Lab CPI1 Soc 695 Family Violence Research In World Perspective Murray A. Straus LAB CPI. CORPORAL PUNISHMENT AND DATING VIOLENCE - INDIVIDUAL LEVEL DATA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Findings from the 2008 National Demographic and Health Survey ESA/STAT/AC.219/33 NSO.
Advertisements

Hypothesis testing 5th - 9th December 2011, Rome.
SPSS Session 5: Association between Nominal Variables Using Chi-Square Statistic.
Contingency Tables Chapters Seven, Sixteen, and Eighteen Chapter Seven –Definition of Contingency Tables –Basic Statistics –SPSS program (Crosstabulation)
Organizing Data Proportions, Percentages, Rates, and rates of change.
Bivariate Analysis Cross-tabulation and chi-square.
Chapter 13: The Chi-Square Test
CTS401 ANALYZING AND INTERPRETING DATA FROM THE REVISED CONFLICT TACTICS SCALES AND THE INTERNATIONAL DATING VIOLENCE STUDY Murray A. Straus Family Research.
Chapter 11 Contingency Table Analysis. Nonparametric Systems Another method of examining the relationship between independent (X) and dependant (Y) variables.
Section 4.2: How to Look for Differences. Cross-Tabulations College student binge drinkers experienced many personal and social problems, the researchers.
Determining and Interpreting Associations Among Variables.
Lecture 3: Chi-Sqaure, correlation and your dissertation proposal Non-parametric data: the Chi-Square test Statistical correlation and regression: parametric.
PSY 340 Statistics for the Social Sciences Chi-Squared Test of Independence Statistics for the Social Sciences Psychology 340 Spring 2010.
1 Here are some additional methods for describing data.
Chapter18 Determining and Interpreting Associations Among Variables.
Lab CPA1 LAB CPA. CORPORAL PUNISHMENT AND APPROVAL OF VIOLENCE The Research Questions 1. Do nations where corporal punishment is used by many parents have.
CORRELATIONAL RESEARCH II Relations in Observational and Survey Research Lawrence R. Gordon Psychology Research Methods I.
Chi-square Test of Independence
CTS401 ANALYZING AND INTERPRETING DATA FROM THE REVISED CONFLICT TACTICS SCALES AND THE INTERNATIONAL DATING VIOLENCE STUDY Murray A. Straus Family Research.
Lab 3 CP & IPV1 LAB 4. NEGLECT AS A CHILD AND DATING PARTNER VIOLENCE “Macro” level research. Also called “societal level” research if the units are societies.
Lab 3 CP & IPV1 LAB 3. NATIONAL DIFFERENCES IN CORPORAL PUNISHMENT AND DATING PARTNER VIOLENCE “Macro” level research. Also called “societal level” research.
MR2300: MARKETING RESEARCH PAUL TILLEY Unit 10: Basic Data Analysis.
Cross-Tabulations.
Crosstabs. When to Use Crosstabs as a Bivariate Data Analysis Technique For examining the relationship of two CATEGORIC variables  For example, do men.
Problem 1: Relationship between Two Variables-1 (1)
World Health Organization Gender and Women’s Health Toward a common set of indicators to measure violence against women Henrica A.F.M. Jansen, WHO UNECE.
8/15/2015Slide 1 The only legitimate mathematical operation that we can use with a variable that we treat as categorical is to count the number of cases.
Example of Simple and Multiple Regression
Significance Testing 10/22/2013. Readings Chapter 3 Proposing Explanations, Framing Hypotheses, and Making Comparisons (Pollock) (pp ) Chapter 5.
Cross Tabulation and Chi-Square Testing. Cross-Tabulation While a frequency distribution describes one variable at a time, a cross-tabulation describes.
Bivariate Relationships Analyzing two variables at a time, usually the Independent & Dependent Variables Like one variable at a time, this can be done.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved. Chapter 15 Inference for Counts:
Wiseman lab 1 LAB: GENDER & PARTNER VIOLENCE IN WISEMAN VIDEOS ON “DOMESTIC VIOLENCE” SOME WAYS THIS LAB IS DIFFERENT Experience with a different research.
© 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education The Statistical Imagination Chapter 13: Nominal Variables: The Chi-Square and Binomial Distributions.
