QFEXT07 Leipzig, Germany, September 17-21, 2007. Recent progress on the precision measurement of the Casimir interaction Ricardo S. Decca Department of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
7-1 PRENTICE HALL ©2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ FORENSIC SCIENCE An Introduction By Richard Saferstein THE MICROSCOPE Chapter.
Advertisements

Motivation to measure Casimir force with Indium Tin Oxide (ITO) Use Transparent Electrodes to Reduce the Casimir Force Manipulation of the Casimir Force.
Tests of Gravity and Gravitational PhysicsCase Western Reserve University, May 19 th, Micromechanical oscillators in the Casimir regime: A tool to.
Irreducible Many-Body Casimir Energies (Theorems) M. Schaden QFEXT11 Irreducible Many-Body Casimir Energies of Intersecting Objects Euro. Phys. Lett. 94.
Chemical Analysis Qualitative Analysis Quantitative Analysis Determination “Analyze” a paint sample for lead “Determine” lead in a paint sample.
Characteristics of Instruments P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department A Step Towards Design of Instruments….
QFEXT11 COMPARISON BETWEEN EXPERIMENT AND THEORY FOR THE THERMAL CASIMIR FORCE G. L. KLIMCHITSKAYA Department of Physics, North-West Technical University,
Precision measurements of the Casimir force and problems of statistical physics G. L. Klimchitskaya Central Astronomical Observatory at Pulkovo of the.
Optical Tweezers F scatt F grad 1. Velocity autocorrelation function from the Langevin model kinetic property property of equilibrium fluctuations For.
Non-linear matter power spectrum to 1% accuracy between dynamical dark energy models Matt Francis University of Sydney Geraint Lewis (University of Sydney)
PRESENTATION TOPIC  DARK MATTER &DARK ENERGY.  We know about only normal matter which is only 5% of the composition of universe and the rest is  DARK.
WMAP. The Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe was designed to measure the CMB. –Launched in 2001 –Ended 2010 Microwave antenna includes five frequency.
Physical Constraints on Gauss-Bonnet Dark Energy Cosmologies Ishwaree Neupane University of Canterbury, NZ University of Canterbury, NZ DARK 2007, Sydney.
TESTING EXTRA DIMENSIONS Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine Kavli Frontiers of Science Symposium National Academy of Sciences 2-4 November.
On the Casimir Effect in the High Tc Cuprates
California Science Content Standards related to Nanoscience & Nanotechnology PhysicsChemistryBiology Investigation & Experimentation 1h1b 1c 1e 6a.
Atomic Force Microscopy Studies of Gold Thin Films
Extra Dimensions, Dark Energy and the Gravitational Inverse-Square Law ? Liam J. Furniss, Humboldt State University.
References Acknowledgements This work is funded by EPSRC 1.R. P. Abel, U. Krohn, P. Siddons, I. G. Hughes & C. S. Adams, Opt Lett (2009). 2.A.
First year talk Mark Zentile
Acknowledgements Experiment C.C. Chang A.B. Banishev R. Castillo Theoretical Comparison V.M. Mostepanenko G.L. Klimchitskaya Research Funded by: DARPA,
Hw: All Chapter 5 problems and exercises. Outline Applications of Gauss’s Law - The single Fixed Charge -Field of a sphere of charge -Field of a spherical.
The Pursuit of Unification: Fulfilling Einstein’s Dream N. Seiberg Institute for Advanced Study 2004.
Fast imaging of global eigenmodes in the H-1 heliac ABSTRACT We report a study of coherent plasma instabilities in the H-1 plasma using a synchronous gated.
PASI- Frontiers on Casimir Physics Ushuaia, Argentina, 10/7/2012 Casimir force measurements using mechanical transducers: sensitivity, noise and background.
PREVIEW 1 ST SIX WEEKS – 5 WEEKS LONG 2 ND SIX WEEKS – 5 WEEKS LONG 3 RD SIX WEEKS – 6 WEEKS LONG 2 WEEKS OF TESTING SEMESTER ENDS BEFORE CHRISTMAS.
Generate and interpret graphs and charts describing different types of motion, including the use of real-time technology such as motion detectors or photogates.[PHY.4A]
Mechanics and Wave Motion. Purpose providing the student a good understanding of physics at undergrad level. is essential for understanding the modern.
Does a nucleon appears different when inside a nucleus ? Patricia Solvignon Argonne National Laboratory Postdoctoral Research Symposium September 11-12,
CERN, January 2009 Evading the CAST bound with a chameleon Philippe Brax, IPhT Saclay.
L. Perivolaropoulos Department of Physics University of Ioannina Open page.
Constant-Volume Gas Thermometer
Neutron Interferometry and Optics Facility for Precision Scattering Length D.L. Jacobson, M. Arif, P. Huffman K. Schoen, S.A. Werner, T. Black W.M. Snow.
1 Martin L. Perl SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Holger Mueller Physics Department, University California-Berkeley Talk.
Gravitational Potential Energy p extra p ,7 Conservation of Energy p , 7(tricky)extra p Chapter Review for above p. 226.
New constraints on Yukawa-type interactions from the Casimir effect V. M. Mostepanenko Noncommercial Partnership “Scientific Instruments”, Moscow, Russia.
Sub-Millimeter Tests of the Gravitational Inverse-Square Law C.D. Hoyle University of Washington In collaboration with: E.G. Adelberger J.H. Gundlach B.R.
Uncertainty & Error “Science is what we have learned about how to keep from fooling ourselves.” ― Richard P. FeynmanRichard P. Feynman.
The Casimir force Is there a fifth force in nature? Marian Otter, 15 June 2006.
Kinematics and Dynamics Part 2 By: Nichole Raught.
GWDAW - Annecy December 17 th 2004 LIGO-G Z1 Searching for gravitational waves from known pulsars Matthew Pitkin for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
1/10 Tatsuya KUME Mechanical Engineering Center, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) ATF2-IN2P3-KEK kick-off meeting (Oct. 10, 2006) Phase.
An example of vertical profiles of temperature, salinity and density.
3rd International Workshop on Dark Matter, Dark Energy and Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry NTHU & NTU, Dec 27—31, 2012 Likelihood of the Matter Power Spectrum.
Duke University, Physics Department and the Fitzpatrick Institute for Photonics · Durham, NC Collective Nonlinear Optical Effects in an Ultracold Thermal.
Gravitational Experiment Below 1 Millimeter and Search for Compact Extra Dimensions Josh Long, Allison Churnside, John C. Price Department of Physics,
1 Martin L. Perl SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory 5 in collaboration with Holger Mueller Physics Department, University.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education Inc. Gravitation Physics 7C lecture 17 Tuesday December 3, 8:00 AM – 9:20 AM Engineering Hall 1200.
Hartmann Sensor for advanced gravitational wave interferometers
Systematic Errors Units and Measurement Systematic Errors.
1 I.G. Pirozhenko, On the vacuum energy between a sphere and a plane at finite temperature On the vacuum energy between a sphere and a plane at finite.
Brenna Flaugher for the DES Collaboration; DPF Meeting August 27, 2004 Riverside,CA Fermilab, U Illinois, U Chicago, LBNL, CTIO/NOAO 1 Dark Energy and.
Measurement of the Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.7 ppm Results from the Data of 2000 Yannis K. Semertzidis Brookhaven National Lab Muon g-2 Collaboration.
Dark Energy at Future Colliders: Testing the True Nature of Dark Energy in Black Hole Evaporations Jörg Jäckel Rencontres des Moriond March 2005 Michael.
Collisional loss rate measurement of Cesium atoms in MOT Speaker : Wang guiping Date : December 25.
Atom-interferometry constraints on dark energy Philipp Haslinger Müller group University of California Berkeley.
XXXVI th Recontres de Moriond Very High Energy Phenomena in the Universe 22 January 2001 Ephraim Fischbach Department of Physics Purdue University, West.
Testing general relativity experimentally: Equivalence Principle Tests
qBOUNCE: a quantum bouncing ball gravity spectrometer
The Search for Gravitational Waves with Advanced LIGO
Direct Detection of Vector Dark Matter
Comparing Theory and Measurement
Content Heavy ion reactions started fragmenting nuclei in the 1980’s. Its study taught us that nuclear matter has liquid and gaseous phases, phase.
武汉物数所理论交叉学术交流系列报告 (第一三四期)
Shintaro Nakamura (Tokyo University of Science)
Marco Polo, Daniel Felinto and Sandra Vianna Departamento de Física
Intrinsic Alignment of Galaxies and Weak Lensing Cluster Surveys Zuhui Fan Dept. of Astronomy, Peking University.
PHYSICS.
Introduction to Analytical Chemistry
Presentation transcript:

QFEXT07 Leipzig, Germany, September 17-21, Recent progress on the precision measurement of the Casimir interaction Ricardo S. Decca Department of Physics, IUPUI

QFEXT07 Leipzig, Germany, September 17-21, Daniel LópezAlcatel-Lucent Technologies Ephraim FischbaschPurdue University Dennis E. Krausse Wabash College and Purdue University Valdimir M. MostepanenkoNoncommercial Partnership “Scientific Instruments”, Russia Galina L. KlimchitskayaNorth-West Technical University, Russia Eduardo OsquiguilInstituto Balseiro, Argentina. Fullbright Fellow. NSF, DOE, LANL Collaborators Funding

QFEXT07 Leipzig, Germany, September 17-21, Why does it matter? Consequences in nanotechnology (MEMS and NEMS) “Long-range” interaction between moving parts Possibility of controlling the interaction by engineering materials Consequences in quantum field theory Thermal dependence Consequences in gravitation Background to measure deviations from Newtonian potential at small separations

QFEXT07 Leipzig, Germany, September 17-21, Outline Experimental set-up -Measurement of the force between a Au-coated sphere and a Au-coated plate -Determination of the equivalent pressure between two Au-coated plates -Measurement of the separation between the bodies Casimir interaction Experimental studies of the PFA Future directions -External parameters to change  (  ) -Low temperature measurements -Constraints on Newtonian gravitation Summary

QFEXT07 Leipzig, Germany, September 17-21, Experimental setup

QFEXT07 Leipzig, Germany, September 17-21, 2007.

Dynamic measurements

QFEXT07 Leipzig, Germany, September 17-21, Separation measurement z g = ( ± 0.1) nm, interferometer z i = ~( ± 0.2) absolute interferometer z o = ( ± 0.5) nm, electrostatic calibration b = (206 ± 3)  m, optical microscope  = ~(1.000 ± 0.001)  rad zgzg z meas is determined using a known interaction z i,  are measured for each position

QFEXT07 Leipzig, Germany, September 17-21, Distance measurement Electrostatic force calibration Determine: R V Au  o 

QFEXT07 Leipzig, Germany, September 17-21, LC =(775 +/-  ) nm (low coherence), CW 1550 nm (high coherence) in x Mirror (v ~ 10  m/s)  x = z i Readout - Changes in  about 2 nm) give different curves. Intersections provide  x -Quite insensitive to jitter. Only 2  x’/( CW ) 2 Instead of 2  x’/ CW (Yang et al., Opt. Lett. 27, 77 (2005) Interferometer Distance measurement

QFEXT07 Leipzig, Germany, September 17-21, Pressure determination

QFEXT07 Leipzig, Germany, September 17-21, Pressure determination -Dark grey, Drude model approach -Light grey, Leontovich impedance approach PRD 75,

QFEXT07 Leipzig, Germany, September 17-21, Pressure determination Random error Systematic error For the first time in our experiment the random error is smaller than the systematic one

QFEXT07 Leipzig, Germany, September 17-21, Pressure determination What are the characteristics of the Au used? Plasma model Leontovich impedance

QFEXT07 Leipzig, Germany, September 17-21, Proximity force approximation Measurements as a function of R 10.5  m 31.4  m 52.3  m  m  m

QFEXT07 Leipzig, Germany, September 17-21, Proximity force approximation Insets: Fits at z =170 nm Yield the slopes  ’

QFEXT07 Leipzig, Germany, September 17-21, Proximity force approximation  ’(z<300 nm)| < 0.4 Not so clear  with  If we assume the ideal case situation, |  (z<300 nm)| < 0.6

QFEXT07 Leipzig, Germany, September 17-21, Future work External parameters to change  (  ) Negative index of refraction materials Magnetic field in manganites Quantum Hall effect Thermal dependence Check for consistency between models by lowering the temperature Corrections to Newtonian gravitation Check upturn observed at low separations Continue building new system for “Casimir-less” measurements

QFEXT07 Leipzig, Germany, September 17-21, Reduce background What’s next? -Improve signal

QFEXT07 Leipzig, Germany, September 17-21, Two orders of magnitude improvement About four orders of magnitude improvement

QFEXT07 Leipzig, Germany, September 17-21, Summary Random errors smaller than systematic ones Improved agreement with theory Experimental investigations to test PFA Continued effort towards a more sensitive “Casimir-less” experiment

QFEXT07 Leipzig, Germany, September 17-21, 2007.

Jonathan L. Feng, Science 301, 795 (’03) The strength of gravity for various numbers of large extra dimensions n, compared to the strength of electromagnetism (dotted) Without extra dimensions, gravity is weak relative to the electromagnetic force for all separation distances. With extra dimensions, the gravitational force rises steeply for small separations and may become comparable to electromagnetism at short distances. What is the background?

QFEXT07 Leipzig, Germany, September 17-21, Proximity force theorem a : energy density R Believed to be exact for Casimir interaction. Proved to produce errors smaller than a/R ~ 1/1000

QFEXT07 Leipzig, Germany, September 17-21, t w w, t = 2  m

QFEXT07 Leipzig, Germany, September 17-21, v i : Fraction of the sample at separation zi AFM image of the Au plane