2x2 BG Factorial Designs Definition and advantage of factorial research designs 5 terms necessary to understand factorial designs 5 patterns of factorial.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Statistics for the Social Sciences
Advertisements

Factorial Designs Passer Chapter 9
Kxk BG Factorial Designs expanding the 2x2 design reasons for larger designs statistical analysis of kxk BG factorial designs using LSD for kxk factorial.
Topic 12 – Further Topics in ANOVA
ANOVA & Pairwise Comparisons
Factorial Hypotheses Some review & practice Identifying main effect and interaction RH: Explicit factorial RH: “Blending” interaction and main effect RH:
3-way Factorial Designs Expanding factorial designs Effects in a 3-way design Causal Interpretations of 3-way factorial effects Defining a 3-way interaction.
Chapter Fourteen The Two-Way Analysis of Variance.
Analytic Comparisons & Trend Analyses Analytic Comparisons –Simple comparisons –Complex comparisons –Trend Analyses Errors & Confusions when interpreting.
Two Factor ANOVA.
Multiple Group X² Designs & Follow-up Analyses X² for multiple condition designs Pairwise comparisons & RH Testing Alpha inflation Effect sizes for k-group.
Factorial Designs: Research Hypotheses & Describing Results Research Hypotheses of Factorial Designs Inspecting tables to describe factorial data patterns.
Multiple Group X² Designs & Follow-up Analyses X² for multiple condition designs Pairwise comparisons & RH Testing Alpha inflation Effect sizes for k-group.
ANCOVA Workings of ANOVA & ANCOVA ANCOVA, Semi-Partial correlations, statistical control Using model plotting to think about ANCOVA & Statistical control.
Describing Factorial Effects Kinds of means & kinds of effects Inspecting tables to describe factorial data patterns Inspecting line graphs to describe.
Statistical Analysis of Factorial Designs z Review of Interactions z Kinds of Factorial Designs z Causal Interpretability of Factorial Designs z The F-tests.
Multivariate Analyses & Programmatic Research Re-introduction to Programmatic research Factorial designs  “It Depends” Examples of Factorial Designs Selecting.
3-way Factorial Designs Expanding factorial designs Effects in a 3-way design Defining a 3-way interaction BG & WG comparisons Experimental & Non-experimental.
Multivariate Analyses & Programmatic Research Re-introduction to Multivariate research Re-introduction to Programmatic research Factorial designs  “It.
Introduction to Multivariate Research & Factorial Designs
Chapter 10 - Part 1 Factorial Experiments.
2x2 ANOVA BG & MG Models Kinds of Factorial Designs ANOVA for BG, MG & WG designs Causal Interpretation of Factorial Results.
Review of Factorial Designs 5 terms necessary to understand factorial designs 5 patterns of factorial results for a 2x2 factorial designs Descriptive &
Design Conditions & Variables Limitations of 2-group designs “Kinds” of Treatment & Control conditions Kinds of Causal Hypotheses Explicating Design Variables.
Complex Design. Two group Designs One independent variable with 2 levels: – IV: color of walls Two levels: white walls vs. baby blue – DV: anxiety White.
K-group ANOVA & Pairwise Comparisons ANOVA for multiple condition designs Pairwise comparisons and RH Testing Alpha inflation & Correction LSD & HSD procedures.
Intro to Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences PSYC 1900
Factorial Designs More than one Independent Variable: Each IV is referred to as a Factor All Levels of Each IV represented in the Other IV.
Intro to Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences PSYC 1900 Lecture 14: Factorial ANOVA.
Lecture 13: Factorial ANOVA 1 Laura McAvinue School of Psychology Trinity College Dublin.
An Introduction to Classification Classification vs. Prediction Classification & ANOVA Classification Cutoffs, Errors, etc. Multivariate Classification.
Analysis of Factorial Designs Statistical Analysis of 2x2 Designs Statistical Analysis of kxk Designs.
1 Two Factor ANOVA Greg C Elvers. 2 Factorial Designs Often researchers want to study the effects of two or more independent variables at the same time.
Understanding the Two-Way Analysis of Variance
Psy B07 Chapter 1Slide 1 ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE. Psy B07 Chapter 1Slide 2 t-test refresher  In chapter 7 we talked about analyses that could be conducted.
