Validation of the UW Virtual Reality TURP Simulator Version 1.0 Presented By: Timothy Kowalewski Robert Sweet, MD Peter Oppenheimer Suzanne Weghorst Jeff.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Establishing the reliability and validity of a Virtual Reality Upper Gastrointestinal simulator using a novel video-endoscopic assessment technique. Moorthy.
Advertisements

Effective Supervision
No. 091 Bipolar Diathermy for Transurethral Resection of Prostate: 6 year Australian Single Regional Centre Experience Devang Desai (Urology Registrar),
Whole Slide Digital Images in Residency Education: Sliced Bread or Iced Dread? Lewis A. Hassell, MD University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center Pathology.
How Accurate is the ACGME Resident Survey? Comparison Between ACGME and In-House GME Survey Bridget N. Fahy 1, S. Rob Todd 1, Judy L. Paukert 2, Melanie.
5/5/14 Evaluation of Tube Thoracostomy Teaching Models: An Argument for Developing Low-Fidelity Simulators Azmath Mohammed, MD; Christina Jenkins, MD;
Susan Malone Mercer University.  “The unit has taken effective steps to eliminate bias in assessments and is working to establish the fairness, accuracy,
Human interface technology lab Medical Applications of VR Suzanne Weghorst Human Interface Technology Lab University of Washington.
Simulation based Assessment Training the Trainer Series October, 2014 Training the Trainer Series October, 2014.
Virtual Reality Simulators for Minimal Invasive Surgery Training
Design Activities in Usability Engineering laura leventhal and julie barnes.
The Xitact Platform for Laparoscopic Surgery Training Ivan Večerina, M.D. – Xitact S.A. MMVR11, 2003 LS 500 Trainer Platform.
Minimally Invasive Surgery Task Decomposition - Etymology of Endoscopic Suturing Jacob Rosen* Ph.D., Lily Chang** MD, Jeff Brown ***, Andy Isch** MD Blake.
Visual Spatial Ability – Are Surgeons Born or Made? Zackary Boom-Saad, Pamela Andreatta, EdD, Miranda L. Hillard, Anthony G. Gallagher, PhD †, Scott Langenecker,
Simulation for Training January 25 th, 2003 MMVR Simbionix Corp Cedar Ave. Cleveland OH
Virtual Reality Surgical Training at the University of Washington Presented By: Timothy Kowalewski Robert Sweet MD, Urology Suzanne Weghorst, Human Interface.
Purpose of the Standards
Perception between Regular and Sped teachers in Handling Children with Intellectual Disability: Basis for a Specialized Training Program for Teachers by.
Improved Patient Safety By Comprehensive Simulation-Based Training in Cardiac Surgery AHRQ 2012 Annual Conference September 10, 2012 Richard H. Feins,
Emergency Ultrasound Proposal. Emergency Ultrasound In common use since early 1990’s In common use since early 1990’s First curriculum was published in.
Blood effects for Flinders Sinus Surgery Simulator
Assessment of Communication Skills in Medical Education
Scales and Indices While trying to capture the complexity of a phenomenon We try to seek multiple indicators, regardless of the methodology we use: Qualitative.
1 Development of Valid and Reliable Case Studies for Teaching, Diagnostic Reasoning, and Other Purposes Margaret Lunney, RN, PhD Professor College of.
Applying Principles of Universal Design to Assessment Item Modification Peter A. Beddow III Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN June 2008.
Increasing Pharmacists reporting of adverse medication incidents Being Ready for new risks and Opportunities Prepared by Tim Garrett Northern Sydney Central.
Matthew Roberts, Vanessa Bacal, Mohammed Mahdi, Ethan D. Grober Mount Sinai & Women’s College Hospital, Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University.
Sandeep Bagla, MD Cardiovascular & Interventional Radiology Inova Alexandria Hospital.
Lecture 6: Reliability and validity of scales (cont) 1. In relation to scales, define the following terms: - Content validity - Criterion validity (concurrent.
Simulation and Medical Performance Peter G. Schulam, M.D., Ph.D. Associate Professor Department of Urology Eric Savitsky, M.D. Associate Professor Department.
EVIDENCE ABOUT DIAGNOSTIC TESTS Min H. Huang, PT, PhD, NCS.
Howard University February 13,2013 The Integrity of Data Management Responsible Conduct of Research Workshop Peggy Carr, Ph.D. Associate Commissioner National.
