Ashish Gupta (98130) Ashish Gupta (98131) Under guidance of Prof. B. N. Jain.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
QoS Strategy in DiffServ aware MPLS environment Teerapat Sanguankotchakorn, D.Eng. Telecommunications Program, School of Advanced Technologies Asian Institute.
Advertisements

APNOMS2003Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd.1 A QoS Control Method Cooperating with a Dynamic Load Balancing Mechanism Akiko Okamura, Koji Nakamichi, Hitoshi Yamada.
Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching: An Overview of Signaling Enhancements and Recovery Techniques IEEE Communications Magazine July 2001.
IETF Differentiated Services Concerns with Intserv: r Scalability: signaling, maintaining per-flow router state difficult with large number of flows r.
Internetworking II: MPLS, Security, and Traffic Engineering
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS v2.2—8-1 MPLS TE Overview Understanding MPLS TE Components.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS v2.2—8-1 MPLS TE Overview Introducing the TE Concept.
Restoration by Path Concatenation: Fast Recovery of MPLS Paths Anat Bremler-Barr Yehuda Afek Haim Kaplan Tel-Aviv University Edith Cohen Michael Merritt.
Introducing MPLS Labels and Label Stacks
Ashish Gupta Under Guidance of Prof. B.N. Jain Department of Computer Science and Engineering Advanced Networking Laboratory.
Protection in OBS Zartash Afzal Uzmi. Jan 13, 2006Lahore University of Management Sciences2 First slide… This is not a tutorial! This is a discussion.
Jan 13, 2006Lahore University of Management Sciences1 Protection Routing in an MPLS Network using Bandwidth Sharing with Primary Paths Zartash Afzal Uzmi.
Introduction to MPLS and Traffic Engineering Zartash Afzal Uzmi.
October 8, 2004MPLS: TE and Restoration1 MPLS: Traffic Engineering and Restoration Routing Basics Zartash Afzal Uzmi Computer Science and Engineering Department.
Restoration Routing in MPLS Networks Zartash Afzal Uzmi Computer Science and Engineering Lahore University of Management Sciences.
Path Protection in MPLS Networks Ashish Gupta Design and Evaluation of Fault Tolerance Algorithms with Performance Constraints.
December 20, 2004MPLS: TE and Restoration1 MPLS: Traffic Engineering and Restoration Routing Zartash Afzal Uzmi Computer Science and Engineering Lahore.
MPLS H/W update Brief description of the lab What it is? Why do we need it? Mechanisms and Protocols.
MPLS and Traffic Engineering
Restoration Routing in MPLS Networks Zartash Afzal Uzmi Computer Science and Engineering Lahore University of Management Sciences.
A General approach to MPLS Path Protection using Segments Ashish Gupta Ashish Gupta.
Introduction to MPLS and Traffic Engineering
Traffic Engineering and Routing Hansen Bow. Topics Traffic Engineering with MPLS Issues Concerning Voice over IP Features of Netscope QoS Routing for.
Path Protection in MPLS Networks Using Segment Based Approach.
Introduction to Protection & Restoration for OBS Copyright, 2000, SUNY, Univ. at Buffalo Presented by Zaoyang Guo & Dahai Xu.
RATES: A Server for MPLS Traffic Engineering (Routing And Traffic Engineering Server) Zlatokrilov Haim Advanced Topics in IP Networks5/1/2001 Tel-Aviv.
A Scheduling-based Routing Network Architecture Omar Y. Tahboub & Javed I. Khan Multimedia & Communication Networks Research Lab (MediaNet) Kent State.
A General approach to MPLS Path Protection using Segments Ashish Gupta Ashish Gupta.
QoS-Aware Path Protection in MPLS Networks Ashish Gupta Ashish Gupta Bijendra Jain Indian Institute of Technology Delhi Satish Tripathi University of California.
A Study of MPLS Department of Computing Science & Engineering DE MONTFORT UNIVERSITY, LEICESTER, U.K. By PARMINDER SINGH KANG
Control and Traffic Management Paper: Banerjee et al.: ” Generalized multiprotocol label switching: an overview of signaling enhancements and recovery.
