1 20 - 21 November 2006 MERCURY OBSERVATIONS - JUNE 2006 DATA REVIEW MEETING Review of Physical Processes and Modeling Approaches "A summary of uncertain/debated.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Plasma-induced Sputtering & Heating of Titan’s Atmosphere R. E. Johnson & O.J. Tucker Goal Understand role of the plasma in the evolution of Titan’s atmosphere.
Advertisements

1 5 – 6 May 2008 IMW Meeting PARIS THEMIS Observations (2007) F. Leblanc (Service d'Aéronomie), A. Doressoundiram (Observatoire de Paris),V. Mangano (IFSI),
1 5 – 6 May 2008 IMW MeetingPARIS Observations (new) and Comparison with one (ours) Exospheric Model F. Leblanc Service d'Aéronomie du CNRS/IPSL.
Mercury’s Seasonal Na Exosphere Tim Cassidy, Aimee Merkel, Bill McClintock and the MASCS team.
MSASI Mercury Sodium Atmospheric Spectral Imager PI: Ichiro Yoshikawa (Univ. of Tokyo) Co-PI: Oleg Korablev (IKI) Co-I: Shoichi Okano (Tohoku University)
ESS 7 Lecture 14 October 31, 2008 Magnetic Storms
Plasma entry in the Mercury’s magnetosphere S. Massetti S. Massetti INAF-IFSI Interplanetary Space Physics Institute, Roma - Italy.
Solar wind interaction with the comet Halley and Venus
Storm-Time Dynamics of the Inner Magnetosphere: Observations of Sources and Transport Michelle F. Thomsen Los Alamos National Laboratory 27 June 2003.
20 November 2006Boston Mercury Observation Workshop Observational Quests for Mercury’s Exosphere Ann L. Sprague Lunar and Planetary Laboratory University.
June 2006 data review meeting, Boston, Nov 2006 Alain Doressoundiram1 MERCURY ’ S EXOSPHERE OBSERVATION USING EsPadOnS/CFHT Alain Doressoundiram(LESIA.
Magnetospheric Morphology Prepared by Prajwal Kulkarni and Naoshin Haque Stanford University, Stanford, CA IHY Workshop on Advancing VLF through the Global.
Solar Activity and VLF Prepared by Sheila Bijoor and Naoshin Haque Stanford University, Stanford, CA IHY Workshop on Advancing VLF through the Global AWESOME.
Mercury’s Atmosphere: A Surface-bound Exosphere Virginia Pasek PTYS 395.
THE SODIUM EXOSPHERE OF MERCURY: COMPARISON BETWEEN OBSERVATIONS AND MODEL A.Mura, P. Wurz, H. Lichtenegger, H. Lammer, A. Milillo, S. Orsini, S. Massetti,
Monte Carlo Atmosphere Model Dana Crider, CUA Rosemary Killen, U. Md.
Sponge: List the six layers of the Earth.. Atmosphere A mixture of gases: N 2 78% O 2 21% Ar0.9% CO %
BC/MPO/SERENA Scientific Objectives Anna Milillo and the SERENA team.
Computer Simulations in Solar System Physics Mats Holmström Swedish Institute of Space Physics (IRF) Forskarskolan i rymdteknik Göteborg 12 September 2005.
ESS 7 Lectures 15 and 16 November 3 and 5, 2008 The Atmosphere and Ionosphere.
Space Weather from Coronal Holes and High Speed Streams M. Leila Mays (NASA/GSFC and CUA) SW REDISW REDI 2014 June 2-13.
14 May JIM M. RAINES University of Michigan DANIEL J. GERSHMAN, THOMAS H. ZURBUCHEN, JAMES A. SLAVIN, HAJE KORTH, and BRIAN J. ANDERSON Magnetospheric.
Elemental Abundance variations of the Suprathermal Heavy Ion Population over solar cycle 23 M. Al Dayeh, J.R. Dwyer, H.K. Rassoul Florida Institute of.
Observational Tests of Suprathermal Particle Acceleration (Dayeh/Hill  Hill/Desai) WORKING GROUP SUMMARY.
Stefano Orsini 1, Valeria Mangano 1, Alessandro Mura 1, Francois Leblanc 2, Anna Milillo 1 1 IFSI-INAF Roma, Italy 2 CNRS/IPSL Paris, France Stefano Orsini.
9 May MESSENGER First Flyby Magnetospheric Results J. A. Slavin and the MESSENGER Team BepiColombo SERENA Team Meeting Santa Fe, New Mexico 11 May.
Europa’s exosphere generation C. Plainaki, A. Milillo, A. Mura, S. Orsini Isituto di Fisica dello Spazio Interplanetario, Rome, ITALY 2nd SERENA-HEWG Meeting,
Solar Wind and Coronal Mass Ejections
JAXA’s Exploration of the Solar System Beyond the Moon and Mars.
International Colloquium and Workshop “Ganymede lander: science goals and experiments” Space Research Institute (IKI), Moscow, Russia 5-7 March 2013 Chemistry.
