Status of Operational Windows for HIF Chamber Transport Modes D. V. Rose, D. R. Welch, C. L. Olson, S. Neff, and S. S. Yu ARIES Project Meeting January.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Plasma Window Options and Opportunities for Inertial Fusion Applications Leslie Bromberg Ady Herskovitch* MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center ARIES meeting.

Advertisements

The scaling of LWFA in the ultra-relativistic blowout regime: Generation of Gev to TeV monoenergetic electron beams W.Lu, M.Tzoufras, F.S.Tsung, C. Joshi,

Systems Analysis for Modular versus Multi-beam HIF Drivers * Wayne Meier – LLNL Grant Logan – LBNL 15th International Symposium on Heavy Ion Inertial Fusion.

Update on Self Pinch Transport of Heavy Ion Beams for Chamber Transport D. V. Rose, D. R. Welch, Mission Research Corp. S. S. Yu, Lawrence Berkeley National.

Effects of External Magnetic Fields on the operation of an RF Cavity D. Stratakis, J. C. Gallardo, and R. B. Palmer Brookhaven National Laboratory 1 RF.

DAH, UW-FTI ARIES-IFE, April 2002, 1 Results from parametric studies of thin liquid wall IFE chambers D. A. Haynes, Jr. Fusion Technology Institute University.

Beamline Design Issues D. R. Welch and D. V. Rose Mission Research Corporation W. M. Sharp and S. S. Yu Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Presented.

Wayne R. Meier Lawrence Livermore National Lab Heavy Ion Fusion Modeling Update - Spot Size Model Changes* ARIES Meeting April 22-23, 2002 * This work.

Update on Self-Pinched Transport Simulations D. V. Rose and D. R. Welch Mission Research Corp. General Atomics, 7/1/02.

Diversion of Plasma in Beam Port with a Vertical Magnetic Field: 3-D Simulations D. V. Rose, D. R. Welch, and S. S. Yu Presented at the ARIES Project Meeting.

The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory Self-Pinched Transport Modeling C. L. Olson Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM D. R. Welch,

Wayne R. Meier Lawrence Livermore National Lab Heavy Ion Fusion Modeling Update* ARIES e-Meeting October 17, 2001 * This work was performed under the auspices.

3D Target Simulations with Front Tracking/Ghost Fluid Method Wurigen Bo (Sept. 9, 2009) Brookhaven National Lab.

Design Considerations for Beam Port Insulator Rings

The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory UC Berkeley Christophe S. Debonnel 1,2 (1) Thermal Hydraulics Laboratory Department of Nuclear Engineering.

Advanced Energy Technology Group Mechanisms of Aerosol Generation in Liquid-Protected IFE Chambers M. S. Tillack, A. R. Raffray.

EFFECTS OF CHAMBER GEOMETRY AND GAS PROPERTIES ON HYDRODYNAMIC EVOLUTION OF IFE CHAMBERS Zoran Dragojlovic and Farrokh Najmabadi University of California.

April 4-5, 2002 A. R. Raffray, et al., Chamber Clearing Code Development 1 Chamber Dynamics and Clearing Code Development Effort A. R. Raffray, F. Najmabadi,

Modeling the benchmark experiments Mingsheng Wei, Fei He, John Pasley, Farhat Beg,… University of California, San Diego Richard Stephens General Atomics.

Simulations of Neutralized Drift Compression D. R. Welch, D. V. Rose Mission Research Corporation Albuquerque, NM S. S. Yu Lawrence Berkeley National.

The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory Comparison of final focus magnetic systems for the Assisted Pinched Transport and the RPD-2002 J. Barnard,

Chamber Dynamic Response Modeling Zoran Dragojlovic.

Beam Interaction with Chamber Aerosols D. R. Welch and D. V. Rose, MRC C. L. Olson, SNL S. S. Yu, LBNL October 2-4, 2002 Presented at the ARIES Project.

Propagation of HI Beams in Chamber Metal Vapor Atmosphere C. Olson, Sandia National Laboratories D. Welch, D. Rose, B. Oliver, T. Genoni, and R. Clark,

The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory ARIES-IFE Meeting Atlanta, Georgia September 4, 2003 “Modular Solenoid with Assisted Pinch” by S. Yu,

May 5-6, 2003/ARR 1 Town Meeting on Liquid Wall Chamber Dynamics ARIES Town Meeting Hilton Garden Inn, Livermore, CA May 5-6, 2003 Background and Goals.

Modeling of Assisted and Self- Pinch Transport D. V. Rose and D. R. Welch Mission Research Corporation C. L. Olson Sandia National Laboratories S. S. Yu.

October 24, Remaining Action Items on Dry Chamber Wall 2. “Overlap” Design Regions 3. Scoping Analysis of Sacrificial Wall A. R. Raffray, J.

The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory Towards An Analytic Model for Beam Spot Size in Ballistic Neutralized Transport Simon Yu, J. Barnard,

Coupling of APT Transported Ion beam to Hybrid Target D. R. Welch and D. V. Rose Mission Research Corporation C. L. Olson Sandia National Laboratories.