Chapter 14Prepared by Samantha Gaies, M.A.1 Chapter 14: Two-Way ANOVA Let’s begin by reviewing one-way ANOVA. Try this example… Does motivation level affect.
WG ANOVA Analysis of Variance for Within- groups or Repeated measures Between Groups and Within-Groups ANOVA WG ANOVA & WG t-tests When to use each Similarities.
1 of 46 MGMT 6970 PSYCHOMETRICS © 2014, Michael Kalsher Michael J. Kalsher Department of Cognitive Science Inferential Statistics IV: Factorial ANOVA.
@ 2012 Wadsworth, Cengage Learning Chapter 9 Applying the Logic of Experimentation: Between-Subjects 2012 Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Types of validity we will study for the Next Exam... internal validity -- causal interpretability external validity -- generalizability statistical conclusion.
Analysis of Variance (Two Factors). Two Factor Analysis of Variance Main effect The effect of a single factor when any other factor is ignored. Example.
PSY 2005 Week 10 – Simple Effects. Factorial Analysis of Variance Simple Effects.
Chapter 7 Experimental Design: Independent Groups Design.
Two-way ANOVA Introduction to Factorial Designs and their Analysis.
Factorial Analysis of Variance One dependent variable, more than one independent variable (“factor”) 1 2.
Describing Factorial Effects Kinds of means & kinds of effects Inspecting tables to describe factorial data patterns Inspecting line graphs to describe.
Reintroduction to Factorial Designs (re-)Introduction to factorial designs 5 patterns of factorial results Understanding main effects Research Hypotheses.
Intro to Factorial Designs The importance of “conditional” & non-additive effects The structure, variables and effects of a factorial design 5 terms necessary.
Chapter 10: Analyzing Experimental Data Inferential statistics are used to determine whether the independent variable had an effect on the dependent variance.
Regression Models w/ 2 Categorical Variables Sources of data for this model Variations of this model Definition and advantage of factorial research designs.
Basic Analysis of Factorial Designs The F-tests of a Factorial ANOVA Using LSD to describe the pattern of an interaction.
Chapter 14 Repeated Measures and Two Factor Analysis of Variance
Factorial Designs: Programmatic Research, RH: Testing & Causal Inference Applications of Factorial designs in Programmatic Research Research Hypotheses.
Chapter 13 Repeated-Measures and Two-Factor Analysis of Variance
Smith/Davis (c) 2005 Prentice Hall Chapter Fifteen Inferential Tests of Significance III: Analyzing and Interpreting Experiments with Multiple Independent.
Introduction to “Kinds” of 2-way Factorial Designs Incorporating within-groups comparisons ANOVA for BG, MG & WG designs Applying LSD mmd to kxk designs.
Kxkxk 3-way Factorial Designs kxkxk 3-way designs, effects & causality 3-way interactions describing effects and checking if they are. “descriptive” or.
Other Ways of Thinking About Interactions Ways of Describing Interactions other than “Simple Effects” Interactions as “other kinds of” cell mean difference.
3-way Designs defining 2-way & 3-way interactions all the effects conditional and unconditional effects orthogonality, collinearity & the like kxkxk kxkxq.
Effect Sizes & Power Analyses for k-group Designs Effect Size Estimates for k-group ANOVA designs Power Analysis for k-group ANOVA designs Effect Size.
Test the Main effect of A Not sign Sign. Conduct Planned comparisons One-way between-subjects designs Report that the main effect of A was not significant.
SPSS Homework SPSS Homework 12.1 Practice Data from exercise ) Use linear contrasts to compare 5 days vs 20 and 35 days 2) Imagine you.
Statistics for the Social Sciences
Two Way ANOVAs Factorial Designs.
Interactions & Simple Effects finding the differences
Review Compare one sample to another value One sample t-test
Main Effects and Interaction Effects
Factorial Designs Factorial design: a research design that includes two or more factors (Independent Variables) A two-factor design has two IVs. Example:
What if. . . You were asked to determine if psychology and sociology majors have significantly different class attendance (i.e., the number of days a person.
Presentation transcript:

2x2 BG Factorial Designs Definition and advantage of factorial research designs 5 terms necessary to understand factorial designs 5 patterns of factorial results for a 2x2 factorial designs Descriptive & misleading main effects The F-tests of a Factorial ANOVA Using LSD to describe the pattern of an interaction

Introduction to factorial designs Factorial designs have 2 (or more) Independent Variables An Example… Forty clients at a local clinic volunteered to participate in a research project designed to examine the individual and combined effects of the client’s Initial Diagnosis (either general anxiety or social anxiety) and the Type of Therapy they receive (either group or individual). Twenty of the participants had been diagnosed with general anxiety and 20 had been diagnosed as having social anxiety. One-half of the clients with each diagnosis were assigned to receive group therapy and one-half received individual therapy. All clients underwent 6 months of the prescribed treatment, and then completed a battery of assessments which were combined into a DV score of “wellness from anxiety”, for which larger scores indicate better outcome. Here is a depiction of this design.

Type of Therapy Initial Diagnosis GroupIndividual General clients diagnosed w/ clients diagnosed w/ Anxiety general anxiety who general anxiety who received group therapy received individual therapy Social clients diagnosed w/ clients diagnosed w/ Anxiety social anxiety who social anxiety who received group therapy received individual therapy Participants in each “cell” of this design have a unique combination of IV conditions. Showing this design is a 2x2 Factorial

What’s involved in a 2x2 factorial design ? There are 3 variables examined … 1-- the DV (dependent, outcome, response, measured, etc. variable) 2 -- one IV (independent, treatment, manipulated, grouping, etc. variable) 3 – second IV (independent, treatment, manipulated, grouping, etc. variable) There are 3 effects examined … 1 -- the interaction of the two IVs -- how they jointly relate to DV 2 -- the main effect of the one IV -- how it relates to the DV independently of the interaction and the other main effect 3 -- the main effect of the other IV -- how it relates to the DV independently of the interaction and the other main effect For the example… 1 -- the “interaction” of Initial Diagnosis & Type of Therapy 2 -- the “main effect” of Initial Diagnosis 3 -- the “main effect” of Type of Therapy

The difficult part of learning about factorial designs is the large set of new terms that must be acquired. Here’s a summary;; cell means -- the mean DV score of all the folks with a particular combination of IV treatments marginal means -- the mean DV score of all the folks in a particular condition of the specified IV (aggregated across conditions of the other IV) Main effects involve the comparison of marginal means. Simple effects involve the comparison of cell means. Interactions involve the comparison of simple effects.

Identifying Cell Means and Marginal Means Type of Therapy Initial DiagnosisGroup Individual General Anxiety Social Anxiety Cell means  mean DV of subjects in a design cell Marginal means  average mean DV of all subjects in one condition of an IV

Identifying Main Effects -- difference between the marginal means of that IV (ignoring the other IV) Type of Therapy Initial DiagnosisGroup Individual General Anxiety Social Anxiety Main effect of Initial Diagnosis Main effect of Type of Therapy

Identifying Simple Effects -- cell means differences between conditions of one IV for a specific level of the other IV Type of Therapy Initial DiagnosisGroupIndividual General Anxiety Social Anxiety ab Simple effects of Initial Diagnosis for each Type of Therapy aSimple effect of Initial Diagnosis for group therapy bSimple effect of Initial Diagnosis for individual therapy

Identifying Simple Effects -- cell means differences between conditions of one IV for a specific level of the other IV Type of Therapy Initial DiagnosisGroupIndividual General Anxiety Social Anxiety a b Simple effects of Type of Therapy for each Initial Diagnosis 1 Simple effect of Type of Therapy for general anxiety patients 2 Simple effect of Type of Therapy for social anxiety patients

Here are the three basic patterns of interactions #1 Task Presentation Paper Computer Task Difficulty Easy 90 = 90 one simple effect “null” Hard 40 < 70 one simple effect There is an interaction of Task Presentation and Task Difficulty as they relate to performance. Easy tasks are performed equally well using paper and using the computer (90 vs. 90), however, hard tasks are performed better using the computer than using paper (70 vs. 40).

#2 Task Presentation Paper Computer Task Difficulty Easy 90 > 70 simple effects are Hard 40 < 60 opposite directions There is an interaction of Task Presentation and Task Difficulty as they relate to performance. Easy tasks are performed better using paper than using computer (90 vs. 70), whereas hard tasks are performed better using the computer than using paper (60 vs. 40).

#3 Task Presentation Paper Computer Task Difficulty Easy80 < 90 simple effects in the same direction, Hard 40 < 70 but of different sizes There is an interaction of Task Presentation and Task Difficulty as they relate to performance. Performance was better using the computer than using paper, however this effect was larger for hard tasks (70 vs. 40) than for easy tasks (90 vs. 80).

Here are the two basic patterns of NON-interactions #1 Task Presentation Paper Computer Task Difficulty Easy 30 < 50 both simple effects are in the same direction and are Hard 50 < 70 the same size There is no interaction of Task Presentation and Task Difficulty as they relate to performance. Performance is better for computer than for paper presentations (for both Easy and Hard tasks).

#2 Task Presentation Paper Computer Task Difficulty Easy 50 = 50 both simple effects Hard 70 = 70 are nulls There is no interaction of Task Presentation and Task Difficulty as they relate to performance. Performance is the same for computer and paper presentations (for both Easy and Hard tasks).

