical Application of Contingency Management Michael J. McCann, MA Matrix Institute on Addictions.
Largest evaluation of treatment outcomes by the State to date 1,890 adult clients recruited from 40 treatment programs across the state Three levels of.
Randomized Controlled CTN Trial of OROS-MPH + CBT in Adolescents with ADHD and Substance Use Disorders Paula Riggs, M.D., Theresa Winhusen, PhD., Jeff.
Medication Adherence and Substance Abuse Predict 18-Month Recidivism among Mental Health Jail Diversion Program Clients Elizabeth N. Burris 1, Evan M.
Date of download: 6/27/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: A Comparison of Contingency Management and Cognitive-Behavioral.
One-Year Post-Treatment COMBINE Study Drinking Outcomes Dennis M. Donovan, Ph.D. for the COMBINE Study Research Group Research Society on Alcoholism Baltimore,
Implementing evidence-based psychosocial therapies for substance use: Aspects of measuring adherence and competence Andrea Meier, Mark P. McGovern, Bethany.
Differences in Treatment Outcome and Current Cognitive and Behavioral Functioning of Individuals Who Received Ibogaine-Assisted Treatment for a SUD Alan.
L.S. Remy1, G. Woody2, K. Lynch2, K. M. Kampman2
Babson, et al., in progress Isabella Romero
Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence May-June, 2018
Clinically significant improvements in function
Overview of Substance Use Outcomes in Other SUD trials
Presentation transcript:

Evaluating Cocaine Use Outcome Measures: Relationships with Long Term Cocaine Use and Functioning Brian D. Kiluk, Ph.D. Kathleen M. Carroll, Ph.D. Yale University School of Medicine Supported by NIDA Supplement to R01 DA15969 MOST Meeting March 25, 2015

Overview Evaluate 15 candidate cocaine use treatment outcome measures Pooled data across 5 RCTs Criteria ▫Sensitivity to medication effects ▫Sensitivity to behavioral therapies ▫Relationship with post-treatment cocaine use ▫Relationship to measures of general functioning Carroll, Kiluk et al., (2014). Towards empirical identification of a clinically meaningful indicator of treatment outcome for drug addiction: Features of candidate indicators and evaluation of sensitivity to treatment effects and relationship to one year cocaine use follow-up outcomes. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 137, 3-19.

Multiple cocaine treatment RCTs, 2000-present Study 1 “Cocaine-alcohol” Carroll, K.M., Nich, C., Ball, S.A., et al Treatment of cocaine and alcohol dependence with psychotherapy and disulfiram. Addiction 93, Carroll, K.M., Nich, C., Ball, S.A., et al One year follow-up of disulfiram and psychotherapy for cocaine-alcohol abusers: Sustained effects of treatment. Addiction 95, Study 2 “M&M” Carroll, K.M., Fenton, L.R., Ball, S.A.,et al Efficacy of disulfiram and cognitive- behavioral therapy in cocaine-dependent outpatients: A randomized placebo controlled trial. Archives of General Psychiatry 64, Study 3 “TSF/Disulfiram” Carroll, K.M., Eagan, D., Nich, C., et al. 2012,. Efficacy of Twelve Step Facilitation and disulfiram for cocaine-using methadone-maintained individuals. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 126, Study 4 “CBT4CBT1” Carroll, K.M., Ball, S.A., Martino, S., et al Computer-assisted cognitive-behavioral therapy for addiction. A randomized clinical trial of 'CBT4CBT'. American Journal of Psychiatry 165, Carroll, K.M., Ball, S.A., Martino, S., et al Enduring effects of a computer- assisted training program for cognitive-behavioral therapy: A six-month follow-up of CBT4CBT. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 100, Study 5 “CM Disulfiram” Carroll, K.M., Nich, C., Petry, N.M., et al, under review. Disulfiram and contingency management to enhance CBT for cocaine dependence: effects on cocaine use and preliminary evidence for interactions with DBH polymorphism.

