Mucool Test Area Cryostat & cooling-loop design Christine Darve Fermilab/Beams Division/ Cryogenic Department/ Engineering and Design Group MuCool / MICE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mar 13, Low-energy RHIC electron Cooler (LEReC) CRYOGENICS Mar 13, 2014.
Advertisements

The Use of Small Coolers for Hydrogen and Helium Liquefaction
1 Cooling the Hydrogen (Helium) Absorbers with Small Coolers Michael A. Green University of Oxford Department of Physics Oxford OX1 3RH, UK MICE Video.
February 17-18, 2010 R&D ERL Roberto Than R&D ERL Cryogenics Roberto Than February 17-18, 2010 CRYOGENICS.
Agreement on scope of supply and extent of interface among different suppliers of the AFC module This talk covers the scope of supply on the Absorber Focus.
Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel Solenoid Magnet System
23 October 2005MICE Meeting at RAL1 MICE Tracker Magnets, 4 K Coolers, and Magnet Coupling during a Quench Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
Proposal for Convection Absorber Test with Hydrogen at Fermilab Barry Norris Representing colleagues in BD/Cryogenics February 21, 2003.
1 Update on Focus Coil Design and Configuration M. A. Green, G. Barr, W. Lau, R. S. Senanayake, and S. Q. Yang University of Oxford Department of Physics.
MICE Safety System DE Baynham TW Bradshaw MJD Courthold Y Ivanyushenkov.
MICE AFCSWG Safety Review Summary Mary Anne Cummings Dec. 17, 2003 MICE Video Conference.
MuCool Absorber Review meeting FermiLab, Chicago 21 – 22 February 2003 Fluid Flow and Convective Heat Transfer Modelling by Wing Lau & Stephanie Yang Oxford.
MTA Cryostat & cooling loop design Christine Darve Fermilab/Beams Division/ Cryogenic Department/ Engineering and Design Group Preparation of the Mucool/MICE.
MICE Collaboration meeting at Columbia University, New York 12 – 14 June 2003 How Liquid Hydrogen behaves thermally in a Convective Absorber by Wing Lau,
11/26/2002Edgar L Black IIT MICE Video Conference November 27, 2002 Summary of safety implementation for proposal.
Cryogenic Facility for Mucool at Linac MUCOOL – MICE meeting Barry Norris, Engineer, Beams Division/Cryogenic Dept. Fermilab phone:
LH2 Absorber Design Mary Anne Cummings MICE Safety Review LBL Dec 9, 2003.
MICE Hydrogen System Implementation Tom Bradshaw Elwyn Baynham Iouri Ivaniouchenkov Jim Rochford.
March 14, 2003 MICE Absorber/Coil Integration MICE LH2 Absorber 1.Assembly 2.Safety 3.Staging 4.Instrumentation.
A discussion paper for the Absorber Review pre-meeting on February 11 th 2003 On 3-D Fluid Flow calculations on the 22cm Absorber Window By Stephanie Yang.
MICE absorber and Window / flow Design Wing Lau, Giles Barr & Stephanie Yang Oxford University MICE Meeting Berkeley, Oct 2002.
1 Infrastructure at RAL Iouri Ivaniouchenkov, RAL MICE Collaboration CERN, 29 March 2003.
LH2 Absorber Design Mary Anne Cummings MICE Safety Review LBL Dec 9, 2003.
Absorber cryo and safety design MUCOOL – MICE meeting Del Allspach / PPD Christine Darve / BD Arkadiy Klebaner / BD Alexander Martinez / BD Barry Norris.
Mucool cryo-design Christine Darve Fermilab/Beams Division/ Cryogenic Department 8/12/02.
CO2 cooling pressure drop measurements R. Bates, R. French, G. Viehhauser, S. McMahon.
Interface issues on Super-FRS magnets test at CERN
CASIPP Design of Cryogenic Distribution System for CFETR CS model coil Division of Cryogenic Engineering and Technical Institute of Plasma Physics Chinese.
