01/08/2002Ramon Miquel, LBNL1 Multiparameter Fits in tt Threshold Scan Manel Martinez, IFAE (Barcelona) Ramon Miquel, LBNL (Berkeley) Introduction. The.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
23, June, 2005Beauty2005, Assisi, Italy Electroweak Penguin decays at Belle Akimasa Ishikawa KEK.
Advertisements

Electroweak b physics at LEP V. Ciulli INFN Firenze.
Model independent determination of the top quark Yukawa coupling from LHC and ILC data Klaus Desch, Hamburg University Markus Schumacher, Bonn University.
Zhiqing Zhang (LAL, Orsay) 30/5-3/6/ SM Background Contributions Revisited for SUSY DM Stau Analyses Based on 1.P. Bambade, M. Berggren,
R Measurement at charm resonant region Haiming HU BES Collaboration Charm 2007 Cornell University Ithaca, NY. US.
1 Rutherford Appleton Laboratory The 13th Annual International Conference on Supersymmetry and Unification of the Fundamental Interactions Durham, 2005.
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
Susy05, Durham 21 st July1 Split SUSY at Colliders Peter Richardson Durham University Work done in collaboration with W. Kilian, T. Plehn and E. Schmidt,
F.Sanchez (UAB/IFAE)ISS Meeting, Detector Parallel Meeting. Jan 2006 Low Energy Neutrino Interactions & Near Detectors F.Sánchez Universitat Autònoma de.
Measurement of R at CLEO - Jim Libby1 Measurement of R at CLEO Jim Libby University of Oxford.
Paris 22/4 UED Albert De Roeck (CERN) 1 Identifying Universal Extra Dimensions at CLIC  Minimal UED model  CLIC experimentation  UED signals & Measurements.
Data-based background predictions using forward events Victor Pavlunin and David Stuart University of California Santa Barbara July 10, 2008.
Study of e + e  collisions with a hard initial state photon at BaBar Michel Davier (LAL-Orsay) for the BaBar collaboration TM.
CMD-2 and SND results on the  and  International Workshop «e+e- Collisions from  to  » February 27 – March 2, 2006, BINP, Novosibirsk, Russia.
E. Devetak - LCWS t-tbar analysis at SiD Erik Devetak Oxford University LCWS /11/2008 Flavour tagging for ttbar Hadronic ttbar events ID.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
Associated top Higgs search: with ttH (H  bb) Chris Collins-Tooth, 17 June 2008.
Hints for Low Supersymmetry Scale from Analysis of Running Couplings Dimitri Bourilkov University of Florida DPF06 + JPS06, October 31, 2006, Waikiki,
STUDY OF CHARMONIUM STATES IN ANTIPROTON-PROTON ANNIHILATIONS: RESULTS FROM FERMILAB E-835 Giulio Stancari Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory for the.
Rare B  baryon decays Jana Thayer University of Rochester CLEO Collaboration EPS 2003 July 19, 2003 Motivation Baryon production in B decays Semileptonic.
Z AND W PHYSICS AT CEPC Haijun Yang, Hengne Li, Qiang Li, Jun Guo, Manqi Ruan, Yusheng Wu, Zhijun Liang 1.
BaBar physics, recent highlights and future prospects Owen Long, BaBar physics analysis coordinator U. C. Riverside & SLAC December 5, 2008.
Top threshold Monte Carlo generator Stewart Boogert John Adams Institute Royal Holloway, University of London Filimon Gournaris (Ph.D student and majority.
Latest Physics Results from ALEPH Paolo Azzurri CERN - July 15, 2003.
Trilinear Gauge Couplings at TESLA Photon Collider Ivanka Božović - Jelisavčić & Klaus Mönig DESY/Zeuthen.
June, 14th, 2006Mo Xiaohu1  Mass Measurement at BESIII X.H.MO Workshop on Future PRC-U.S. Cooperation in High Energy Physics Beijing, China, Jun
Contents 1. Introduction 2. Analysis 3. Results 4. Conclusion Presice measurement of the Higgs-boson electroweak couplings at Linear Collider and its physics.
Higgs Reach Through VBF with ATLAS Bruce Mellado University of Wisconsin-Madison Recontres de Moriond 2004 QCD and High Energy Hadronic Interactions.
LHCb: Xmas 2010 Tara Shears, On behalf of the LHCb group.
P.Pakhlov ITEP, Moscow (for Belle collaboration) e+e- collision from  to  Novosibirsk, BINP, 2006.
