Identification of neutrino oscillations in the MINOS detector Daniel Cole

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Update on Data / MC Comparisons for Low Hadronic Energy CC-like Events Reminder of problem Fiducial studies with more MC statistics Effect of offset in.
Advertisements

Expected Sensitivity of the NO A  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays (Caltech) for the NO A Collaboration April 14, 2013 APS DPF Denver Kirk Bays, APS DPF.
N. Saoulidou Fermilab 1 Update on track reconstruction in the Near Detector N. Saoulidou, Fermilab
MINERvA Overview MINERvA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: – Study.
22/5/2011 Particle-ID and Tracking performance in CLIC_ILD1/27 CLIC_ILD particle identification and tracking performance J. Nardulli This talk in 2 parts:
Event Reconstruction Andy Blake Cambridge University.
Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?
CC analysis progress This talk: –A first attempt at calculating CC energy sensitivity using the Far Mock data MC files with full reconstruction. –Quite.
How to Build a Neutrino Oscillations Detector - Why MINOS is like it is! Alfons Weber March 2005.
Performance of a Water Cherenkov Detector for e Appearance Shoei NAKAYAMA (ICRR, University of Tokyo) November 18-19, 2005 International Workshop on a.
Searching for Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations at MINOS Andy Blake Cambridge University April 2004.
Update on NC/CC separation At the previous phone meeting I presented a method to separate NC/CC using simple cuts on reconstructed quantities available.
1 First look at new MC files First look at reconstruction output from the newly- generated “mock-data” MC files. –These contain the following improvements:
Atmospheric Neutrino Event Reconstruction Andy Blake Cambridge University June 2004.
Far Detector Fiducial Volume Studies Andy Blake Cambridge University Saturday February 24 th 2007.
2015/6/23 1 How to Extrapolate a Neutrino Spectrum to a Far Detector Alfons Weber (Oxford/RAL) NF International Scoping Study, RAL 27 th April 2006.
NuMI Offaxis Near Detector and Backgrounds Stanley Wojcicki Stanford University Cambridge Offaxis workshop January 12, 2004.
Atmospheric Neutrino Event Reconstruction Andy Blake Cambridge University September 2003.
25 April Antineutrino selection for constraining the e beam Goal: extract component of  rate from  + decays Requirement: High purity at low neutrino.
1 CC update –  momentum resolution Software news: –Converted code to read Sue’s ntuples. Allows use of Chris’s analysis framework (including event display)
CC/NC SEPARATION STUDY Andy Blake Cambridge University Friday February 23 rd 2007.
1 Latest CC analysis developments New selection efficiencies: –Based on C++ reco + PDFs rather than old (Fortran+reco_minos) cuts –Attempt to optimise.
April 1, Beam measurement with -Update - David Jaffe & Pedro Ochoa 1)Reminder of proposed technique 2)Use of horn-off data 3)Use of horn2-off data?
FD event selection and data/MC comparisons Motivation of this study –Look at FD events (with blinding scheme imposed) to determine Whether we observe neutrino.
Neutrino Event Reconstruction Andy Blake Cambridge University September 2003.
1 BaBar Collaboration Randall Sobie Institute for Particle Physics University of Victoria.
In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to efficiently identify photons and electrons.
First tried to reproduce Jeff’s cuts described in his talk at Oxford (minos-doc 1409): For this, used tracks in fiducial volume (1m
1 CC analysis update Repeat of CC analysis with R1.9 ntuples –What is the effect of improved tracking efficiency? Alternative PID methods: likelihood vs.
CC ANALYSIS STUDIES Andy Blake Cambridge University Fermilab, September 2006.
10/24/2005Zelimir Djurcic-PANIC05-Santa Fe Zelimir Djurcic Physics Department Columbia University Backgrounds in Backgrounds in neutrino appearance signal.
MINERvA Overview MINERvA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: – Study.
November 6, 2004Carl Bromberg, FNAL LAr Exp. Workshop Nov. 4-6, Particle ID, energy resolution, neutrino flavor tagging, efficiencies, backgrounds,
Latest Results from The MINOS Experiment
Apr. 4, KEK JHF-SK neutrino workshop 1 e appearance search Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK - IPNS)
Accelerator neutrino interactions in the MINOS Experiment Krzysztof Wojciech Fornalski Warszawa 3.XII.2007.
Latest Results from the MINOS Experiment Justin Evans, University College London for the MINOS Collaboration NOW th September 2008.
Detection of electromagnetic showers along muon tracks Salvatore Mangano (IFIC)
Detector Monte-Carlo ● Goal: Develop software tools to: – Model detector performance – Study background issues – Calculate event rates – Determine feasibility.
Search for Electron Neutrino Appearance in MINOS Mhair Orchanian California Institute of Technology On behalf of the MINOS Collaboration DPF 2011 Meeting.
First Look at Data and MC Comparisons for Cedar and Birch ● Comparisons of physics quantities for CC events with permutations of Cedar, Birch, Data and.
N. Saoulidou, Fermilab, MINOS Collaboration Meeting N. Saoulidou, Fermilab, ND/CC Parallel Session, MINOS Collaboration Meeting R1.18.
Cedar and pre-Daikon Validation ● CC PID parameter based CC sample selections with Birch, Cedar, Carrot and pre-Daikon. ● Cedar validation for use with.
Optimization of Analysis Cuts for Oscillation Parameters Andrew Culling, Cambridge University HEP Group.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
Beam Extrapolation Fit Peter Litchfield  An update on the method I described at the September meeting  Objective;  To fit all data, nc and cc combined,
Mark Dorman UCL/RAL MINOS Collaboration Meeting Fermilab, Oct. 05 Data/MC Comparisons and Estimating the ND Flux with QE Events ● Update on QE event selection.
Study of the ND Data/MC for the CC analysis October 14, 2005 MINOS collaboration meeting M.Ishitsuka Indiana University.
Medium baseline neutrino oscillation searches Andrew Bazarko, Princeton University Les Houches, 20 June 2001 LSND: MeVdecay at rest MeVdecay in flight.
MiniBooNE MiniBooNE Motivation LSND Signal Interpreting the LSND Signal MiniBooNE Overview Experimental Setup Neutrino Events in the Detector The Oscillation.
Low Z Detector Simulations
1 A study to clarify important systematic errors A.K.Ichikawa, Kyoto univ. We have just started not to be in a time blind with construction works. Activity.
Progress Report on GEANT Study of Containerized Detectors R. Ray 7/11/03 What’s New Since Last Time?  More detailed container description in GEANT o Slightly.
Measurement of the neutrino velocity with the MINOS detectors and NuMI neutrino beam GdR Saclay – 11/04/08 Magali Besnier hep-ex – v3.
MINOS Coll Meet. Oxford, Jan CC/NC Data Cross Checks Thomas Osiecki University of Texas at Austin.
Search for active neutrino disappearance using neutral-current interactions in the MINOS long-baseline experiment 2008/07/31 Tomonori Kusano Tohoku University.
P. Ochoa, September Using Muon Removed files to assess the purity of the nubar-PID selection Pedro Ochoa MINOS Collaboration Meeting September 2006.
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
Measuring Oscillation Parameters Four different Hadron Production models  Four predicted Far  CC spectrum.
Mark Dorman UCL/RAL MINOS ANL Meeting March 05 Dr. Quasi-Elastic (or... How I learned to stop worrying and love the Hough transform) Mark Dorman ● Update.
 CC QE results from the NOvA prototype detector Jarek Nowak and Minerba Betancourt.
Mark Dorman UCL/RAL MINOS WITW June 05 An Update on Using QE Events to Estimate the Neutrino Flux and Some Preliminary Data/MC Comparisons for a QE Enriched.
DOE review slide 1 MINOS Software and Data Analysis Peter Litchfield, U. of Minnesota DOE Review, 28 th August 2003  Progress on Offline Software  Detector.
Neutral Current Interactions in MINOS Alexandre Sousa, University of Oxford for the MINOS Collaboration Neutrino Events in MINOS Neutrino interactions.
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
A PID based approach for antineutrino selection
Wrong sign muons detection in a
Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK - IPNS)
Jaewon Park University of Rochester
High Energy Neutrino Detectors Day 2
Presentation transcript:

Identification of neutrino oscillations in the MINOS detector Daniel Cole

Aims Use likelihood methods to investigate separation of CC muon neutrino events from background of NC and electron neutrino events. Focus on improving separation of low energy (<2GeV) neutrino events.

Code MC beam neutrino events (generated at Cambridge using NuMI low-energy beam (PH2LE) flux file) 4/5 data used to generate PDFs of 3 variables 1/5 data used as sample DetSim Cambridge demultiplexer Cambridge Standard Reconstruction Analysis

Formation of the Likelihood i) track strips / total strips ii) track pulse height per track plane iii)track planes For each event in sample: p cc = p cc1 ×p cc2 ×p cc3 p nc = p nc1 ×p nc2 ×p nc3 i) ii) iii)

Standard Likelihood Standard likelihood: efficiency = CC events above PID threshold / total CC events purity = CC events above PID threshold / total events above PID threshold

Super-K Likelihood Attempt to reproduce David Petyt’s results using likelihood based on S-K analysis: S-K likelihood: Improvement due to updated reconstruction code

Likelihood Function Comparison Comparison of standard and Petyt’s likelihood functions (using SR): Little difference in performance. Standard likelihood used from now on. Attempt to develop analysis…

Track Plane Cut First new cut: any events with ≥60 track planes must be CC so put into likelihood at PID = 1 Negligible gain in efficiency but pre- likelihood cut simplifies the procedure

Comparison of Reco Algorithms Comparison of SR and Cambridge (AtNu). reconstruction codes (using the track plane cut):

Visible Energy Comparison CC: visible energy = true neutrino energy NC: visible energy = true hadronic energy Sample split into 4 visible energy ranges: energy < 2GeV energy = 2-5GeV energy = 5-10GeV energy > 10GeV

Low Energy Events <2GeV visible energy range performs poorly due to low number of reconstructed tracks and high background. Sample of <2GeV events generated and added to previous data. Define: reconstructed energy = reconstructed track energy + reconstructed hadronic energy New set of PDFs constructed from low reconstructed energy events only. Previously used all events.

PDFs for Low Energy Events New set of variables: i) ii) iii) i) track strips / total strips ii)track planes iii)reconstructed track velocity (Also tried: i)track pulse height per track plane ii)track end plane – shower vertex end plane) Further cut: events with track end plane - shower vertex end plane ≥40 identified as CC.

Separation of Low Energy Events original variables, all events used in PDFs new variables, all events used in PDFs new variables, only low reconstructed energy events used in PDFs 5% improvement in efficiency at 95% purity for low energy events – but even better at higher purities.

Conclusions used new likelihood separated events by reconstructed energy chose suitable variables for energy range (for low energy events: i) track strips / total strips ii) track planes iii) reconstructed track velocity) performed pre-likelihood cuts when: track planes ≥60 track end plane - shower vertex end plane ≥40 achieved improvements in signal separation