So, there are 5 basic patterns of results from a 2x2 Factorial Three patterns that have an interaction: 1. = vs. < one null simple effect and one simple effect 2. simple effects in opposite directions 3. < vs. < simple effects in same direction, but different sizes Two patterns that have no interaction: 4. < vs. < simple effects of the same size in the same direction 5. = vs. = both null simple effects

Interpreting main effects … When there is an interaction, the pattern of the interaction may influence the interpretability (generality) of the description of the marginal means. Task Presentation Paper Computer Task Difficulty There is a main effect for Easy80 < 90 Task Presentation, overall performance was better using computer presenta- Hard 40 < 70 tion than using paper presentation. 60< 80 Notice: that the pattern of the main effect is consistent with both the simple effect of Task Presentation for easy tasks and the simple effect of Task Presentation for hard tasks.

Another example … Task Presentation Paper Computer Task Difficulty Easy 90 = 90 Hard 40 < < 80 There is a main effect for Task Presentation, overall performance was better using computer presentation than using paper presentation. However, this pattern is descriptive for hard tasks, but not for easy tasks, for which there was no simple effect of Task Presentation.

Yet another example … Task Presentation Paper Computer Task Difficulty Easy 80 > 60 Hard 20 < < 65 There is a main effect for Task Presentation, overall performance was better using computer presentation than using paper presentation. However, this pattern is descriptive for hard tasks, but not for easy tasks, for which performance was better using paper presentations than using computer presentation.

“Null” main effects can also be misleading…. Task Presentation Paper Computer Task Difficulty Easy 90 > 70 Hard 40 < = 65 There is no main effect for Task Presentation, overall performance was equivalent using computer presentation and using paper presentation. However, this pattern is descriptive for neither hard tasks, for which computer presentations worked better than paper, nor for easy tasks, for which performance was better using paper presentations than using computer presentation.

1. = vs. < one null simple effect and one simple effect 2. simple effects in opposite directions 3. < vs. < simple effects in same direction, but different sizes 4. < vs. < simple effects of the same size in the same direction 5. = vs. = both null simple effects Remember the 5 basic patterns of results from a 2x2 Factorial ? Interaction -- simple effects of different size and/or direction Misleading main effects Descriptive main effects No Interaction -- simple effects are null or same size

Statistical Analysis of 2x2 Factorial Designs 1.Tell IVs and DV 2.Present data in table or figure 3. Determine if the interaction is significant if it is, describe it in terms of one of the sets of simple effects. 4. Determine whether or not the first main effect is significant if it is, describe it determine if that main effect is descriptive or misleading 5. Determine whether or not the second main effect is significant if it is, describe it determine if that main effect is descriptive or misleading

Interpreting Factorial Effects Important things to remember: main effects and the interaction are 3 separate effects each must be separately interpreted -- three parts to the “story” most common error -- “interaction is different main effects” best thing -- be sure to carefully separate the three parts of the story and tell each completely Be careful of “causal words” when interpreting main effects and interactions (only use when really appropriate). caused, effected influenced, produced, changed …. Consider more than the “significance” consider effect sizes, confidence intervals, etc. when describing the results

Statistical Analysis of a 2x2 Design Task Presentation (a) SE of Presentation Paper Computer for Easy Tasks Task Difficulty (b) Easy Hard SE for Presentation for Hard Tasks Presentation Difficulty Interaction Main Effect Main Effect Effect SS Presentation SS Dificulty SS Interaction 65 vs vs. 50 SE Easy vs. SE Hard

Constructing F-tests for a 2x2 Factorial F Presentation = ( SS Presentation / df Presentation ) ( SS Error / df Error ) F Difficulty = ( SS Difficulty / df Difficulty ) ( SS Error / df Error ) F Interaction = ( SS Interaction / df Interaction ) ( SS Error / df Error )

In a 2x2 Design, the Main effects F-tests are sufficient to tell us about the relationship of each IV to the DV… since each main effect involves the comparison of two marginal means -- the corresponding significance test tells us what we need to know… whether or not those two marginal means are “significantly different” Don’t forget to examine the means to see if a significant difference is in the hypothesized direction !!! Statistical Analyses Necessary to Describe Main Effects of a 2x2 Design

However, the F-test of the interaction only tells us whether or not there is a “statistically significant” interaction… it does not tell use the pattern of that interaction to determine the pattern of the interaction we have to compare the simple effects to describe each simple effect, we must be able to compare the cell means we need to know how much of a cell mean difference is “statistically significant” Statistical Analyses Necessary to Describe the Interaction of a 2x2 Design

Using LSD to Compare cell means to describe the simple effects of a 2x2 Factorial design LSD can be used to determine how large of a cell mean difference is required to treat it as a “statistically significant mean difference” Will need to know three values to use the computator df error -- look on the printout or use N – 4 MS error – look on the printout n = N / 4 -- use the decimal value – do not round to the nearest whole number! Remember – only use the lsdmmd to compare cell means. Marginal means are compared using the man effect F-tests.