Neutrino cross sections in few hundred MeV energy region Jan T. Sobczyk Institute of Theoretical Physics, University of Wrocław (in collaboration with.
Fast or slow positron spin flipping Sabine Riemann (DESY) November 17, 2008 ILC08, University of Illinois - Chicago.
A Linear Collider Run Scenario Choose a physics scenario that is CONSERVATIVE in the sense that it has many particles and thresholds to explore. Assume.
Progress on F  with the KLOE experiment (untagged) Federico Nguyen Università Roma TRE February 27 th 2006.
Top/QCD program (b) Higher Order EW + QCD Fixed order vs resummed Normalization (and peak position) stabilised by higher orders; –summation of leading.
Alternatives: Beyond SUSY Searches in CMS Dimitri Bourilkov University of Florida For the CMS Collaboration SUSY06, June 2006, Irvine, CA, USA.
1 Searching for Z’ and model discrimination in ATLAS ● Motivations ● Current limits and discovery potential ● Discriminating variables in channel Z’ 
1 TOP MASS MEASUREMENT WITH ATLAS A.-I. Etienvre, for the ATLAS Collaboration.
JPS 2003 in Sendai Measurement of spectral function in the decay 1. Motivation ~ Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment ~ 2. Event selection 3. mass.
1 Recent results on  (3770) production & decays from BES/BEPC Gang RONG (for BES Collaboration) Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing , P.R.
Jan. 18, 2008 Hall C Meeting L. Yuan/Hampton U.. Outline HKS experimental goals HKS experimental setup Issues on spectrometer system calibration Calibration.
Jet Studies at CDF Anwar Ahmad Bhatti The Rockefeller University CDF Collaboration DIS03 St. Petersburg Russia April 24,2003 Inclusive Jet Cross Section.
E. Devetak - IOP 081 Anomalous – from tools to physics Erik Devetak Oxford - RAL IOP 2008 Lancaster‏ Anomalous coupling (Motivation – Theory)
Feasibility study of Higgs pair creation in gamma-gamma collider Hiroshima University Nozomi Maeda 19.April 2009.
La Thuile, March, 15 th, 2003 f Makoto Tomoto ( FNAL ) Prospects for Higgs Searches at DØ Makoto Tomoto Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (For the.
Top couplings: ILC-B physics interplay Top couplings: ILC-B physics interplay TYL-FJPPL B physics TYL-FJPPL B physics February 20, 2015 LAL February 20,
Stano Tokar, slide 1 Top into Dileptons Stano Tokar Comenius University, Bratislava With a kind permissison of the CDF top group Dec 2004 RTN Workshop.
Bc → J/   Lifetime measurement Use 6.7 fb -1 and try two independent approaches Selection 1: no dependence of selection on decay time Fit fixes bkgd.
IFIC. 1/15 Why are we interested in the top quark? ● Heaviest known quark (plays an important role in EWSB in many models) ● Important for quantum effects.
Experimental considerations about  physics at DA  NE2 F. Anulli, D. Babusci, G. Pancheri Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati  Physics window at DA  NE2.
Measurement of the neutral kaon mass Using Ks-> p+p- events*
Electroweak physics at CEPC
Electroweak Physics Towards the CDR
Status report on   f0  00
Matteo Negrini Frascati, Jan 19, 2006
Top and WW final states Harry Weerts For LC working group
Current status and future prospects
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
W Charge Asymmetry at CDF
Using Single Photons for WIMP Searches at the ILC
University of Minnesota on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration
How to optimize the ILC energy for measuring ZH
Report on p0 decay width: analysis updates
e+e−→ J/ D(*)D(*) & ψ(4160) → DD
Study of e+e collisions with a hard initial state photon at BaBar
NKS2 Meeting with Bydzovsky NKS2 Experiment / Analysis Status
Top Threshold at the ILC
Study of coherent c.s. dependence on Energy, what was done
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Heavy Quarkonium production in p-Pb collisions at LHCb
Presentation transcript:

01/08/2002Ramon Miquel, LBNL1 Multiparameter Fits in tt Threshold Scan Manel Martinez, IFAE (Barcelona) Ramon Miquel, LBNL (Berkeley) Introduction. The top threshold scan m t and  s The top width The top Yukawa coupling Conclusions

01/08/2002Ramon Miquel, LBNL2 Introduction. The Top Threshold Scan (1) Top threshold scan studied in great detail for many years in the contexts of both NLC/JLC and TESLA The cross section in the threshold region is sensitive to m t,  s,  t and t (Kuehn, Jezabek, Teubner et al.)  m t = 100 MeV Cross section

01/08/2002Ramon Miquel, LBNL3 Introduction. The Top Threshold Scan (2) Two additional observables have been used: A FB (s) and the peak of the top momentum distribution (Fermi motion)  t = 200 MeV Forward Backward asymmetry Peak of top momentum distr.

01/08/2002Ramon Miquel, LBNL4 Introduction. The Top Threshold Scan (3) Experimental study based on work of “Barcelona” group: Martinez, R.M., Comas, Juste, Merino, Orteu Outcome of experimental simulations:  :  = 0.41 syst = 3% bkgd = pb A FB :  = 0.11 syst = negligible P:  = 0.41 syst = 4% Assume: –Luminosity = 300 fb -1, TESLA beam spectrum. 9 point scan plus one point well below threshold for bkgd. determination –m t = 175 GeV,  s  (M Z )=0.120, M H = 120 GeV,  t and t as in the Standard Model

01/08/2002Ramon Miquel, LBNL5 Introduction. The Top Threshold Scan (4) Cross sectionPeak of top momentum distr.A FB The “Experimental” Data

01/08/2002Ramon Miquel, LBNL6 m t and  s Previous studies focused on m t determination: –Large correlation with  s –Broken with new definitions of m t : “potential subtracted” mass and “1S” mass (Beneke, Huang, Teubner et al.) −Results (experimental errors only), using 1S mass:  m t = 16 MeV  s =  = 0.34 (Including theoretical errors:  m t = 100 MeV) −Using only cross section:  m t = 24 MeV  s =  = 0.74  Improvement due to peak of momentum distribution Now it is possible to look for sensitivity to top width and Yukawa coupling

01/08/2002Ramon Miquel, LBNL7 The Top Width(1) So far, only 1D or 2D fits used to study top width and Yukawa coupling. However, sizable correlations with m t and  s exist Multiparameter fits needed Impractical with original TOPPIK (Kuehn, Jezabek, Teubner et al.) program. Used 4D interpolation routine instead. 24 hours on PIII 400MHz to build 4D grid. Then fits take a few seconds.

01/08/2002Ramon Miquel, LBNL8 The Top Width(2) Sizable sensitivity in all observables Leave the top width free in fit Fix the Yukawa coupling to its SM value Results:  m t = 18 MeV  s =  t = 32 MeV All correlations below 50% Cross section  t = 200 MeV

01/08/2002Ramon Miquel, LBNL9 The Top Width (3) Previous result (Comas et al. 1996) had an 18% uncertainty while for new result it is about 2%. Why? –Higher luminosity: 300 fb -1 instead of 50 fb -1 factor 2.4 –Higher selection efficiency: 41% instead of 25% factor 1.3 –Sharper TESLA beam spectrum factor 1.5 –Previously, the pole mass was used and the peak of the cross section was 2 GeV below 2 m t, so that the scan around 2 m t missed some energy points sensitive to  t. With the 1S mass the peak is at 2 m t and the scan is centered factor 1.8 Putting all factors together results in a factor 8.5: good agreement with old result

01/08/2002Ramon Miquel, LBNL10 The Top Width(4) No ISR No beam effects No ISR No beam effects  t = 200 MeV

01/08/2002Ramon Miquel, LBNL11 The Yukawa Coupling (1) Sensitivity very small in all observables To start with, fix all other parameters (unrealistic) Leave the Yukawa free Result:  t / t = Assume now a 1% syst. in cross section (realistic)  t / t = Cross section  t / t 

01/08/2002Ramon Miquel, LBNL12 The Yukawa Coupling (2) Next step: leave m t and  s free. Fix  t to SM value. Add external constraint to  s : Systematic in cross section lowered to 1%. Results:  m t = 25 MeV  s = (constraint)  t = fixed  t / t = (correlations up to 0.8) Finally, one could try to leave also  t free: four parameter fit with constraint on  s. Results:  m t = 30 MeV  s = (constraint)  t  = 35 MeV  t / t = (correlations up to 0.85)

01/08/2002Ramon Miquel, LBNL13 Conclusions(1) First 4-parameter fits to all three threshold observables have been carried out. Correlations important: only multiparameter fits make sense. Experimental uncertainty in top mass around 30 MeV. Experimental uncertainty in top width at the level of 2%.

01/08/2002Ramon Miquel, LBNL14 Conclusions(2) Measuring the top Yukawa coupling with a top threshold scan looks difficult Experimental error around 30% More difficult for Higgs masses above 120 GeV Current theoretical error could be larger for all parameters (but it is being improved)