Why ROI ? (Region Of Interest) 1.To explore one’s data (difficult to discern patterns across whole brain) To control for Type 1 error and limit the number.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INTRODUCTION Assessing the size of objects rapidly and accurately clearly has survival value. Thus, a central multi-sensory module for magnitude assessment.
Advertisements

fMRI data analysis at CCBI
Automatic Identification of ROIs (Regions of interest) in fMRI data.
fMRI data analysis – t-tests and correlations.
Multiple testing Justin Chumbley Laboratory for Social and Neural Systems Research Institute for Empirical Research in Economics University of Zurich With.
Dissociating the neural processes associated with attentional demands and working memory capacity Gál Viktor Kóbor István Vidnyánszky Zoltán SE-MRKK PPKE-ITK.
Circular analysis in systems neuroscience – with particular attention to cross-subject correlation mapping Nikolaus Kriegeskorte Laboratory of Brain and.
Region of Interests (ROI) Extraction and Analysis in Indexing and Retrieval of Dynamic Brain Images Researcher: Xiaosong Yuan, Advisors: Paul B. Kantor.
1 Haskins fMRI Workshop Part III: Across Subjects Analysis - Univariate, Multivariate, Connectivity.
Surface-based Analysis: Intersubject Registration and Smoothing
Experimental Design Tali Sharot & Christian Kaul With slides taken from presentations by: Tor Wager Christian Ruff.
2nd Level Analysis Jennifer Marchant & Tessa Dekker
MNTP Trainee: Georgina Vinyes Junque, Chi Hun Kim Prof. James T. Becker Cyrus Raji, Leonid Teverovskiy, and Robert Tamburo.
From Localization to Connectivity and... Lei Sheu 1/11/2011.
Basics of fMRI Inference Douglas N. Greve. Overview Inference False Positives and False Negatives Problem of Multiple Comparisons Bonferroni Correction.
An Example Using PET for Statistical Parametric Mapping An Example Using PET for Statistical Parametric Mapping Jack L. Lancaster, Ph.D. Presented to SPM.
With a focus on task-based analysis and SPM12
Analysis of fMRI data with linear models Typical fMRI processing steps Image reconstruction Slice time correction Motion correction Temporal filtering.
FMRI Group Natasha Matthews, Ashley Parks, Destiny Miller, Ziad Safadi, Dana Tudorascu, Julia Sacher. Adviser: Mark Wheeler.
1/35 Structural and Probabilistic Approaches in Group Analysis of fMRI Data Brain and ICT workshop Bertrand Thirion 1, Alan Tucholka 2, Philippe Pinel.
Functional Brain Signal Processing: EEG & fMRI Lesson 13
FMRI ROI Analysis 7/18/2014 Friday Yingying Wang
Voxel-based morphometry The methods and the interpretation (SPM based) Harma Meffert Methodology meeting 14 april 2009.
Functional Brain Signal Processing: EEG & fMRI Lesson 14
Spatial Smoothing and Multiple Comparisons Correction for Dummies Alexa Morcom, Matthew Brett Acknowledgements.
Methods for Dummies Second level Analysis (for fMRI) Chris Hardy, Alex Fellows Expert: Guillaume Flandin.
Methodological issues for scanning geriatric populations Andy James fMRI Journal Club October 12, 2004.
SPM short – Mai 2008 Linear Models and Contrasts Stefan Kiebel Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging.
functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)
Figure 1. Priming task. (A) A schematic representation of the trial sequence. (B) Examples of the factorial combination of prime–target contextual (Related.
Group Averaging of fMRI Data
Surface-based Analysis: Inter-subject Registration and Smoothing
2nd Level Analysis Methods for Dummies 2010/11 - 2nd Feb 2011
Surface-based Analysis: Intersubject Registration and Smoothing
Surface-based Analysis: Intersubject Registration and Smoothing
Volume 63, Issue 3, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Maintaining Brain Health
Signal fluctuations in 2D and 3D fMRI at 7 Tesla
Contrasts & Statistical Inference
Volume 63, Issue 2, Pages (July 2009)
John-Dylan Haynes, Jon Driver, Geraint Rees  Neuron 
Rajeev D.S. Raizada, Russell A. Poldrack  Neuron 
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages (August 2007)
Volume 63, Issue 3, Pages (August 2009)
A Map for Social Navigation in the Human Brain
Statistical Challenges in “Big Data” Human Neuroimaging
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2002)
Empathy and the Somatotopic Auditory Mirror System in Humans
Talia Konkle, Aude Oliva  Neuron  Volume 74, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Adaptive multi-voxel representation of stimuli, rules and responses
Modality-Independent Coding of Spatial Layout in the Human Brain
Effect of propofol on the medial temporal lobe emotional memory system: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in human subjects  K.O. Pryor, J.C.
Uri Hasson, Orit Furman, Dav Clark, Yadin Dudai, Lila Davachi  Neuron 
Contrasts & Statistical Inference
Integration of Local Features into Global Shapes
Figure 2 Lesion localization visualized in the top view of the model
Brain Mechanisms for Extracting Spatial Information from Smell
Volume 40, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
Volume 69, Issue 3, Pages (February 2011)
Maintaining Brain Health
Laurie S. Glezer, Xiong Jiang, Maximilian Riesenhuber  Neuron 
Contrasts & Statistical Inference
Whole-brain, voxel-based correlation analyses with leptin.
Under-Recruitment and Nonselective Recruitment
Lior Reich, Marcin Szwed, Laurent Cohen, Amir Amedi  Current Biology 
Results from the ROI-restricted TBSS group analysis for the right dorsal cingulum. Results from the ROI-restricted TBSS group analysis for the right dorsal.
Volume 63, Issue 2, Pages (July 2009)
Estimating statistical significance using the overlap rule for 95% CI bars. Estimating statistical significance using the overlap rule for 95% CI bars.
Activation maps of imagery during AS condition show learning effects in experiment 2 (Exp. 2). Activation maps of imagery during AS condition show learning.
Presentation transcript:

Why ROI ? (Region Of Interest) 1.To explore one’s data (difficult to discern patterns across whole brain) To control for Type 1 error and limit the number of statistical tests by using pre-defined knowledge: 2.Anatomical landmarks 3.separate functional localizer

Anatomical landmarks FDR Peak of Activation ROI??? Group selection AnatomicalFunctional Individually FunctionalAnatomical

Individually Vs. Group replication across groups and not across subjects? Different location and/or size of activations between subjects? Experimenter bias? Anatomical Vs. Functional Using orthogonal contrast Including only relevant voxels? Relevant in what contrast? Experimenter bias?

How ROI ? (Region Of Interest) 1.To explore one’s data (difficult to discern patterns across whole brain) peak of activation (sphere) masked with the threshold activation map -orthogonal contrast To control for Type 1 error and limit the number of statistical tests by using pre-defined knowledge: 2.Anatomical landmarks Using individual subject’s anatomy for detention – not Talairach 3.separate functional localizer Orthogonal contrasts in a factorial design (Poldrack, 2007)

Conclusions No one good way to extract ROI : There has not been a systematic study of the power of one approach in comparison with the other Different brain regions may require different methods Different protocols may require different methods Voxels count have been shown to be an unreliable measure of activation compared to signal change (Cohen & Dubois, 1999) Tip - using ROI to remove outliers (Wager et al., 2005)