Modeling the Sublimation-driven Atmosphere of Io with DSMC Andrew Walker David Goldstein, Chris Moore, Philip Varghese, and Laurence Trafton University.
Mercury’s Seasonal Na Exosphere Data from MESSENGER’s MASCS UVVS instrument Tim Cassidy, Aimee Merkel, Bill McClintock, Matt Burger Menelaos Sarantos,
Scott M. Bailey, LWS Workshop March 24, 2004 The Observed Response of the Lower Thermosphere to Solar Energetic Inputs Scott M. Bailey, Erica M. Rodgers,
The ionosphere of Mars never looked like this before Paul Withers Boston University Space Physics Group meeting, University of Michigan.
Introduction to Space Weather Jie Zhang CSI 662 / PHYS 660 Spring, 2012 Copyright © Ionosphere II: Radio Waves April 12, 2012.
Spatial Distribution of Atom Velocities in the Mercury Sodium Tail - Observation at Haleakala in June H. Fukazawa, M. Kagitani, S. Okano H. Fukazawa,
Seasonal Variability in Mercury’s Calcium Exosphere Matthew Burger Morgan State University/GESTAR Rosemary Killen (NASA/GSFC) Bill McClintock (U. Colorado/LASP)
Response of the Earth’s environment to solar radiative forcing
1 MAVEN PFP ICDR May 23-25, 2011 Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN (MAVEN) Mission Particles and Fields Science Critical Design Review May ,
ASTRONOMY 340 FALL October 2007 Class #11.
ESS 200C Lecture 13 The Earth’s Ionosphere
Solar Wind Induced Escape on Mars and Venus. Mutual Lessons from Different Space Missions E. Dubinin Max-Planck Institute for Solar System Research, Katlenburg-Lindau,
The Suprathermal Tail Properties are not well understood; known contributors Heated solar wind Interstellar and inner source pickup ions Prior solar and.
Solar Energetic Particles (SEP’s) J. R. Jokipii LPL, University of Arizona Lecture 2.
M. Yamauchi 1, H. Lammer 2, J.-E. Wahlund 3 1. Swedish Institute of Space Physics (IRF), Kiruna, Sweden 2. Space Research Institute (IWF), Graz, Austria.
The effects of the solar wind on Saturn’s space environment
Lunar Surface Atmosphere Spectrometer (LSAS) Objectives: The instrument LSAS is designed to study the composition and structure of the Lunar atmosphere.
ASEN 5335 Aerospace Environments -- Magnetospheres 1 As the magnetized solar wind flows past the Earth, the plasma interacts with Earth’s magnetic field.
Mercury Disk Observations by Japanese team 1. Observation of Mercury transit on the solar disk on November 9, 2007 [Dawn-Dusk Asymmetry] by Junya Ono and.
Characteristics and source of the electron density irregularities in the Earth’s ionosphere Hyosub Kil Johns Hopkins University / Applied Physics Laboratory.
Earth’s Magnetosphere Space Weather Training Kennedy Space Center Space Weather Research Center.
Observations of reflected ions downstream of shocks in the heliosphere John Richardson M.I.T. (Voyager plasma experiment) 10 – 5950 eV/q.
A Global Hybrid Simulation Study of the Solar Wind Interaction with the Moon David Schriver ESS 265 – June 2, 2005.
Cluster observation of electron acceleration by ULF Alfvén waves
Sponge: List the six layers of the Earth.
Elemental Abundance variations of the Suprathermal Heavy Ion Population over solar cycle 23 M. Al Dayeh, J.R. Dwyer, H.K. Rassoul Florida Institute of.
Comet “Anatomy” nucleus (<30km) atmosphere (near sun)
1 Rikkyo University, 2 Tohoku University
MESSENGER observations of Mercury’s northern cusp
Importance of Pickup Ions & Suprathermal Ions in the Inner Heliosphere
Shyama Narendranath Space Astronomy Group ISRO Satellite Centre
Berlin MESSENGER-BepiColombo Joint Science Meeting
Planetary Discovery in the era of Spacecraft Exploration Xi Zhang
Introduction to Space Weather
Earth’s Atmosphere.
Earth’s Ionosphere Lecture 13
Energy conversion boundaries
Astronomy 340 Fall October 2005 Class #10.
The Ionosphere Equatorial Anomaly.
Magnetosphere: Structure and Properties
Presentation transcript:

November 2006 MERCURY OBSERVATIONS - JUNE 2006 DATA REVIEW MEETING Review of Physical Processes and Modeling Approaches "A summary of uncertain/debated questions from a modeler's point of view" F. Leblanc Service d'Aéronomie du CNRS/IPSL

November 2006 MERCURY OBSERVATIONS - JUNE 2006 DATA REVIEW MEETING Most debated questions based on Mercury's observations

November 2006 MERCURY OBSERVATIONS - JUNE 2006 DATA REVIEW MEETING Observed components of Mercury's exosphere H 3  10 9 ~ 23 (hot) 230 (cold) He 3  ~ 6  10 3 O 3  ~ 4.4  10 4 Mariner 10 Solar Occultation (Broadfoot et al. 1976) At terminator: neutral density < 10 7 cm -3 Mariner 10 Radio Occultation (Fjelbo et al. 1976) Electronic density around Mercury < 10 3 cm -3 SpeciesSubsolar column density (cm -2 ) Near surface subsolar density (cm -3 ) Na  ~ 10 4 K  10 9 ~ 10 2 Ca 1.1  10 8 ? Remarks From Earth Mariner 10 Known Species  Which other species?

November 2006 MERCURY OBSERVATIONS - JUNE 2006 DATA REVIEW MEETING 1985: First Spectroscopic observation (Potter et al. 1985) 1986: observation of K, Na/K = >> Moon (6), solar (20) (Potter and Morgan 1986) Is the Na/K ratio always so large and why? Suprathermal component in Na line (Potter and Morgan 1987; Killen et al. 1999) Latitudinal, longitudinal, Mercury's position dependencies of this suprathermal component? Sporadic spots of Na emission at high latitudes (Potter and Morgan 1990, 1997; 2006) Due to exospheric recycling and/or to solar wind sputtering? Local enhancement on Caloris of K emission (Sprague 1990) Role of surface topography on the formation of the exosphere? Ground based observations of the Na, K, Ca components

November 2006 MERCURY OBSERVATIONS - JUNE 2006 DATA REVIEW MEETING West North Occultation of the Solar Na D2 line by Mercury's exosphere (Schleicher et al. 2004) Dayside Terminator Nightside Terminator What spatial distributions? Observations of the Na D lines (Potter and Morgan 1997) Sun N E W S Role of the solar radiation pressure, of Mercury's orbit?

November 2006 MERCURY OBSERVATIONS - JUNE 2006 DATA REVIEW MEETING What are the origins of the "short" term variation? Potter et al. (1999) South North 220° 214° 229° 223° 217° 236° Is it a CME encounter with Mercury? Is it a solar wind and UV variation inducing this observation? Role of Caloris? Other mechanisms?

