Jacksonville, October 5 2004 Giacomo Rotoli Superconductivity Group & INFM Coherentia Dipartimento di Energetica, Università di L’Aquila ITALY Unconventional.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quantum Theory of Collective Atomic Recoil in Ring Cavities
Advertisements

Coulomb or Dry Friction Damping.
Superconducting qubits
Two Major Open Physics Issues in RF Superconductivity H. Padamsee & J
The Quantum Mechanics of Simple Systems
Josepson Current in Four-Terminal Superconductor/Exciton- Condensate/Superconductor System S. Peotta, M. Gibertini, F. Dolcini, F. Taddei, M. Polini, L.
Machine Transformations
U N C L A S S I F I E D Operated by the Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the DOE/NNSA Suppression of Spin Diffusion: Modeling and Simulations Gennady.
Small Josephson Junctions in Resonant Cavities David G. Stroud, Ohio State Univ. Collaborators: W. A. Al-Saidi, Ivan Tornes, E. Almaas Work supported by.
Novel HTS QUBIT based on anomalous current phase relation S.A. Charlebois a, T. Lindström a, A.Ya. Tzalenchuk b, Z. Ivanov a, T. Claeson a a Dep. of Microtechnology.
Operating in Charge-Phase Regime, Ideal for Superconducting Qubits M. H. S. Amin D-Wave Systems Inc. THE QUANTUM COMPUTING COMPANY TM D-Wave Systems Inc.,
D-Wave Systems Inc. THE QUANTUM COMPUTING COMPANY TM A.M. Zagoskin (D-Wave Systems and UBC) Tunable coupling of superconducting qubits Quantum Mechanics.
The Persistent Spin Helix Shou-Cheng Zhang, Stanford University Banff, Aug 2006.
Superfluid insulator transition in a moving condensate Anatoli Polkovnikov Harvard University Ehud Altman, Eugene Demler, Bertrand Halperin, Misha Lukin.
METO 621 Lesson 14. Prototype Problem I: Differential Equation Approach In this problem we will ignore the thermal emission term First add and subtract.
Multiple scale analysis of a single-pass free-electron lasers Andrea Antoniazzi (Dipartimento di Energetica, Università di Firenze) High Intensity Beam.
The Persistent Spin Helix Shou-Cheng Zhang, Stanford University Les Houches, June 2006.
1 A. Derivation of GL equations macroscopic magnetic field Several standard definitions: -Field of “external” currents -magnetization -free energy II.
Dissipation of Alfvén Waves in Coronal Structures Coronal Heating Problem T corona ~10 6 K M.F. De Franceschis, F. Malara, P. Veltri Dipartimento di Fisica.
Phase Diagram of a Point Disordered Model Type-II Superconductor Peter Olsson Stephen Teitel Umeå University University of Rochester IVW-10 Mumbai, India.
Content Origins of Magnetism Kinds of Magnetism Susceptibility and magnetization of substances.
Guillermina Ramirez San Juan
F. Cheung, A. Samarian, W. Tsang, B. James School of Physics, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Superconductivity and Superfluidity The London penetration depth but also F and H London suggested that not only To which the solution is L is known as.
Magnetic Field Lines for a Loop Figure (a) shows the magnetic field lines surrounding a current loop Figure (b) shows the field lines in the iron filings.
ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT ET 201 Define and explain characteristics of sinusoidal wave, phase relationships and phase shifting.
Density Matrix Density Operator State of a system at time t:
J. R. Kirtley et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 (1996),
New hints from theory for pumping spin currents in quantum circuits Michele Cini Dipartimento di Fisica, Universita’ di Roma Tor Vergata and Laboratori.
Double carbon nanotube antenna as a detector of modulated terahertz radiation V. Semenenko 1, V. Leiman 1, A. Arsenin 1, Yu. Stebunov 1, and V. Ryzhii.
Dynamics of phase transitions in ion traps A. Retzker, A. Del Campo, M. Plenio, G. Morigi and G. De Chiara Quantum Engineering of States and Devices: Theory.
Ampere’s Law The product of can be evaluated for small length elements on the circular path defined by the compass needles for the long straight wire.
Modeling thermoelectric properties of TI materials: a Landauer approach Jesse Maassen and Mark Lundstrom Network for Computational Nanotechnology, Electrical.
