LIGO- G02XXXX-00-Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Zwerger Muller SN waveforms The 78 ZM waveforms differ in initial angular momentum they have (A parameter),

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

LIGO-G v2 Recovering Burst Injections in LIGO S5 Data Alex Cole Data Analysis Meeting May 6, 2014.

Advertisements

Lesson 17 Intro to AC & Sinusoidal Waveforms

Initial results of burst signal injections into a GEO burst search pipeline Indentify clusters of TF pixels Frame data from IFO Calculate time- frequency.

LIGO-G Z Update on the Analysis of S2 Burst Hardware Injections L. Cadonati (MIT), A. Weinstein (CIT) for the Burst group Hannover LSC meeting,

LIGO- G Z August 19, 2004August 2004 LSC Meeting 1 Towards an Astrophysics-Based Burst ETG Tuning Keith Thorne Penn State University Relativity.

GWDAW-8 (December 17-20, 2003, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA) Search for burst gravitational waves with TAMA data Masaki Ando Department of Physics, University.

Nov 10, 2003Frey1 Astrophysical implications of external triggers, GRB in particular GRB astrophysics is still very uncertain Associated GW emission:

Burst detection efficiency  In order to interpret our observed detection rate (upper limit) we need to know our efficiency for detection by the IFO and.

LIGO- G R AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Simulation of Burst Waveforms and Burst Event Triggers Alan Weinstein Caltech Burst UL WG LSC meeting, 8/13/01.

LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Use of detector calibration info in the burst group

G R AJW, Caltech, LSC Meeting, 3/20/02 Discussion of Statistical Methods, Tools, and Simulations  Review of tools and methods  (I am only familiar.

LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Hardware Burst Injections in E9  S2 Alan Weinstein, Caltech Laura Cadonati, MIT Shourov Chatterjee, MIT.

G R AJW, Caltech, LSC Meeting, 3/20/02 Progress on Burst Simulation  t-f character of burst waveforms  Burst waveforms  Calibration  E7 data.

LSC Meeting, 17 March 2004 Shawhan, Marka, et al.LIGO-G E Summary of E10 / S3 Hardware Signal Injections Peter Shawhan, Szabolcs Márka, Bruce.

G R AJW, Caltech, LSC Meeting, 3/20/02 Discussion of Statistical Methods, Tools, and Simulations  Review of tools and methods  (I am only familiar.

LIGO-G W Gregory Mendell, LIGO Hanford Observatory on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Stackslide search for continuous gravitational.

Kashif Bashirwww.kashifpaf.greatnow.com1 Alternating Voltage and Current Alternating Current Applications: The Sine Wave Alternating Current Voltage and.

1/25 Current results and future scenarios for gravitational wave’s stochastic background G. Cella – INFN sez. Pisa.

LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Use of detector calibration info in the burst group

1 Characterising the Space of Gravitational-Wave Bursts Patrick J. Sutton California Institute of Technology.

S.Klimenko, G Z, December 21, 2006, GWDAW11 Coherent detection and reconstruction of burst events in S5 data S.Klimenko, University of Florida.

LIGO-G Z LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 Upper Limits on the Rate of Gravitational Wave Bursts from the First LIGO Science Run Edward Daw Louisiana.

LIGO PAC Meeting, 6 June 2003 Peter Shawhan (LIGO/Caltech)LIGO-G E First LIGO Search for Binary Inspirals Peter Shawhan (LIGO Lab / Caltech)

Chapter 15 AC Fundamentals.

The RIDGE pipeline as a method to search for gravitational waves associated with magnetar bursts LIGO-G Z Jason Lee, Tiffany Summerscales (Andrews.

The Analysis of Binary Inspiral Signals in LIGO Data Jun-Qi Guo Sept.25, 2007 Department of Physics and Astronomy The University of Mississippi LIGO Scientific.

The inclusion of sub-dominant modes in the signal brings additional modulation in the strain. This effect is visible on the time-frequency profile as measured.

LIGO-G Z April 2006 APS meeting Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech) Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO’s S5 run Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech)

S.Klimenko, August 2005, LSC, G Z Constraint likelihood analysis with a network of GW detectors S.Klimenko University of Florida, in collaboration.

S.Klimenko, July 14, 2007, Amaldi7,Sydney, G Z Detection and reconstruction of burst signals with networks of gravitational wave detectors S.Klimenko,

Energy Peter Shawhan GWPAW PPT February 2011 ~10 46 Joules ~2.4x10 31 Megatons ~10 16 times the annual output of the sun.

Searching for gravitational-wave bursts with the Q Pipeline Shourov K. Chatterji LIGO Science Seminar 2005 August 2.

Sinusoid Seventeenth Meeting. Sine Wave: Amplitude The amplitude is the maximum displacement of the sine wave from its mean (average) position. Simulation.

MODELING THE CALIBRATED RESPONSE OF THE ADVANCED LIGO DETECTORS Luke Burks 2013 LIGO Caltech SURF Mentors: Alan Weinstein, Jameson Rollins Final Presentation.

LIGO-G Data Analysis Techniques for LIGO Laura Cadonati, M.I.T. Trento, March 1-2, 2007.

