Students With Multiple Disabilities Harold Johnson Michigan State University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Responsiveness to Instruction North Carolina Problem Solving Model Problem Solving Model Session 1/4.
Advertisements

Performance Assessment
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects Defining Reading Proficiency for Accessible Large Scale Assessments Principles and Issues Paper American.
National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects (NARAP)
Meeting the Needs of all Learners
Morris Community High School Systematic Approach to Implementing RtI (Response to Intervention)
IMPROVEMENTS IN REPORTING IN GRADES 1–8 Qualitative Descriptors (Part A) OCTOBER 2013.
NCLB Basics From “What Parents of Students with Disabilities Need to Know & Do” National Center on Educational Outcomes University of Minnesota
Imagine you are in the classroom of a highly effective teacher:  What would you see?  What would you hear?  What would the students be doing or saying?
Improving Educational Participation and Outcomes for ALL Students with Universal Design for Learning and–for some–Special Education Services Joy Smiley.
1 Alignment of Alternate Assessments to Grade-level Content Standards Brian Gong National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment Claudia.
Resource Rooms Resource Room is a special education program for a student with a disability who is registered in either a special class or regular education.
Alternate Assessment on Alternate Achievement Standards Aligned to Common Core State Standards 1.
Shelley Zion, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver
This research was supported by: U.S. Department of Education (U411B110098) and private-sector matched funds from 20 funders and foundations The Human Capital.
Educational Psychology/ Special Education Class #2 Agenda 1. Ministry document: Education for All 2. Group work: Chapters 2 and 3 of Education for All.
NCCSAD Advisory Board1 Research Objective Two Alignment Methodologies Diane M. Browder, PhD Claudia Flowers, PhD University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
Copyright © 2007 National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. All rights reserved. Innovation Configurations Daniel J. Reschly, Ph.D., and Susan.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Building Blocks for Including and Teaching Preschoolers with Special Needs Susan Sandall, Ph.D. University of Washington
Resources for Supporting Engagement for Each and Every Family 1.
This series of five presentations has the following goals: Presentation III A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement,
UDL Presentation: Sharing Ideas and Building Resources By: Vickie P. Murphy.
 Relationships  Classroom management  Teaching styles › Visual › Auditory › Kinesthetic.
The present publication was developed under grant X from the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs. The views.
Including Quality Assurance Within The Theory of Action Presented to: CCSSO 2012 National Conference on Student Assessment June 27, 2012.
Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Marialena Winter Educational Technology Teacher July 8, 2011.
Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Legislation Non-Profit Research Architecture and Product Development Neuroscience Chickering & Gamson ORIGINS OF UNIVERSAL.
 MOVING BEYOND UNDERSTANDING: Developing authentic learning tasks and assessments for problems based curricular approach in Family and Consumer Sciences.
What is it we expect students to learn? Curriculum learning tasks need to be clearly stated 1.What policies and practices, regarding curriculum development,
TAG Communication Identification Services 2015 Fall Parent Meeting For Parents of TAG Identified Students and Those Who Are Interested in Finding Out About.
GATE/SAS Gifted and Talented Education and School for Advanced Studies Cowan Avenue Elementary.
Supports K–12 School Effectiveness Framework: A Support for School Improvement and Student Success (2010). The integrated process of assessment and instruction.
Literacy Framework: What Does It Look Like at Shawnee Heights? Tamara Konrade ESSDACK Educational Services and Staff Development Association of Central.
UDL Meeting the Needs of all Learners LARGE TYPE.
Policy for Results: How Policy Meets Preparation to Lead the Way to Improved Outcomes: H325A
Module 3: Unit 3, Session 1 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 3, Session 1.
The Family Model. Breadth Burden Barriers Benefits.
Assessment Design. Four Professional Learning Modules 1.Unpacking the AC achievement standards 2.Validity and reliability of assessments 3. Confirming.
Bauman Moscow State Technical University Professional Development Seminar Sponsored by: PEN-International 18-19, November 2004.
Race to the Top Assessment Program: Public Hearing on Common Assessments January 20, 2010 Washington, DC Presenter: Lauress L. Wise, HumRRO Aab-sad-nov08item09.
Please check, just in case… Announcements 1.The final assignment is due by the start of class on the last class session. 2.It may be turned in LATE up.
Test Equity Assessment and Evaluation of Individuals who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing Mary Morrison Chris Skoczynski
Mariel Zeller Lexington, Kentucky 1.  Introduce NCSC GSEG goals and available resources  Become familiar with resources and how to support students.
ISOA MARCH 2, 2011 Sustaining Response to Intervention 1.
Connecticut Accountability for Learning Initiative District and School Capacity Building Leadership No Child Left Behind Partnerships & Professional Learning.
Join Together: A Nationwide On-Line Community of Practice and Professional Development School Dedicated to Instructional Effectiveness and Academic Excellence.
Tier 3 Intervention The Most Intense Level of Intervention!!!
Community Activities in TL Classroom Community Activities Presentational Interpretive Interpersonal Communication Modes Participation Structures Peer Tutoring.
Identifying Outcomes Peggy Maki Senior Scholar Assessing for Learning American Association for Higher Education
National Science Education Standards. Outline what students need to know, understand, and be able to do to be scientifically literate at different grade.
SPED 447/547 Physical and Health Disabilities Overview and Historical Perspectives of Physical Health Disabilities.
Fountas and Pinnell Resources Christ Our Holy Redeemer 2015.
Measurable Goals December 13, 2012 Crystal Cutler
Working with other adults to support bilingual learners.
UDL & DIFFERENTIATION Cynthia Eason EDU 673 Instruction, Strategy for Differentiated Teaching & Learning.
Standard One: Engaging & Supporting All Students in Learning
American Institutes for Research
December 13, 2012 Crystal Cutler
Goals for This Module Teachers will understand the value of mastery learning strategies as a tool for planning instruction for students who are gifted.
Diversity and Learning
All readers by 3rd grade Guidance for the Use of Diagnostic
Self-instruction in CPR - Is less better?
Response To Intevention
Exceptionality and Special Education
Professional Portfolio
…determine if the disability adversely affects the educational performance of the child to the extent the child needs specially designed instruction and.
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP)
Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession EHHS Conceptual Framework
Presentation transcript:

Students With Multiple Disabilities Harold Johnson Michigan State University

Jones, T.W., Jones, J. K., & Wing, K.M. (2006). Students with multiple disabilities. In D. F. Moores & D.S. Martin (Eds.), Deaf learners: Developments in curriculum and instruction (pp ). Washington, DC” Gallaudet University Press. –“Deaf students with multiple disabilities have the educational needs of deaf students plus the educational needs associated with one or more additional disabilities.” (p. 127)

Jones et al (cont) –Common characteristics Diverse in relation to the type and severity of additional disabilities Low incidence in relation to the number of students in any one setting that demonstrate a similar array of disabilities Difficulty in determining the presence and primacy of disabilities Historically low levels of achievement achievement

Jones et al (cont) –Guiding Assumptions Every child can learn Each student with multiple disabilities is unique Educational goals should be functional Students must develop effective social skills Families are critical for success Cross disciplinary professionals must work together effectively

Jones et al (cont) –Approaches to curriculum design Student centered, i.e., designed to meet their individual needs Ecological assessments and instructional validity Access to, yet adaptation of, the general education curriculum, i.e., –Depth of study –Curricular materials –Functional/applied activities –Focus on learning –Pace or rate of instruction –Alternative assessment of student progress –12 month instruction