First Measurements of 2005 GGTIV* Installations Eric C. Turnblom, SMC Keith Jayawickrama, NWTIC SMC Spring Policy Meeting, 25 – 26 Apr 2007 Vancouver,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fertilization of Western Redcedar (Thuja plicata) R.W. Negrave Coast Region, MFR.
Advertisements

S tand D evelopment M onitoring FREP Timber Production Protocol SDM.
Determine seeding rate and hybrid effects on: Phenotypical and physiological plant measurements Canopy and leaf sensor measurements A goal in precision.
Frontiers in Fuels Science: Frontiers in Fuels Science: Species-Specific Crown Profiles Models from Terrestrial Laser Scanning.
The Effects of Site and Soil on Fertilizer Response of Coastal Douglas-fir K.M. Littke, R.B. Harrison, and D.G. Briggs University of Washington Coast Fertilization.
Northwest Advanced Renewables Alliance Douglas-fir biomass and nutrient removal under varying harvest intensities designed for co-production of timber.
Modeling Effects of Genetic Improvement in Loblolly Pine Plantations Barry D. Shiver Stephen Logan.
Examining Clumpiness in FPS David K. Walters Roseburg Forest Products.
Impact of plot size on the effect of competition in individual-tree models and their applications Jari Hynynen & Risto Ojansuu Finnish Forest Research.
Modeling Branch Characteristics In Douglas-fir & Western Hemlock.
Brief History of Site Quality Estimation from a Forest Mensuration Perspective Eric C. Turnblom ESRM Forest Soils and Site Productivity - Autumn.
A Young Douglas-fir Plantation Growth Model for the Pacific Northwest Nick Vaughn University of Washington College of Forest Resources.
1 Nutrition Current Situation RFNRP completed measurements of last phase in 1998 Fertilization is part of auxiliary plots on Type I Installations –extends.
15 September 2003 SMC Fall Policy Meeting TreeLab (v1.0) Variable-density Yield Simulator for Immature, Managed Stands of Douglas-fir Sam D. Pittman Eric.
SMC Fall Policy Mtg NWTIC / SMC Genetic Gains / Type IV Joint Trial Progress Report (GGTIV) David G. Briggs Robert B. Harrison Keith Jayawickrama.
Summary of results from the Regional Forest Nutrition Research Project and Stand Management Cooperative Rob Harrison, Dave Briggs, Eric Turnblom, Bob Gonyea,
Measures of the relationship between 2 variables: Correlation Chapter 16.
Juvenile Wood in Pines. Overview Basics Of Wood Production What Is Juvenile Wood Characteristics What influences Juvenile Wood What Are The Problems With.
What Do You See? Message of the Day: The management objective determines whether a site is over, under, or fully stocked.
Estimation and Application of Genetic- Gain Multipliers for Douglas-Fir Height and Diameter Growth Peter J. Gould 1, David D. Marshall 2, Randy Johnson.
Modeling the Effects of Genetic Improvement on Diameter and Height Growth Greg Johnson Weyerhaeuser Company.
Comparison of Active Optical Sensors
1 Density and Stocking. 2 Potential of the land to produce wood is determined mainly by its site quality. The actual production or growth of wood fiber.
Adapting a Mortality Model for Southeast Interior British Columbia By - Temesgen H., V. LeMay, and P.L. Marshall University of British Columbia Forest.
Combining historic growth and climate data to predict growth response to climate change in balsam fir in the Acadian Forest region Elizabeth McGarrigle.
21 June 2004 Western Mensurationists Meeting Developing a Whole-stand Model for Douglas-fir Plantations Eric C. Turnblom Samuel D. Pittman.
VEGETATION ANALYSIS.
Extensive culture of burbot (Lota lota maculosa) Jimmy Barron 1.
Modeling Crown Characteristics of Loblolly Pine Trees Modeling Crown Characteristics of Loblolly Pine Trees Harold E. Burkhart Virginia Tech.
__________. Introduction Importance – Wildlife Habitat – Nutrient Cycling – Long-Term Carbon Storage – Key Indicator for Biodiversity Minimum Stocking.
Do stem form differences mask responses to silvicultural treatment? Doug Maguire Department of Forest Science Oregon State University.