Common assessment approach 12 weeks outpatient treatment ▫Behavioral therapies manual guided with independent fidelity checks ▫Medications placebo controlled with riboflavin checks ▫1-3/x weekly urine toxicology screens 1 year follow-up (15 months from randomization) Substance Use Calendar ▫Day by day frequency of cocaine use during entirety of study ▫Average 13% discrepancy from urine results (urine positive, self-report negative) Follow-ups with urine collection at 1, 3, 6, 12 months >80% of the intention to treat sample Addiction Severity Index at each assessment

Common follow-up indicators Mean days of cocaine use 1, 3, 6, and 12 month follow ups via Substance Use Calendar Abstinent throughout full follow-up Composite measure of ‘good outcome’ ▫Days of employment problems = 0, Days of legal problems = 0, Days of psych problems=0, Days of cocaine use = 0

Study 1 Clinical Mangmt TSFCBT Disulfiram 250 mg/day No medication 121 cocaine- and alcohol dependent outpatients 12 weeks 1 year follow-up Weekly utox Manual guided, fidelity rated Riboflavin for med compliance Outcomes: ▫CBT, TSF > Clinical management ▫Disulfiram > no med

Study 2 CBTIPT Disulfiram Placebo N=121 cocaine dependent outpatients 12 weeks Utox 1x week 1 year follow-up Manual-guided with fidelity ratings Double blind placebo control, riboflavin Outcomes ▫CBT>IPT ▫Disulif>placebo

Study 3 TAUTAU + TSF Disulfiram Placebo N=112 cocaine-dependent methadone maintained patients 12 weeks Utox 3x week 1 year follow-up Manual-guided with fidelity ratings Double blind placebo control, riboflavin Outcomes ▫TSF>TAU alone ▫No medication effect

Study 4 TAUTAU + CBT4CBT N=78 mixed substance users, outpatients, 38 cocaine users. 8 weeks of treatment, 6 month follow-up Utox 2x weekly Outcomes ▫CBT4CBT>TAU alone

Study 5 CBTCBT+ CM Disulfiram Placebo N=99 cocaine-dependent outpatients 12 weeks Utox 3x week 1 year follow-up Manual-guided with fidelity ratings Double blind placebo control Outcome: ▫CM+CBT>CBT alone ▫No main effect for disulfiram, interaction with DBH

Overview of trials MedicationBehav therapy N for follow- up sample (all > 80%) % female % ethnic minority Mean days cocaine use/past 28 % not working % criminal justice referred Study 1: Coc-Alcohol, Disulfiram v no med CBT v TSF v clinical management 9129%60%1455%24% Study 2: M&M Disulfiram v placebo CBT v IPT Study 3: TSF- Disulifram, Disulfiram v placebo TSF v no TSF Study 4: CBT4CBT No medCBT4CBT v TAU 38** Study 5: CM-Dis Disuflriam v placebo CM + CBT v CBT TOTAL

Outcomes across trials DesignPlatformUrine schedule/ % cocaine free Mean % days abstinent during tx % completely abstinent during treatment 6 month follow-up % good outcome composite 1Coc- Alcohol 3 x 2 RCT Outpatient Coc+alcohol 2x/ 55% 85%19%13% 2 M&M 2 x 2 RCT Outpatient cocaine 1x/ 68% TSF Dis 2 x 2 RCT Methadone cocaine 3x/ 18% CBT4CBT 2 group RCT Outpatient cocaine subgroup only 2x/ 50% CM Disulf 2 x 2 RCT Outpatient cocaine 3X/ 44%

Medication effects across indicators No medication Placebo Disulfiram n=36 n=148n=212 Outcome Indicator Type mean or N sd or % mean or N sd or % mean or N sd or % F/X 2 pTukey/phi Days retained in treatment protocol C Disulf, Placebo >No med Percent negative cocaine urine specimens C Maximum consecutive days abstinent C Disulf > Placebo Percent days of abstinence from cocaine C No med>Placebo Maximum days of continuous abstinence during last two weeks of treatment* C Disulfiram > Placebo Completely abstinent last two weeks of treatment D 1036% 2924% 7524% No med > Disulf, placebo 3 or more weeks of continuous abstinence D 925% 6141%9344% or more weeks of continuous abstinence D 1542% 6846%11353% or more weeks of continuous abstinence D 2261% 10672%15875% Completely abstinent from cocaine during treatment D 514% 1710%2914% Completed treatment and abstinent in last week D 719% 3524% 7437% Disulf > no med % reduction (28 days prior/days last 4 weeks) C % reduction in frequency of cocaine use D 925% %7033% % reduction in cocaine use D 411% 2819%3617% Report no cocaine use, legal, employment, or psychological problems last 28 days of treatment – ‘good outcome’ D 217% 1913% 1819%