SMUCSE 8344 Constraint-Based Routing in MPLS. SMUCSE 8344 Constraint Based Routing (CBR) What is CBR –Each link a collection of attributes (performance,
MPLS Evan Roggenkamp. Introduction Multiprotocol Label Switching High-performance Found in telecommunications networks Directs data from one network node.
1 Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) presented by: chitralekha tamrakar (B.S.E.) divya krit tamrakar (B.S.E.) Rashmi shrivastava(B.S.E.) prakriti.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS v2.2—1-1 MPLS Concepts Introducing Basic MPLS Concepts.
1 Fabio Mustacchio - IPS-MOME 2005 – Warsaw, March 15th 2005 Overview of RSVP-TE Network Simulator: Design and Implementation D.Adami, C.Callegari, S.Giordano,
1 Multi Protocol Label Switching Presented by: Petros Ioannou Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, UCY.
1 Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS). 2 MPLS Overview A forwarding scheme designed to speed up IP packet forwarding (RFC 3031) Idea: use a fixed length.
Introduction to MPLS and Traffic Engineering Zartash Afzal Uzmi.
IP/MPLS Multiprotocol Label Switching
PRESENTED BY:- VIVEK SINGH THAKUR VIVEK MISHRA HEMANT GUPTA TARANMEET SINGH KAKKAR VIVEK GUPTA.
“Intra-Network Routing Scheme using Mobile Agents” by Ajay L. Thakur.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS Introduction Module 4: Frame Mode MPLS Implementation.
MPLS and Traffic Engineering Ji-Hoon Yun Computer Communications and Switching Systems Lab.
Computer Networks with Internet Technology William Stallings
Protection and Restoration Definitions A major application for MPLS.
A Snapshot on MPLS Reliability Features Ping Pan March, 2002.
Enhanced Protection using Shared Segment Backups in a Multiservice GMPLS-based Networks Anna Urra, Eusebi Calle, Jose L Marzo Institute of Informatics.
Two-layer Restoration Scheme for IP over Optical Networks with MPLS Jia Ke, L. Mason, Q. Yang ICIS, School of EEE, Nanyang Technological University
(Slide set by Norvald Stol/Steinar Bjørnstad
IP Traffic Engineering RSP draft-shen-ip-te-rsp-01.txt Naiming Shen Albert Tian Jun Zhuang
ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP) Presented by Sundar P Subramani UMBC.
A Snapshot on MPLS Reliability Features Ping Pan March, 2002.
Draft-li-mpls-proxy-te-lsp-01IETF 90 MPLS1 Proxy MPLS Traffic Engineering Label Switched Path(LSP) draft-li-mpls-proxy-te-lsp-01 Zhenbin Li, Xinzong Zeng.
Label Distribution Protocols LDP: hop-by-hop routing RSVP-TE: explicit routing CR-LDP: another explicit routing protocol, no longer under development.
1 Protection in SONET Path layer protection scheme: operate on individual connections Line layer protection scheme: operate on the entire set of connections.
MULTI-PROTOCOL LABEL SWITCHING By: By: YASHWANT.V YASHWANT.V ROLL NO:20 ROLL NO:20.
MEF Protection Work Pascal Menezes Technical Contributor June 3 rd 2003.
MPLS Introduction How MPLS Works ?? MPLS - The Motivation MPLS Application MPLS Advantages Conclusion.
Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Routing algorithms provide support for performance goals – Distributed and dynamic React to congestion Load balance.
Multi Protocol Label Switching (MPLS)
Requirements for LER Forwarding of IPv4 Option Packets
Inter domain signaling protocol
Presenter: Jeffrey Zhang
Yimin Shen (Juniper) Rahul Aggarwal (Arktan Inc)
School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
CHAPTER 8 Network Management
1 Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS). 2 MPLS Overview A forwarding scheme designed to speed up IP packet forwarding (RFC 3031) Idea: use a fixed length.
Technical Issues with draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed
Eusebi Calle, Jose L Marzo, Anna Urra. L. Fabrega
Presentation transcript:

Ashish Gupta (98130) Ashish Gupta (98131) Under guidance of Prof. B. N. Jain

 What is MPLS ?  Path Protection in MPLS Networks  Existing Work  Our Scheme: Segment Based Protection  Research Issues  Present Status  Targets

 Current IP’s Routing Model  Each router makes independent forwarding decisions based on destination IP address  MPLS: Multi Protocol Label Switching  Applies concept of VC routing  Packet forwarding is done based on Labels  FEC: Destination address prefix, Traffic Engineering tunnel, Class of Service.

 Today’s IP Routing Model does not provide guaranteed services => no path protection required  MPLS provides guaranteed services => Path needs to be protected  Protection against: Link Failure, Node Failure  Parameters Involved: Fault detection, Fault localization, Notification, New LSP setup R2 R3 R6 R4 R8 R7 R1 R10 R9 R5

Global Path Protection Local Path Protection Link Failure Node Failure 1+1 Path Protection Sharing Modes - 1 : 1, 1 : N, M : N r Original LSP Backup LSP

Segment Based Protection (SBP) Original LSP Backup Paths Egress Ingress Seg. 1 Seg. 2 Seg 3 Seg. 4 Divide the path into segments

 Closest bound on our restoration time (Global)  Need to reserve less backup paths (Local)  Less Rejection Rate (More capacity of the network)  Flexible : Example heterogeneous core  Includes Global/Local Path Protection as special cases  User of the service (SLA) can set the delay. More delay => larger segments => less resources (cost)

A suitable method to detect, locate and notify failure to the segment head node. Signaling schemes - LDP, RSVP - TE Detection : Tradeoff between periodicity and segment length Notification Performance An algorithm for Segmentation based approach Constrained based segmentation setup – basis ? How much network state information do we need ? Online vs Offline Algo More considerations in multiple paths

Making the backup paths How does our scheme differs from standard methods of making backup paths Constraints will be superset of constraints needed for active path Avoid looping Amount of Reservation needed for backup paths Compare to other algorithms like local restoration No. of rejections in the system Do simulations for above and report the results Report advantages

 Managing the Labels  Ensuring correct labeling mechanisms when backup path is used  Buffering in our scheme to reduce packet loss during switchover time  Buffer sizes- depending on segment metrics  Buffer at each node or only at segment head nodes. ?

 Understanding the problem  Literature survey  Identified Research areas  Constrain Based Routing

 December 1 st 2001  Error detection and notification issues in Segment based protection (SBP)  Work out example scenarios using SBP  An algorithm for SBP for different types of basis  Label management issues in SBP  May 1 st 2002  Simulations to test performance and resource usage vs. other schemes  Explore other issues like Buffering  More simulation and analysis for comparison and advantages  Documenting our work

Literature Survey Segment based path protection in MPLS networks with bounds on packet loss by: Prof B N Jain & Satish Tripathi IEEE Comms Designing Multiprotocol label switching networks by: Jeremy Lawrence (Cisco systems) Generalized MPLS : an overview of signal enhancement and recovery techniques by: Ayan Banerjee, john Darke, et al. MPLS : breaking through by: bill Michael Papers Dynamic routing of locally restorable Banddwidth Guranteed tunnels using aggregated link usage information by: Murali Kodilam, T. V. Lakshman (bell labs.)

Literature Survey RFCs & Internet Drafts MPLS Architecture RFC (RFC #3031) draft-ietf-mpls-recovery-frmwrk-03 Path Protection draft-andersson-fast-reroute-frmwrk-00 draft-haskin-mpls-fast-reroute-03 draft-iwata-mpls-shared-fastreroute-00 draft-shandilya-fault-tolerant-lsp-00 draft-shew-lsp-fast-restoration-00 draft-kini-restoration-shared-backup-00 draft-gan-fast-reroute-RSVP-detours-00

Literature Survey  Presentations on MPLS from CISCO  Documents on constrained based routing