Photospheric Sources of Very Fast (>1100km/s) Coronal Mass Ejections Recent studies show that only very fast CMEs (> 1100 km/s) are capable of producing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Analysis of a C4.1 flare occurred in a δ spot using SDO and SST data
Advertisements

The Physics of Solar Flares Examining Solar Flares and Radio Bursts By Caylin Mendelowitz and Claire Rosen.
The Relationship Between CMEs and Post-eruption Arcades Peter T. Gallagher, Chia-Hsien Lin, Claire Raftery, Ryan O. Milligan.
Estimating the magnetic energy in solar magnetic configurations Stéphane Régnier Reconnection seminar on Thursday 15 December 2005.
TRACE and RHESSI observations of the failed eruption of the magnetic flux rope Tomasz Mrozek Astronomical Institute University of Wrocław.
On the Space Weather Response of Coronal Mass Ejections and Their Sheath Regions Emilia Kilpua Department of Physics, University of Helsinki
1 Hinode Coordinated Observations: Plasma Composition Photospheric composition ~ 1 in coronal hole (CH) -> fast wind Coronal composition ~1.5-3 in active.
Coronal Mass Ejections without photospheric/chromospheric signatures Session organizers: Alexei Pevtsov (NSO) and Vasyl Yurchyshyn (BBSO) Discussion leaders:
Evolution of Barb-Angle and Partial Filament Eruption J.T. Su [1,2], Y. Liu [2], H.Q. Zhang [1], H. Kurokawa [2] V. Yurchyshyn [3] (1)National Astronomical.
Changyi Tan et al. NJIT, April 2008 Evolution of Evershed and Shear Flows Associated with the X3.4 Flare of 2006 December 13 Evolution of Evershed and.
Chip Manchester 1, Fang Fang 1, Bart van der Holst 1, Bill Abbett 2 (1)University of Michigan (2)University of California Berkeley Study of Flux Emergence:
September 2006 CISM All Hand Meeting Properties of Solar Active Regions and Solar Eruptive Events Yang Liu -- Stanford University
Observations of the failed eruption of the magnetic flux rope – a direct application of the quadrupolar model for a solar flare Tomasz Mrozek Astronomical.
Rapid Changes in the Longitudinal Magnetic Field Associated with the July gamma -ray Flare Vasyl Yurchyshyn, Haimin Wang, Valentyna Abramenko,
Prediction of Central Axis Direction of Magnetic Clouds Xuepu Zhao and Yang Liu Stanford University The West Pacific Geophysics Meeting, Beijing, China.
Statistical Distributions of Speeds of Coronal Mass Ejections 1 Big Bear Solar Obs, Big Bear, CA 92314; 2 Catholic University of America, Washington DC.
Center for Space Environment Modeling Ward Manchester University of Michigan Yuhong Fan High Altitude Observatory SHINE July.
Ward Manchester University of Michigan Coupling of the Coronal and Subphotospheric Magnetic Field in Active Regions by Shear Flows Driven by The Lorentz.
Coronal Ejecta in October - November of 2003 and predictions of the associated geomagnetic events 1 Big Bear Solar Observatory, New Jersey Institute of.
The May 1,1998 and May 12, 1997 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
On the Origin of Strong Gradients in Photospheric Magnetic Fields Brian Welsch and Yan Li Space Sciences Lab, UC-Berkeley, 7 Gauss Way, Berkeley, CA ,
AR 10759/ May Event Overview
Free Magnetic Energy in Solar Active Regions above the Minimum-Energy Relaxed State (Regnier, S., Priest, E.R ApJ) Use magnetic field extrapolations.
Space Weather Forecast With HMI Magnetograms: Proposed data products Yang Liu, J. T. Hoeksema, and HMI Team.
V.I. Abramenko, V.B. Yurchyshyn, H. Wang, T.R. Spirock, P.R. Goode Big Bear Solar Observatory, NJIT Crimean Astrophysical Observatory, Ukraine
Magnetic Field and Heating of the Corona Valentyna Abramenko and Vasyl Yurchyshyn Big Bear Solar Observatory.
The May 1997 and May 1998 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
Magnetic Structures of Active Regions and their Link to Coronal Mass Ejections Vasyl Yurchyshyn, Big Bear Solar Observatory, Big Bear City, CA 92314,
Twist & writhe of kink-unstable magnetic flux ropes I flux rope: helicity sum of twist and writhe: kink instability: twist  and writhe  (sum is constant)
1 Mei Zhang ( National Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences ) Helicity Transport from the convection zone to interplanetary space Collaborators:
Coronal Mass Ejection As a Result of Magnetic Helicity Accumulation
Locating the solar source of 13 April 2006 Magnetic Cloud K. Steed 1, C. J. Owen 1, L. K. Harra 1, L. M. Green 1, S. Dasso 2, A. P. Walsh 1, P. Démoulin.
1Yang Liu/Magnetic FieldHMI Science – 1 May 2003 Magnetic Field Goals – magnetic field & eruptive events Yang Liu Stanford University.
The Sun ROBOTS Summer Solar Structure Core - the center of the Sun where nuclear fusion releases a large amount of heat energy and converts hydrogen.
Radio obsevation of rapid acceleration in a slow filament eruption/fast coronal mass ejection event Kundu et al ApJ, 607, 530.
On the February 14-15, 2011 CME-CME interaction event and consequences for Space Weather Manuela Temmer(1), Astrid Veronig(1), Vanessa Peinhart(1), Bojan.
The Sun- Solar Activity. Damage to communications & power systems.
SUB-GROUP 1: Surface Solar Magnetic Fields  The central question: Can we infer the orientation of Bz of an ICME at 1 AU by focusing on the study of the.
Invited speakers (afternoon): David Alexander (Rice University) Chip Manchester (University of Michigan) Brad Hindman (JILA/University of Colorado)
II. MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS (Space Climate School, Lapland, March, 2009) Eric Priest (St Andrews)
WG3: Extreme Events Summary N. Gopalswamy & A. Vourlidas.
SHINE 2006 David Alexander Rice University Exploring the dynamics of flux-emergence in magnetically-complex solar active regions David Alexander and Lirong.
SPD 2004 Peter T Gallagher (NASA/GSFC) The Active Region Evolution and Activity of Halloween 2003 Peter T. Gallagher (L-3 Com GSI) and R. T. James McAteer.
SHINE Formation and Eruption of Filament Flux Ropes A. A. van Ballegooijen 1 & D. H. Mackay 2 1 Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge,
Coronal and Interplanetary Magnetic Fields in October-November 2003 and November CMEs Vasyl Yurchyshyn Big Bear Solar Observatory,
1 Yongliang Song & Mei Zhang (National Astronomical Observatory of China) The effect of non-radial magnetic field on measuring helicity transfer rate.
Funding from: BOF, Odysseus & GOA (KU Leuven), EC-FP7 (Soteria, Giovanni Lapenta, Lapo Bettarini Centrum voor.
Units to cover: 52, 53, Observatories in Space.
Anemone Structure of AR NOAA and Related Geo-Effective Flares and CMEs A. Asai 1 ( 浅井 歩 ), T.T. Ishii 2, K. Shibata 2, N. Gopalswamy 3 1: Nobeyama.
Show 1 -- photosphere & sunspots SUN COURSE - SLIDE SHOW 4 Show 2 -- corona & solar cycle Today: Sun today + waves + prominences +UFO’s Show 3 -- SOHO.
Summary Using 21 equatorial CHs during the solar cycle 23 we studied the correlation of SW velocity with the area of EIT CH and the area of NoRH RBP. SW.
Solar Magnetism: Solar Cycle Solar Dynamo Coronal Magnetic Field CSI 662 / ASTR 769 Lect. 03, February 6 Spring 2007 References: NASA/MSFC Solar Physics.
On Coronal Mass Ejections and Configurations of the Ambient Magnetic Field Yang Liu Stanford University 3/17/ COSPAR 2008.
What we can learn from active region flux emergence David Alexander Rice University Collaborators: Lirong Tian (Rice) Yuhong Fan (HAO)
Initiation of Coronal Mass Ejections: Implications for Forecasting Solar Energetic Particle Storms Ron Moore, Alphonse Sterling, David Falconer, John Davis.
Axel Brandenburg & Jörn Warnecke NorditaStockholm  loop emergence –Buoyant rise –Many scale heights –Twist needed Dynamo –bi-helical field Emergence.
BBSO 2007 Science Planning. Focal Plane Instruments AO (Wenda, Nicolas, Deqing, Patricia and Park) AO (Wenda, Nicolas, Deqing, Patricia and Park) IRIM.