Progress on the MuCool and MICE Coupling Coils * L. Wang a, X. K Liu a, F. Y. Xu a, A. B. Chen a, H. Pan a, H. Wu a, X. L. Guo a, S. X Zheng a, D. Summers.
23 Jan 2007 LASA Cryogenics Global Group 1 ILC Cryomodule piping L. Tavian for the cryogenics global group.
CD-03/12/06 – IIT NFMCC meeting Flow Absorber Possibilities C. Darve Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Batavia, IL, 60500, USA Neutrino Factory & Muon.
ESS Cryogenic Distribution System for the Elliptical Linac CM - CDS requirements Preliminary Design Review Meeting, 20 May 2015, ESS, Lund, Sweden J. Polinski.
MTA Cryogenics: Where We Are The Work of Fermilab AD/Cryo Barry Norris, Christine Darve and a host of wonderfully talented Cryogenic Personnel John Thompson,
Hydrogen system R&D. R&D programme – general points Hydrogen absorber system incorporates 2 novel aspects Hydrogen storage using a hydride bed Hydrogen.
Preliminary Design for the Coupling Coil Cryostat in MICE
ERL: G-5/e-Gun Cryogenic & Pressure Safety Committee Review ERL G-5/e-gun Beam Line Vacuum Failure Analysis April 24, 2009.
Hall D Target System Review J. FochtmanSeptember 28,2011 Preliminary Design Work.
LH2 Safety Issues for MICE 1.O2/LH2 separation 2.No Ignition sources near LH2 3.Adequate ventilation 4.Affects: Windows: absorbers and vacuum Primary and.
56 MHz SRF Cavity Thermal Analysis and Vacuum Chamber Strength C. Pai
Preparation for the 3He Injection Test
Process Definition of the Operation Modes for Super-FRS Magnet Testing CSCY - CrYogenic department in Common System, GSI, Darmstadt Y. Xiang, F. Wamers.
1 Small Coolers for MICE Michael A. Green University of Oxford Department of Physics Oxford OX1 3RH, UK MICE Collaboration Meeting RAL.
CRYOGENICS FOR MLC Cryogenic Principle of the Module Eric Smith External Review of MLC October 03, October 2012Cryogenics for MLC1.
Date 2007/Sept./12-14 EDR kick-off-meeting Global Design Effort 1 Cryomodule Interface definition N. Ohuchi.
CW Cryomodules for Project X Yuriy Orlov, Tom Nicol, and Tom Peterson Cryomodules for Project X, 14 June 2013Page 1.
Cryogenics for SuperB IR Magnets J. G. Weisend II SLAC National Accelerator Lab.
ILC : Type IV Cryomodule Design Meeting Main cryogenic issues, L. Tavian, AT-ACR C ryostat issues, V.Parma, AT-CRI CERN, January 2006.
ESS Cryomodule Status Meeting – Introduction | | Christine Darve Introduction to Cryomodules for the ESS 2013 January, 9 th Christine Darve.
October 7, 2010 HINS Test Cryostat 2 K Conversion Status October 7, 2010.
Hongyu Bai LCLS-II 2 K Cold Box PDR September 27, 2016
Michael A. Green and Heng Pan
Vishy Ravindranath LCLS-II 2 K Cold Box FDR March 9, 2017
Final Design Cryogenic and mechanical configurations
NPDG Liquid Hydrogen Target: Design and Safety Features
Dana Arenius LCLS-II 4.5K Cold Box Director’s Review November 16, 2016
2 K Coldbox Safety and ESH
Design of the thermosiphon Test Facilities 2nd Thermosiphon Workshop
Cryogenic behavior of the cryogenic system
Leak Detection Tutorial Work
LARP Vertical Test Facility
Small Coolers for MICE MICE Collaboration Meeting RAL Michael A. Green
CERN Cryomodule Requirements for Crab Cavities
Cryostat design Mechanical design: Thermal screens: Specifications:
2K Cold Box Process Design
SHMS Cryogenics and Q2(Q3Dipole) Cool Down
ESS elliptical cryomodule
SNS PPU Cryomodule Instrumentation
ESS elliptical cryomodule
Cryogenic behavior of the magnet
Conceptual design of the Cryogenic System of Comprehensive Research Facility for Key Fusion Reactor Core Systems Liangbing Hu Sep.4.
Presentation transcript:

Mucool Test Area Cryostat & cooling-loop design Christine Darve Fermilab/Beams Division/ Cryogenic Department/ Engineering and Design Group MuCool / MICE 02/21/03

February CDMuCool/MICE review

February CDMuCool/MICE review Cryostat design

February CDMuCool/MICE review Specifications BD/Cryogenic Department FERMILAB The Linac beam will deposit within the absorber a maximum heat deposition of 150 Watt P= 1.2 atm, T= 17 K  < 5%  T~ 1 K (could be 3 K) Safety gudelines: 1. “ Guidelines for the Design, Fabrication, Testing, Installation and Operation of LH2 Targets–20 May 1997”, Fermilab by Del Allspach et al. 2. Fermilab ES&H (5032) 3. code/standard ASME, NASA 4. NEC (art 500) 5. CGA

February CDMuCool/MICE review Materials 1. Caltech LH2 pump Max LH2 mass-flow = 450 g/s (0.12 MPa, Tin=17 K)  P total < 0.36 psig References : 1. “A high power liquid hydrogen target for parity violation experiments”, E.J. Beise et al., Research instruments & methods in physics research (1996), ” 2. “ MuCool LH2 pump test report”, C. Darve and B. Norris, (09/02) BD/Cryogenic Department FERMILAB 2. Lab-G magnet

February CDMuCool/MICE review Conceptual Design BD/Cryogenic Department FERMILAB

February CDMuCool/MICE review BD/Cryogenic Department FERMILAB Heat transfer by conduction through supports Heat transfer by radiation and through MLI Legend: Cryostat vacuum 300 K 300 K Cryostat Thermal 80 K 20 K 67 W 6 W 1.5 W (39 W if no MLI) 0.2 W 0.3 W N2 Cooling line HeGeneral refrigeration system 48 W 17 W Safety factor =2 Cryostat windows CD, 12/07/01 Heat load calculations

February CDMuCool/MICE review “Materials list” - Cryostat Design  LH2 Absorber  Vacuum vessel  Thermal shield  Hydrogen buffer  Vacuum window  Transfer lines  Safety devices  Heat exchanger  LH2 pump  Motor  Supports  Equipment BD/Cryogenic Department FERMILAB Cryogens used:  LN2 to cool Thermal shield  Ghe to cool LH2 cryo-system  LH2 to cool cryo-system (beam+static) The MTA cryostat is mainly composed of:

February CDMuCool/MICE review Assembly Vacuum vessel: MAWP=25 psig; SS, 16 IPS Sch10, 48 IPS Sch10 Dome (SS, 0.25 inch) Plate (SS, 0.25 inch) Central support (1 inch) Thermal shield (Al) +MLI (Al, Mylar) Aluminum braids Aluminum cooling line He, H2 and N2 Piping (SS, 1-2 inch IPS) Hydrogen buffer(SS,  3 inch) Vacuum window Flange, Al, SS, Al seal Vacuum pump flange Relief vacuum BD/Cryogenic Department FERMILAB

February CDMuCool/MICE review Pressure relief valve – LH 2 : II C 4 a (iii) Relief pressure (10 psig or 25 psid) Sized for max. heat flux produced by air condensed on the LH 2 loop at 1 atm. 2 valves ACGO=> inch 2 ASME codeRedundant Capacity = 52 g/s Pressure relief valve – Insulation vacuum : II D 3 MAWP (15 psig internal) Capable of limiting the internal pressure in vacuum vessel to less than 15 psig following the absorber rupture (deposition of 25 liter in the vacuum space) Vapor evaluation q= 20 W/cm2 Take into account DP connection piping and entrance/exit losses 3 parallel plates (FNAL design)=> 2 inch Calculated Capacity = 197 g/s Redundant Relief system must be flow tested BD/Cryogenic Department FERMILAB Pressure safety devices

February CDMuCool/MICE review MTA Cryostat Design BD/Cryogenic Department FERMILAB 1. Heat exchanger assembly Coil (copper,  0.55 inch) Outer shell (SS, 6 inch tube) 2. LH2 pump assembly LH2 pump and shaft with foam Motor outer shield 3. Absorber assembly: Black/Wing windows and manifold design Interface of the systems Bimetallic junction Indium Doubled-seal 4. Supports G10 spider and rods

