STUDY II: m1507 vs. m1510 IDS120f: m1507/MCNP vs. M1510/MCNP vs. FLUKA IDS120f vs. IDS20g GEOMETRY IDS90f: B10/B11 SHIELDING RING(S) STUDIES Nicholas Souchlas.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SUPERCONDUCTING SOLENOIDS - SHIELDING STUDIES 1. N. Souchlas BNL (Oct. 5, 2010)
Advertisements

IDS120j WITH/WITHOUT GAPS SH#4 AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (3/14/2012) 1.
Energy deposition and neutron background studies for a low energy proton therapy facility Roxana Rata*, Roger Barlow* * International Institute for Accelerator.
KT McDonald Target Studies Weekly Meeting July 10, Power Deposition in Graphite Targets of Various Radii K.T. McDonald, J. Back, N. Souchlas July.
Particle Production of a Carbon/Mercury Target System for the Intensity Frontier X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ MAP Spring.
Comparison of Power Depositions Xiaoping Ding UCLA Target Studies Jul. 13, 2010.
Operated by Brookhaven Science Associates for the U.S. Department of Energy A Pion Production and Capture System for a 4 MW Target Station X. Ding, D.
Pion capture and transport system for PRISM M. Yoshida Osaka Univ. 2005/8/28 NuFACT06 at UCI.
IDS120h: Be WINDOW DETAILED CALCULATION, SHIELDING VESSELS, RESULTS FOR DIFFERENT GLOBAL STEPS Nicholas Souchlas (9/20/2011) 1.
Energy Deposition of 4-MW Beam Power in a Mercury Jet Target Xiaoping Ding UCLA Target Studies Meeting, Feb. 9, 2010.
MC/NF TARGET SHIELDING STUDIES. NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS (10/29/2010)‏ 1.
SHIELDING STUDIES FOR THE MUON COLLIDER TARGET NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS BNL Nov 30, 2010 ‏ 1.
Energy Deposition of 4MW Beam Power in a Mercury Jet Target Xiaoping Ding UCLA Target Studies Mar. 9, 2010 (Update of talk on Feb. 9, 2010)
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target System Update IDS-NF Plenary Meeting Arlington, VA October 18, 2011.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target Baseline IDS-NF Plenary CERN March 23-24, 2009.
IDS-NF Target Studies H. Kirk (BNL) July 8, 2009.
1 Comparison of Power Depositions X. Ding, D. B. Cline, UCLA H. Kirk, J. S. Berg, BNL Collaboration Meeting July 2, 2010.
Comparison of Power Deposition in SC1 Coil Xiaoping Ding UCLA Target Studies Jun. 29, 2010.
Power Deposition in SC1 Coil Xiaoping Ding UCLA Target Studies Apr. 20, 2010.
1 Neutrino Factory Front End (IDS) and Variations David Neuffer November 23, 2010.
Above: Power deposition in the superconducting magnets and the tungsten-carbide + water shield inside them, according to a FLUKA simulation Approximately.
Above: On-axis field profiles of resistive, superconducting and all magnets, and bore-tube radius r = 7.5 (B/20T) −½ cm. Above: Hoop strain ε θ in resistive.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Review of NFMCC Studies 1 and 2: Target Support Facilities V.B. Graves Meeting on High Power Targets.
SUPERCONDUCTING SOLENOIDS - SHIELDING STUDIES 3. NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS (10/28/2010)‏
Solid Target Options NuFACT’00 S. Childress Solid Target Options The choice of a primary beam target for the neutrino factory, with beam power of
IDS120h POWER DEPOSITION AND Hg POOL STUDIES Nicholas Souchlas (7/26/2011) 1.
Background comparison between 20 mrad and 2 mr crossings Takashi Maruyama SLAC Machine-Detector Interface Workshop SLAC January 6-8, 2005.
Target and Absorbers L2 Manager: K McDonald, Princeton U March xx, 2013 Presenter’s Name | DOE Mini-Review of MAP (FNAL, March 4-6, 2013)1 Mission Target:
SUPERCONDUCTING SOLENOIDS - SHIELDING STUDIES 1..
Meson Productions for Target System with GA/HG Jet and IDS120h Configuration X. Ding (Presenter), D. Cline, UCLA H. Kirk, J.S. Berg, BNL Muon Accelerator.
Energy deposition for intense muon sources (chicane + the rest of the front end) Pavel Snopok Illinois Institute of Technology and Fermilab December 4,
IDS120j WITHOUT GAPS AND WITH MAXIMUM SIZE GAPS ( aka ''NIGHTMARE'' CASE SCENARIO ) SC#4, SC#7 AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS. Nicholas Souchlas,
IDS120h GEOMETRY WITH MODIFIED Hg POOL VESSEL. SIMULATIONS FOR 60%W+40%He SHIELDING (P12 'POINT') WITH STST SHIELDING VESSELS EFFECTS OF Be WINDOW WATER.
SHIELDING STUDIES FOR THE MUON COLLIDER TARGET. (From STUDY II to IDS120f geometries) NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS (BNL)‏ ‏ 1.
