Magnetic Structures of Active Regions and their Link to Coronal Mass Ejections Vasyl Yurchyshyn, Big Bear Solar Observatory, Big Bear City, CA 92314, www.bbso.njit.edu/~vayur.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The flare-CME relationship – determining factors (if any!) Sarah Matthews, Lucie Green, Hilary Magee, Louise Harra & Len Culhane MSSL, University College.
Advertisements

Observational evidence of a magnetic flux rope eruption associated with the X3 flare on 2002 July 15 Liu Yu Solar Seminar, 2003 June 16.
Analysis of a C4.1 flare occurred in a δ spot using SDO and SST data
Bach ground: The correlation between sunspot proper motion and flares has been investigated for a long time (e.g. Antalova, 1965, Gesztelyi, 1984). The.
The Physics of Solar Flares Examining Solar Flares and Radio Bursts By Caylin Mendelowitz and Claire Rosen.
Estimating the magnetic energy in solar magnetic configurations Stéphane Régnier Reconnection seminar on Thursday 15 December 2005.
Hot Precursor Ejecta and Other Peculiarities of the 2012 May 17 Ground Level Enhancement Event N. Gopalswamy 2, H. Xie 1,2, N. V. Nitta 3, I. Usoskin 4,
Microwave and hard X-ray imaging observations of energetic electrons in solar flares: event of 2003 June 17 Kundu, M R., Schmahl, E J, and White, S M.
Energy and Helicity Budget of Four Solar Flares and Associated Magnetic Clouds. Maria D. Kazachenko, Richard C. Canfield, Dana Longcope, Jiong Qiu Montana.
TRACE and RHESSI observations of the failed eruption of the magnetic flux rope Tomasz Mrozek Astronomical Institute University of Wrocław.
Magnetic Reconnection Across the HCS Mark Moldwin UM and Megan Cartwright UC-Berkeley Isradynamics April 2010 With thanks to Mark Linton at NRL Linton.
On the Space Weather Response of Coronal Mass Ejections and Their Sheath Regions Emilia Kilpua Department of Physics, University of Helsinki
Solar Erupting Filaments and Magnetic Field Configurations of IP Magnetic Clouds Yuming Wang 1, 2 & Jie Zhang 1 (Presenting) 1 George Mason University.
Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures N. Gopalswamy, S. Yashiro, H. Xie, S. Akiyama, and P. Mäkelä IHY – ISWI Regional meeting.
Evolution of Barb-Angle and Partial Filament Eruption J.T. Su [1,2], Y. Liu [2], H.Q. Zhang [1], H. Kurokawa [2] V. Yurchyshyn [3] (1)National Astronomical.
Active Region Evolution and the Removal of Magnetic Helicity by CMEs Len Culhane Mullard Space Science Laboratory University College London.
ESS 7 Lecture 14 October 31, 2008 Magnetic Storms
The Relation between Filament Skew Angle and Magnetic Helicity of Active Regions Masaoki HAGINO, Y.J. MOON (Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute)
Intense Flares Without Solar Energetic Particle Events N. V. Nitta (LMSAL), E. W. Cliver (AFRL), H. S. Hudson (UCB) Abstract: We study favorably located.
3-D Pre-Eruption Magnetic Field Configuration Involved in 28 Oct 2003 Fast Halo CMEs Xuepu Zhao Stanford University 36 Th COSPAR Assembly Beijing, China,
Rapid Changes in the Longitudinal Magnetic Field Associated with the July gamma -ray Flare Vasyl Yurchyshyn, Haimin Wang, Valentyna Abramenko,
Nonlinear Force Free Field Models for AR J.McTiernan, H.Hudson (SSL/UCB) T.Metcalf (LMSAL)
Prediction of Central Axis Direction of Magnetic Clouds Xuepu Zhao and Yang Liu Stanford University The West Pacific Geophysics Meeting, Beijing, China.
Relationship Between Magnetic Clouds and Earth-Directed CMEs: Space Weather Research in Stanford Solar Group Xuepu Zhao The Second International Space.
Center for Space Environment Modeling Ward Manchester University of Michigan Yuhong Fan High Altitude Observatory SHINE July.
Solar Activities and Halloween Storms Ahmed Hady Astronomy Department Cairo University, Egypt.