Critical Period Threshold Study Effects of up to Five Years of Consecutive Weed Control Relative to Growth Losses from Delaying Weed Control for Douglas-
Growth and Yield Lecture 6 (04/17/2015). Overview   Review of stand characteristics that affect growth   Basic Stand Growth Terminology Yield curve;
Random Sampling Approximations of E(X), p.m.f, and p.d.f.
Course Review FORE 3218 Course Review  Sampling  Inventories  Growth and yield.
Then… ….and Now. 2 Old growth Second growth Stand age vs. percent of juvenile wood When trees grow rapidly so that they are of harvestable size when.
Overstory Vegetation Overstory Vegetation 2008 MOFEP PI Meeting John Kabrick and Randy Jensen.
Thinning. Objectives Consider basic factors in the planning of a thinning operation Know different methods of thinning.
Effects of Intensive Fertilization on the Growth of Interior Spruce Presentation to: Interior Fertilization Working Group February 5/13 (revised March.
Comparisons of DFSIM, ORGANOIN and FVS David Marshall Olympia Forestry Sciences Laboratory PNW Research Station USDA Forest Service Growth Model Users.
Growth Model Users Group November 15, 2013 Greg Johnson Weyerhaeuser NR Company.
By Klaus Puettmann & Mike Saunders Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota A New Tool for White Spruce Management: Density Management Guides.
Managing a model population to market the potential of breeding  Tree breeding characteristics þ Model population Goals Techniques þ Breeding strategies.
Forest Dynamics on the Hickory Ridge of St. Catherines Island Alastair Keith-Lucas Forestry and Geology Department, University of the South Introduction.
Stem Exclusion. Objectives 1.Understand the patterns and processes within the stem exclusion stage 2.Understand when processes of crown closure and self-thinning.
Looking for the Plateau in Douglas-fir Annual Volume Increment
University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna Department of Applied Plant Sciences and Plant Biotechnology Universität für Bodenkultur.
SMC Silviculture Project Report Eric C. Turnblom Silviculture Project Leader, SMC SMC Spring Policy Meeting, 25 – 26 Apr 2007 Vancouver, WA.
Stand Development. Site Capability The ability of a forest to grow is related directly to physical site factors. Favourable physical factors create better.
Research Update Coastal Douglas-fir Fertilization Ian R. Cameron, RPF Kamloops BC Eleanor R.G. McWilliams, RPF North Vancouver BC.
Annualized diameter and height growth equations for plantation grown Douglas- fir, western hemlock, and red alder Aaron Weiskittel 1, Sean Garber 1, Greg.
Class “A” western larch seed and interim seed deployment zones Barry Jaquish and Susan Zedel Tree Improvement Branch October 3,
Populations & Population Growth Populations Population size - number of members in a population 2 ways to estimate population size: 1.Random sampling.
Sampling variability & the effect of spread of population.
Incorporating Genetics into Growth Models: Results from Block-Plot Trials of Douglas-Fir Peter Gould and Brad St Clair PNW Research Station Keith Jayawickrama.
Gary W. Miller USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station Morgantown, West Virginia Intermediate Stand Management – The Crop Tree Approach.
Growth of remaining branches in pruned Douglas-fir trees E.C. Turnblom and R.L. Collier.
Genotype by silviculture interactions on growth, stand uniformity and leaf-level gas exchange of loblolly pine varieties Marco Yanez, Thomas Fox, John.
Leah Rathbun PhD Candidate, University of British Columbia
and Other Related Measurements
Rapeepan Kantavichai, PhD student
Manipulate broadleaf density Tend individual Sw
Developing Edition 3.0 of CIPSANON
Then… ….and Now.
Plant Sampling Techniques
By: Philip W. Williams Bachelor of Science in Forestry Student
Principal Component Analysis
North Carolina's Selective Vegetation Removal.
DOE Terminologies IE-432.
Presentation transcript:

First Measurements of 2005 GGTIV* Installations Eric C. Turnblom, SMC Keith Jayawickrama, NWTIC SMC Spring Policy Meeting, 25 – 26 Apr 2007 Vancouver, WA * Genetic Gain (NWTIC) / (SMC) Type IV joint trials