November 2006 MERCURY OBSERVATIONS - JUNE 2006 DATA REVIEW MEETING What drives Mercury's tail formation? 26/05/2001 Potter et al. (2002) morning side 0.42 AU D2 emission TAA = 23° TAA = 83° TAA = 125° TAA = 190° TAA = 261° TAA = 315° Related to the ejection process? To the ionization frequency? To the solar radiation pressure? 3D model

November 2006 MERCURY OBSERVATIONS - JUNE 2006 DATA REVIEW MEETING Driven by Mercury's rotations? Driven by the solar radiation pressure? Driven by the distance to the Sun? From Potter et al. (2006) Aphelion Perihelion Variation with respect to TAA? Perihelion AU Aphelion AU The Sun TAA 3D model Observation

November 2006 MERCURY OBSERVATIONS - JUNE 2006 DATA REVIEW MEETING H and He: thermal desorption and surface accomodation Ca meteoroid vaporization and photo- dissociation (+4 up to 6 eV)  Ca/cm 2 T = 12, ,000 K Different energy distributions?  Different release mechanisms? Altitude (km) Emission (Rayleigh) H 1216 Å (Broadfoot et al. 1976) 420 K 110 K Ca 4226 A Killen et al. (2005) Altitude (km) λ (5890 A) Intensity (MR/A) Na 5890 A Killen et al. (1999) 1500 K Data 1100 K 750 K Na: hotter than surface temperature  Energetic processes (?) ∆λ~6 mA

November 2006 MERCURY OBSERVATIONS - JUNE 2006 DATA REVIEW MEETING How could we describe Mercury's exosphere?

November 2006 MERCURY OBSERVATIONS - JUNE 2006 DATA REVIEW MEETING Boundaries? The surface: the first layers of grains or the regolith layer? Is it a finite or infinite reservoir of ambient or/and source particles? The Interplanetary medium: the magnetopause? the bow shock? The orbit of Mercury? Crust Regolith Exosphere

November 2006 MERCURY OBSERVATIONS - JUNE 2006 DATA REVIEW MEETING Surface absorption: is it a sink or/and just a recycling process? Neutral escape: what energy distributions for the ejecta? Ionization and Acceleration through the tail: what ionization cross section and electric field? Sinks? Absorption of neutral and magnetospheric ion Photo ionization Neutral loss Crust Regolith Exosphere

November 2006 MERCURY OBSERVATIONS - JUNE 2006 DATA REVIEW MEETING Diffusion: through the grain and/or the regolith? Meteoroid supply: rate and spatial distribution ? Meteoroid gardening: how to constrain this mechanism? Solar Wind implantation: where, how much, which depth? Meteoroid gardening Diffusion Sources? Meteoritic supply + solar wind implantation Crust Regolith Exosphere

November 2006 MERCURY OBSERVATIONS - JUNE 2006 DATA REVIEW MEETING Photo Stimulated Desorption Solar Wind sputtering Thermal Desorption Micro- Meteoritic Impact Crust Regolith Mechanisms of ejection: - Acting on the same population or on different population? (binding energy distribution, depth of implantation...) - What kind of variability vs heliocentric distance, solar activities (CME), surface temperature, radiative environment? Exospheric production Also chemical sputtering, is it negligible?

November 2006 MERCURY OBSERVATIONS - JUNE 2006 DATA REVIEW MEETING Adapted from Morgan and Killen (1997) Photo Stimulated Desorption Solar Wind sputtering Absorption of neutral and magnetospheric ion Diffusion Photo ionization Neutral loss Thermal Desorption Micro- Meteoritic Impact Meteoritic supply + solar wind implantation Meteoroid gardening Crust Regolith In summary

November 2006 MERCURY OBSERVATIONS - JUNE 2006 DATA REVIEW MEETING Mercury can be observed only the evening or the morning during one hour One hour = less than one Mercury minute One Earth day = 1/176 of one Mercury day ~15 Mercury minutes No possibility to observe simultaneously both evening and morning sides From telescopes located at different longitudes we can observe the exosphere for few hours on the same day  Access to new time scales In particular of the solar wind variability time scale Coordinate observing campaign

November 2006 MERCURY OBSERVATIONS - JUNE 2006 DATA REVIEW MEETING Conclusions Uncertainties on the real energy, density and composition structure of Mercury's exosphere:  Which mechanisms lead to ejection, with which intensity and with which released energy (related to the boundaries)?  What are the sources and sinks of Mercury's exosphere ? We can partially solve these questions by tracking variations:  from day to night sides (global exospheric recycling)  from perihelion to aphelion (ambient vs source populations)  with respect to latitude (solar wind sputtering or topography)  due to short and long time variations of the solar wind and photon flux (relations with surface and magnetosphere)  Access to new time scales should hightlight other variabilities...  Discovery of new exospheric species