6.852: Distributed Algorithms Spring, 2008 April 1, 2008 Class 14 – Part 2 Applications of Distributed Algorithms to Diverse Fields.
Lecture 3. Granular superconductors and Josephson Junction arrays Plan of the Lecture 1). Superconductivity in a single grain 2) Granular superconductors:
Experiments with semifluxon generator Edward Goldobin University of Tübingen, Germany M. Paramonov, M. Fominsky, V. Koshelets IRE RAS, Moscow [Logo of.
D.Giuliano (Cosenza), P. Sodano (Perugia) Local Pairing of Cooper pairs in Josephson junction networks Obergurgl, June 2010.
Superfluid dynamics of BEC in a periodic potential Augusto Smerzi INFM-BEC & Department of Physics, Trento LANL, Theoretical Division, Los Alamos.
Correlated States in Optical Lattices Fei Zhou (PITP,UBC) Feb. 1, 2004 At Asian Center, UBC.
NEMATIC COLLOID AS A TOPOLOGICAL PLAYGROUND
Pumping 1. Example taken from P.W.Brouwer Phys. Rev.B 1998 Two parameter pumping in 1d wire back to phase 1 length along wire Uniform conductor: no bias,
Kink escape from a potential well created by an external perturbation LENCOS, July, Monica A. Garcia Ñustes This talk is on based on a joint.
Drude weight and optical conductivity of doped graphene Giovanni Vignale, University of Missouri-Columbia, DMR The frequency of long wavelength.
Quantum Glassiness and Topological Overprotection Quantum Glassiness and Topological Overprotection Claudio Chamon DMR PRL 05, cond-mat/
HEAT TRANSFER FINITE ELEMENT FORMULATION
Numerical Ginzburg-Landau studies of J c in 2D and 3D polycrystalline superconductors G.J.Carty and D P Hampshire Superconductivity Group, Department of.
Tuesday April 19, PHYS , Dr. Andrew Brandt PHYS 1444 – Section 02 Lecture #18 Tuesday April 19, 2011 Dr. Andrew Brandt Chapter 29 Lenz Law.
Peak effect in Superconductors - Experimental aspects G. Ravikumar Technical Physics & Prototype Engineering Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai.
Para, Dia and Ferromagnetism. Magnetization The presence (or absence) of a significant magnetic moment for atoms will govern how they respond to magnetic.
Work Readings: Chapter 11.
Slow Dynamics of Magnetic Nanoparticle Systems: Memory effects P. E. Jönsson, M. Sasaki and H. Takayama ISSP, Tokyo University Co-workers: H. Mamiya and.
Vibrational Motion Harmonic motion occurs when a particle experiences a restoring force that is proportional to its displacement. F=-kx Where k is the.
Non classical correlations of two interacting qubits coupled to independent reservoirs R. Migliore CNR-INFM, Research Unit CNISM of Palermo Dipartimento.
Topics 1 Specific topics to be covered are: Discrete-time signals Z-transforms Sampling and reconstruction Aliasing and anti-aliasing filters Sampled-data.
Superconductivity and Superfluidity Flux line motion In principlea Type II superconductor should be “better” than a Type I for most applications - it remains.
1 Non-uniform superconductivity in superconductor/ferromagnet nanostructures A. Buzdin Institut Universitaire de France, Paris and Condensed Matter Theory.
Anomalous Local Transport in MicrofabricatedSr 2 RuO 4 -Ru Eutectic Junction Univ. AISTHiroshi Kambara Satoshi Kashiwaya Tokyo.
Superconductivity and Superfluidity The Pippard coherence length In 1953 Sir Brian Pippard considered 1. N/S boundaries have positive surface energy 2.
Superconductivity and Superfluidity Landau Theory of Phase Transitions Lecture 5 As a reminder of Landau theory, take the example of a ferromagnetic to.
1 15. Magnetic field Historical observations indicated that certain materials attract small pieces of iron. In 1820 H. Oersted discovered that a compass.
ENE 429 Antenna and Transmission lines Theory Lecture 10 Antennas DATE: 18/09/06 22/09/06.
1 AC Circuit Theory. 2 Sinusoidal AC Voltage Waveform: The path traced by a quantity, such as voltage, plotted as a function of some variable such as.
Trigonometric Identities
Applications of the Canonical Ensemble: Simple Models of Paramagnetism
Applications of the Canonical Ensemble:
Trigonometric Identities
Design and Realization of Decoherence-Free
10.3 NMR Fundamentals nuclear spin calculations and examples
Mean Field Approximation
Arian Lalezari 22 September 2004 Modeling in Applied Math
Presentation transcript:

Jacksonville, October Giacomo Rotoli Superconductivity Group & INFM Coherentia Dipartimento di Energetica, Università di L’Aquila ITALY Unconventional Josephson junction arrays for qubit devices. Collaborations: F. Tafuri, Napoli II A. Tagliacozzo, A. Naddeo, P. Lucignano, I. Borriello, Napoli I

Gran Sasso range (2914 m/9000 ft) and L’Aquila Superconductivity Group Applied Physics Division Dipartimento di Energetica L’Aquila We are here

1D open unconventional arrays Building block: the two-junction loop conventional loop for small  use  Eq)  -loop for small   dia,  (0)=0  + para,  - dia, moreover there are spontaneous currents for f going to zero, i.e.,  + (0)=1 and  - (0)=-1 ++++ ---

Model: 1D GB Long Josephson Junction with presence of  -sections alternanting with conventional sections. This is equivalent to have localized  -loops in a 1D array Quest: what is the fundamental state in zero field ? 0   Chain of ½ Flux quanta or Semi-fluxons (SF) +SF  SF  SF  SF +SF  0 1D open unconventional arrays

0  Quest: what is the effect of the magnetic field ?  0 Two solutions are no longer degenerate! Red ones is paramagnetic and have a lower energy with respect to Blue ones which is diamagnetic and with higher energy… screening current adds 1D open unconventional arrays

Total energy Total energy is the sum of Josephson and magnetic energy We can write Moreover, using flux quantization, Magnetic energy is written Where  = 2  I 0 L/  0. With  j =  j -  j-1 +2  n j we obtain

The quantum number n j is typically zero for open arrays because the variations of the phases are small if  is not Large. On the other hand, in an annular array the last loop n N =n play the role of winding number of the phase, i.e., the number of flux quanta into the annulus. The winding number

Q: How we find phases  i ? A: Solving Discrete Sine-Gordon equation (DSG) We assume f constant, i.e., f i =f, moreover With  N+2 =  0 =0, i + =i,i - =i-1, f N+1 = f 0 =0 (see E. Goldobin et al., Phys. Rev. B66, , 2002; J. R. Kirtley et al., Phys. Rev. B56, 886, 1997) 1D open unconventional arrays

0-  junction (equal length) (a)diamagnetic sol (b)paramagnetic sol N=63,  =0.04 Mean magnetization for different GBLJJs: symmetric 0-  => circles  x 2 / J 2 t ( 1  m) 2 /(5  m) 2 =0.04 Grain size Josephson length dd G. Rotoli PRB68, , D open unconventional arrays

N=255,  =0.04 with 15  -loops (a)7 dia + 8 para (b)5 dia + 10 para (c)3 dia + 12 para (b) and (c) corresponds to a pre-selection of paramagnetic solutions due to FC (c) (b) (a) (b) (a) (c) FC can be introduced assuming that it flips some SF from dia to para state G. Rotoli PRB68, , 2003 Previous work on 1D open unconventional arrays

F. Tafuri and J. R. Kirtley, Phys. Rev. B62, 13934, 2000; Tilt-Twist 45 degree YBCO GB junctions sample diamagnetic with ½ half flux quanta pinned to defects and along GB, paramagnetism only local F. Lombardi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. in print, 2002; Tilt-Twist GB junctions with angles betw 0 and 90 rich structure of spontaneous currents for 0/90 GB Il’ichev et al., to be subm. Phys. Rev. B, 2002; First paramagnetic signal recorded, very flat GB form 45 deg asymmetric twist junctions, no spontaneous currents have been experimentally observed H. J. H. Smilde et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, , 2002; Artificial “zig-zag” LTC-HTC arrays Other papers in unconv. arrays and junctions

Some estimate of demag field:  d H d (a) =7.6 mG H d (b) =36 mG H d (c) =80 mG we use L = c-axis equal to 5  m Note that in (a) fields are of the same order of magnitude cited in Tafuri and Kirtley ( c-axis =5.9  m) J L 1D open unconventional arrays

