Ultra-sensitive HALO monitor N. Vinogradov, A. Dychkant, P. Piot.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lyon 2005 DIPAC Lyon th DIPAC Lyon June 2005Ulrich Raich CERN AB/BDI Instrumentation in small, low energy machines Ulrich Raich CERN AB-BDI.
Advertisements

The JLab IR/UV FEL Driver D. Douglas for the JLab FEL anarcho-syndicalist commune.
Simulation of Neutrino Factory beam and quasielastic scattering off electrons in the near detector Yordan Karadzhov University of Sofia “St. Kliment Ohridski”
Radiation Physics | ELBE | SRF Photo Injector for Electron- Laser Interaction LA 3 NET conference: Laser applications at accelerators, Mallorca,
The performance of Strip-Fiber EM Calorimeter response uniformity, spatial resolution The 7th ACFA Workshop on Physics and Detector at Future Linear Collider.
R Scrivens, CERN, ABI Workshop, 12/2008 The Feschenko Bunch Shape Monitor User experience at CERN Developed by INR, Troitsk. High resolution bunch shape.
Experience with Bunch Shape Monitors at SNS A. Aleksandrov Spallation Neutron Source, Oak Ridge, USA.
SoLID EC Design for IHEP 2012/10. Basic Features of Preliminary Design Based on COMPASS Shashlyk module design. 0.5mm lead/0.12mm air gap/1.5mm scintillator/0.12mm.
Scint. Al Internal reflection External reflection ↑ ↑ ↑ Decay Detector Development for Giant Resonance Studies By: Gus Olson Mentor: Dr. D.H.Youngblood.
Juhao Wu LCLS FAC 7 Apr Dark Current, Beam Loss, and Collimation in the LCLS J. Wu, D. Dowell, P. Emma, C. Limborg, J. Schmerge,
Beam current4 A Beam pulse length1.5 ms Power input/structure 35 MW Ohmic losses (beam on)1.6 MW RF power to load (beam on) 0.4 MW RF-to-beam efficiency.
Stephen KahnParticle ID Software Mice Collaboration Meeting Page 1 Particle ID Software Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab 27 March 2003.
F Specifications for the dark current kicker for the NML test facility at Fermilab S. Nagaitsev, M. Church, P. Piot, C.Y. Tan, J. Steimel Fermilab May.
Generation and Characterization of Magnetized Bunched Electron Beam from DC Photogun for MEIC Cooler Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD)
Status Report on Mk.II Pepperpot Simon Jolly Imperial College 13 th June 2007.
Generation and Characterization of Magnetized Bunched Electron Beam from DC Photogun for MEIC Cooler Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD)
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
New particle ID detector for Crystal Ball at MAMI-C Daniel Watts, University of Edinburgh John Annand 1, B. Briscoe 3, A. Clarkson 2, Evie Downie 1, D.
Transverse emittance Two different techniques were used to measure the transverse emittance. The multislit mask in the injector 9 MeV Quadrupole scan for.
ASTRA Injector Setup 2012 Julian McKenzie 17/02/2012.
H8-RD22 Experiment to test Crystal Collimation for the LHC Organized by: Walter Scandale Conducted at CERN Geneva, 27 September 2006 Participants included:
Proton Driver: Status and Plans C.R. Prior ASTeC Intense Beams Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
05/05/2004Cyrille Thomas DIAMOND Storage Ring Optical and X-ray Diagnostics.
ATLAS Forward Detector Trigger ATLAS is presently planning to install forward detectors (Roman Pot system) in the LHC tunnel with prime goal to measure.
W. Scandale 1 Status of UA9 Walter Scandale CERN CC09 5 th workshop on crystal channeling March 2009.
Recent Experiments at PITZ ICFA Future Light Sources Sub-Panel Mini Workshop on Start-to-End Simulations of X-RAY FELs August 18-22, 2003 at DESY-Zeuthen,
MEIC Staged Cooling Scheme and Simulation Studies He Zhang MEIC Collaboration Meeting, 10/06/2015.
Overview of ERL MEIC Cooler Design Studies S.V. Benson, Y. Derbenev, D.R. Douglas, F. Hannon, F. Marhauser, R. A Rimmer, C.D. Tennant, H. Zhang, H. Wang,
G5 Beam Instrumentation D. Gassner, E. Pozdeyev 4-09.
1 Plan and Opportunities for Migration and Integration of the Photoinjector into New Muon Lab Mike Church AAC Review - 12/5/06.
Beam Loss Simulation in the Main Injector at Slip-Stacking Injection A.I. Drozhdin, B.C. Brown, D.E. Johnson, I. Kourbanis, K. Seiya June 30, 2006 A.Drozhdin.
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
DEVELOPMENT OF A BEAM LOSS DETECTION SYSTEM FOR THE CLIC TEST FACILITY 3 T. Lefevre Beam loss monitors for the CLIC Test Facility 3 Preliminary study done.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre POST-LINAC BEAM TRANSPORT AND COLLIMATION FOR THE UK’S NEW LIGHT SOURCE PROJECT D. Angal-Kalinin,
Christoph Gabor, ASTeC HIPPI—Meeting (WP 5) 26 th – 28 th September 2007 Non—destructive transverse emittance measurement device The Front End Test Stand.
LDRD: Magnetized Source JLEIC Meeting November 20, 2015 Riad Suleiman and Matt Poelker.
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
Luminosity Monitoring Issues  ZDC  what’s the advantage?  problems  BBC  can they do it? A. Drees QCD critical point workshop, Mar
R.Chehab/ R&D on positron sources for ILC/ Beijing, GENERATION AND TRANSPORT OF A POSITRON BEAM CREATED BY PHOTONS FROM COMPTON PROCESS R.CHEHAB.
1 Beam Extinction and Monitoring at the Upcoming Mu2e Experiment Ryan J. Hooper on behalf of the Mu2e Collaboration DPF 2015 August 5th, 2015.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Jorg Kewisch, Dmitri Kayran Electron Beam Transport and System specifications.
Electron Spectrometer: Status July 14 Simon Jolly, Lawrence Deacon 1 st July 2014.
MeRHIC Internal Cost Review October, Dmitry Kayran for injector group MeRHIC Internal Cost Review October 7-8, 2009 MeRHIC: Injection System Gun.
Marcel Schuh CERN-BE-RF-LR CH-1211 Genève 23, Switzerland 3rd SPL Collaboration Meeting at CERN on November 11-13, 2009 Higher.
Awake electron beam requirements ParameterBaseline Phase 2Range to check Beam Energy16 MeV MeV Energy spread (  ) 0.5 %< 0.5 % ? Bunch Length (
Development of High Current Bunched Magnetized Electron DC Photogun MEIC Collaboration Meeting Fall 2015 October 5 – 7, 2015 Riad Suleiman and Matt Poelker.
Progress of Bunched Beam Electron Cooling Demo L.J.Mao (IMP), H.Zhang (Jlab) On behalf of colleagues from Jlab, BINP and IMP.
LINAC4 emittance measurements BI Day Divonne, 24 th November 11/24/2011 B.Cheymol, E. Bravin, D. Gerard, U. Raich, F. Roncarolo BE/BI 1.
After Protons from RCS 1 st DeeMe Collaboration Meeting Dec. 10, 2012 Kazami Yamamoto J-PARC Center Accelerator Division.
Simulation of Extinction Channel Eric Prebys Mu2e Extinction Technical Design Review 2 November 2015.
Alexander Aleksandrov Spallation Neutron Source Oak Ridge, USA
Dielectric Wakefield R&D programme at Daresbury Lab.
MICE The International Muon Ionisation Cooling Experiment
Electron Cooling Simulation For JLEIC
Time-Reversed Particle Simulations In GPT (or “There And Back Again”)
Update on GEp GEM Background Rates
Dark current and halo tracking in ERLs
Experimental Overview
Magnetized Bunched Electron Beam from DC High Voltage Photogun
Application of a Streak camera at PITZ
Polarized Positrons at Jefferson Lab
ERL accelerator review. Parameters for a Compton source
R. Suleiman and M. Poelker October 12, 2018
R. Suleiman and M. Poelker September 29, 2016
Beam Loss Simulations LHC
ICFA Mini-Workshop, IHEP, 2017
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Beam Halo Considerations for Back Angle Running
New VUV-FEL Simulation results
Generation of Magnetized Bunched Electron Beam for MEIC Cooler
Presentation transcript:

Ultra-sensitive HALO monitor N. Vinogradov, A. Dychkant, P. Piot

Motivation (courtesy to Daniel Mihalcea) Beam requirements (original design): l Charge/pulse: 133pC (I avg = 100 mA) l Transverse emittance < 3  m l Longitudinal emittance < 100 ps-keV l Energy  7 MeV l Energy spread < 1% Keep bunch charge at 1nC and decrease the radius at cathode from 3mm to 2mm => Halo formation downstream of SRF cavities (rings in the transverse plane separated from the beam core). No Halo 16% of particles 19% of particles

Schematic layout of the HALO monitor Primary beam Scanning actuator Plate with narrow slit Beamlet “Cleaning” dipole “Cleaned” signal from HALO Scintillator with array of fibers Long flexible shielded lightguide Photo Multiplier Tube in magnetic shielding High voltage to PMT Signal from PMT

Can we clean the beamlet good enough? Spatial distribution of beam particles right after they passed the slit Momentum distribution (p/mc) in collimated beam right after it passed the slit Momentum distribution (p/mc) of collimated beam at the location of detector head Spatial distribution (m) of beam particles right after they passed the slit (green) and at the location of detector head (red) Initial 10 MeV electron beam: Gaussian distribution for coordinates and momentums X, Y RMS = 2 mm Tungsten plate of 2 mm thickness Slit is 1 mm wide Useful signal Slit at 1 mm from beam axis Computer model: SHOWER is used to simulate the scattered particles passed the collimator along with the true beamlet ELEGANT is used to track the signal from the collimator to the detector location through the cleaning dipole Slit at 7 mm from beam axis

Who is who? Integrated signal from PMT (what we actually see) True HALO signal (signal picked up by scintillator) Background signal picked up by scintillator: should be small or repeatable Background signal picked up by PMT: can be suppressed by shielding the PMT 1. “Good” scenario: the true HALO signal is easy to distinguish 2. “Worse” scenario: still can measure HALO repeatable 3. “Worst” scenario: background is large and not repeatable ←beam is not stable ← there is no stable HALO anyway I I r r

Background test at AWA (Argonne) Shielded scintillating head in fixture Fiber Kuraray Y-11 outer diameter 1.2mm Scintillating material BC-408 with grooves for the fibers (no glue) PMT Hamamatsu R580Lightguide 5· ·10 -9 Beam on scintillator was not measured but calibration on lab source shows signal at the level of 5·10 -9 for 10 single electrons! 6 MeV electron beam; 15 psec pulse; 50 nC bunch charge