The York Bragg Detector – Design and Simulation James Butterworth Seminar at York 31/03/2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
General Characteristics of Gas Detectors
Advertisements

GEANT4 Simulations of TIGRESS
Γ spectroscopy of neutron-rich 95,96 Rb nuclei by the incomplete fusion reaction of 94 Kr on 7 Li Simone Bottoni University of Milan Mini Workshop 1°-
Drift velocity Adding polyatomic molecules (e.g. CH4 or CO2) to noble gases reduces electron instantaneous velocity; this cools electrons to a region where.
Parameterized Shower Simulation in Lelaps: a Comparison with Geant4 Daniel Birt, Amy Nicholson.
Laser Testing of Silicon Detectors Rhorry Gauld University of Saint Andrews IPM program – PPD Mentor: Ronald Lipton 30/07/08 1.
Charged Particle Radiation
Bordeaux Meeting June 6-7th, 2005 Meeting starts at 2:30 pm, Monday June 6th 1)Summary of EURONS meeting (February 2005, Madeira) 2)Discussion of ACTAR.
Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Status of TACTIC: A detector for nuclear astrophysics Alison Laird University of York.
Chris Rogers, MICE CM16 Wednesday Plenary Progress in Cooling Channel Simulation.
First simulations for ACTAR H. Alvarez, J. Benlliure, M. Caamaño, D. Cortina, I. Durán Universidad de Santiago de Compostela EURONS ACTAR JRA 1 Ganil,
Study of the fragmentation of Carbon ions for medical applications Protons (hadrons in general) especially suitable for deep-sited tumors (brain, neck.
The Work Being Done at the Ion Beam Laboratory at Texas A&M University Van D. Willey Columbia High School Under the Direction of Lin Shao Assistant Professor.
Particle Interactions
Lunchtime S.I.E.S.T.A. James Butterworth Finding Atomic Nuclei Offenders with James the Nuclear Detective “It’s element.. element... elementary my dear.
1 Chris Rogers MICE Collaboration Meeting 11th Feb 2005 Tracking and Cooling performance of G4MICE.
1 EMCal design MICE collaboration meeting Fermilab Rikard Sandström.
At the position d max of maximum energy loss of radiation, the number of secondary ionizations products peaks which in turn maximizes the dose at that.
Radiation therapy is based on the exposure of malign tumor cells to significant but well localized doses of radiation to destroy the tumor cells. The.
ECE/ChE 4752: Microelectronics Processing Laboratory
Geant4: Electromagnetic Processes 2 V.Ivanchenko, BINP & CERN
Centre de Toulouse Radiation interaction with matter 1.
October 28-th, 2005Straw tracker 1 Status of Straw Tracker for P236 P.L. Frabetti, V.Kekelidze, K.Kleinknecht, V.Peshekhonov, B.Peyaud, Yu.Potrebenikov,
Status of the Beamline Simulation A.Somov Jefferson Lab Collaboration Meeting, May 11, 2010.
User Documents and Examples I Sébastien Incerti Slides thanks to Dennis Wrigth, SLAC.
Tools for Nuclear & Particle Physics Experimental Background.
NE Introduction to Nuclear Science Spring 2012 Classroom Session 7: Radiation Interaction with Matter.
CJ Barton Department of Physics INTAG Meeting – GSI – May 2007 Large Acceptance Bragg Detector at ISOLDE.
Gamma Ray Imaging Lab Tour
Instrumentation Review. Direct and Indirect Ionization Direct - Charge particles that strip away electrons from atoms Indirect - uncharged that have to.
LRT2004 Sudbury, December 2004Igor G. Irastorza, CEA Saclay NOSTOS: a spherical TPC to detect low energy neutrinos Igor G. Irastorza CEA/Saclay NOSTOS.
NanoPHYS’12 – December 17-19, 2012 K. Nakano, S. Miyasaka, K. Nagai and S. Obata (Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology) Drift Chambers.
Simulation of an MPGD application for Homeland Security Muon Tomography for detection of Nuclear contraband Kondo Gnanvo, M. Hohlmann, P. Ford, J. Helsby,
Alpha and Beta Interactions
Experimental part: Measurement the energy deposition profile for U ions with energies E=100 MeV/u - 1 GeV/u in iron and copper. Measurement the residual.
Radiation damage calculation in PHITS
CEBAF The Continuous Electron Beam Accelerating Facility(CEBAF) is the central particle accelerator at JLab. CEBAF is capable of producing electron beams.
