(Session #40 -- 10:30-11:45 a.m.) Intellectual Property (IP) 101: “What Research Administrators Should Know about Faculty IP Responsibility” by Tom Kelly,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 RIT: Support Infrastructure, Policies and Procedures – Perceptions, Myths and Reality Varda Main Director Technology Licensing Office.
Advertisements

1 UMass Dartmouth Conflicts of Interest Policies UMass Dartmouth Liz Rodriguez February 17, 2011.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
Technology and Economic Development Intellectual Property Issues in Research Jim Baker Director Office of Technology and Economic Development
INTRODUCTION TO PATENT RIGHTS The Business of Intellectual Property
Chapter 10 Intellectual Property. Objectives Different forms of intellectual property Value of trademarks, copyrights, and patents. How to obtain a copyright.
Intellectual Property Rights Margaret Lawlor Business Development Manager Faculty of Medical Sciences 2015 copyright©NewcastleUniversity 2015.
So you’ve invented something? A Guide for UMass Faculty, Researchers and Students.
Intellectual Property March 4, 2015 Don Keach Director, Intellectual Property Development and Technology Transfer Office Copyright University of Kentucky.
Air Force Materiel Command I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Developing, Fielding, and Sustaining America’s Aerospace Force INTELLECTUAL.
Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer Ron Huss, Ph.D., Associate Vice President of Research and Technology Transfer Michael Brignati, Ph.D., J.D.,
1 Intellectual Property Basics Peggy Wade, Ph.D. Director, Division of Engineering Research, College of Engineering Michigan State University
Intellectual Property
Technology Transfer at UIC © 2009 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois Presentation to the Software Commercialization Symposium April.
Intellectual Property Patent Primer Michael Pratt Executive Director, Business Development November 1, 2011.
Cochran Law Offices, LLC Patent Procedures Presented by William W. Cochran.
Intellectual Property: Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State University Research Foundation (ISURF) Director, Office of Intellectual Property.
Intellectual Property (IP) 101: What Faculty Should Know about Intellectual Property Policies and Procedures at SFSU.
Iowa State University Technology Protection and Licensing.
Intellectual Property
What is Commercialization of IP Josiah Hernandez.
UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI Training Workshop on Intellectual Property Rights (Jun17-18,2013, Heads Dept, sonu, champs) Intellectual Property Management Office.
Wyoming Research Products Center Intellectual Property and Licensing Services Senator Enzi’s Inventors Conference April 12, 2008 Davona K. Douglass, Acting.
Management of Intellectual Property at Iowa State University Contributing to Economic Development Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State.
Introduction to IP & TLC Tony von Sadovszky Software Commercialization Manager February 6, 2009.
Technology Transfer at Rice
Overview OTL Mission Inventor Responsibility Stanford Royalty Sharing Disclosure Form Patent View Inventor Agreements Patent.
“Today, the Department of Veterans Affairs takes credit for the work our researchers did in the past and will do in the future.” Anthony J. Principi Secretary.
10/19/2011F. B. Bramwell1.  Thanks to conversations with: ◦ HU Office of General Counsel  John Gloster  Dan McCabe ◦ University of Kentucky Intellectual.
Intellectual Property GE 105 Introduction to Engineering Design.
Investing in research, making a difference. Patent Basics for UW Researchers Leah Haman Intellectual Property Associate WARF 1.
Patent Law Presented by: Walker & Mann, LLP Walker & Mann, LLP 9421 Haven Ave., Suite 200 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca Office.
