M. Lefebvre, 6 June 2006Noise and correlation monitoring1 Noise and correlation monitoring using LArNoiseMonToolBase M. Lefebvre University of Victoria.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RPC & LVL1 Mu Barrel Online Monitoring during LS1 M. Della Pietra.
Advertisements

Online Monitoring and plane checkout Online monitoring is used at the mine for: –sanity checks - “is everything working” –diagnostics - rates, hot/dead.
Trigger Validation Board PVSS panels tutorial 1. TVB components 2 FPGA controls :  FPGA HCAL hadron trigger  FPGA EPPI electron, photon, pi0, Global.
R. Zitoun, Stony Brook and LAPP CTF Meeting10 February Much Noise About Nothing? Robert Zitoun Stony Brook and LAPP CTF Meeting February 10, 2003.
Julien Labbé - Status of Barrel Crosstalk Analysis - Barrel P3C meeting, Thursday May 3rd Status of Barrel Crosstalk Analysis 2 definitions : Peak-to-peak.
1 The ATLAS Missing E T trigger Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University of Oxford On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University.
Digital Filtering Performance in the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger David Hadley on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
S 1 Summer Student Sessions 13 August 2008 Chew Soo Hoon University Of Malaya, Malaysia Jan Stark LPSC, Grenoble, France
Zero Energy Response of ADF Raw ADC and ADF Output Et & New “36 LiveX sampling mode” for Find_DAC Philippe Laurens MSU Sept 2006 (rev 20-sept-2006)
ECAL Spike Plot Approval ECAL Anomalous Signal Plots Approval Adi Bornheim for ECAL
On Noise Characterization Michel Lefebvre University of Victoria Physics and Astronomy 14 August 2003.
M. Lefebvre, 31 July 2007LArNoiseMonToolBase and MMTB migration1 First attempt at MMTB migration of LArNoiseMonToolBase suite M. Lefebvre University of.
Athena LAr Noise Monitoring Software Brief Status Report Following discussions with Remi Lafaye, the design is evolving Try to avoid computing the pedestal.
Possible code modifications for real online environment use of LArNoiseMonToolBase M. Lefebvre University of Victoria Monitoring meeting 18 September 2006.
M. Lefebvre, 31 May 2006 (updated 2006/06/04)Noise and correlation issues1 Noise and correlation issues using LArNoiseMonToolBase M. Lefebvre University.
1Calice-UK Cambridge 9/9/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare Feb’05 DESY data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. Work in progress – no definitive conclusions.
M. Lefebvre, 8 June 2006Noise and correlation monitoring1 Noise and correlation monitoring using LArNoiseMonToolBase M. Lefebvre University of Victoria.
ECAL Digitization Rick Wilkinson May 25, ECAL Digitization CaloHitResponse CaloSamples (analog signal) EcalElectronicsSim EBDataFrame EEDataFrame.
LAr Noise Monitoring Software Brief Status Report Although some tools already exist, many are testbeam specific  not made for large number of cells to.
HCAL Digitization Rick Wilkinson. Program Flow CaloHitResponse CaloSamples (analog signal) HcalElectronicsSim HBHEDataFrame (or HF, or HO) SimHits DetId= ,
Event Phase Reconstruction Raw TDC Event time used for monitoring Event phase  TBPhaseRec  TBPhase Michel Lefebvre Rob McPherson University of Victoria.
M. Lefebvre, 14 Feb 2006LArNoiseMonToolBase update and work in progress1 T.Ince, M.Lefebvre, R.McPherson, R.Seuster, K.Voss University of Victoria 14 Feb.
ENSEMBLE EMPIRICAL MODE DECOMPOSITION Noise Assisted Signal Analysis (nasa) Part II EEMD Zhaohua Wu and N. E. Huang: Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition:
ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeters Geneva Group Alain BLONDEL Arno STRAESSNER Ahmed ABDELALIM Daniel LA MARRA Eric PERRIN Gabriel PELLERITI Gilbert VIOLLAT.
Social Science Research Design and Statistics, 2/e Alfred P. Rovai, Jason D. Baker, and Michael K. Ponton Mann-Whitney U Test PowerPoint Prepared by Alfred.
2011 HV scan SF6 flow-meter accident 2011 Results comparison RPC HV efficiency scan Pigi Paolucci on behalf of RPC collaboration.
Plug & Play Middle School Common Core Statistics and Probability using TinkerPlots.
Performance of SPIROC chips in SKIROC mode
SSD Status P. Christakoglou (NIKHEF-UU) for the SSD collaboration Thanks to: Marco vL, Enrico, Mino, Marek and Massimo.
W  eν The W->eν analysis is a phi uniformity calibration, and only yields relative calibration constants. This means that all of the α’s in a given eta.
Some notes on ezTree and EMC data in MuDst Marco van Leeuwen, LBNL.