Two Way ANOVA ©2005 Dr. B. C. Paul. ANOVA Application ANOVA allows us to review data and determine whether a particular effect is changing our results.
Chi-Square Test of Independence Practice Problem – 1
Chi-Square as a Statistical Test Chi-square test: an inferential statistics technique designed to test for significant relationships between two variables.
Copyright © 2012 by Nelson Education Limited. Chapter 10 Hypothesis Testing IV: Chi Square 10-1.
Lab B1 LAB B (A)SCORING THE CTS SCALE FOR MINOR VIOLENCE (B)CROSS TABULATION TO TEST THE HYPOTHESIS THAT CORPORAL PUNISHMENT IS A RISK FACTOR FOR HITTING.
17-18 February 2011 Revision of the module on violence.
Quantitative Methods Partly based on materials by Sherry O’Sullivan Part 3 Chi - Squared Statistic.
The Scientific Method. Steps of Scientific Method 1.Observation: notice and describe events or processes 2.Make a question 1.Relate to observation 2.Should.
Review of the Basic Logic of NHST Significance tests are used to accept or reject the null hypothesis. This is done by studying the sampling distribution.
Grading and Analysis Report For Clinical Portfolio 1.
SW318 Social Work Statistics Slide 1 Frequency: Nominal Variable Practice Problem This question asks the frequency of widowed respondents of the survey.
Chi-square Test of Independence
ID1 THE INTERNATIONAL DATING VIOLENCE STUDY** The work was supported by National Institute of Mental Health grant T32MH15161 and the University of New.
International Workshop on Social Statistics Beijing, China 22 – 26 November 2010 Violence against Women Questionnaire Interregional Project on Eradicating.
Reasoning in Psychology Using Statistics Psychology
Lab CPM1 LAB CPM. NATIONAL CONTEXT DIFFERENCES IN CORPORAL PUNISHMENT AND DATING PARTNER VIOLENCE “An example of “macro” level research. Also called “societal.
IDV study1 The work was supported by National Institute of Mental Health grant T32MH15161 and the University of New Hampshire. A STUDY OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS.
Chapter 11: Chi-Square  Chi-Square as a Statistical Test  Statistical Independence  Hypothesis Testing with Chi-Square The Assumptions Stating the Research.
IDV study1 The work was supported by National Institute of Mental Health grant T32MH15161 and the University of New Hampshire. A STUDY OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS.
Approve viol1 Lab NPV. TO WHAT EXTENT DO ATTITUDES APPROVING PARTNER VIOLENCE EXPLAIN HITTING A DATING PARTNER? DOES THIS THIS APPLY TO WOMEN AS WELL AS.
Chapter 14 – 1 Chi-Square Chi-Square as a Statistical Test Statistical Independence Hypothesis Testing with Chi-Square The Assumptions Stating the Research.
Approve viol1 Lab 7. TO WHAT EXTENT DO ATTITUDE AND CULTURAL NORMS EXPLAIN PARNER VIOLENCE, AND IS THE RELATIONSHIP DIFFERENT FOR MEN AND WOMEN? The Research.
Cross Tabs and Chi-Squared Testing for a Relationship Between Nominal/Ordinal Variables.
Lab CPM1 LAB CPM. NATIONAL CONTEXT DIFFERENCES IN CORPORAL PUNISHMENT AND DATING PARTNER VIOLENCE “An example of “macro” level research. Also called “societal.
The Chi Square Equation Statistics in Biology. Background The chi square (χ 2 ) test is a statistical test to compare observed results with theoretical.
Class Seven Turn In: Chapter 18: 32, 34, 36 Chapter 19: 26, 34, 44 Quiz 3 For Class Eight: Chapter 20: 18, 20, 24 Chapter 22: 34, 36 Read Chapters 23 &
Partner violence among young adults in the Philippines: The role of intergenerational transmission and gender Jessica A. Fehringer Michelle J. Hindin Department.
Bivariate Association. Introduction This chapter is about measures of association This chapter is about measures of association These are designed to.
Criminal Justice and Criminology Research Methods, Second Edition Kraska / Neuman © 2012 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
Hypothesis Testing Review
Bi-variate #1 Cross-Tabulation
Module 8 Statistical Reasoning in Everyday Life
The Chi-Square Distribution and Test for Independence
Reasoning in Psychology Using Statistics
Hypothesis Testing and Comparing Two Proportions
Presentation transcript:

Lab CPI1 Soc 695 Family Violence Research In World Perspective Murray A. Straus LAB CPI. CORPORAL PUNISHMENT AND DATING VIOLENCE - INDIVIDUAL LEVEL DATA The Research Question Is having experienced corporal punishment by parents related to a higher probability of hitting a dating partner? Illustrates Individual level Research Other Lab Projects Will Use “macro” or societal level method STEPS (1) Writing a hypothesis (2) Score the CTS scale for minor violence (3) Identify the Independent and Dependent variables (4) Cross-Tabulation to test your hypothesis about the relation of corporal punishment to hitting a dating partner (5) Write the Results section of the lab report (6) Write the Discussion of the results

Lab CPI2 STEP 1 -- THE HYPOTHESIS What is a hypothesis? What is your hypothesis about the relation of CP to violence against a dating partner? Write it on the Lab Report Form You will NOT be graded on whether your hypothesis is supported by the results of the cross-tabulation. So put down whatever you think the results might show.

Lab CPI3 SAMPLE AND MEASURES SAMPLE: About 70 students: Students currently in Sociology Students from last time the course was taught INDEPENDENT VARIABLE Corporal Punishment measured by Question 105. “When I was less then 12 years old, I was spanked or hit a lot by my mother or father.” 1 = Strongly disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Agree 4 = Strongly Agree DEPENDENT VARIABLE Conflict Tactics Scales score for Minor assaults on a dating partner in the past year

Lab CPI4 CONFLICT TACTICS SCALES (CTS) – VIOLENCE SCALE QUESTIONS SPSS IDV NAME Q #ASSAULT – MINOR CCAMS1 208 THREW SOMETHING AT PARTNER THAT COULD HURT CCAMS2 210 TWISTED MY PARTNER'S ARM OR HAIR CCAMS3 218 PUSHED OR SHOVED MY PARTNER CCAMS4 246 GRABBED MY PARTNER CCAMS5 254 SLAPPED MY PARTNER ASSAULT - SEVERE CCASS1 222 USED A KNIFE OR GUN ON MY PARTNER CCASS2 228 PUNCHED PARTNER OR HIT PARTNER WITH CCASS3 234 CHOKED MY PARTNER CCASS4 238 SLAMMED PARTNER AGAINST A WALL CCASS5 244 BEAT UP MY PARTNER CCASS6 262 BURNED OR SCALDED MY PARTNER PURPOSE CCASS7 274 I KICKED MY PARTNER

Lab CPI5 STEP 2. SCORING THE CTS VIOLENCE SCALE CTS has scales for “minor” and “severe” violence. For simplicity we will score only the “minor violence” scale. Several ways to score the violence scale. The two main ways are Annual Frequency = sum of the 6 questions. Score range = 0 to 125 Prevalence = Did any of the violent acts occur Example Physical Assault Scale Item: “I Slapped my partner” 1 = Once in the past year 2 = Twice in the past year 3 = 3-5 times in the past year 4 = 6-10 times in the past year 5 = times in the past year 6 = More than 20 times in the past y 7 = Not in the past year, but it did happen before 8 = This has never happened