0-  Annular JJ arrays 1)Have properties similar to the Annular Josephson junction So can be thinked are related to “fluxon qubit” (A. Ustinov, Nature 425, 155, 2003) 2) Will have some “protection” from external perturbation In the limit of large N (Doucout et al., PRL90, , 2003) 3) Can be build using  -junctions as in Hilgenkamp et al., Nature 50, 422, 2003 Merging together these three ideas we have 1 qubit2 qubit

Annular arrays A practical layout N = 8 array, with CF (control field) CB (control barrier) CN (control loop N)

Q: How we find phases  i ? A: Solving Discrete Sine-Gordon equation (DSG) for the ring A f constant do no longer apply, f have to be not uniform to have effect on a 0-  AJJA With  N+1 =  1 +2  n, n is the winding number i + =i,i - =i-1 0-  Annular JJA DSG

Fundamental states in AJJA Spin notation

AJJA arrays (excited states) N = 2 & 4N = 6 n = 0 n = 1

AJJA (excited states) (2) Fractionalization phenomenon K-AK states large  small 

0 –  Annular long junction Fund. state E. Goldobin et al. PRB66, , 2002 E. Goldobin et al. PRB67, , 2003 E. Goldobin et al. cond-mat/ (ring) k 0 -  boundaries N/k sections

LJJ case 0-  JJ K = 2,4 N=32,64k=6N=96 l / k=1 l / k=2 (nor. length of sections)

Annular arrays in magnetic field I Single loop (Cn) frustation on an N=16 array Frustation over loops On an N=16 array

Annular arrays in magnetic field II Frustation applied via CF is independent of N and induce a flip between para-dia sol. at  =2.1 Critical field for flip between fund. states Effect of frustation applied via a single loop, say C1, decrease with N

Magnetic behavior of annular 0-  LJJ The effect of field in LJJ case is very similar

Variation of fundamental state energy for different values of  and Magnetic field In the N=16 and N=64 AJJA Top: magnetic field in a single loop Bottom: magnetic field over 7 loops Magnetic behavior for different spatial configuration

Annular arrays: flip dynamics N = 16 array via C1 N=256, k =16 array via s-type control

The process (classical) Classically it is possible to flip an half-flux quantum adding it a full flux quantum (fluxon) E. Goldobin et al. cond-mat/ Successive time plot of annihilation of a fluxon on a 0-  boundary where a positive half-flux quantum was localized. Annihilation ends in a negative half flux quantum + radiation motion direction

The process (quantum) Calculation for quantum process in collaboration With A. Tagliacozzo, A. Naddeo and I. Borriello (Napoli I) is in progress… The flip process is approximated summing up the analytical expression for fluxon (kink) and a localized half-flux quantum with kink velocity As free parameter to be used in a variational approach. Next step is the calculation of euclidean action for the flip, its minimization will give the result.

 -Junction realization There are essentially three way to fabricate  -junctions: dId dId YBCO made have the best performances in dissipation and recently show also MQT effect (collaboration Napoli II, F. Tafuri + Chalmers, T. Cleason) dissipation are good (100  ) control of currents and capacity not so easy dIs dIs used by Hilgenkamp et al. in “zigzag” arrays, are YBCO-Nb ramp edge junctions dissipation are intermediate (20  ), control on other parameters is good SFS SFS these are Nb-(Ni-Cu)-Nb junctions which show a phase shift depending on F barrier thickness dissipation is high at moment, critical currents and capacitance can be controlled in a fine manner

Conclusion Part of results shown here will be submitted to ASC04 conference, Jacksonville, FL USA 3-8 october 2004 session 3EI01 1)Annular unconventional arrays and their LJJ counterpart the annular 0-  junction are very interesting physical object condensing the properties of half-flux quantum arrays and annular junction together with some energy and topological protection properties 2)It is conceivable to think to a protected qubit made of unconventional arrays, which will be the simplest topologically not trivial system showing the above properties and realizable with present tecnology (conventional ring array was realized for study breather solutions, see PRE 66, , 2002) 3)A quantum description of flip process between half-flux quantum is in progress

We would like to thank F.Tafuri, A. Tagliacozzo, I. Borriello, A. Naddeo for helpful discussions and suggestions. This work was supported by Italian MIUR under PRIN 2001 “Reti di giunzioni Josephson quantistiche: aspetti teorici e loro controparte sperimentale”. Contact: => web => Acknowledgements