What statistic is used for which factorial effects???? There will be 4 statistics 1.F Age 2.F Gender 3.F Int 4.LSD mmd Age 5 10 Gender Male Female This design as 7 “effects” 1.Main effect of age 2.Main effect of gender 3.Interaction of age & gender 4.SE of age for males 5.SE of age for females 6.SE of gender for 5 yr olds 7.SE of gender for 10 yr olds

What statistic is used for which factorial effects???? 1.F Age p = F Gender p = F Int p = LSD mmd = 15 Age 5 10 Gender Male Female Are 40 & 70 different ? Are 50 & 30 different ? Are 30 & 80 different ? Are 50 & 60 differently different than 30 & 80 ? Are 50 & 60 different ? Are 25 & 30 different ? Are 50 & 30 differently different than 60 & 80 ? Are 60 & 80 different ? F Age LSDmmd F Int LSDmmd F Gender F Int LSDmmd

Applying lsd mmd to 2x2 BG ANOVA Task Presentation Paper Computer Task Difficulty for the interaction Easy F(1,56) = 6.5, p =.023 Hard lsd mmd = 14 Is there an Interaction effect? Based on what? for the following, tell the mean difference and apply the lsd mmd Simple effect of Task Presentation SE of Task Presentation for Easy Tasks SE of Task Presentation for Hard Tasks Simple effects of Task Difficulty SE of Task Difficulty for Paper Pres. SE of Task Difficulty for Comp. Pres. 30 > 10 = 0 > 20 = Yes! F-test of Int

Applying lsd mmd to 2x2 BG ANOVA Task Presentation Paper Computer Task Difficulty for Difficulty ME Easy F(1,56) = 4.5, p =.041 Hard lsd mmd = 14 Is there a Task Difficulty main effect? Based on what? Is main effect descriptive (unconditional) or potentially misleading (conditional)? Simple effects of Task Difficulty SE of Task Difficulty for Paper Pres. SE of Task Difficulty for Comp. Pres. Yes! F-test of ME Descriptive only for Computer presentation; misleading for Paper presentations. 0 > 20 =

Applying lsd mmd to 2x2 BG ANOVA Task Presentation Paper Computer Task Difficulty for Presentation ME Easy F(1,56) = 7.2, p =.011 Hard lsd mmd = Is there a Presenation main effect? Based on what? Is main effect descriptive (unconditional) or potentially misleading (conditional)? Simple effects of Task Difficulty SE of Task Presentation for Easy Tasks SE of Task Presentation for Hard Tasks Yes! F-test of ME Descriptive only for Easy tasks; misleading for Difficult tasks. 30 < 10 =

Remember the definition of an interaction… An interaction is when the simple effects are different in direction and/or size Remember about the differential power of the different tests… Interaction significance tests are usually less powerful than main effects significance tests. Simple effect significance tests are usually more powerful than interaction significance tests, but less powerful than main effect significance tests.

A couple of data patterns you should know about… #1 – significant interaction with no significant SEs Task Presentation Paper Computer Task Difficulty for the interaction Easy 60 = 70F(1,56) = 6.5, p =.023 Hard 80 = 70 LDS mmd = 14 Huh??? The significant interaction tells us  the simple effects are different from each other (not that  either is different from 0) The 10-point SEs in opposite directions  neither is different from 0  but, they are different from each other!

A couple of data patterns you should know about… #2 – non-significant interaction with a significant SE Task Presentation Paper Computer Task Difficulty for the interaction Easy 60 < 75F(1,56) = 2.5, p =.13 Hard 60 = 70 LDS mmd = 14 Huh??? The non-significant interaction tells us  the simple effects are not different from each other (not that they are both the same) The 10-point & 15-point SEs in the same direction  one is different from 0 and one is not  but, they are not different from each other!

Effect Sizes for 2x2 BG Factorial designs For Main Effects & Interaction (each w/ df=1) r =  [ F / (F + df error )] For Main Effects & Simple Effects d = (M 1 - M 2 ) /  Mserror d² r =  d² + 4 ( This is an “approximation formula” )