A coherent null stream consistency test for gravitational wave bursts Antony Searle (ANU) in collaboration with Shourov Chatterji, Albert Lazzarini, Leo.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL, Dec 2004 Alexandre A. P. Suaide University of Sao Paulo Slide 1 BEMC software and calibration L3 display 200 GeV February.
1 Online Calibration of Calorimeter Mrinmoy Bhattacharjee SUNY, Stony Brook Thanks to: D. Schamberger, L. Groer, U. Bassler, B. Olivier, M. Thioye Institutions:
ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter Monitoring & Data Quality Jessica Levêque Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter.
CAT plenary meeting VLIMANT Jean-RochLPNHE13 may 2003 T42 algorithm dedicated webpage :
1 xCAL monitoring Yu. Guz, IHEP, Protvino I.Machikhiliyan, ITEP, Moscow.
28 June 2010 LHCb week St Petersburg M.N Minard 1 Calorimeter status Hardware status Controls & monitoring Timing alignment Calorimeters calibration Pending.
Tracker Visualization Tool: integration in ORCA Maria S. Mennea, Giuseppe Zito University & INFN Bari, Italy Tracker b-tau Cosmic Challenge preparation.
Results from particle beam tests of the ATLAS liquid argon endcap calorimeters Beam test setup Signal reconstruction Response to electrons  Electromagnetic.
Ch. 10 Correlation and Regression 10-2 Notes Linear Regression and the Coefficient of Determination.
Online (GNAM) and offline (Express Stream and Tier0) monitoring produced results during cosmic/collision runs (Oct-Dec 2009) Shifter and expert level monitoring.
Digitization and hit reconstruction for Silicon Tracker in MarlinReco Sergey Shulga, Tatiana Ilicheva JINR, Dubna, Russia GSU, Gomel, Belarus LCWS07 30.
5-9 June 2006Erika Garutti - CALOR CALICE scintillator HCAL commissioning experience and test beam program Erika Garutti On behalf of the CALICE.
TTF - ECAL Plenary in CMS week ECAL Stability Contacts: Marc Dejardin, Julie Malcles (laser)
CalTask Force Workshop VLIMANT Jean-RochLPNHE10 feb 2003 T42 algorithm dedicated webpage :
10-Dec-2008 / S.KunoriHCAL Noise Identification and Monitoring1 HCAL Noise Identification and Filtering (HPD behavior and noise identification) Shuichi.
Summary of User Requirements for Calibration and Alignment Database Magali Gruwé CERN PH/AIP ALICE Offline Week Alignment and Calibration Workshop February.
N. Saoulidou, Fermilab1 Study of the QIE Response & Calibration (Current Injection CalDet & Development of diagnostic tools for NearDet N.Saoulidou,
Monitoring for the EMEC/HEC Combined Run in August HEC/FCAL/Combined Testbeam Meeting 16 April 2002 Rob McPherson for the UVic group (Fincke, Kanaya, Keeler,
The ATLAS Electromagnetic and Hadronic End-Cap Calorimeter in a Combined Beam Test Tamara Hughes University of Victoria WRNPPC 2004.
Development of a pad interpolation algorithm using charge-sharing.
Calo Calibration meeting 08 september 2009 Calorimeter Olivier Deschamps LPC Clermont-Fd Software Status&News.
1 Some reminders 2011 flagging policy : – Event by event flagging. Correlation between express stream and CosmicCalo – Luminosity blocks flagging. Impact.
Comparison of MC and data Abelardo Moralejo Padova.
L1Calo EM Efficiency Maps Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham L1Calo Weekly Meeting 07/03/2011.
LAr Noise Monitoring Tools T.Ince, M.Lefebvre, R.McPherson, R.Seuster, K.Voss University of Victoria LAr Week Nov 2005.
New zero suppression in simulation: current status David Adams BNL November 25, 2015 DUNE 35-ton simulation, reconstruction and analysis.
3/06/06 CALOR 06Alexandre Zabi - Imperial College1 CMS ECAL Performance: Test Beam Results Alexandre Zabi on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group CMS ECAL.
4 Dec., 2001 Software Week Data flow in the LArG Reconstruction software chain Updated status for various reconstruction algorithm LAr Converters and miscellaneous.
11 june 2002 CMS ECAL : Patrick Jarry ( Saclay) 1 Pulse shape reconstruction : CMS ECAL Introduction –the problem –the tools –experimental pulse shape.
Check of Calibration Hits in the Atlas simulation. Assignment of DM energy to CaloCluster. G.Pospelov Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk,
Analysis of LumiCal data from the 2010 testbeam
LAr Response to pions: Data vs MC
EZDC spectra reconstruction and calibration
Online Monitoring : Detector and Performance check
RAPID/IES Calibration Status Rutherford Appleton Lab
BESIII EMC electronics
Dilepton Mass. Progress report.
Current status Minjung Kim
Presentation transcript:

M. Lefebvre, 6 June 2006Noise and correlation monitoring1 Noise and correlation monitoring using LArNoiseMonToolBase M. Lefebvre University of Victoria Endcap expert week 06 June 2006

M. Lefebvre, 6 June 2006Noise and correlation monitoring2 tools and default jobOptions Two concrete implementations of LArNoiseMonToolBase  LArDigitNoiseMonTool  LArRawChannelNoiseMonTool  channels which do not have a valid offlineID are not monitored LArDigitNoiseMonTool_jobOptions.py  monitor the adc value of time sample 0 of LArDigits LArRawChannelNoiseMonTool  monitor the energy value of LArRawChannels Default jobOptions allows the following monitoring:  Summary histo: cryostatEnd context FEB status of noise performance, one entry per FEB  FEB context channel mean (pedestal) for all febs, all gains  FEB context channel rms (noise) for all febs, all gains  cryostatEnd context total/incoherent noise ratio (per FEB) over all channels for each FEB

M. Lefebvre, 6 June 2006Noise and correlation monitoring3 summary histo summarizes noise performance, one entry per FEB for tags including LArMonTools  for each FEB, the average noise A is computed  if at least one channel has noise N such that |1 – N/A| > D then this FEB is flagged as NOT ok.  by default, D = 1.  this criterion works well for the EM (barrel and endcap), where the noise is rather uniform per FEB by design  this criterion is not adequate for the HEC, where the noise varies a lot in one FEB, again by design.

M. Lefebvre, 6 June 2006Noise and correlation monitoring4 summary histo (continued) for tags above and including LArMonTools  the same criterion is applied for the EM and FCal  for the HEC, the same criterion is applied but per region per ieta within a FEB  this is well adapted to the HEC the noise varies a lot per FEB and per region at least 4 channels for a given (region, ieta) in each HEC FEB, corresponding to different iphi values  this is NOT well adapted to the EM often only 2 channels for a given (region, ieta) in a FEB  by default, D = 0.5 better that 1., as it allows to flag very low noise channels

M. Lefebvre, 6 June 2006Noise and correlation monitoring5 summary histo (continued) example run 1078 (pedestal high gain, 1000 events) EndcapCFT10Slot08 EndcapCFT02LHECM2

M. Lefebvre, 6 June 2006Noise and correlation monitoring6 pedestal and noise A closer look at the pedestal noise of the flagged FEB there are in fact 8 channels in this FEB in HEC sampling 1 region 0 and ieta = 5 Channel 21 is one of them, and it is different from the others...