Helicity Thinkshop 2009, Beijing Asymmetry of helicity injection in emerging active regions L. Tian, D. Alexander Rice University, USA Y. Liu Yunnan Astronomical.
Studies on Twisted Magnetic Flux Bundles
Ward Manchester University of Michigan
Diagnostic of Chromospheric Flare Plasma
Orientations of Halo CMEs and Magnetic Clouds
Anemone Structure and Geo-Effective Flares/CMEs
Anemone Structure of AR NOAA and Related Geo-Effective Flares and CMEs
Preflare State Rust et al. (1994) 太陽雑誌会.
MHD Simulation of Plasmoid-Induced-Reconnection in Solar Flares
Ju Jing, Vasyl B. Yurchyshyn, Guo Yang, Yan Xu, and Haimin Wang
Ron Moore and Alphonse Sterling
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
CORONAL MASS EJECTIONS
Presentation transcript:

Photospheric Sources of Very Fast (>1100km/s) Coronal Mass Ejections Recent studies show that only very fast CMEs (> 1100 km/s) are capable of producing strong geomagnetic storms (Dst < -150nT). BIG QUESTION: Where these very fast CMEs come from? We analyzed photospheric sources of 45 very fast CMEs and distinguished four different types of specific magnetic configurations associated with them: i) delta-configurations (47%), ii) magnetic complexes (22%), iii) “tadpole” - shaped sunspots (18%) and iv) quiescent filaments located near active regions (13%). Here we briefly discuss the first three types of magnetic configurations. Vasyl Yurchyshyn Seiji Yashiro Nat Gopalswamy Big Bear Solar Observatory Catholic University of America NASA/GSFC CME projection speed is related to the intensity of Bz in interplanetary ejecta: In turn, the intensity of the southward Bz largely determines the intensity (Dst Index) of a geomagnetic storm: 1. Complex Delta Spots (11 - X, 8 - M & 2 – C flare) Date Speed Coord NOAA Area Length Flare 2. Tadpole-Shaped ARs (2 - X, 5 - M & 1 – C flare) Date Speed Coord NOAA Area Length Flare 3. Magnetic Complex (1- X, 8 - M & 1 – C flare) Typical features: a large sunspot w/ many small satellites a large sunspot w/ many small satellites twisted magnetic field & strong magnetic shear twisted magnetic field & strong magnetic shear well pronounced moat structure well pronounced moat structure In this magnetic topology, a CME, too, can be a result of reconnection between many closed twisted magnetic loops as suggested by the Quadruple Reconnection Configuration. (Yurchyshyn et al., 2000, ApJ 540, 1143) The magnetic complexes are extended magnetic regions which consist of two adjacent decaying active regions or a new magnetic region emerging inside a decaying active region. Because of the age of these active regions, a large scale helical magnetic fields (flux tube) could be formed and CMEs could be associated with their eruptions. Another possibility is that a CME is a result of interaction between the two adjacent active regions. AR 8375 on Nov 5, 1998 Typical features: two opposite polarity sunspots located in the same penumbra two opposite polarity sunspots located in the same penumbra large magnitude of the magnetic field and high horizontal gradients large magnitude of the magnetic field and high horizontal gradients highly twisted magnetic fields, strong magnetic shear highly twisted magnetic fields, strong magnetic shear Delta-sunspots are proposed to be formed via emergence of a twisted loop (Fan et al. 1999) and they are believed to be connected above the photosphere. However, Zirin & Liggett (1987), Shi & Wang (1993) and Liu & Zhang (1999) suggested that delta-sunspots can be formed due to i) emergence of a cluster of sunspots; ii) emergence of a satellite sunspot and iii) collision of two bipolar magnetic features and direct magnetic connections (“post flare” loops) within a delta-sunspot occur only as it decays (Zirin & Liggett 1987). Thus, a delta sunspot can be associated with two independent magnetic fluxes which can reconnect and produce a CME as described in the Sweet (1958) and Hirose (2001) models. Those models are based on the Quadruple Reconnection Configuration Thus, a delta sunspot can be associated with two independent magnetic fluxes which can reconnect and produce a CME as described in the Sweet (1958) and Hirose (2001) models. Those models are based on the Quadruple Reconnection Configuration (see also poster SH51C-03) NOAA AR 9415 ARs 39 Filaments 6 No Source 70 Total 115 CMEs Yurchyshyn et al. 2004, ApJ, 619, 599 Yurchyshyn et al. 2004, Space Weather, 2, S02001