1 AGBell – EECT by Andrew G. Bell (260) Lecture 11.

T.Akutsu, M.Ando, N.Kanda, D.Tatsumi, S.Telada, S.Miyoki, M.Ohashi and TAMA collaboration GWDAW10 UTB Texas 2005 Dec. 13.

S.Klimenko, G Z, December 2006, GWDAW11 Coherent detection and reconstruction of burst events in S5 data S.Klimenko, University of Florida for.

LIGO- G Z August 17, 2005August LSC Meeting – ASIS Session 1 Recovering Hardware Injection Waveforms with Maximum Entropy Tiffany Summerscales.

Searching for Binary Black Holes with Spin Aligned with Orbital Angular Momentum 1 Deborah L. Hamm – Northern Arizona University LIGO SURF 2013 Mentors:

Isentropic “shock waves” in numerical astrophysical simulations G.S.Bisnovatyi-Kogan, S.G.Moiseenko IKI RAN.

LIGO-G Z Confidence Test for Waveform Consistency of LIGO Burst Candidate Events Laura Cadonati LIGO Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

LIGO-G Z GWDAW9 December 17, Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO Science Run 2 Data John G. Zweizig LIGO / Caltech for the LIGO.

A Comparison of Burst Gravitational Wave Detection Algorithms for LIGO Amber L. Stuver Center for Gravitational Wave Physics Penn State University.

LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 First look at Injection of Burst Waveforms prior to S1 Alan Weinstein Caltech Burst UL WG LSC meeting, 8/21/02.

LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 A Coherence Function Statistic to Identify Coincident Bursts Surjeet Rajendran, Caltech SURF Alan Weinstein,

Comparison of filters for burst detection M.-A. Bizouard on behalf of the LAL-Orsay group GWDAW 7 th IIAS-Kyoto 2002/12/19.

LIGO-G Z TFClusters Tuning for the LIGO-TAMA Search Patrick Sutton LIGO-Caltech.

LIGO- G Z March 23, 2005March LSC Meeting – ASIS Session 1 Extracting Supernova Information from a LIGO Detection Tiffany Summerscales Penn State.

For linear motion, we know that E kin = p 2 /2m. For angular motion (e.g. rotation), we can make the following assumptions: mass  moment of inertia I.

LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Hardware Burst Injections in Pre-S2  S2 Alan Weinstein, Caltech Laura Cadonati, MIT Shourov Chatterjee,

G08XXXX-00-Z S. Chatterji, Cascina, Italy, 2008 November 261 Gravitational-wave data analysis and supernovae Shourov K. Chatterji INFN Sezione di Roma.

January 12, 2006Sources & Simulations 1 LIGO Supernova Astronomy with Maximum Entropy Tiffany Summerscales Penn State University.

E. W. Grashorn, for the MINOS Collaboration Observation of Shadowing in the Underground Muon Flux in MINOS This poster was supported directly by the U.S.

LIGO-G07XXXX-00-Z Beating the Crab pulsar spin-down and other upper limits: new results from the LIGO S5 known pulsar search Matthew Pitkin for the LIGO.

Calibration in the Front End Controls Craig Cahillane Luke Burks LIGO Caltech SURF 2013 Mentors: Alan Weinstein, Jamie Rollins Presentation to Calibration.

Lesson 14: Introduction to AC and Sinusoids

Detecting a Galactic Supernova with H2 or GEO

Discussion of Statistical Methods, Tools, and Simulations

Detecting a Galactic Supernova with H2 or GEO

L(h) = || X – A*h ||2 + hT *Ω*h

Travis Hansen, Marek Szczepanczyk, Michele Zanolin

Hardware Injections in S4

SLOPE: A MATLAB Revival

Component: E Local quakes Broad frequency Two tremor bursts

Search for gravitational waves from binary black hole mergers:

First look at Injection of Burst Waveforms prior to S1

Recovering Hardware Injection Waveforms with Maximum Entropy

Volume 110, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)

Presentation transcript:

LIGO- G02XXXX-00-Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Zwerger Muller SN waveforms The 78 ZM waveforms differ in initial angular momentum they have (A parameter), governing degree of differential rotation initial rotational energy (B, or  = E rot /E pot ). A,B roughly govern how many bounce peaks are in the waveform, as seen on the left. Within each (AB) set, the adiabatic index  r is varied from to 1.28 (stiff to soft), and the peak amplidue of the wave depends strongly on this parameter, as seen in the right.

LIGO- G02XXXX-00-Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project2 SineGaussians Sine Gaussians, f 0 evenly spaced in logf Left:  = 0.05 s,  f = 6.3 Hz Middle:  = s,  f = 63 Hz Right:  = 10/f 0,  f ~ /f 0

LIGO- G02XXXX-00-Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project3 sensitivity with PZ fit to S1H2 My reconstruction with Mike’s PZ fit, on left. Right: Calibration web page. They agree very well. AND, the burst at 100 Hz injected into LDAS and passed through the response function in datacond, agrees perfectly with the matlab simulation. Confidence in use of response function!

LIGO- G02XXXX-00-Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project4 Same for S1H1

LIGO- G02XXXX-00-Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project5 And for L1

LIGO- G02XXXX-00-Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project6