M. Lefebvre, 6 June 2006Noise and correlation monitoring7 pedestal and noise pedestal and noise of a “good” FEB

M. Lefebvre, 6 June 2006Noise and correlation monitoring8 region context histograms pedestal and noise can also be monitored in region context there are in fact 8 channels in this FEB in HEC sampling 1 region 0 and ieta = 5 Channel 21 is one of them.

M. Lefebvre, 6 June 2006Noise and correlation monitoring9 channel data profile use the jobOption  febNamesForChannelHistos = [“EndcapCFT02LHECM2”]  and generate signal distribution for all channel is this feb  default is [] (no FEB enabled) channel 21 rms = 6.69 ADC channel 24 rms  50 ADC

M. Lefebvre, 6 June 2006Noise and correlation monitoring10 coherent noise summary produced by default jobOptions  R = total/incoherent noise ratio computed over all channels in a FEB EndcapCFT10Slot01 EndcapCFT02LEMInner1 R = 1.91 values of R for each FEB are printed as INFO

M. Lefebvre, 6 June 2006Noise and correlation monitoring11 coherent noise investigations: 1d histos use the jobOption  binWindowSizesForSums = [0,4,8]  monitorTotalNoise obtain useful histograms sensitive to coherent noise  0 means running sums from channel 0 to n  4 means sums in sliding window from channel n-3 to n some coherent noise present R = 1.91 EndcapCFT10Slot01 EndcapCFT02LEMInner1 this FEB ok EndcapCFT10Slot02 EndcapCFT02LEMInner2

M. Lefebvre, 6 June 2006Noise and correlation monitoring12 coherent noise investigations: 2d histos use the jobOption  febNamesFor2dCorrCoef = [“EndcapCFT10Slot01”,” EndcapCFT10Slot02”]  groupSizesFor2dCorrCoef = [1,4,8,16] obtain 2d correlation coefficient matrices  1 means 128 x 128 (for a FEB with 128 channels monitored)  4 means 32 x 32 (for a FEB with 128 channels monitored)  nice symmetric colour palette, thanks to Tayfun

M. Lefebvre, 6 June 2006Noise and correlation monitoring13 correlation coefficient matrices 128 x 128 matrices EndcapCFT10Slot01 EndcapCFT02LEMInner1 is more red!! EndcapCFT10Slot02 EndcapCFT02LEMInner2 is normal

M. Lefebvre, 6 June 2006Noise and correlation monitoring14 correlation coefficient matrices 32 x 32 matrices (groups of 4 channels) EndcapCFT10Slot01 EndcapCFT02LEMInner1 is more red!! EndcapCFT10Slot02 EndcapCFT02LEMInner2 is normal

M. Lefebvre, 6 June 2006Noise and correlation monitoring15 barrel commissioning examples Interesting features have been observed on barrel commissioning data small correlations with distinctive pattern run 3506 (2006/05/11)

M. Lefebvre, 6 June 2006Noise and correlation monitoring16 run 1220 (2006/02/02) BarrelC FT08R Front3 Channel 052 BarrelC FT01 Slot05 Channel 052 running sum R 4channel sum R

M. Lefebvre, 6 June 2006Noise and correlation monitoring17 run 1220 (2006/02/02) BarrelC FT08R Front3 Channel 052 BarrelC FT01 Slot05 Channel 052

M. Lefebvre, 6 June 2006Noise and correlation monitoring18 runs 1220, 1221, 1222 (2006/02/02) HIGH MEDIUM LOW BarrelC FT08R Front3 BarrelC FT01 Slot05 channel 52 region slow growth of running sum R caused by near neighbour correlations

M. Lefebvre, 6 June 2006Noise and correlation monitoring19 run 3506 (2006/05/11)

M. Lefebvre, 6 June 2006Noise and correlation monitoring20 configurable tools Have a look at the jobOption files for more options Uses the latest LArOnlineIDStrHelper  from HWIdentifier to std::string for histo names, histo titles, printouts  from std::string to HWIdentifier for jobOptions  establishes a standard  works with the debugged FCal channel mapping