Tracking Photon Conversions. Existing Track Seeding From pixels –Widely used, but not useful here From stereo silicon layers –Uses layers 5 and 8 (barrel),

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2 Oct 2003 UCL 2nd Year Talk 1 Crosstalk Removal to Improve Muon dE/dX Measurements Leo Jenner, UCL.
Advertisements

CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
UK egamma meeting, Sept 22, 2005M. Wielers, RAL1 Status of Electron Triggers Rates/eff for different triggers Check on physics channels Crack region, comparison.
Tracey Berry1 Looking into e &  for high energy e/  Dr Tracey Berry Royal Holloway.
Efforts to Improve the Reconstruction of Non-Prompt Tracks with the SiD Lori Stevens UCSC ILC Simulation Reconstruction Meeting May 15, 2007 Includes contributions.
Lauri A. Wendland: Hadronic tau jet reconstruction with particle flow algorithm at CMS, cHarged08, Hadronic tau jet reconstruction with particle.
CMS reconstruction and identification Part II CMS reconstruction and identification Part II A. Nikitenko Tau jetsTau jets Missing E T (briefly)Missing.
INTRODUCTION TO e/ ɣ IN ATLAS In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to identify.
1 Reconstruction of Non-Prompt Tracks Using a Standalone Barrel Tracking Algorithm.
1  trigger optimization in CMS Tracker Giuseppe Bagliesi On behalf of  tracking group Workshop on B/tau Physics at LHC Helsinki, May 30 - June 1, 2002.
1 Vertex fitting Zeus student seminar May 9, 2003 Erik Maddox NIKHEF/UvA.
 Track-First E-flow Algorithm  Analog vs. Digital Energy Resolution for Neutral Hadrons  Towards Track/Cal hit matching  Photon Finding  Plans E-flow.
Bill Atwood, Core Meeting, 9-Oct GLAS T 1 Finding and Fitting A Recast of Traditional GLAST Finding: Combo A Recast of the Kalman Filter Setting.
Tracking Efficiency and Momentum Resolution Analysis Chris Meyer UCSC ILC Simulation Reconstruction Meeting March 13, 2007.
Track Reconstruction with the CMS Tracking Detector With proton-proton collision energy of 14 TeV at luminosity of cm -2 s -1, the LHC environment.
1 Adventures In Calorimeter Assisted Tracking Chris Meyer, Tyler Rice UC Santa Cruz October 16, 2007.
Progress on B-tagging Efficiency Monica Dunford May 22 nd, 2007.
Silicon Tracking for Forward Electron Identification at CDF David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara Oct 30, 2002 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara Oct 30, 2002.
Tracking Simulation Studies at UC Santa Cruz Bruce Schumm UCSC/SCIPP LCWS07 DESY May 30-Jun Tracking Validation Studies Non-prompt tracks with SiD.
Framework for track reconstruction and it’s implementation for the CMS tracker A.Khanov,T.Todorov,P.Vanlaer.
1 Tracking Reconstruction Norman A. Graf SLAC July 19, 2006.
Track Reconstruction: the trf & ftf toolkits Norman Graf (SLAC) ILD Software Meeting, DESY July 6, 2010.
Non-prompt Track Reconstruction with Calorimeter Assisted Tracking Dmitry Onoprienko, Eckhard von Toerne Kansas State University, Bonn University Linear.
STAR Sti, main features V. Perevoztchikov Brookhaven National Laboratory,USA.
Valeria Perez Reale University of Bern On behalf of the ATLAS Physics and Event Selection Architecture Group 1 ATLAS Physics Workshop Athens, May
A Study of Electron Identification Jim Branson UCSD with collaborators from FNAL, UCSB & UCSD.
STAR Kalman Track Fit V. Perevoztchikov Brookhaven National Laboratory,USA.
Development of a Particle Flow Algorithms (PFA) at Argonne Presented by Lei Xia ANL - HEP.
Tracking, PID and primary vertex reconstruction in the ITS Elisabetta Crescio-INFN Torino.
1 Muon Collider Backgrounds Steve Geer Fermilab Steve Geer MC Detector & Physics DOE June 24, 2009.
Pandora calorimetry and leakage correction Peter Speckmayer 2010/09/011Peter Speckmayer, WG2 meeting.
Detection of electromagnetic showers along muon tracks Salvatore Mangano (IFIC)
“Vertexig and tracking ” Entirely based on works and results by: S. Rossegger, R. Shahoyan, A. Mastroserio, C. Terrevoli Outline: Comparison Fast simulation.
CBM ECAL simulation status Prokudin Mikhail ITEP.
T RACKING E FFICIENCY FOR & CALORIMETER S EED TRACKING FOR THE CLIC S I D Pooja Saxena, Ph.D. Student Center of Detector & Related Software Technology.
p-on-n Strip Detectors: ATLAS & CMS
A Clustering Algorithm for LumiCal Halina Abramowicz, Ronen Ingbir, Sergey Kananov, Aharon Levy, Iftach Sadeh Tel Aviv University DESY Collaboration High.
05/04/06Predrag Krstonosic - Cambridge True particle flow and performance of recent particle flow algorithms.
1 QuickSim - brief introduction - Akiya Miyamoto KEK 22 June 2005 GLD meeting See also.
Photon reconstruction and matching Prokudin Mikhail.
PFA on sidloi3: update Ron Cassell 4/27/10. 2 Proposed changes Calibration Tracking Extrapolation Subcluster finding Muon finding Structure.
Track Reconstruction: the trf toolkit Norman Graf (SLAC) ILC-ACFA Meeting, Beijing February 6, 2007.
Software offline tutorial, CERN, Dec 7 th Electrons and photons in ATHENA Frédéric DERUE – LPNHE Paris ATLAS offline software tutorial Detectors.
HLT Kalman Filter Implementation of a Kalman Filter in the ALICE High Level Trigger. Thomas Vik, UiO.
LCWS11 – Tracking Performance at CLIC_ILD/SiD Michael Hauschild - CERN, 27-Sep-2011, page 1 Tracking Performance in CLIC_ILD and CLIC_SiD e + e –  H +
Electron physics object tutorial C. Charlot / LLR Automn08 tutorials, 14 oct
7/13/2005The 8th ACFA Daegu, Korea 1 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP), M-C.Chang(Tohoku), K.Fujii (KEK), T.Fujikawa (Tohoku), A.Miyamoto (KEK), S.Yamashita.
06/2006I.Larin PrimEx Collaboration meeting  0 analysis.
LAV efficiency studies with photons T. Spadaro* *Frascati National Laboratory of INFN.
SiD Tracking in the LOI and Future Plans Richard Partridge SLAC ALCPG 2009.
Overview of EMU Software Rick Wilkinson. Slice Test DAQ We succeeded in using Slice Test DAQ code to take test beam data, combining chamber and trigger.
3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 1 Tracking performance in LHCb Tracking Performance Jeroen van.
John Marshall, 1 John Marshall, University of Cambridge LCD-WG2, July
BESIII offline software group Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System.
Tracking: An Experimental Overview Richard Partridge Brown / SLAC Fermilab ALCPG Meeting.
FCAL Krakow meeting, 6. May LumiCal concept including the tracker R. Ingbir, P.Růžička, V. Vrba.
FP-CCD GLD VERTEX GROUP Presenting by Tadashi Nagamine Tohoku University ILC VTX Ringberg Castle, May 2006.
14/06/2010 Stefano Spataro Status of LHE Tracking and Particle Identification Status of LHE Tracking and Particle Identification Stefano Spataro III Panda.
Track Reconstruction: the ftf and trf toolkits Norman Graf (SLAC) Common Software Working Meeting CERN, January 31, 2013.
Τ HLTrigger Optimization Mike B 6 th Nov. 2 M. Bachtis - UW The tau High Level Trigger scheme in CMS For the events that pass the L1 Trigger jet reconstruction.
Full Sim Status Estel Perez 27 July 2017.
Erik Devetak Oxford University 18/09/2008
SiD tracking using VXD as a primary tracking device
Converted photons efficiency
Track Finding.
SANE Cherenkov - Bigcal Efficiency Update
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Jin Huang Los Alamos National Lab
Individual Particle Reconstruction
 discrimination with converted photons
Presentation transcript:

Tracking Photon Conversions

Existing Track Seeding From pixels –Widely used, but not useful here From stereo silicon layers –Uses layers 5 and 8 (barrel), not enough acceptance

First Question: Inside-Out or Outside-In? Both go into same supercluster Supercluster loses particles: more likely for early conversions, asymmetric, bremming. Need to work outside-in Maybe look for 2 nd track inside-out Might be cleaner to work inside-out in a narrow  -window

Outside-In: Finding the starting trajectory state Do separately for each basic cluster –Or should I only do once for each supercluster? Assume the conversion happened 1/3 rd of the way in the tracker –Hand-wavingly Bayesian, since we can’t track the outer conversions Assume the track had the full energy of the cluster Calculate where in  to start the track –From the formula for the intersection of two circles Propagate this trajectory to outer layers and look for consistent hits (  < 0.015,  z consistent with IP spread)

Outside-In Completing the Seed Next, create a trajectory state from the calo cluster position, the hit position, and the cluster energy. Propagate inwards and look for second hits in the seed (still optimizing  and z windows) If a second point is found, create a new trajectory from a helix of the two tracker points and the calo cluster point. Use the Kalman Filter Updator to add the points to the trajectory, to get combined errors correct. Send seeds off to Kalman track reconstructor. Demand four-hit tracks, hit   <5, one lost hit

Outside-In Seeding Current Results

Inside-Out Seeding Look for first hits within a narrow  window (0.006) along the supercluster centroid Once a first hit is found, look for 2 nd hits on the next two layers, assuming the track starts at the first point, and has a curvature of half the supercluster energy If a second point is found, make a seed using the curvature that was found, assuming the track was going radially at the first hit. Try to find tracks If only one track is found, try looser cuts to find a second seed with the same vertex

Inside-Out Seeding: Two-Way Trajectory Building? Brem showers degrade the measurement Of the calo cluster  What if the cluster  is mismeasured, so I miss the first few points? Tried to make a TrajectoryBuilder that works In both directions, but isn’t quite working yet

Inside-Out Results

Next Steps Not nearly enough efficiency from either algorithm. Keep refining/debugging the algorithms Find a final combined algorithm: –Different algorithm depending on calo cluster shape? –Implement an outside-in for the first track, then inside-out for the second –Use stereo silicon seeding for early conversions, inside-out for later ones How to reject  0 s? Track  -matching? Can I get two tracks and get an energy match constraint, or a vertex constraint?