Experimental and Numerical studies on Bulk Micromegas SINP group in RD51 Applied Nuclear Physics Division Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics Kolkata, West.
G4GeneralParticleSource Class: Developed by ESA as the space radiation environment is often quite complex in energy and angular distribution, and requires.
Simulation of GOSSIP/GridPix Nominal Detector, and GOSSIP in ATLAS.
Accelerator Physics, JU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Electron pick-up. ~1/E What about fission fragments????? Bragg curve stochastic energy.
April 22nd, 2004Nigel Lockyer / Young-Kee Kim1 Drift Chambers AMY experiment at e + e - TRISTAN collider CDF experiment B = 3 T B = 1.4 T.
Radiation Detectors In particular, Silicon Microstrip Detectors by Dr. Darrel Smith.
Study of GEM Structures for a TPC Readout M. Killenberg, S. Lotze, J. Mnich, A. Münnich, S. Roth, M. Weber RWTH Aachen October 2003.
CEBAF The Continuous Electron Beam Accelerating Facility (CEBAF) at JLab in Newport News, Virginia, is used to study the properties of quark matter. CEBAF.
1 Design of active-target TPC. Contents I.Physics requirements II.Basic structure III.Gas property IV.Electric field Distortion by ground Distortion of.
1 Cost Room Availability Passive Shielding Detector spheres for accelerators Radiation Detection and Measurement, JU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh).
Charles University Prague Charles University Prague Institute of Particle and Nuclear Physics Absolute charge measurements using laser setup Pavel Bažant,
Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry (RBS)
T. Lari – INFN Milan Status of ATLAS Pixel Test beam simulation Status of the validation studies with test-beam data of the Geant4 simulation and Pixel.
Numerical Model of an Internal Pellet Target O. Bezshyyko *, K. Bezshyyko *, A. Dolinskii †,I. Kadenko *, R. Yermolenko *, V. Ziemann ¶ * Nuclear Physics.
The Prototype Simulation of SDHCAL Ran.Han Gerald.Grenier Muriel.Donckt IPNL.
P.F.Ermolov SVD-2 status and experimental program VHMP 16 April 2005 SVD-2 status and experimental program 1.SVD history 2.SVD-2 setup 3.Experiment characteristics.
Development of a Single Ion Detector for Radiation Track Structure Studies F. Vasi, M. Casiraghi, R. Schulte, V. Bashkirov.
10/25/2007Nick Sinev, ALCPG07, FNAL, October Simulation of charge collection in chronopixel device Nick Sinev, University of Oregon.
Measuring the Position resolution of a COMPASS Drift Chamber Prototype Rojae Wright, Mathias Perdekamp, Ihnjea Choi, Alabama A&M university, University.
1 Activation by Medium Energy Beams V. Chetvertkova, E. Mustafin, I. Strasik (GSI, B eschleunigerphysik), L. Latysheva, N. Sobolevskiy (INR RAS), U. Ratzinger.
Transverse Coherent Transition Radiation (TCTR) Experiment First Ideas for a Measurement Setup Max-Planck-Institute for Physics Munich Olaf Reimann, Scott.
Alex Howard, Imperial College Slide 1 July 2 nd 2001 Underground Project UNDERGROUND PROJECT – Overview and Goals Alex Howard Imperial College, London.
Manoj B. Jadhav Supervisor Prof. Raghava Varma I.I.T. Bombay PANDA Collaboration Meeting, PARIS – September 11, 2012.
Chapter 2 Radiation Interactions with Matter East China Institute of Technology School of Nuclear Engineering and Technology LIU Yi-Bao Wang Ling.
Simulation of Properties of COMPASS Drift-Chamber Prototypes
Radiation Detectors : Detection actually means measurement of the radiation with its energy content and other related properties. The detection system.
1. Introduction Secondary Heavy charged particle (fragment) production
Ch. THEISEN – CEA Saclay MUSETT: the segmented Si array for the focal plane of the VAMOS spectrometer Ch. THEISEN – CEA Saclay.
CLAS Simulations for the E5 Data Set
The Hadrontherapy Geant4 advanced example
Mass spectrometry (MS) is an analytical technique that can be used to determine the mass, elemental composition or chemical structure of molecules. Mass.
Presentation transcript:

The York Bragg Detector – Design and Simulation James Butterworth Seminar at York 31/03/2010

Overview Bragg Curve Spectroscopy The York Bragg Detector – Bragg Volume – PGAC Simulations – Simulation Path – SRIM/TRIM – Garfield – Matlab – Results Current state of the project and Future developments Bragg Curve Spectroscopy The York Bragg Detector – Bragg Volume – PGAC Simulations – Simulation Path – SRIM/TRIM – Garfield – Matlab – Results Current state of the project and Future developments

1. BRAGG CURVE SPECTROSCOPY Bragg Curve Spectroscopy The York Bragg Detector – Bragg Volume – PGAC Simulations – Simulation Path – SRIM/TRIM – Garfield – Matlab – Results Current state of the project and Future developments Bragg Curve Spectroscopy The York Bragg Detector – Bragg Volume – PGAC Simulations – Simulation Path – SRIM/TRIM – Garfield – Matlab – Results Current state of the project and Future developments

Bragg Curve Spectrometry Idea suggested in 1982 by Gruhn et. al. “Conceptually BCS involves using the maximum data available from the Bragg curve of the stopping heavy ion for purposes of identifying the particle and measuring its energy.” Nuclear Instruments and Methods 196 (1982) 33-40

Typical Bragg Curves

From the Bragg Curve you can determine...  The range of the ion in the gas → A  The total area under the curve → E  The peak of the curve → Z TThe range of the ion in the gas → A TThe total area under the curve → E TThe peak of the curve → Z

How to analyse a Bragg Curve  Taking the peak height gives ΔE.  Integrating the full curve gives E.  Can create an E- ΔE plot.  Taking the peak height gives ΔE.  Integrating the full curve gives E.  Can create an E- ΔE plot.

A Typical Bragg Curve Spectrometer

2. THE YORK BRAGG DETECTOR Bragg Curve Spectroscopy The York Bragg Detector – Bragg Volume – PGAC Simulations – Simulation Path – SRIM/TRIM – Garfield – Matlab – Results Current state of the project and Future developments Bragg Curve Spectroscopy The York Bragg Detector – Bragg Volume – PGAC Simulations – Simulation Path – SRIM/TRIM – Garfield – Matlab – Results Current state of the project and Future developments

ISOLDE

Miniball

Contamination Issues  Isobaric contamination  A/q contamination  Contamination from radioactive decays in the beamline  Isobaric contamination  A/q contamination  Contamination from radioactive decays in the beamline Isobar

The Munich Bragg Detector  Situated at the end of the beam at Miniball, REX-ISOLDE.  An on axis Bragg detector for small sampling of the beam.  Designed and built at Technische Universität München.  Situated at the end of the beam at Miniball, REX-ISOLDE.  An on axis Bragg detector for small sampling of the beam.  Designed and built at Technische Universität München. Main drawbacks: 1.On axis so Miniball target must be removed in order to obtain data. 2.Due to detector response time only takes small sample of the beam. Main drawbacks: 1.On axis so Miniball target must be removed in order to obtain data. 2.Due to detector response time only takes small sample of the beam.