2011 Industry Sponsored Research Workshop INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Michael Jaremchuk Associate Director CVIP Phone: FAX:
3 Intellectual Property and You Carl Mahler Director of Intellectual Property CMU Center for Technology Transfer.
Introduction to IP Ellen Monson Director Intellectual Property Office University of Cincinnati.
Intellectual Property and the Graduate Student Presentation to Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering March 28, 2003 Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive.
Preparing a Provisional Patent Application Hay Yeung Cheung, Ph.D. Myers Wolin, LLC March 16, 2013 Trenton Computer Festival 1.
Intellectual Property Rights Margaret Lawlor Business Development Manager Faculty of Medical Sciences 3rd October 2013 copyright©NewcastleUniversity 2013.
Tech Transfer at the University of Florida Presented by Bruce Clary Assistant Director University of Florida Office of Technology Licensing.
USC Stevens at a Glance Navigating the University August 19, 2014.
Organizing a Technology Licensing Office (TLO) Jon Sandelin Senior Associate Emeritus
Dr. Marie Talnack, Director, TechnologyTransfer Office and Industry Clinic.
Policies Promoting IP Development in Universities and Higher Institutions of Learning In Africa OGADA Tom WIPO National Workshop on Intellectual Property.
How Commercial Firms Protect Intellectual Property In Transactions Daniel J. Mazella Celera Genomics Group, An Applera Corporation Business.
Intellectual Property Dr Laura Rush Business Development Manager Research Enterprise Services copyright©NewcastleUniversity 2015.
1 Columbia University Office of the General Counsel March 2012 Columbia University Office of the General Counsel Patenting Biotech: Strategies and Tips.
Intellectual Property Basics: What Rules Apply to Faculty, Staff, and Student Work Product? Dave Broome Vice Chancellor and General Counsel October 15,
1 Gary Williams – Director Jeni Clark – Associate Director New Product Development May 16,2012.
Wyoming Research Products Center Technology Transfer and Licensing Senator Enzi’s Inventors Conference April 20, 2013 Phillip Wulf, Intellectual Property.
Stephanie Roof, CRA Proposal Manager Sponsored Projects Administration BALL STATE UNIVERSITY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER.
NATIONAL CONFERENCE Intellectual Property Policies for Universities and Innovation dr. sc. Vlatka Petrović Head, Technology Transfer Office Acting Head,
Patents Presented by Cutting Edge Homework Development.
Intellectual Property at USC October 27, 2003 Dr. Michael Muthig.
Lecture 27 Intellectual Property. Intellectual Property simply defined is any form of knowledge or expression created with one's intellect. It includes.
Fundamentals of Intellectual Property
Slide Set Eleven: Intellectual Property Patents, Trademarks and Copyrights 1.
Review of Research-Related Agreements Between Academic Institutions and Other Entities. Manoja Ratnayake Lecamwasam, PhD Intellectual Property and Innovation.
Boston New York San Francisco Washington, DC Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute Understanding Intellectual Property June 4, 2008.
Entrepreneurship CHAPTER 8 SECTION 1.  When you develop a new product or service, you create an asset that must be protected.  Intellectual property.
Patent Review Overview Summary of different types of Intellectual Property What is a patent? Why would you want one? What are the requirements for patentability?
Technology Transfer Office
So you’ve invented something?
Intro to Intellectual Property 3.0
IP, Invention Disclosures and Commercialization
ECE362 Principles of Design
ARP, New Faculty Orientation August 22, 2008 Simran Trana Director
What are the types of intellectual property ?
What are the types of intellectual property?
Presentation transcript:

(Session # :30-11:45 a.m.) Intellectual Property (IP) 101: “What Research Administrators Should Know about Faculty IP Responsibility” by Tom Kelly, Office of Intellectual Property Administration (OIPA), WSU Research Foundation (WSURF), and WSU Ag Research Center (ARC)

What You Should Take Away from This Presentation: --An general understanding of intellectual property (IP) and the invention disclosure process at WSU --The rights and obligations of WSU faculty regarding invention disclosure --The function of the Office of Intellectual Property Administration (OIPA) and the WSU Research Foundation (WSURF) in invention disclosure, IP protection, and technology licensing

What Is Intellectual Property? Standard Definition: Intellectual property (commonly referred to as “IP”) is anything that is created by the intellect in a tangible form. Translation: An invention, such as a new and useful process, machine, manufactured item, composition of matter, and any new, useful improvement of the above (which is disclosed on the invention disclosure form) Some basics first…

Purpose of Protecting Intellectual Property: By protecting your invention—and depending upon the form of protection used and the type of invention involved—you can exclude others from making it, growing it, propagating it, using it, selling it, offering to sell it, importing a protected product, or importing a product made using a protected process. By not protecting your IP, it may become part of the public domain, where anyone can use it, and it’ll be outside of your control.

Pros & Cons of Patenting Risks of not patenting -Legitimate re-discovery -Reverse Engineering -Patenting may be forever barred if application is not filed Cons – Exposure -Invention and research strategy exposed to the public -Infringement is difficult to detect -Trade secret status destroyed

Protecting Your IP: Forms of U.S. Intellectual Property Protection Patents Copyrights Plant variety protection (PVP) Trademarks Trade secrets and Know-how

The Most Common Form of IP Protection: The Patent To be patented, an invention must be useful, novel, non-obvious to one skilled in the art, and it must work. Patents are governed by federal law. They are property ownership documents similar to a lease on a car. Patents give the owner the right to exclude others from making, using, or selling the invention. They are valid for 20 years from the first filing date of the patent. But, patents are expensive and involve a long-term commitment and on-going maintenance payments.

Advantages of Disclosing, Protecting, and Licensing WSU IP Extends WSU’s research mission by fostering investment in innovation, through licensing and start-up company development. Furthers WSU’s extension mission by providing new products and services to society. Promotes economic development in the state of Washington and in the nation. Provides income to WSU to further its research and scholarship activities. Improves WSU’s standing in the research institution hierarchy, which tends to attract leading researchers and high quality students. Provides a financial incentive to inventors.

Who Owns Faculty IP? Official WSU Policy: “The University shall own the rights to all patentable property and other tangible research and scholarship developed as a result of University employment, or when the equipment, supplies, facilities, employee time or proprietary information of the University are used. After the employee terminates his or her Washington State University employment and is re-employed elsewhere, the University retains ownership of subsequent inventions where the invention is a direct outgrowth of the University's business or University research and development.”

WSU’s Copyright Policy “The University shall not assert ownership in the following works created by faculty within the faculty’s scope of employment, unless (1) substantial kinds or amounts of University resources...were used to create the works; (2) the works are created pursuant to a written agreement between the employee and the University; or (3) the works are created pursuant to a third-party sponsored

agreement, contract, or grant, specifically allocating ownership rights to the University: Scholarly material Educational material Art works Musical compositions Dramatic and non-dramatic literary works”

Invention Disclosure Process/Faculty Requirements: Faculty, during their employment at WSU, are required to disclose all potentially patentable inventions and discoveries (i.e., IP) to WSU’s Office of Intellectual Property Administration (OIPA). The disclosure process starts when the faculty member completes an invention disclosure form available on the OIPA website.

Confidentiality --Prior to disclosure of IP to OIPA: When a faculty member needs to discuss a potentially patentable invention with a company prior to disclosure of the IP to OIPA, whether it’s prior to submission of a research proposal or while conducting the research, The faculty member should so inform OGRD, and OGRD should sign a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) with the company prior to the discussion. --Following disclosure of IP to OIPA: Once the IP has been disclosed to OIPA by the faculty member, prior to the discussion, OIPA should sign a confidential disclosure agreement (CDA) with the company.

IP Protection Scenario A company wants to sponsor research but first wants to discuss the research with the faculty member. What should the researcher do next?  Set up an NDA via OGRD.  Discuss the research; submit proposal to company.  OGRD negotiates the SRA.  Company wants to send materials to researcher. Material Transfer Agreement (MTA) negotiated by OGRD. Company sends materials.  Conduct the research. An invention results.  Submit invention disclosure to OIPA.  OIPA evaluates disclosure, negotiates with company. Perhaps another CDA and/or outgoing MTA needed.

Why is Confidentiality Important? --If a faculty member discloses confidential information to a company without a signed NDA/CDA in place, the company may use that information to file its own patent on the invention. --Such public disclosures could result in loss of patent rights. --In the U.S., you have one year to file a patent after public disclosure. --In most other countries, except for Canada and Australia, loss of patent rights occurs upon public disclosure.