Coronal Ejecta in October - November of 2003 and predictions of the associated geomagnetic events 1 Big Bear Solar Observatory, New Jersey Institute of.
The May 1,1998 and May 12, 1997 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
AR 10759/ May Event Overview
EUV vs. B-field Comparisons Yingna Su Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Coauthours: Leon Golub, Aad Van Ballegooijen, Maurice Gros. HMI/AIA Science.
Photospheric Sources of Very Fast (>1100km/s) Coronal Mass Ejections Recent studies show that only very fast CMEs (> 1100 km/s) are capable of producing.
Solar Source and Magnetic Cloud Yang Liu – Stanford University
The May 1997 and May 1998 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
Solar Origin of energetic particle events Near-relativistic impulsive electron events observed at 1 AU M. Pick, D. Maia, S.J. Wang, A. Lecacheux, D. Haggery,
Review of Conditions for the Formation and Maintenance of Filaments Paper by Sara F. Martin, 1998 Review presented by Samuel Tun October 13, 2005
Quick changes of photospheric magnetic field during flare-associated surges Leping Li, Huadong Chen, Suli Ma, Yunchun Jiang National Astronomical Observatory/Yunnan.
Probing Energy Release of Solar Flares M. Prijatelj Carnegie Mellon University Advisors: B. Chen, P. Jibben (SAO)
Locating the solar source of 13 April 2006 Magnetic Cloud K. Steed 1, C. J. Owen 1, L. K. Harra 1, L. M. Green 1, S. Dasso 2, A. P. Walsh 1, P. Démoulin.
RHESSI and Radio Imaging Observations of Microflares M.R. Kundu, Dept. of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD G. Trottet, Observatoire.
Radio obsevation of rapid acceleration in a slow filament eruption/fast coronal mass ejection event Kundu et al ApJ, 607, 530.
SHINE SEP Campaign Events: Long-term development of solar corona in build-up to the SEP events of 21 April 2002 and 24 August 2002 A. J. Coyner, D. Alexander,
Flare Energy Build-Up in a Decaying Active Region Near a Coronal Hole Yingna Su Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Collaborators: A. A. van Ballegooijen,
1 The Astrophysical Journal, 601:L195–L198, 2004 February RAPID PENUMBRAL DECAY FOLLOWING THREE X-CLASS SOLAR FLARES H. Wang, 1,2 C. Liu, 1 J.
SUB-GROUP 1: Surface Solar Magnetic Fields  The central question: Can we infer the orientation of Bz of an ICME at 1 AU by focusing on the study of the.
SHINE SEP Campaign Events: Detailed comparison of active regions AR9906 and AR0069 in the build-up to the SEP events of 21 Apr 2002 and 24 Aug 2002 D.
NoRH Observations of RHESSI Microflares M.R. Kundu, Dept. of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD E.J.Schmahl, Dept. of Astronomy, University.
WG3: Extreme Events Summary N. Gopalswamy & A. Vourlidas.
SH 51A-02 Evolution of the coronal magnetic structures traced by X-ray and radio emitting electrons during the large flare of 3 November 2003 N.Vilmer,
Forecast of Geomagnetic Storm based on CME and IP condition R.-S. Kim 1, K.-S. Cho 2, Y.-J. Moon 3, Yu Yi 1, K.-H. Kim 3 1 Chungnam National University.
KASI Low atmospheric reconnections associated with an eruptive flare Yong-Jae Moon(1), Jongchul Chae(2), Young-Deuk Park(1) 1: Korea Astronomy and.
Solar seminor: 4 Oct (1)Eruption of a multiple-turn helical magnetic flux tube in a large flare : Evidence for external and i ternal reconnection.
Observations and nonlinear force-free field modeling of active region Y. Su, A. van Ballegooijen, B. W. Lites, E. E. DeLuca, L. Golub, P. C. Grigis,
Coronal and Interplanetary Magnetic Fields in October-November 2003 and November CMEs Vasyl Yurchyshyn Big Bear Solar Observatory,
Anemone Structure of AR NOAA and Related Geo-Effective Flares and CMEs A. Asai 1 ( 浅井 歩 ), T.T. Ishii 2, K. Shibata 2, N. Gopalswamy 3 1: Nobeyama.
The Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) on NASA’s Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) has continuously measured the vector magnetic field, intensity, and.
Analysis of 3 and 8 April 2010 Coronal Mass Ejections and their Influence on the Earth Magnetic Field Marilena Mierla and SECCHI teams at ROB, USO and.
17 th November, 2005STEREO/Solar-B Workshop 1 Related Solar Imaging and Near-Earth In-situ Observations of an ICME A. N. Fazakerley 1, L.K. Harra 1, J.L.
Multi-Point Observations of The Solar Corona for Space weather Acknowledgements The forecasting data was retrieved from NOAA SWPC products and SIDC PRESTO.
BBSO 2007 Science Planning. Focal Plane Instruments AO (Wenda, Nicolas, Deqing, Patricia and Park) AO (Wenda, Nicolas, Deqing, Patricia and Park) IRIM.
The Sun. Sun Fact Sheet The Sun is a normal G2 star, one of more than 100 billion stars in our galaxy. Diameter: 1,390,000 km (Earth 12,742 km or nearly.
The Sun All images and information courtesy of SOHO consortium. SOHO is a project of international cooperation between ESA and NASA."
Predicting the Probability of Geospace Events Based on Observations of Solar Active-Region Free Magnetic Energy Dusan Odstrcil1,2 and David Falconer3,4.
Orientations of Halo CMEs and Magnetic Clouds
Orientations of Halo CMEs and Magnetic Clouds
Coronal and interplanetary radio emission as a tracer of solar energetic particle propagation Karl-Ludwig Klein (F Meudon)
Anemone Structure of AR NOAA and Related Geo-Effective Flares and CMEs
Preflare State Rust et al. (1994) 太陽雑誌会.
Ju Jing, Vasyl B. Yurchyshyn, Guo Yang, Yan Xu, and Haimin Wang
Filament/Prominence Eruption Corona Mass Ejection (CME)
CORONAL MASS EJECTIONS
Presentation transcript:

Magnetic Structures of Active Regions and their Link to Coronal Mass Ejections Vasyl Yurchyshyn, Big Bear Solar Observatory, Big Bear City, CA 92314, Bz 55 deg (MFI) MC axis The active region’s magnetic field was mainly NS orientated and the left handed twist caused its axial field to be directed eastwardly. Because the ejecta had southwardly directed azimuthal component, this eruption was associated with a very strong geomagnetic storm. CME on July 14, 2000 – Bastille Day Flare CME on February 17, 2000 Bz 85 deg (MFI) MC axis The erupted filament D had the SN orientation, i.e. its axial field was directed northward. This AR was positively twisted and the azimuthal field was directed westward. This eruption did not cause any geomagnetic activity because no strong southwardly directed magnetic component was present in the erupted field. October X17 Event November 18, 2003 M5.7 Flare and CME Solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) are a principal link that connect the chain of events in the solar atmosphere, interplanetary space and the earth's magnetosphere. When CMEs reach the earth, they may cause a significant magnetic perturbations, provided that their magnetic environment contains intensive southward magnetic fields. Earlier studies unanimously suggest that there is a correspondence between the erupted filaments and magnetic clouds (MC) at 1AU. Our study shows that in the case of active regions there also is the correspondence between the solar and interplanetary magnetic fields. Another conclusion is that the origin of the studied MCs is probably related to the local magnetic fields of the active region and the reconnection of the AR’s fields with the global large –scale field probably plays a minor role. The study further supports the idea that it is possible to predict the presence of the southward magnetic field in interplanetary ejecta. CME) result from global changes in solar magnetic fields, which are often accompanied by powerful energy release. Besides the strong emission from the flare core, remote emission (RB) is often observed in H alpha, EUV and X ray spectral lines and it is thought to be related to the large scale structure of the flare (Wang 2005). LaBonte (1976) and Tang & Moore (1982) showed that RBs, coincide with type III reverse slope (RS) radio bursts that are the descending part of U bursts and are generated by fast electrons channeled within large-scale, closed magnetic loops. It is suggested that interaction between the erupted core field and the surrounding fields of an active region is the reason for RBs to occur (Manoharan et al., 1996; Wang et al ; Yurchyshyn et al., 2004). Friday, May 13, 2005 M8.0 flare and CME The April M7.9 flare occurred in a delta-configuration at 1522UT as a two bright patches in Areas 2 and 3 located within the delta-sunspot. At 1524UT, when the two first Halpha patches have almost reached their maximum intensity, several additional Halpha RBs appeared (Areas 4, 5 and 1 at1528UT). BBSO magnetogram and linear force free lines (LFFF, alpha=0.01 arcsec -1 ) show that Area 1 was magnetically connected with the site of the flare (Area 2) as well as Area 4 was connected to Areas 