January 8-10, 2003/ARR 1 1. Pre-Shot Aerosol Parameteric Design Window for Thin Liquid Wall 2. Scoping Liquid Wall Mechanical Response to Thermal Shocks.

ILE, Osaka Concept and preliminary experiment on protection of final optics in wet-wall laser fusion reactor T. Norimatsu, K. Nagai, T. Yamanaka and Y.

Wayne R. Meier Lawrence Livermore National Lab Per Peterson UC Berkeley Updated Heavy Ion Driver Parameters for Snowmass Point Design ARIES Meeting July.

Wayne R. Meier Lawrence Livermore National Lab Heavy Ion Driver Model Update* ARIES IFE Meeting LLNL March 8-9, 2001 * This work was performed under the.

The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory UC Berkeley Christophe S. Debonnel 1,2 (1) Thermal Hydraulics Laboratory Department of Nuclear Engineering.

Introductio n The guiding of relativistic laser pulse in performed hollow plasma channels Xin Wang and Wei Yu Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics,

Diversion of Plasma in Beam Port with a Vertical Magnetic Field D. R. Welch, D. V. Rose, S. S. Yu and W. Sharp Presented at the ARIES Project Meeting April.

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy Neutrino Factory / Muon Collider Collaboration Meeting March 17-19, 2008, FNAL, Batavia, IL Target.

Distribution of Advanced Design Research FY02 FY03 (Current) ARIES (IFE & MFE) System Studies1,9661,939 Socio-economic Studies UCSD/UW/RPI 1,189.

ARIES-IFE Study L. M. Waganer, June 7, 2000 Page 1 Considerations of HI Beam and Vacuum System Arrangement L. Waganer The Boeing Company 7 June 2001 ARIES.

2 Lasers: Centimeters instead of Kilometers ? If we take a Petawatt laser pulse, I=10 21 W/cm 2 then the electric field is as high as E=10 14 eV/m=100.

HAPL WORKSHOP Chamber Gas Density Requirements for Ion Stopping Presented by D. A. Haynes, Jr. for the staff of the Fusion Technology Institute.

The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory Analytical and Numerical Studies of Ion Beam Plasma Interaction for Heavy Ion Driven Inertial Fusion Igor.

The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory UC Berkeley Christophe S. Debonnel Thermal Hydraulics Laboratory Department of Nuclear Engineering University.

Oliver Boine-FrankenheimSIS100-4: High current beam dynamics studies SIS 100 ‘high current’ design challenges o Beam loss in SIS 100 needs to be carefully.

Recent Results on the Plasma Wakefield Acceleration at FACET E 200 Collaboration 1)Beam loading due to distributed injection of charge in the wake reduces.

Robust Heavy Ion Fusion Target Shigeo KAWATA Utsunomiya Univ. Japan U.S.-J. Workshop on HIF December 18-19, 2008 at LBNL & LLNL.

Aerosol Limits for Target Tracking Ronald Petzoldt ARIES IFE Meeting, Madison, WI April 22-23, 2002.

W.Lu, M.Tzoufras, F.S.Tsung, C.Joshi, W.B.Mori

Magnetic Deflection of Ionized Target Ions D. V. Rose, A. E. Robson, J. D. Sethian, D. R. Welch, and R. E. Clark March 3, 2005 HAPL Meeting, NRL.

1 Computational Modeling of Magnetic Intervention D. V. Rose* Voss Scientific, LLC A. E. Robson, J. D. Sethian, and J. L. Giuliani Naval Research Laboratory.

The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory Neutralized Transport Experiment (NTX) P. K. Roy, S. S. Yu, S. Eylon, E. Henestroza, A. Anders, F. M.

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 1 PRoy LINAC06 Neutralized Drift Compression and Related Experiments* P. K. Roy 1, W. L. Waldron.

Effect of Re Alloying in W on Surface Morphology Changes After He + Bombardment at High Temperatures R.F. Radel, G.L. Kulcinski, J. F. Santarius, G. A.

1 Computational Modeling in Support of the Magnetic Intervention Concept D. V. Rose,* T. C. Genoni, R. E. Clark, D. R. Welch, and T. P. Hughes Voss Scientific,

Slide 1 The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory Why heavy ions? Target requires: 3.5 – 6 MJ in ~ 10 ns  500 TW Range ~ 0.02 – 0.20 g/cm.

Fusion Technology Institute 4/5/2002HAPL1 Ion Driven Fireballs: Calculations and Experiments R.R. Peterson, G.A. Moses, and J.F. Santarius University of.

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MUTAC Review April , 2004, BNL Target Simulations Roman Samulyak in collaboration with Y.

Non Double-Layer Regime: a new laser driven ion acceleration mechanism toward TeV 1.

Meson Production at Low Proton Beam Energy (Update) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies May 9, /9/113.

Simulation of Heavy Ion Beam Propagation D. R. Welch and D. V. Rose Mission Research Corporation, Albuquerque NM C. L. Olson Sandia National Laboratories.