Lab CPI6 We will use the Prevalence method of scoring the CTS It has just 2 categories (yes and no) and that is easier to tabulate Scoring Violence Against A Dating Partner * There are 5 questions, about minor violence 208, 210, 218, 246, 254 * Check all 5 questions * If ANY one or more are answered 1 through 6 write a 1 in the upper left corner of side 1 of the answer sheet to indicate that this student had hit a partner * If NONE are marked 1-6 (i.e. if ALL are marked 7 for not in the past year, or 8 for never occurred) write a 0 in the upper left corner of side 1 of the answer sheet

Lab CPI7 STEP 4. CROSS TAB TO TEST THE HYPOTHESIS Each of you will have an answer sheet for 1 to 3 students. We will go around the class and you will read out the value for the independent variable (Q 105 – corporal punishment) and then for the dependent (the minor violence scale score that you computed and wrote on the answer sheet) * As each pair of scores is read out, everyone will put a tally mark in the box where it belongs. Make every 5 th tally mark horizontal: //// Add up each column and put the number in the N OF CASES row For each column, compute the percentage of cases coded 1 (violent to a partner) by dividing the number in the YES row by the number in the N Of Cases row. Put the sum in cell F. F Compute the percent of cases who experienced each level of corporal punishment by dividing the numbers in row C by cell D and write the percents in the row labeled Percent Hit By Parents

Lab CPI8

9 RESULTS (Number the parts) 1. What percent of UNH students experienced CP? * To find out, look in the Total Column of row E * Write this is the results section of your lab report 2. How prevalent is partner violence among the students in this course? * To find out, look in the % Violent column 3. What is the relation of CP to violence against a dating partner? * To find out, Compare the percent violent in the columns of the cross tabulation * On the lab report form, say (1) whether the percent goes up, goes down, or does not show a trend in either direction, (2) what this indicates about the relation of corporal punishment to hitting a dating partner? (3) Whether your hypothesis is supported or not. If there is a relationship, how close is it? Anything else you noticed about the results ?

Lab CPI10 IS THE RELATION BETWEEN CP AND VIOLENCE AGAINST A DATING PARTNER SIGNIFICANT? With about 70 cases, differences of the size we found would not be statistically significant I used a computer program to calculate it for, and found that Chi-square = ?, p <.OO1 What is a test of significance? What does the p value tell us? How low a p value is needed to be considered “significant”? What does it mean if the chi-square is not significant?

Lab CPI11

Lab CPI12

Lab CPI13 COMPARE THE RELATION OF CP TO TOTAL AND SEVERE ASSAULTS

Lab CPI14 DISCUSSION SECTION  IF THE PERCENT DOES NOT INCREASE, WHY COULD BE THE REASON? Small sample and chance variation Sample has special characteristics – not a representative sample There really is no relationship The measures are not accurate – not valid Other explanation IF THERE IS A RELATIONSHIP, HOW CLOSE IS IT?  (answer either or both) What processes could produces this relationship? What do the results suggest concerning social policy?  WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THE MEASURES OF CORPORAL PUNISHMENT AND OF VIOLENCE?

Lab CPI15 WHAT HAS BEEN LEARNED FROM THIS LAB? RESULTS The prevalence of corporal punishment for UNH students The prevalence of violence against dating by UNH students Whether corporal punishment as a child is related to violence against a dating partner by students at UNH The above for students in other nations METHODS How to formulate a hypothesis for sociological research Use of cross-tabulation to test a hypothesis based on a theory Use of data on individual students to test a theory An understanding of the following research tools: Why use percentages Test of significance An experience with evaluating data and interpreting results

Lab CPI16 MATERIALS NEEDED FOR THIS LAB Answer sheets for this and a previous class Power point hand out Cross-tab form Lab report forms Instructions for lab reports (if not distributed earlier)