Indicators across behavioral therapies Comparison (1) TSF (2)CBT (3)CM (4) n=195n=97n=105n=37 Outcome indicator Mean or n sd or % Mean or n sd or % Mean or n sd or % Mean or n sd or % F/ X 2 pTukey Days retained in treatment protocol ns Proportion cocaine negative urine specimens v3, 1v4 2v3, 2v4 Maximum consecutive days abstinent ns Percent days of abstinence v3 Maximum days of continuous abstinence during participant's last two weeks of treatment ns Completely abstinent last 2 weeks of treatment 5433%2427%4246% % v other, 3 v 2 3+ weeks of continuous abstinence 7438%3435%4543% % v other 2+ weeks of continuous abstinence 9046%4041%5754% % v other 1+ weeks of continuous abstinence 13971%6668%7370% % ns Completely abstinent from cocaine during treatment 2513%1111%1615%8.0024% ns Completing treatment and abstinent in last week 5631%2628%3537% % ns % reduction in frequency of cocaine use (28 days prior/days last 4 weeks) ns 50% reduction %2627%3836% % ns 75% reduction 2312%99%2524% % v other, 4 v other ‘Good outcome’ 2011%812%56%9.0024% v other

Outcome indicator Days of Cocaine Use in Follow-Up Month Complete Abstinence in FU Good Functioning Status at Follow-Up Month Days retained in treatment protocol r p Percent cocaine negative urine specimens r p Maximum consecutive days of abstinence r p Percent days of abstinence r p Maximum days of consecutive abstinence during last two weeks of treatment r p.00 Completely abstinent last two weeks of treatment r p weeks of abstinence r p weeks of abstinence r p week of abstinence r p Completely abstinent during treatment r p Completed treatment and abstinent in the last week r p % reduction in frequency of cocaine use r p % reduction r p % reduction r p Good outcome r p Relationship with Post-Treatment Cocaine Use and Functioning

Outcome Indicator Sensitivity to disulfiram effects Sensitivity to behavioral therapies Relationship with post tx cocaine use Relationship to measures of general functioning/ Days retained in treatment protocolX Percent negative cocaine urine specimens XXX Maximum consecutive days abstinent XXX Percent days of abstinence from cocaine XXX Maximum days of continuous abstinence during last two weeks of treatment XXX Completely abstinent last two weeks of treatment XXXX 3 or more weeks of continuous abstinence XXXX 2 or more weeks of continuous abstinence X 1 or more weeks of continuous abstinence Completely abstinent from cocaine during treatment Completed treatment and abstinent in last week XX % reduction (28 days prior/days last 4 weeks) X 50% reduction in cocaine use 75% reduction in cocaine use X “Good outcome” XXX

Does cocaine abstinence have effect on functional problems? Evaluate the relationship between within-treatment cocaine use and problems in major life areas other than cocaine use (e.g., medical, legal, employment, family/social, psychological) following treatment Latent growth curve model to evaluate within-tx cocaine use on change in ‘global problems’ over time Kiluk, B.D., Nich, C., Witkiewitz, K., Babuscio, T.A., & Carroll, K.M. (2014). What happens in treatment doesn’t stay in treatment: Cocaine abstinence during treatment is associated with fewer problems at follow-up. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82,

‘Global Problems’ construct Created latent measure of ‘global problems’ ▫Used longitudinal confirmatory factor analysis to evaluate equivalence of ASI problem subscales over time ▫Used ‘Days of Problems’ item rather than composite score ▫Examined whether factor structure was metric invariant over time Unconditional latent growth curve modeling used to examine changes in ‘global problems’ over time Conditional latent growth curve modeling used to examine association between within-tx cocaine use and follow-up levels of global problems over time (controlling for baseline problems)

Latent growth curve model of within-tx cocaine use and change in global problems during follow-up period β = -.43** β = -.17** β =.32** ** p<.001

Summary, so far Existing widely used continuous measures are consistent predictors of cocaine use and good general functioning in follow up: ▫Percent days abstinent, maximum days of consecutive abstinence, percent positive urines, max days abstinence in last 2 weeks Good performance of urine measures and abstinence at termination measures offset by limits to availability of data (80% of samples) Poorer performance for ‘reduction’ measures, as well as ‘complete abstinence during treatment” End of treatment abstinence, 3+ weeks abstinence very consistent predictor of long term cocaine use and functioning, sensitive to effects of medication and behavioral therapies Higher levels of cocaine abstinence during tx associated with fewer problems during follow-up (controlling for baseline level of problems)