First Measurements of 2005 GGTIV Installations Background: Objectives / Design Data & Methods PRELIMINARY Results: Survival, Height, basal diameter, crown width Summary

Background: Objectives / Design Objectives: Provide information to guide managers currently applying combinations of genetics, spacing and vegetation control Provide linkages with other studies (such as Genetic Gain Trials, intensive ‘veg’ mgt. trials, spacing trials (like SMC Type III), that will assist modeling Compare realized gains (per unit area basis) with predicted gains (individual tree basis) Compare estimates of growth and yield parameters for populations with different expected growth potentials

Background: Objectives / Design Three Treatment Factors: 1)Genetic Gain levels (G1) Unimproved (G2) Intermediate gain Type IV Trial portion does NOT use this level (G3) Elite gain

Background: Objectives / Design Three Treatment Factors: 2)Spacing levels (S1) 15 x 15’, nominally 200 SPA (S2) 10 x 10’, nominally 440 SPA Genetic Gain Trial uses ONLY this density (S3) 7 x 7’, nominally 900 SPA

Background: Objectives / Design Three Treatment Factors: 3)Vegetation Control levels (V1) Current Practice Defined as single site prep; used ONLY in Type IV (V2) Complete Defined as 80% or greater bare ground until crown closure; standard on all GGT plots and on Type IV

GGTIV General Site Layout G2 G1 (S2 V2) G1 G2 G3G1 G3 (S2 V2) G2 G1 G3 G2 G1G3 G3 S1 V1 G3 S3 V2 G1 S2 V1 G1 S3 V2 G3 S3 V1 G1 S1 V2 G3 S1 V2 G1 S2 V1

First Measurements of 2005 GGTIV Installations Background: Objectives / Design Data & Methods Analysis Results: Survival, Height, basal diameter, crown width Summary

GGTIV Installation Locations (apprx.)

601 – Donkey Creek 2

602 – Donaldson Creek

603 – Crane Creek 2

Data & Methods Measurements –Basal diameter at 6 in. on 100% sample –Diameter Breast Height on 100% of trees that have it –Total height on 100% sample –Crown Width, two perpendicular directions on 42 tree sample –Height to Live Crown on 42 tree sample –Comments where warranted (Ex. BR, browsed; DE, dead; etc. –Record genetic family tab number on elite and moderate gain stock

Data & Methods Model(s) I denotes installation, B denotes block G denotes gain: low, mod, high (-1,0,1) S denotes spacing: sparse, mod, dense (-1, 0, 1) V denotes veg. control: standard, complete (0,1)

First Measurements of 2005 GGTIV Installations Background: Objectives & Design Data & Methods PRELIMINARY Results: Survival, Height, basal diameter, crown width Summary

2 Growing Season Results: Survival

2 Growing Season Results: Height

2 Growing Season Results: Diameter

2 Growing Season Results: CW

First Measurements of 2005 GGTIV Installations Background: Objectives & Design Data & Methods PRELIMINARY Results: Survival, Height, basal diameter, crown width Summary

These results are PRELIMINARY –Based on exactly HALF the number of observations we’ll eventually have There is strong evidence for installation level effects on all response variables (p< ) –Growing season length? –Animal / critter damage? –Other local effects …

Summary These results are PRELIMINARY –Based on exactly HALF the number of observations we’ll eventually have Survival was marginally better at narrowest spacing after two years (p=0.0464) –Potential interaction between gain level and spacing – high gain survived better at widest spacing, woods run at narrowest Height was seemingly affected by spacing (p=0.0294) after two years –Effect appears to be small at this stage

Summary These results are PRELIMINARY –Based on exactly HALF the number of observations we’ll eventually have Basal diameter affected marginally by gain level (p=0.0574) stronger evidence for spacing effect was observed (p=0.0323), though small in magnitude –Very slight evidence of optimum at middle density Crown width seemed strongly affected by gain level (p=0.0077), slightly by spacing (p=0.0505) –Narrower crowns in high gain level

Questions / Comments? First Measurements of 2005 GGTIV Installations