3 and 5, where foot point of the post flare loop systems were located. The pre-flare Yohkoh and TRACE images provide observational evidence for these magnetic connections (indicated by the arrows). Thus, data suggest that the delta-sunspot was associated with two topologically independent magnetic fluxes that were not connected at the flare onset and direct magnetic connections (short and dark loops in the after-flare (TRACE image) within the delta-sunspot occurred only after the flare. The interplanetary shock, associated with the April 9 CME, is seen in ACE data at UT on April 11, while the structures, between 2230UT (April 11) and 0530UT (April 12), could be related to the April 9 eruption. It is interesting to note that a strong westward By component (green line) is present in the disturbance, which is expected from the quadruple reconnection model. Please, note that a flux rope model would predict a strong rotating By component and strong negative Bz. In the radio range, 4 strong quasi-periodic bursts were detected at 3GHz (peaks at 1526UT, 1530UT, 1537UT and 1545UT). Type II burst at MHz were seen at UT, while type III bursts were detected at UT. Many fast type III RS bursts that looked as a descending part of the type U burst were observed during the flare, which indicates the motion of electrons along closed large-scale magnetic loops that passed through the reconnection site. Data suggests that this flare was a result of reconnection in the quadruple configuration that was realized in a delta-type magnetic topology. This suggestion differs from the current view that delta-sunspots are rising highly twisted kink-unstable magnetic flux tubes (Linton et al., 1998; Fan et al., 1999). In those models, the two opposite polarity sunpots that comprise the delta sunspot are connected and the eruption is thought to proceed according to the flux rope model (bipolar configuration) (Forbes & Isenberg 1991; Amari et al.,2000). April 9, 2001 M7.9 flare and CME BBSO H  1624UT BBSO H  1654UT BBSO H  UT BBSO H  1738UT EIT 195A 1637UT EIT 195A 1657UT Post flare loop system CME old reconnecting loops Estimated orientation and directions of the magnetic field in the associated left handed (alpha<0) magnetic cloud BBSO H  May 13, UT AR NOAA 0759 was located nearly at the disk center on May 13, It produced a moderate M8.0 flare and a very fast CME (v~1500km/s). The flare seems to be caused by reconnection between to large magnetic fluxes (indicated by the green lines), which produced post flare loops system (pink) and large-scale loop system that most probably has erupted and gave rise to a the CME. The linear force free modeling (LFFF) showed that the predominant twist in this AR was negative (left handed) and we estimated that the CME should have its axial field pointed eastward, while the polarity of the magnetic field at its leading edge should be southward (see the green cylinder in the figure above). If so, ACE measurements should then detect Bz component rotating from being negative (S) to positive to (N), while the By component should be predominantly positive (eastward). Observed magnetic cloud (plots to the left, shaded area) fully supports this prediction. ACE data show that Bz component indeed rotated (yellow), while the By was positive (eastward). Thus, this observed SEN magnetic cloud very well agrees with the orientation and field directions in the active region. These data also suggest that, at least, some CMEs and the associated MCs are formed via reconnection between active region’s magnetic fields and the surrounding coronal fields play a minor role in determining their spatial parameters. flare ribbons The X17.2/4B flare on Oct was associated with the erupted field of negative helicity. The blue arrows indicate the direction of the axial and azimuthal fields in the post flare arcade. Thus, data suggest that the associated interplanetary ejecta may have a southward Bz component. The observed magnetic cloud (green cylinder) at 1AU was southwardly oriented, as expected, and it had negative helicity. filament, which suggests that the orientation of the ejecta may not coincide with the that inferred from the PFL. We were able to identify the foot points of the erupted filament. The comparison of the solar and MC data shows that the MC was co- aligned with the foot points of the filament (yellow dots), which indicates that the MC was associated with the local fields of the active region. The M3.9/2N flare and the CME on Nov caused one of the strongest geomagnetic storms of solar cycle 23. Although the axial field of the post-flare loops system (PFL) was east-west oriented (blue arrow) and the system had positive helicity, the flare emission stretched along the dark H 