February CDMuCool/MICE review 6. Equipment Pressure transducers Temperature sensors Flowmeter Heater Valves and actuators Vacuum pump cart Other instrumentation BD/Cryogenic Department FERMILAB MTA Cryostat Design Minimum spark energies for ignition of H 2 in air is mJ at 1 atm, 300 K Lower pressure for ignition is ~1 psia (min abs psia // 1.4 mbar) Safety constraints: N2 guard Low excitation current Interlocks

February CDMuCool/MICE review 1. Cryo-pumping 2. Position of cryostat vacuum windows 3. Interfaces: atmosphere or vacuum behind cryostat vacuum windows 4. Absorber Instrumentation routing and ports BD/Cryogenic Department FERMILAB Comments/questions

February CDMuCool/MICE review Cryostat 3D model current focuses: Change orientation of the heat exchanger Final LN2 cooling system Implementation of vacuum windows Heater implementation Supports Instrumentation implementation BD/Cryogenic Department FERMILAB MTA Cryostat design – Conclusions

February CDMuCool/MICE review As it looks today

February CDMuCool/MICE review Cooling-loop design (Introduction to Oxford analysis)

February CDMuCool/MICE review BD/Cryogenic Department FERMILAB Flow Simulation by Wing Lau/ Stephanie Yang (Oxford) Cooling-loop Design TT Heat transfer coeff. Given geometry, Power and nozzle distribution mass flow PP 1.Simulate MTA manifold geometry 2.Simulate beam at 150 W (vol. deposition, ø10mm, 3 sigma gaussian) 3.Calculate heat transfer coefficients and temperature distribution for MTA conditions (  V ~ 0.5 m/s – 4 m/s) Velocity at nozzle The beam as a fluid sub- domain Manifold optimization of nozzle distribution and geometry

February CDMuCool/MICE review BD/Cryogenic Department FERMILAB Pressure drop calculations 5.3% 15.1% 13.2% 17.5% 38.3% Nozzle supply velocity = 3 m/s Maximum allowable  P = psi Total  P calculated = psi m_dot=450 g/s 11 supply / 15 return nozzles Nozzle dia. = 0.6 inch Study of the thermo-hydraulic behavior in LH2 absorber w/  T=1 K Will a velocity at the nozzle lower than 2 m/s be enough for ionization cooling (i.e.  T< 1K)?

February CDMuCool/MICE review BD/Cryogenic Department FERMILAB Temperature distribution simulation By Wing Lau and Stephanie Yang (Oxford) Model A 11 supply nozzles 15 return nozzles Nozzle diameter: 0.43 inch

February CDMuCool/MICE review BD/Cryogenic Department FERMILAB Temperature distribution simulation By Wing Lau and Stephanie Yang (Oxford) Model A V_sup = 2 m/s  T< 1 K But … DP = 90 psi (DP adm.=76psi)

February CDMuCool/MICE review BD/Cryogenic Department FERMILAB Model A Temperature distribution simulation By Wing Lau and Stephanie Yang (Oxford) Model A V_sup = 0.5 m/s Lower limit for the solution with m_dot = 38 g/s  T< 1 K

February CDMuCool/MICE review BD/Cryogenic Department FERMILAB Temperature distribution simulation By Wing Lau and Stephanie Yang (Oxford) Model B 8 supply nozzles 12 return nozzles Nozzle diameter: 0.63 inch

February CDMuCool/MICE review BD/Cryogenic Department FERMILAB Temperature distribution simulation By Wing Lau and Stephanie Yang (Oxford) Model B V_sup = 2 m/s But …  P = psi (  P adm.=0.119 psi)  T< 1 K

February CDMuCool/MICE review BD/Cryogenic Department FERMILAB MTA cooling loop system – Conclusions Cooling loop Focuses: The Model A proves that  T=1K is achieved if nozzle velocity is 0.5 m/s Therefore any configuration with at least 26 nozzles, larger then 0.43 inch diameter will meet our requirement. Model C will permit us to cross-check the current solution. Proposed Solution: 11 supply/15 return, Dia 0.6”

February CDMuCool/MICE review Process Instrumentation Diagram BD/Cryogenic Department FERMILAB