The York Bragg Detector  Off axis.  Allows concurrent monitoring of the beam.  Large acceptance.  Forms an annulus around the beamline.  Highly sensitive and selective.  Hope to achieve a Z resolution of 1/40.  Off axis.  Allows concurrent monitoring of the beam.  Large acceptance.  Forms an annulus around the beamline.  Highly sensitive and selective.  Hope to achieve a Z resolution of 1/40.

2.1 THE BRAGG VOLUME Bragg Curve Spectroscopy The York Bragg Detector – Bragg Volume – PGAC Simulations – Simulation Path – SRIM/TRIM – Garfield – Matlab – Results Current state of the project and Future developments Bragg Curve Spectroscopy The York Bragg Detector – Bragg Volume – PGAC Simulations – Simulation Path – SRIM/TRIM – Garfield – Matlab – Results Current state of the project and Future developments

Windows 5.486MeV Alpha Particle from 241 Am 241MeV 78 Sr Ion

Detector Gas W = Mean energy needed to create an ion pair Projectile = 90 Zr at 3.1 Mev/u, Gas pressure = 300 mbar

Frisch Grid Shielding Inefficiencyg = spacing between grid wires b α distance between grid & anode r = radius of the grid wires E C = Electric field in the collection volume E D = Electric field in the drift volume

Anode

Z-resolution Z resolution limited by:  Charge state fluctuations around Bragg peak  Z 2/3 dependence of Bragg peak Z resolution limited by:  Charge state fluctuations around Bragg peak  Z 2/3 dependence of Bragg peak Typical Z resolution = 1/40 1 2

2.1 THE PGAC Bragg Curve Spectroscopy The York Bragg Detector – Bragg Volume – PGAC Simulations – Simulation Path – SRIM/TRIM – Garfield – Matlab – Results Current state of the project and Future developments Bragg Curve Spectroscopy The York Bragg Detector – Bragg Volume – PGAC Simulations – Simulation Path – SRIM/TRIM – Garfield – Matlab – Results Current state of the project and Future developments

The Grids

The Gas and Field PGAC gas same as Bragg gas at 1/10 pressure

The Mechanical Elements

3. SIMULATIONS Bragg Curve Spectroscopy The York Bragg Detector – Bragg Volume – PGAC Simulations – Simulation Path – SRIM/TRIM – Garfield – Matlab – Results Current state of the project and Future developments Bragg Curve Spectroscopy The York Bragg Detector – Bragg Volume – PGAC Simulations – Simulation Path – SRIM/TRIM – Garfield – Matlab – Results Current state of the project and Future developments

Simulation Path SRIM/TRIM Garfield Matlab Preamplifier Simulation Result Data: Ions: 78 Sr and 78 Rb at 3.1 MeV/u Detector Gas: Propane at 100 mbar pressure Data: Ions: 78 Sr and 78 Rb at 3.1 MeV/u Detector Gas: Propane at 100 mbar pressure

SRIM vs TRIM TRIM Outputs – Text files containing data about the projectile, target layers, electromagnetic and nuclear energy loss, straggling etc. SRIM Outputs – Single table containing data about energy loss, penetration depth and straggling. Advantages of TRIM...  Simulates individual events  Allows multiple target layers  Number of ions and random seed can be selected  Deals with ionisation by ions and recoils

Introduction to Garfield  Simulation program. Simulates gaseous ionisation chambers.  Uses the best available approximations and techniques. Higher detail than Geant 4.  Garfield needs a description of the chamber and the gas as inputs.  Garfield then simulates the electron drift in the chamber, and the current induced on the chamber wires.  Simulation program. Simulates gaseous ionisation chambers.  Uses the best available approximations and techniques. Higher detail than Geant 4.  Garfield needs a description of the chamber and the gas as inputs.  Garfield then simulates the electron drift in the chamber, and the current induced on the chamber wires.

