Title Koji Niita: RIST, Japan Hiroshi Iwase: GSI, Germany Tatsuhiko Sato, JAEA, Japan Yousuke Iwamoto, Norihito Matsuda, Yukio Sakamoto, Hiroshi Nakashima:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
QMD and Low Energy Neutron Development Koi, Tatsumi SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Geant4 Collaboration Workshop
Advertisements

Beam Composition for Biology
Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
Neutron detectors and spectrometers 1) Complicated reactions → strong dependency of efficiency on energy 2) Small efficiency → necessity of large volumes.
Anomalous Pion Production in High Energy Particle Collisions Alexander Bylinkin, Andrey Rostovtsev XV Moscow School of Physics XXXX ITEP Winter School.
P HI T S Exercise ( II ) : How to stop , ,  -rays and neutrons? Multi-Purpose Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System title1 Feb revised.
Nuclear Data in Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2011 Symposium on Nuclear Data Daiki SATOH Japan Atomic Energy Agency 1. Dosimetry calculations powered.
The fission of a heavy fissile nucleus ( A, Z ) is the splitting of this nucleus into 2 fragments, called primary fragments A’ 1 and A’ 2. They are excited.
Ultra Peripheral Collisions at RHIC Coherent Coupling Coherent Coupling to both nuclei: photon~Z 2, Pomeron~A 4/3 Small transverse momentum p t ~ 2h 
Title Nuclear Reaction Models in Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System PHITS Koji Niita: RIST, Japan Tatsuhiko Sato, JAEA, Japan Hiroshi Iwase:
Using FLUKA to study Radiation Fields in ERL Components Jason E. Andrews, University of Washington Vaclav Kostroun, Mentor.
MCNP Status David Wootan Pacific Northwest National Laboratory February 18, 2015.
Neutral Particles. Neutrons Neutrons are like neutral protons. –Mass is 1% larger –Interacts strongly Neutral charge complicates detection Neutron lifetime.
Frictional Cooling MC Collaboration Meeting June 11-12/2003 Raphael Galea.
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, 1 st Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Nuclear Reactions Categorization of Nuclear Reactions According to: bombarding.
Radiation Dosimetry Dose Calculations D, LET & H can frequently be obtained reliably by calculations: Alpha & low – Energy Beta Emitters Distributed in.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Radiological Design Considerations of Synchrotron Radiation Facilities P.K. Job Radiation Physicist National Synchrotron.
Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden
Centre de Toulouse Radiation interaction with matter 1.
1 MAPLD C192Degalahal SESEE: A Soft Error Simulation & Estimation Engine V Degalahal 1, S M Çetiner 2, F Alim 2, N Vijaykrishnan 1, K Ünlü 2, M.
Overview of ‘classical’ or ‘standardized’ DPA calculation stemming from the reactor world. Colin English NNL.
Sevil Salur for STAR Collaboration, Yale University WHAT IS A PENTAQUARK? STAR at RHIC, BNL measures charged particles via Time Projection Chamber. Due.
Applications of neutron spectrometry Neutron sources: 1) Reactors 2) Usage of reactions 3) Spallation sources Neutron show: 1) Where atoms are (structure)
The Status of Nuclear Data above 20 MeV Masayoshi SUGIMOTO, Tokio FUKAHORI Japan Atomic Energy Agency IAEA’s Technical Meeting on Nuclear Data Libraries.
Interactions of Neutrons
FLUKA Rechnungen für das CBM Experiment an FAIR
Inter-comparison of Medium-Energy Neutron Attenuation in Iron and Concrete (8) H. Hirayama and Attenuation Length Sub-Working Group in Japan.
Kinematics of  + n   p   0  p reaction Susumu Oda 2007/04/10-19.
Nuclear Reactions - II A. Nucleon-Nucleus Reactions A.1 Spallation
Modeling Production, Interactions and Transport Fermilab November 14, 2005 Fermilab ILC-CAL Nikolai Mokhov, Fermilab.
1 dE/dx  Let’s next turn our attention to how charged particles lose energy in matter  To start with we’ll consider only heavy charged particles like.
Radiation damage calculation in PHITS
Monte Carlo methods in ADS experiments Study for state exam 2008 Mitja Majerle “Phasotron” and “Energy Plus Transmutation” setups (schematic drawings)
C. Oppedisano for the ALICE Collaboration. 5 Jun 2012 C. Oppedisano 2/10 Centrality in p-A interactions can be defined through the number of collisions.
1 Interaction Between Ionizing Radiation And Matter, Part 3 Neutrons Audun Sanderud Department of Physics University of Oslo.
Recent Charm Measurements through Hadronic Decay Channels with STAR at RHIC in 200 GeV Cu+Cu Collisions Stephen Baumgart for the STAR Collaboration, Yale.
Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade Drift Chamber Review Jefferson Lab March 6- 8, 2007 CLAS12 Drift Chambers Simulation and Event Reconstruction.
Experimental Studies of Spatial Distributions of Neutrons Produced by Set-ups with Thick Lead Target Irradiated by Relativistic Protons Vladimír Wagner.
Charged Particle Multiplicity and Transverse Energy in √s nn = 130 GeV Au+Au Collisions Klaus Reygers University of Münster, Germany for the PHENIX Collaboration.
Overview of Ion-Ion validation KOI, Tatsumi SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory 1Geant4 Collaboration workshop
Interfacing the JQMD and JAM Nuclear Reaction Codes to Geant4 Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Koi, Tatsumi
Workshop On Nuclear Data for Advanced Reactor Technologies, ICTP , A. Borella1 Monte Carlo methods.
Target Simulations for Hadron, Electron and Heavy-Ion Beams 2 nd High-Power Targetry Workshop Oak Ridge, TN October 10-14, 2005 Fermilab High-Power Targetry.
Statistical and systematic uncertainties in a and A J. David Bowman SNS FPNB Magnet Meeting North Carolina State University Jan. 8, 2006.
G.I. SmirnovMaterials for Collimators and Beam Absorbers, Simulating radiation damage effects in LHC collimators (code development status)
Jan. 18, 2008 Hall C Meeting L. Yuan/Hampton U.. Outline HKS experimental goals HKS experimental setup Issues on spectrometer system calibration Calibration.
Study of  ++ Resonance Abundance in 158 AGeV Pb + Pb Collisions at CERN-SPS CERN-SPS-WA98 Susumu SATO Susumu SATO Contents 1) Introduction ~ Relativistic.
NEEP 541 – Neutron Damage Fall 2002 Jake Blanchard.
Radiation study of the TPC electronics Georgios Tsiledakis, GSI.
1 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN Background radiation studies using Geant4.
1 Activation by Medium Energy Beams V. Chetvertkova, E. Mustafin, I. Strasik (GSI, B eschleunigerphysik), L. Latysheva, N. Sobolevskiy (INR RAS), U. Ratzinger.
State-of-the-art Shielding Design and Simulations for Proton, Electron and Ion Beams FermilabAccelerator Physics Center Nikolai Mokhov, Fermilab International.
Improvements of microscopic transport models stimulated by spallation data for incident energies from 113 to MeV Umm Al-Qura University and King.
P HI T S Setting of various source Part II Multi-Purpose Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System Title1 May 2016 revised.
Direct Photon v 2 Study in 200 GeV AuAu Collisions at RHIC Guoji Lin (Yale) For STAR Collaboration RHIC & AGS Users’ Meeting, BNL, June 5-9.
Validation of Geant4 against the TARC benchmark: Testing neutron production, transportation and interaction TARC – experimental set-up and aims Geant4.
Study of Hypernuclei with Heavy Ion Beams (HypHI) at GSI Shizu Minami GSI, Germany on behalf of HypHI collaboration Introduction Phase 0 experiment R.
Inter-comparison of Particle production (2)
variance reduction techniques to improve efficiency of calculation A
Report to Delta Review: Hadronic Validation
Summary of hadronic tests and benchmarks in ALICE
Shintaro Hashimoto1, Yosuke Iwamoto 1, Tatsuhiko Sato 1, Koji Niita2,
Neutral Particles.
Guidance for hands-on exercise Neutron target
Ryuji Hosoyamada2, Hiroshi Iwase3, Hiroshi Nakashima1, and Koji Niita2
JOINT INSTITUTE FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH
1. Introduction Secondary Heavy charged particle (fragment) production
Performed experiments Nuclotron – set up ENERGY PLUS TRANSMUTATION
Microdosimetric Distributions for a Mini-TEPC due to Photon Radiation
Setting of various source Part II
Presentation transcript:

Title Koji Niita: RIST, Japan Hiroshi Iwase: GSI, Germany Tatsuhiko Sato, JAEA, Japan Yousuke Iwamoto, Norihito Matsuda, Yukio Sakamoto, Hiroshi Nakashima: JAEA, Japan Davide Mancusi, Lembit Sihver: Chalmers, Sweden P HI T S Multi-Purpose P article and H eavy I on T ransport code S ystem

Overview (1) NMTC NMTC/JAERI NMTC/JAERI97 NMTC/JAM PHITS (ORNL) High Energy Fission CG geometry JAM, GG JQMD, MCNP Magnetic Field Gravity P HI T S = MCNP + JAM + JQMD Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions by Molecular Dynamics JQMD Hadron-Nucleus Collisions up to 200 GeV JAM Neutron, Photon, Electron Transport by Nuclear Data MCNP 0 ~ 200 GeV eV ~ 200 GeV 0 ~ 200 GeV 0 ~ 100 GeV/u 1 keV ~ 1 GeV Proton Neutron Meson Barion Nucleus Photon Electron Transport Particle and Energy Language and Parallelism FORTRAN 77 MPI Overview of P HI T S (Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System) (1) Tally, Mesh and Graphic Tally: Track, Cross, Heat, Star, Time, DPA, Product, LET Mesh: cell, r-z, xyz Counter: Graphic: ANGEL (PS generator) Geometry: CG and GG External Field: Magnetic Field, Gravity Optical and Mechanical devices

neutronsprotons hadrons nucleus photons electrons JQMD  JAM, Hadron cascade model  In progress only transport with dE/dx ( SPAR, ATIMA ) 200 GeV 100 GeV/u100 GeV 1 GeV 1 keV 10 MeV/u 1 MeV 20 MeV (JQMD) (Bertini) (JQMD) (Bertini) (JQMD) thermal0 MeV 0 MeV/u  GEM, Evaporation process   SPAR, ATIMA, Ionization process  MCNP with nuclear data MCNP with nuclear data Overview of P HI T S (Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System) (2) Event Generator

Introducing JAM (Jet AA Microscopic Transport Model) Y. Nara et.al. Phys. Rev. C61 (2000) JAM is a Hadronic Cascade Model, which explicitly treats all established hadronic states including resonances with explicit spin and isospin as well as their anti-particles. We have parameterized all Hadron-Hadron Cross Sections, based on Resonance Model and String Model by fitting the available experimental data. JAM code for Hadron Nucleus Collisions up to 200 GeV JAM Au+Au 200GeV/u in cm

DDX of elementary process, p(12GeV/c) + p, by JAM rapidity distributiontransverse momentum distribution Data : Nucl. Phys. B69 (1974) 454 JAM: Y. Nara et.al. Phys. Rev. C61 (2000) JAM (1)

JQMD (Jaeri Quantum Molecular Dynamics) for Simulation of Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions JQMD code for Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions up to 100 GeV/u 56 Fe 800 MeV/u on 208 Pb JQMD-1 K. Niiita et.al. Phys. Rev. C52 (1995) Analysis of Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions by JQMD

Introducing JQMD in P HI T S : H. Iwase et.al. J. Nucl. Sci.Technol. 39 (2002) 1142 Results of PHITS JQMD-2 Neutron Spectra from Thick Target JQMD code in P HI T S

New Feature (1) Event Generator Mode of P HI T S What are we doing in Monte Carlo calculations for particle transport ?  Solving one-body Boltzmann equation by using the evaluated nuclear data.  Simulating real phenomena by using event generators. MCNP type code PHITS for high energy by JAM, JQMD. energy is conserved in average. no correlations treat all ejectiles of collisions. energy and momentum are conserved in each collision. Only one-body observables Any observables Observables beyond one-body quantities are often required. Deposit energy distribution in a cell (pulse height tally). LET distribution in a micro dosimetry, Coincident experiments, ……… Event Generator

New Feature (2) Event Generator Mode for low energy neutrons in P HI T S We use the channel cross sections and neutron energy spectrum of the first neutron and assume the binary decay of recoiled nucleus. Neutron channels capture elastic (n,n’) (n,Nn’) charged particle and photon decay final state is uniquely determined charged particle and photon decay after the first neutron emission all particle and photon decay after the first neutron emission By this model, we can determine all ejectiles (neutrons, charged particles, nucleus and photons) with keeping energy and momentum conservation. PHITS can transport all charged particle and nucleus down to zero energy and estimate deposit energy without local approximation (kerma factor). Neutron data + Special Evaporation Model

Event Generator Mode (2) Neutron-induced semiconductor soft error (SEU: single event upset) Neutron 19 MeV Si Leakage of recoil nucleus from Si Deposit Energy Distribution by PHITS An example of Event Generator Mode Kerma

AGS AGS Benchmark Experiments for Spallation Neutron Source

Heat Benchmark test of HEAT : compared with KEK experiment Exp. and Cal. by H. Ohnishi et.al. Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A545 (2005) GeV MCNPX: calculated by N. Matsuda

90 degree forward backward DDX of Secondary Particles E p =12GeV Cu:1mm t 4° 45° 90° 120° MCNPX PHITS

Space Radiation CREME96 + PHITS with JENDL-HEfile Neutron spectrum in atmosphere T. Sato and K. Niita; Radiat. Res. 166 (2006) 544

by T. Sato EXPACS : Excel-based Program for calculating Atmospheric Cosmic-ray Spectrum EXPACS : Excel-based Program for calculating Atmospheric Cosmic-ray Spectrum

New Features of P HI T S (Recent Developments, released by ver.2.12) (1) Duct Source option for Neutron Long Beam Line calculations (2) Super Mirror function for Neutron Optics: reflection on the wall (3) Time Dependent Materials for moving material, T0 chopper, … (4) Time Dependent Magnetic Fields Pulse Magnet for neutron optics, Wobbler Magnet (AC magnet) (5) Dumpall option for re-calculation of whole process (history tape) New Features (6) Event Generator Mode a full correlated transport for all particles and energies (7) LET tally dose and track length as a function of LET (dE/dx) (8) Deposit2 tally correlation of the deposit energy distribution of two regions (9) Timer (clock of particle) simulation of TOF with dE correlation

RIST. Code Center: PHITS ver.2.13 and ANGEL ver.4.35 have been released from JAEA. RIST. Code Center: PHITS ver.2.13 and ANGEL ver.4.35 have been released from JAEA. RIST. Code Center: PHITS ver.2.13 and ANGEL ver.4.35 have been released from JAEA. RIST. Code Center: PHITS ver.2.13 and ANGEL ver.4.35 have been released from JAEA. Distribution of P HI T S distribution