KT McDonald MAP Tech Board Meeting Oct 20, The MAP Targetry Program in FY11 and FY12 K. McDonald Princeton U. (Oct 20, 2011) MAP Technical Board.
DEPOSITED POWER STUDIES FOR THE MC/NF TARGET STATION. Nicholas Souchlas (PBL) (MAP CONFERENCE SLAC 2012) 1 DEPOSITED POWER STUDIES FOR THE MC/NF TARGET.
1 Energy Deposition of 4MW Beam Power in a Mercury Jet Target X. Ding, D. B. Cline UCLA H. Kirk, J. S. Berg BNL The International Design Study for the.
IDS120j WITH GAPS SC#3 AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS WITH MAX GAPS SC#3, SC#4 AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS, DP AND SC TOTAL DP WITH VARYING.
IDS120h GEOMETRY WITH MODIFIED Hg POOL VESSEL. SIMULATIONS FOR 60%W+40%He SHIELDING (P12 'POINT') WITH STST SHIELDING VESSELS. BP#1(STST/W), SH#1, BeWindow,SC#8.
Particle Production at 3 GeV (update) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies Sept. 23, /23/13.
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS: NEW Hg MODULE mars1510 ( DESKTOP ) vs. mars1512 ( PRINCETON CLUSTER ) Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (3/28/2012) 1.
Beam line Experiment area SC magnet Pion production target
Particle Production of Carbon Target with 20Tto2T5m Configuration at 6.75 GeV (Updated) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies April 3, /3/14.
Beam Dump for Carbon Target with IDS120h Configuration at 6.75 GeV (Updated) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies Jan. 24, /24/14.
Particle Production with Carbon Target and IDS120j Configuration at 3 GeV (update) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies Nov. 14, /14/13.
SPL-SB and NF Beam Window Studies Stress Analysis Matt Rooney, Tristan Davenne, Chris Densham March 2010.
Meson Production of Carbon Target at 3 GeV X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies 17/18/13.
Carbon Target Design and Optimization for an Intense Muon Source X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ MAP Winter Collaboration.
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS ( 20 cm GAPS AND 15.8 g/cc W BEADS ) AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION STUDIES FOR: BP#1, SH#1, SHVS#1/LFL, SC#1+SC#2, BeWind.
Multiprocessing/MARS15(2012)/Princeton Cluster (IDS120j w/t Resistive Magnets: New Hg Module) X. Ding UCLA (4/11/2013)
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS MODIFYING Hg MODULE Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (11/1/2012) 1.
IDS120j WITH AND WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS PION AND MUON STUDIES WITHIN TAPER REGION, III ( 20 cm GAPS BETWEEN CRYOSTATS ) Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (9/4/2012)
IDS120i GEOMETRY. SIMULATIONS FOR 60%W+40%He SHIELDING WITH STST SHIELDING VESSELS. Hg vs. Ga DEPOSITED POWER DISTRIBUTION. (using Ding's optimized parameters)
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS SEMGENTATION STUDIES FOR BEAM PIPE BEYOND FIRST CRYOSTAT ( 20 cm GAPS AND 15.8 g/cc W BEADS ) Nicholas Souchlas, PBL.
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS SEMGENTATION STUDIES FOR BP#2 WITHIN FIRST CRYOSTAT AND RIGHT FLANGE OF Hg POOL INNER VESSEL ( 20 cm GAPS AND 15.8 g/cc.
MDI Simulations at SLAC Takashi Maruyama, Lew Keller, Thomas Markiewicz, Uli Wienands, SLAC MAP Collaboration Meeting, FNAL June 21, 2013.
N_TOF EAR-1 Simulations The “γ-flash” A. Tsinganis (CERN/NTUA), C. Guerrero (CERN), V. Vlachoudis (CERN) n_TOF Annual Collaboration Meeting Lisbon, December.
Ids120h_side. ids120h_top ids120h_iso ids120h_end.
BNL solenoid capture workshop: magnet challenges are not trivial Summarized by Tengming Shen
SHIELDING STUDIES FOR IDS80 (NO IRON PLUG/YOKE), ADDING SHIELDING IN 75 TO 80 cm (WC/H 2 O, B, Cd). NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS (BNL) Dec. 14, 2010‏ ‏ 1.
ENERGY FLOW AND DEPOSITION IN A 4-MW MUON-COLLIDER TARGET SYSTEM
Positron production rate vs incident electron beam energy for a tungsten target
IDS120h: PROTON P0-P14 TRAJECTORY FOOTPRINT
X. Ding, UCLA MAP Spring 2014 Meeting May 2014 Fermilab
Horn and Solenoid Options in Neutrino Factory
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS: NEW Hg MODULE
1 Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (11/15/2011)
1 Nicholas Souchlas (PBL) (MAP CONFERENCE SLAC 2012)
Radiation Damage to Mu2e Apparatus
SPL-SB and NF Beam Window Studies Stress Analysis
Presentation transcript:

STUDY II: m1507 vs. m1510 IDS120f: m1507/MCNP vs. M1510/MCNP vs. FLUKA IDS120f vs. IDS20g GEOMETRY IDS90f: B10/B11 SHIELDING RING(S) STUDIES Nicholas Souchlas (BNL 5/5/2011) 1

Energy deposition from mars1507 and mars1510. STUDY II GEOMETRY. SHIELDING: 80%WC+20% H 2 O 4MW proton beam. Now E=8 GeV, GAUSSIAN PROFILE: σ x =σ y =0.12 cm. N p =100,000 events Default neutron cutoff E n >0.1 MeV 2

STUDY II SOLENOID GEOMETRY, 13 SUPERCODUCTIN COILS (SC) SC#1 -120<z<57.8 cm R in =63.3 cm R out =127.8 cm SC#2 67.8<z<140.7 cm R in =68.6 cm R out =101.1 cm SC# cm (TOTAL # SC=13)‏ 3 SHIELDING SC# 2-13 SC#1 IRON PLUG RESISTIVE COILS

m1507 vs. m1510 FOR STUDY II GEOMETRY (m1510-m1507)/m1510 % Be Wind.: BUT WHY???? 4

Power deposition for IDS120f: mars1507/MCNP vs. mars1510/MCNP vs. FLUKA MeV NEUTRON ENERGY CUTOFF >SHIELDING: 60%WC+40%H 2 O >4 MW proton beam, Np=400,000 >PROTONS ENERGY E=8 GeV. >GAUSSIAN PROFILE: σ x =σ y =0.12 cm. 5

IDS120f GEOMETRY 6

ENERGY DEPOSITED IN SC SOLENOIDS (SC#), SHIELDING (SH#). ENERGY DEPOSITED IN RESISTIVE COILS (RS#), BEAM PIPE (BP#). 7

IDS120f:ENERGY DEPOSITED IN OTHER PARTS AND TOTALS. HIGHLIGHTS... :(mars1507/mars1510/FLUKA) Power Deposited: SC#3: 0.26/0.28/0.26 kW, SC#5: 0.19/0.17/0.066 kW SC#1-19: 0.97/0.99/0.56 kW Peak: SC#3: 0.03/0.018/0.05 mW/gr 8

IDS120f and IDS120g geometries. IDS120fIDS120g: water cooling rings around RS 9 DP: SC#3: 0.28 kW SC#5: 0.17 kW SC#1-19: 0.99 kW DPT: ~3.3 MW~82.5 % PBP DPP: SC#3: mW/gr SC#7: mW/gr SC#14: 0.08 mW/gr DP: SC#2: 0.54 kW SC#3: 0.05 kW SC#1-19: 0.95 kW DPT: ~3.3 MW~82.5 % PBP DPP: SC#2: 0.03 mW/gr SC#4: mW/gr SC#9/10: 0.08 mW/gr

IDS120g geometry:Deposited Power Histogram 10 H 2 O AREA GETS ABOUT 11.3 kW FROM RADIATION ALONE

IDS90f geometry:SC#3 DP, DPP with B10/B11 ring(s) (From Dr. Brooks comments/suggestions) DP in kW SC#3:2.07 (m1507)/2.18 (m1510)/2.16 (3 dr=1 cm B10/B11 rings) DPP in mW/g SC#3: 0.15 (m1507)/0.16 (m1510)/0.20 (3 dr=1 cm B10/B11 rings) 11

Hg DPP STUDIES FOR dx=0.02cm “SLICE” SHIFTED ALONG THE x-AXIS FROM -0.4 TO 0.4 cm AND FOR -6.0<y<6.0 cm dy=0.06 cm, -100<z<60 cm dz=0.434 cm PROTON BEAM: x=0.319 cm y=2.91 cm z=-75 cm, dcx= dcy=0.996 dcz=1.0 DPP~11,500 W/g AT x~0.19 cm y~1.0 cm z~-50 cm 1212

Hg DPP STUDIES FOCUSING AROUND THE DP PEAK AREA FOR 0.5<y<1.5 cm dy=0.05 cm, -55<z<-45 cm dz=0.10 cm 0.15<x<0.25 cm dx=0.1 cm 0.19<x<0.20 cm dx=0.01 cm 0.23<x<0.24 cm dx=0.01 cm DPP~11,000 W/g AT x~0.2 cm 0.95<y<1.2 cm -53<z<-51 cm DPP~20,000 W/g AT x~0.195 cm y~0.82 cm Z~-48.6 cm ~12,000 W/g DPP~13,500 W/g AT x~0.235 cm y~0.92 cm Z~-49.2 cm ~11,000 W/g 1313