Garfield Inputs  Cell section  Gas section  Field section  Drift section  Signal section  Cell section  Gas section  Field section  Drift section  Signal section The chamber is described in this section.  Components are entered a 2D planes or wires, infinite in the third dimension.  Complex structures can be simulated using arrays of wires.  The dimensions of each component and voltages on them are specified here. The gas properties of the chamber are set here including...  Pressure.  Temperature.  Ion mobility.  Work function.  Fano factor.  SRIM file to be read in. The field drift and signal sections contain various commands for calculating and plotting the field, drift lines and induced current.

Garfield Outputs

The Garfield/SRIM Interface Garfield can interface with the SRIM quick range tables. It makes use of the values for...  Electromagnetic energy loss.  Nuclear energy loss.  Distance traversed by ions.  Longitudinal straggling.  Lateral straggling. For ions at a range of energies. Density of the gas is also read in. This replaces any value for density already read into Garfield. Garfield can interface with the SRIM quick range tables. It makes use of the values for...  Electromagnetic energy loss.  Nuclear energy loss.  Distance traversed by ions.  Longitudinal straggling.  Lateral straggling. For ions at a range of energies. Density of the gas is also read in. This replaces any value for density already read into Garfield. The Garfield SRIM interface makes use of the fact...

The TRIMCAT Module Reads in files from TRIM Data read includes gas pressure, positions and thicknesses of layers and a table of ion energy against position(x, y, z) and EM energy loss. Perform Numerical Differentiation Uses a lagrangian method to differentiate energy vs position to give the total ionisation dE/dx. Calculate the splitting between EM and nuclear energy losses Use the differentiated values for total dE/dx and the values of EM dE/dx. Generate electron clusters along the track Generates clusters of electrons according to the ionisation distribution and drifts them using Monte-Carlo methods.

The Matlab Preamplifier Simulation

The Results (1): The SRIM Interface

The Results (2): The TRIMCAT Module

The Results (3): The effect of the PGAC

4. CURRENT STATE OF THE PROJECT AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS Bragg Curve Spectroscopy The York Bragg Detector – Bragg Volume – PGAC Simulations – Simulation Path – SRIM/TRIM – Garfield – Matlab – Results Current state of the project and Future developments Bragg Curve Spectroscopy The York Bragg Detector – Bragg Volume – PGAC Simulations – Simulation Path – SRIM/TRIM – Garfield – Matlab – Results Current state of the project and Future developments

The Engineering Designs  PGAC complete.  Mechanical design of Bragg nearing completion at Daresbury Laboratory.  Designs ready in stages throughout this year.  Electrical design done by Bob Hyde in workshop at York.  PGAC complete.  Mechanical design of Bragg nearing completion at Daresbury Laboratory.  Designs ready in stages throughout this year.  Electrical design done by Bob Hyde in workshop at York. Drawings courtesy of Jon Strachan, STFC Daresbury Laboratory, Cheshire.

The Prototype  Prototype PGAC constructed at York. Ready for testing with fission source at Manchester.  Prototype Bragg volume to be constructed over the coming months – needs to be outsourced.  Prototype PGAC constructed at York. Ready for testing with fission source at Manchester.  Prototype Bragg volume to be constructed over the coming months – needs to be outsourced. Drawings courtesy of Jon Strachan, STFC Daresbury Laboratory, Cheshire.

The Simulations SRIM/TRIM Garfield Bragg Simulation Garfield PGAC Simulation Matlab Preamplifier Simulation Post Processing Software  Geant 4 Efficiency simulation SRIM/TRIM Garfield Bragg Simulation Garfield PGAC Simulation Matlab Preamplifier Simulation Post Processing Software  Geant 4 Efficiency simulation

ANY QUESTIONS? Bragg Curve Spectroscopy The York Bragg Detector – Bragg Volume – PGAC Simulations – Simulation Path – SRIM/TRIM – Garfield – Matlab – Results Current state of the project and Future developments Bragg Curve Spectroscopy The York Bragg Detector – Bragg Volume – PGAC Simulations – Simulation Path – SRIM/TRIM – Garfield – Matlab – Results Current state of the project and Future developments

The Munich Comparison Preliminary!