The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory Erik P. Gilson** PPPL 15 th International Symposium on Heavy Ion Fusion June 9 th, 2004 Research supported.

1 1 Office of Science Plasma control & diagnostics for 10 GeV electron beams on BELLA Work supported by: Office of Science, Office of HEP, US DoE Contract.

402.5 MHz Debunching in the Ring

Numerical Modeling of the Electra Electron-Beam Diode*

University of California, San Diego

University of California, San Diego

New Results for Plasma and Coil Configuration Studies

Action Items from ARIES IFE Meeting, UW, April 22-23, 2002 (DRAFT)

D. V. Rose, T. C. Genoni, and D. R. Welch Mission Research Corp.

Presentation transcript:

Status of Operational Windows for HIF Chamber Transport Modes D. V. Rose, D. R. Welch, C. L. Olson, S. Neff, and S. S. Yu ARIES Project Meeting January 8, 2003 University of California, San Diego

Objectives: Develop meaningful ion beam transport “operational windows” to guide chamber design. Parameter spaces must be directly connected with chamber interface issue –Chamber Radius –Gas Pressure –Wall Materials, Liquids, Jets, etc.

Beam Transport and Chamber Interface Issues Involve Many Constraints Target Constraints: Pulse shape Spot size Materials Ion Beam Transport Constraints: Transport mode Energy loss Stability Beam overlap Aerosols Chamber Design Constraints: Gas Density Pumping Wall design/material Port protection Target injection Target tracking Final Focus System: Beam combining Beam steering Magnet shielding {

Early HIF beam transport operational windows dealt with stability: Early HIF work (1970’s ’s) examined beam stability and stripping for high energy (~10 GeV) beam transport. Example of an operational window (P. Ottinger and D. Mosher, Proc. Heavy Ion Fusion Workshop, Brookhaven Natl. Lab., 1977, p. 61) for 7 GeV Xe at 14 kA assuming preformed background plasma. Also see R. F. Hubbard, et al., Proc. Heavy Ion Fusion Workshop, Argonne, 1978, p. 379, and, S. Yu, et al., p. 403.

Light-Ion Fusion Operational Windows Also Examined Beam Stability Sample operational window (shaded region) for light-ion z- discharge transport [P. Ottinger, et al., Proc. 5 th Intl. Conf. High Power Part. Beams (1983), p. 97.] Modeling includes assessments of JxB driven channel expansion, beam energy loss, time-of-flight bunching, and instabilities. 4 MeV protons, factor-of-five bunching, beam radius = 1.5 cm filamentation packing constraint energy loss 10% v-spread ES stability Also see D. Mosher, Comm. Plasma Phys. 6, 101 (1981) and R. R. Peterson and C. L. Olson, Laser Interaction and Related Phenomena: 13 th Intl. Conf., edited by G. H. Miley and E. M. Campbell (AIP, 1997), p. 259.

Light-Ion Ballistic Transport Sample windows for ballistic transport with time dependent calc. of beam power and plasma evolution in chamber and beam energy on target (focusing constraints) (D. Rose, et al., APS-Div. Plasma Phys. Meeting, 1996.)

Status of Operational Windows for ARIES-HIF Stability constraints are being examined through a combination of analytic modeling and detailed numerical simulations (e.g., time-dependent stripping, ionization, etc.). Examination of chamber design constraints is emphasized in concert with target and final- focus constraints. End-product: operating windows that explicitly map out chamber initial conditions (wall-radius, gas density, aerosol concentrations, etc.)

A first look at beam/aerosol interactions suggest that NBT places the tightest constraints on aerosol density in the chamber. Aerosol equivalent density mapped for three transport modes Basic assumptions about beam interactions with charged droplet confirmed with LSP simulations. Note that beam charge state for pinched modes is likely to be similar. Number used here are copies from assumed values in recent beam transport simulations.

NBT operational window efforts: ES stability is being assessed through a detailed comparison between analytic models [Stroud, Laser Part. Beams (1986)] and numerical simulations. EM stability will be assessed in a similar manner (requires large-scale 3-D simulations). Assessment of NBT spot size as constrained by first wall radius being assessed (next slide).

An envelope analysis for an NBT operational window (D. Welch) Calculation uses the radial space- charge spreading current, and beam stripping as a function of distance and gas pressure. Assumptions are made for neutralization fraction (assumed constant) and stability (always stable). These assumptions can and will be checked as part of our ongoing work.

We will continue quantitatively develop an NBT Operational Window: Mapping out a region of chamber design space that takes into account NBT physics. Most simulation work to date has centered around a limited range of beam and chamber parameters. Recent work has suggested that this propagation mode has a modest operational window. Beam stability presently being addressed.

Pinched Mode Operational Windows APT: significant progress has been made via numerical simulations in exploring parameter sensitivities in this transport mode. All results suggest a broad operational parameter space (presented in previous talks by D. Welch). SPT: A broad gas pressure window has been identified for transport, however, significant work remains to assess transport efficiency and stability.