What Constitutes a Publication or Public Disclosure?  A thesis or dissertation  A journal article  A poster presentation or abstract, e.g., an on-line abstract for a conference presentation  A published grant proposal, which is usually considered public information once funded  Proposals to commodity commissions sent out in booklet form or via to commissions, whether or not funded  A progress report submitted to a funding agency— USDA, NSF, etc.  An oral presentation

What is an Invention Disclosure? --Definition: A 6-page form completed by the faculty member that describes the invention --Once completed, the invention disclosure form is signed by the faculty member (and any co- inventors), a witness, the dept chair, and the dean of the college, and sent to OIPA. (In CAHNRS, invention disclosures are sent to the ARC director and not to the dean.) --The invention disclosure form can be found at the following web address:

What is OIPA and What Happens to Invention Disclosures Sent to OIPA? --OIPA is the WSU office that collects and evaluates invention disclosures and creates a plan of action with the inventor for the disposition of the disclosed technology. --OIPA first evaluates the IP, looks for prior art, and explores possible commercial interest in the technology. (Questions asked: Is the inventor working with a company interested in licensing the technology? Are other companies interested in licensing the technology?)

Evaluation of Invention Disclosures Factors to consider:  Stage of dev’t of the technology  Technical merit of the invention  Cost of protection vs. commercial worth of the technology  Cost of dev’t and production of invention vs. size of market  Commercial interest  Existing patents/prior art  Other factors: long-term value, WSU considerations

--If there is market interest in the invention, OIPA may choose to patent or otherwise protect the invention. (This adds value to the potential license agreement because it allows the patent holder more control over the technology which the patent holder can give to the licensee of the technology.) --Once license negotiations are underway, and a company is close to signing a license agreement—generally for up-front fees, milestone payments, royalties, etc.—OIPA officially assigns the IP over to the WSU Research Foundation (WSURF), which finalizes and signs the license agreement.

--There are variations to the above theme: For example, a WSU technology might be licensed to the WSU inventor’s start-up company in exchange for minimal fees and/or an equity position in the company. Or, an existing company may want to create a start- up company around a WSU technology for any combination of monetary or equity consideration. --On the other hand, if an inventor’s technology proves unmarketable, it is either returned to the inventor or turned over to the federal agency that funded the invention.

Once the technology is in WSURF’s hands, WSURF will: Work with the inventor and attorney to prosecute the patent Monitor the continued prosecution of the patent (or other IP protection) Once the patent is granted, pay appropriate issue and maintenance fees Monitor the fulfillment of license agreement terms Do whatever else is required along the way

Invention Faculty Patenting Patent Atty Evaluation and Marketing OIPA WSURF Licensing WSURF assignment Invention disclosure Licensing/ Company Formation WSURF Invention Flow Chart patent prosecution

What is the Difference between WSURF and OIPA? --The same people work for both OIPA and WSURF, and all are WSU employees. --OIPA is part of WSU and collects and evaluates invention disclosures, markets inventions, and pays initial patent application costs. --WSURF is a separate 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation apart from WSU. (We are not the WSU Foundation, the folks with the big bucks, the endowments, and the 17A accounts.)

What Else Do OIPA and WSURF Do? --OIPA also is part of the Office of Research, which includes OGRD. At times, OIPA assists OGRD with the IP portion of complicated research agreements. --Sometimes OIPA gets involved in writing the IP portions of large research proposal submissions, where significant technology transfer activities or IP is expected. --OGRD handles incoming transfers of material under material transfer agreements (MTAs); WSURF handles outgoing transfers of material, and prepares and signs outgoing MTAs. No commercial use of materials is allowed. --WSURF manages the Research and Technology Park and the residents in the Park.

Distribution of License Revenue from Patented Technologies WSURF deducts unreimbursed patent expenses and then takes 20% off the top. The rest is distributed as follows:  $1-$10,000: Inventor gets 100% of revenue.  $10,000-$200,000: Inventor and WSU split revenue 50:50.  Above $200,000: Inventor gets 25%, WSU gets 75%.

Distribution of License Revenue from Seed-Propagated Crops WSURF deducts the cost of obtaining and maintaining legal protection. WSCIA collects a management fee (currently 2%) for its services in seed production and seed distribution. The rest is distributed as follows:  70% goes to the ARC for the program.  30% goes to WSURF, ARC, and the breeder team (each gets 10%).

Distribution of License Revenue from Asexually Propagated Crops WSURF deducts the cost of obtaining and maintaining legal protection. The rest is distributed as follows:  50% goes to the ARC for the program.  20% goes to the ARC and to WSURF (each gets 10%).  30% goes to the breeder team.

General Contact Information For all OIPA/WSURF employees: --Tel: Fax: Website: