Recruiting Foster Families A Summary of the Department of Health and Human Services OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL REPORT May, 2002 National Resource Center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Child Protection Units
Advertisements

Amanda Barczyk, M.S.W. 1 & Valarie Garza 2 The University of Texas at Austin School of Social Work 1 Texas Health Institute 2.
Intro. Website Purposes  Provide templates and resources for developing early childhood interagency agreements and collaborative procedures among multiple.
Broward’s Infrastructure Design to Guide and Sustain Permanency for Young Foster Children (BRIDGES)
Community Health Assessment San Joaquin County.
Family Services Division THE FAMILY CENTERED PRACTICE MODEL.
A Community Idea For A Better Future: The Pulaski County Commission on Children and Families John Bumgarner Project Associate, Institute for Policy Outreach.
1 North Dakota Children and Family Services Review Paul Ronningen, Division Director Don Snyder, Permanency Unit Manager.
Tribal & State Partnership Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs.
Introduction to Strengthening Families: An Effective Approach to Supporting Families Massachusetts Home Visiting Initiative A Department of Public Health.
Developed by the Center for the Study of Social Policy Funded by the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation.
Texas Children Recovering from Trauma An Initiative of the Department of State Health Services Funded by: SAMHSA’s National Child Traumatic Stress Initiative.
Understanding and Using CONCURRENT PLANNING To Achieve Permanency for Children and Youth
Retaining Foster Families A Summary of the Department of Health and Human Services OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL REPORT May, 2002 National Resource Center.
Independent Living Resource Center Exploring Permanency for Youth: May 16, 2002 Gerald P. Mallon, DSW National Resource Center for Foster Care and Permanency.
Community-Based Child Abuse Prevention Program (CBCAP) 2006 Program Instruction Overview May 2006 Melissa Lim Brodowski Office on Child Abuse and Neglect,
National Perspectives on Long-Term Foster Care. MINNESOTA NATIONAL PERSPECTIVES ON LONG TERM FOSTER CARE AS A PERMANECY OPTION Gerald P. Mallon, DSW National.
Purpose & Significance ∞ In the child welfare field there is an growing need for mental health support for children. This need is due to exposure to or.
Promoting Increased School Stability & Permanence
Module 7 Promoting Family Engagement and Meaningful Involvement.
Promoting Inclusive Opportunities for Young Children with Disabilities: A Cross Agency Initiative OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 12,
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
May 18, MiTEAM Is Michigan’s guide to how staff, children, families, stakeholders and community partners work together to achieve outcomes that.
Oregon’s Community-Involved Approach to Differential Response Implementation.
FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES. BACKGROUND New category of funding in the FY13 Harold Rogers Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Official title is “Category 3:
Overview of Healthy Child Care America. Overview: HCCA Overview: HCCA Healthy Child Care America/Child Care Health Partnership.
Systems Change to Achieve Permanency Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Arlington, Texas April 15, 2009.
United Advocates for Children of California 1401 El Camino Avenue, Suite 340 Sacramento, CA (916) direct  (866) toll free.
Arc-Riverside Child Abuse & Neglect/Disability Outreach Project - CAN/DO An OCJP funded Project through the Children’s Justice Act Task Force.
A New Narrative for Child Welfare February 16, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on Children, Youth & Families.
CAPTA: Lessons Learned WV Birth to Three. Setting the Stage The Department of Health and Human Resources is the umbrella agency for: Bureau for Public.
Ready by 21 is a trademark of the Forum for Youth Investment, core operating division of Impact Strategies, Inc. The SCPA uses the Forum.
Participants Adoption Study 109 (83%) of 133 WSU Cooperative Extension county chairs, faculty, and program staff responded to survey Dissemination & Implementation.
Strengthening Families Protective Factors Hays Kansas Kansas State Coordinators’ Meeting Nancy Keel, MS Ed, P-3 National Trainer Executive Director Kansas.
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
San Joaquin County’s Health Profile: Useful Data to Improve Our Future Sponsored by the San Joaquin County Community Health Assessment Collaborative
Health Data Initiative Forum III June 5, Our Mission ACF is responsible for federal programs that promote the economic and social well-being of.
Promoting school connections for youth in child welfare Joan Rock, Implementation Coordinator Kristen Hayden-West, Implementation Coordinator Jessica Strolin-Goltzman,
Evaluation Highlights from Pilot Phase July 2005 – June 2007 Prepared for Leadership Team Meeting January 11, 2008.
1 Quality Counts: Helping Improve Outcomes for Pennsylvania’s Children & Families September 22, 2008.
Copyright 2007 American Bar Association ABA Permanency Barriers Project Anne Marie Lancour Heidi Redlich Epstein Mimi Laver Brenda Shum Andrea Khoury Debra.
Pennsylvania Permanency Barriers Project Anne Marie Lancour Heidi Redlich Epstein Mimi Laver Kathleen McNaught Elizabeth Thornton Cristina Cooper Jeffrey.
Getting Prepared in Region 5 Barbara Grice, MS, CHES Marge Heim, APRN, BC DHEC Public Health Region 5 South Carolina.
Stemming the Tides Minnesota’s Child Maltreatment Prevention Programs Seventh Annual Citizen Review Panel Conference May 22, 2008 Brenda Lockwood, MN Dept.
WORKING TOGETHER FOR KIDS MENTAL HEALTH. IMPLEMENTATION Working Together for Kids Mental Health is being implemented in four communities during 2010/11:
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW National Resource.
Abstract ID: 395 Author Name: Araya Sripairoj Presenter Name: Araya Sripairoj Authors: Sripairoj A, Liamputtong P, Harvey K.
PUTTING PREVENTION RESEARCH TO PRACTICE Prepared by: DMHAS Prevention, Intervention & Training Unit, 9/27/96 Karen Ohrenberger, Director Dianne Harnad,
Project KEEP: San Diego 1. Evidenced Based Practice  Best Research Evidence  Best Clinical Experience  Consistent with Family/Client Values  “The.
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY WEEK California Association of School Psychologists.
Keep Them Safe Budget Overview Vicki D’Adam A/Deputy Director General Policy and Strategy Department of Premier and Cabinet.
CSEFEL State Planning Rob Corso. CSEFEL  National Center focused on promoting the social emotional development and school readiness of young children.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW Steven Preister,
Midwest Child Welfare Implementation Center MCWIC Purpose Our purpose is to facilitate the implementation of systemic change to improve outcomes for children.
1 Executive Summary of the Strategic Plan and Proposed Action Steps January 2013 Healthy, Safe, Smart and Strong 1.
Pennsylvania Permanency Barriers Project Anne Marie Lancour Heidi Redlich Epstein Mimi Laver Brenda Shum Andrea Khoury Debra Jenkins David Kelly Kathleen.
Anne Sapp Executive Deputy Commissioner. About DHS Mission The mission of the Texas Department of Human Services is to provide financial, health, and.
Midwest Child Welfare Implementation Center MCWIC Purpose Our purpose is to facilitate the implementation of systemic change to improve outcomes for children.
Work Group 3 Seamless System of Placement Options: Community Partnership Governor’s Action Group for Safe Children Work Group 3 Seamless System of Placement.
Report on the NCSEAM Part C Family Survey Batya Elbaum, Ph.D. National Center for Special Education Accountability Monitoring February 2005.
Background Objectives Methods Study Design A program evaluation of WIHD AfterCare families utilizing data collected from self-report measures and demographic.
Improving the Lives of Mariposa County’s Children and Families System Improvement Plan October 2008 Update.
Results of the Title V Five Year Needs Assessment Dr. Manda Hall, MD Title V Maternal and Child Health Director Raquel Flores Research Specialist Texas.
CT’s DCF-Head Start Partnership Working Together to Serve Vulnerable Families & Support the Development of At-Risk Children Presenters: Rudy Brooks Former.
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY WEEK
No Place Like HOME Texas Kick Off Meeting
Department of Family and Protective Services Investigations
Using Early Care and Education Administrative Data
Senate Health and Human Services Committee
House Human Services Committee
Presentation transcript:

Recruiting Foster Families A Summary of the Department of Health and Human Services OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL REPORT May, 2002 National Resource Center for Foster Care and Permanency Planning at the Hunter College School of Social Work A Service of the Children’s Bureau\ACF\DHHS

Purpose of the Report To assess States’ efforts to recruit foster parents.

BACKGROUND State child welfare agencies are tasked with the responsibility of protecting children from abuse and neglect, which sometimes requires that children be removed from their homes and placed in foster care.

METHODOLOGY The investigators used two mechanisms to conduct this inspection. 1.They used a mail survey to solicit information from the foster care program managers for the 50 States, D.C., and territories to determine their efforts to recruit foster care families. The investigators received 41 completed surveys from foster care program managers.

METHODOLOGY The investigators used two mechanisms to conduct this inspection. 2. The investigators purposefully selected a sample of five States (California, Florida, Illinois,New York, and Texas) for additional data collection. Based on FY 1999 AFCARS data reported to ACF, approximately 53 percent of the nation’s foster children reside in these 5 States.

METHODOLOGY Additional data was derived from:  In-depth interviews conducted in these five States, focusing on State recruitment methods through personal interviews with State foster care program managers, and focus group interviews with foster parents and child welfare staff.  In total, the investigators conducted 14 foster parent and 11 child welfare staff focus groups in the 5 States, interviewing 115 foster parents and 107 child welfare staff respectively.

FINDINGS 1.Recruitment Efforts do not Focus on Families Willing and Able to Care for the Most Challenging Children The foster care agencies use recruiting methods designed to cast a wide net and recruit large volume of prospective foster parents. However, many families recruited in this manner are unwilling to care for school-age children, teenagers, and children with special needs. These children constitute the largest portion of children in foster care, thus creating an urgent need to recruit families who are willing and able to provide them with care.

FINDINGS 2. States are Underutilizing Their Most Effective Recruitment Tool - Foster Parents Only 7 States are using foster parents regularly in their recruitment efforts even though survey respondents in 20 States said they find foster parents to be one of the most successful recruitment tools. Foster parents are effective recruiters because they share information about the need for foster parents through word-of- mouth contact and can promote the idea of fostering just by their presence in the community.

FINDINGS 3. Poor Public Perceptions of Foster Care and Cumbersome Requirements Have a Negative Impact on Recruitment Poor public perceptions of foster care discourage prospective foster parents. Unfavorable media portrayals depicting tragedies and abuse endured by foster children perpetuate negative perceptions about the current foster care system. Delayed responses to inquiries stringent requirements, and the length of time involved in becoming a foster parent also adversely effect States’ recruitment efforts and reinforce existing reservations about fostering.

FINDINGS 4. States are Unable to Measure the Success of Their Recruitment Efforts The lack of performance indicators and information about recruitment expenditures renders many States unable to measure the success of their recruitment efforts. States lack the tools necessary to identify which methods of recruitment are most beneficial and cost effective.

RECOMMENDATIONS  Target recruitment efforts on parents for children who are the most difficult to place in foster care by tailoring recruitment campaigns to recruit families willing and able to care for these children;  Offer incentives to foster parents for successfully recruiting other foster families;  Use foster parents as facilitators during pre- service foster parent training classes;

RECOMMENDATIONS  Develop partnerships with community and faith- based organizations to heighten awareness of foster care needs and foster parenting opportunities;  Determine future foster care trends and needs and link to targeted recruitment strategies;  Work collaboratively among foster care agencies to develop innovative recruitment methods;

RECOMMENDATIONS  Determine recruitment goals necessary to meet the current and future needs of children in foster care (e.g., adolescents, teenagers, and physically or mentally disabled);  Develop methods to assess the effectiveness of recruitment efforts (e.g., survey foster parents and establish benchmarks and tracking data);  Strive to sustain recruitment campaign efforts throughout the year;

RECOMMENDATIONS  Allow foster care agencies to recruit outside of their communities to maintain a steady influx of new prospective foster families;  Examine State licensing standards to identify barriers to recruitment

Systemic Factors to Promote Change Improve Public Perceptions The ACF and State foster care program managers should collaborate with national organizations focused on the welfare of children to promote more positive media coverage of foster care. These positive depictions can be augmented through local foster care program postings, newsletters, and partnerships with community based organizations, businesses, churches, and civic groups.

Systemic Factors to Promote Change Enhance Technical Assistance  Enhance and implement targeted recruitment efforts for difficult to place children;  Utilize foster parents as recruiters;  Identify unmet and future recruitment needs;  Establish recruitment goals;

Systemic Factors to Promote Change Enhance Technical Assistance  Develop outcome-based recruitment plans;  Identify sources and using data to monitor and track recruitment outcomes; and  Determine what recruitment methods are most cost-effective and gather data to calculate recruitment expenditures.

The National Resource Center for Foster Care and Permanency Planning Can Help Training Every state, territory and tribe is entitled to ten free days of on- site professional training in areas where they have determined need, especially in the area of foster home recruitment with Regional Office approval. Technical Assistance Every state, territory and tribe is entitled to ten free days of technical assistance in areas where they have determined need, especially in the area of foster home recruitment with Regional Office approval.

Contact Us at: The National Resource Center for Foster Care and Permanency Planning Gerald P. Mallon, DSW Associate Professor and Executive Director National Resource Center for Foster Care and Permanency Planning at the Hunter College School of Social Work A Service of the Children’s Bureau/ACF-DHHS 129 East 79th Street New York, New York (212) /direct; (212) /fax - - Website