Module 2: Quality and Quality Measures The degree to which health services for individuals and populations increase the likelihood of desired health outcomes.
Reliability vs. Validity.  Reliability  the consistency of your measurement, or the degree to which an instrument measures the same way each time it.
Chapter 8 Validity and Reliability. Validity How well can you defend the measure? –Face V –Content V –Criterion-related V –Construct V.
In order to improve the Family Medicine obstetrics (OB) rotation orientation and to encourage resident- resident teaching, we developed an orientation.
Randomized double-blinded trial investigating the impact of a curriculum focused on error recognition on laparoscopic suturing training J Bingener, T Boyd,
Feasibility and Value of a Procedural Workshop for Surgery Residents Based on Phase-II of the APDS/ ACS National Skills Curriculum Dimitrios Stefanidis.
Does the Rate of Achieving Competency on simulated Laparoscopy Training Programs Predict Actual Skill in Performing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy? Warren.
Simulators for Objective Differentiation of Force-Based Laparoscopic Skills: Towards a Salient Haptic Skills Trainer Dane E. Smith, Joseph Singapogu, Timothy.
Measurement and Scaling
Integrating EM QA Performance Metrics with Performance Analysis Processes August 26, 2009 Robert Hinds, Manager, Quality Assurance Engineering & Greg Peterson,
Proficiency-Based Training for Phacoemulsification Princeton Lee Research Fellow RCSI & ICO Alcon Education Night 27/02/2009.
R³P Project Faculty Development. Question Themes: Day 1 Engagement of faculty (5) Recognizing faculty proficiency in assessment (3) Create value for clinician-educator.
R. Sweet 1,2, T. Kowalewski 2, P. Oppenheimer 2, J. Berkley 2, J. Porter 1, R. Satava 3, S. Weghorst 2 1 Department of Urology, University of Washington,
MEASUREMENT: PART 1. Overview  Background  Scales of Measurement  Reliability  Validity (next time)
Great Debate: Simulation A Resident’s Perspective Ernest (Ted) Gomez, MD, MTR PGY-3 Resident Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery.
Neal E. Seymour, MD Baystate Medical Center Tufts University School of Medicine Baystate Simulation Center—Goldberg Surgical Skills Lab 2010 APDS Annual.
Creating a Portfolio Eileen Klein, MD, MPH. Goal Have participants create, update and maintain an effective portfolio throughout their career.
Lesson 3 Measurement and Scaling. Case: “What is performance?” brandesign.co.za.
LEARN. CARE. COMMUNITY. PNWU.edu Figure 1: Concept Map for IPE Fidelity 1.Determine the rubric score that represents high, medium, and low fidelity. 2.Identify.
Introduction Motivation Ultrasound-guided (USG) needle interventions, such as central venous catheterization (CVC), require simultaneous sonography and.
From Program Theory to Systems Theory: Using Logic Analysis to Re- conceptualize an Evaluation Lori L. Bakken, PhD; Jonathan M. Ross, MD; Curtis A. Olson,
Can Computers Teach Empathy? A Randomized Controlled Study Using Virtual Patients to Enhance Medical Students’ Empathic Communication Adriana Foster, MD.
Two-and-half years of Experience in Implementing New Expanded Curriculum in Geriatrics for the Family Medicine Residency Program. O Pishchalenko, MD, PhD,
Design and Evaluation of a Virtual Reality Simulation Module for Training Advanced Temporal Bone Surgery Sudanthi Wijewickrema Department of Surgery (Otolaryngology)
Objective Methods for Assessment of Technical Skills in Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery Residents: A Systematic Review Érika MERCIER1, Ségolène CHAGNON-MONARQUE1,
Medical Simulation J. Peter Kincaid, Ph.D.
Presenter: Sarah Z. Cole, DO, FAAFP A Work in Progress (15 minutes)
ACT with Mindfulness: Piloting
1st International Online BioMedical Conference (IOBMC 2015)
Measurement: Part 1.
Angela Buffington, PhD, MA
International Consensus on Defining and Measuring Quality in Surgical Training Pritam Singh, Rajesh Aggarwal, Boris Zevin, Teodor Grantcharov, Ara Darzi.
Assessing learners’ needs
Training and Development
CLICK TO GO BACK TO KIOSK MENU
Department of Emergency Medicine
Figure 2 Recommended simulation training pathway
– Graphics and Visualization
Presentation transcript:

Validation of the UW Virtual Reality TURP Simulator Version 1.0 Presented By: Timothy Kowalewski Robert Sweet, MD Peter Oppenheimer Suzanne Weghorst Jeff Berkley, Ph.D

What is TURP? Transuretheral Resection of the Prostate Transuretheral Resection of the Prostate Gold-standard for treating obstructive urinary symptoms Gold-standard for treating obstructive urinary symptoms Challenging to teach and learn Challenging to teach and learn

Goals of the Project Overall Project Goal: Overall Project Goal: To help streamline urological procedure education with the aid of simulation technologyTo help streamline urological procedure education with the aid of simulation technology Specific Goals of This Study: Specific Goals of This Study: Establish validation status of Version 1.0, UW Establish validation status of Version 1.0, UW TURP Simulator as a training and assessment tool. TURP Simulator as a training and assessment tool.

TURP: a good model for Simulation Objective assessment Objective assessment High risk to patients High risk to patients Apparent training gap Apparent training gap Common problem Common problem National Average Number of TURPS performed by residents Source: ACGME Sweet, et al. Journal of Endourology. October, 2002.

Mainstay operation Mainstay operation Apparent demand Apparent demand Amenable to current technology Amenable to current technology 99%: Validated Simulator Useful in Training 75%: Validated Simulator Useful after Residency …YES 98%: TURP is the Gold Standard of care TURP: a good model for Simulation

Methods Simulator Construction Simulator Construction  Virtual anatomy and visual elements  Virtual anatomy and visual elements  Real-time force / tactile feedback  Real-time force / tactile feedback  O.R. instrumentation  O.R. instrumentation  External physical model  External physical model  Auditory cues  Auditory cues

Methods Simulator Construction Simulator Construction Training Video Training Video  Definition of task and errors  Definition of task and errors  Statement of goal:  Statement of goal: “Efficiently resect as much tissue as possible while avoiding errors “Efficiently resect as much tissue as possible while avoiding errors and minimizing blood loss, amount of irrigant used, coagulation and minimizing blood loss, amount of irrigant used, coagulation current and number of cuts…” current and number of cuts…” Special Thanks to Anthony Gallager, Ph.D

Methods Simulator Construction Simulator Construction Training Video Training Video Pre-Task Questionnaire Pre-Task Questionnaire  Demographics, gender, professional experience, education, ‘video  Demographics, gender, professional experience, education, ‘video game’ experience, TURP-related questions, etc… game’ experience, TURP-related questions, etc…  Stratification of database  Stratification of database

Methods Simulator Construction Simulator Construction Training Video Training Video Pre-Task Questionnaire Pre-Task Questionnaire Pre-Compiled, 5-minute Task Pre-Compiled, 5-minute Task  Three trained, non-medical technicians  Three trained, non-medical technicians  Consistent, pre-determined responses  Consistent, pre-determined responses  Privacy and Anonymity  Privacy and Anonymity

Methods Simulator Construction Simulator Construction Training Video Training Video Pre-Task Questionnaire Pre-Task Questionnaire Pre-Compiled, 5-minute Task Pre-Compiled, 5-minute Task Post-Task Questionnaire Post-Task Questionnaire  Critique of simulator according to its elements  Critique of simulator according to its elements  Open feedback  Open feedback

Methods Simulator Construction Simulator Construction Training Video Training Video Pre-Task Questionnaire Pre-Task Questionnaire Pre-Compiled, 5-minute Task Pre-Compiled, 5-minute Task Post-Task Questionnaire Post-Task Questionnaire AUA Annual Conference AUA Annual Conference  72 Experts  72 Experts  19 Trainees  19 Trainees  19 Novices  19 Novices

Metrics Grams of tissue resected Grams of tissue resected Amount of irrigant used Amount of irrigant used Quantity of ambient blood Quantity of ambient blood Number and severity of bleeding vessels Number and severity of bleeding vessels Instrument position and interaction Instrument position and interaction Number of cuts at tissue Number of cuts at tissue ~ 12 Hz resolution ~ 12 Hz resolution Combinations thereof … Combinations thereof …

Results: Face Validity  Do you feel the UW TURP Simulator would be useful as a training tool?

Results: Face Validity  Would you like to see it implemented into the curriculum of residency programs?

Results: Face Validity  Do you feel it would be useful as a tool for accreditation?

Results: Content Validity Categorical Standardized Likert scale of global acceptability Acceptability threshold Slightly acceptable Moderately acceptable Totally acceptable Slightly unacceptable Moderately unacceptable Totally unacceptable

Results: Novices vs. Experts ( p < ) Result of Levene-conditioned two-tailed T-test quantifies resolving potential of selected metrics to determine differences between novices and experts.

Results: Construct Validity Performance of Errors

Construct/Concurrent Validity (Cross-sectional) Metrics correlations mimicked the operating room. Experts and trainees were more efficient at cutting than novices. (P<.01) Experts were more efficient at coagulating bleeders than trainees who were more efficient than novices. (P<.05, P<.01) Performance among experts did not exhibit “decay” Video game experience influenced performance in novices and experts only.

Conclusions Established Face and Content Validity Established Face and Content Validity Established Construct Validity (X-sectional) Established Construct Validity (X-sectional) Addressed Concurrent Validity (incomplete) Addressed Concurrent Validity (incomplete) NO assessment predictive validity or longitudinal studies NO assessment predictive validity or longitudinal studies For Version For Version

Version 2.0 Predictive and Construct Validation Anatomy ID Module Coagulation Module Cutting Module Advanced Resection Module