12 July 2015 Requirements for prioritized access to PSTN resources Henning Schulzrinne Columbia University superset of draft-schulzrinne-ieprep-resource-req-00.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fall VoN 2000 SIP Servers SIP Servers: A Buyers Guide Jonathan Rosenberg Chief Scientist.
Advertisements

1 IP Telephony (VoIP) CSI4118 Fall Introduction (1) A recent application of Internet technology – Voice over IP (VoIP): Transmission of voice.
Communication Service Identifier Requirements on SIP draft-loreto-3gpp-ics-requirements.txt
Early Media Authorization Under what conditions should negotiated media flow prior to 200 OK (INVITE)? Richard Ejzak.
Microsoft ISA Server H.323 Gateway and Gatekeeper Overview of IP Telephony, H.323, and ISA Server H.323 Support.
H.323 Recommended by ITU-T for implementing packet-based multimedia conferencing over LAN that cannot guarantee QoS. Specifying protocols, methods and.
Voice over IP Fundamentals
© 2004, NexTone Communications. All rights reserved. Introduction to H.323.
Security in VoIP Networks Juan C Pelaez Florida Atlantic University Security in VoIP Networks Juan C Pelaez Florida Atlantic University.
1 © 2005 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential Session Number Presentation_ID STUN, TURN and ICE Cary Fitzgerald.
SIP Security Issues: The SIP Authentication Procedure and its Processing Load Stefano Salsano, DIE — Universit à di Roma “ Tor Vergata ” Luca Veltri, and.
IEPREP (Internet Emergency Preparedness) By: Jeffery Pelletier.
Where should services reside in Internet Telephony Systems? Xiaotao Wu, Henning Schulzrinne {xiaotaow, Department of Computer Science,
Requirements for Resource Priority Mechanisms for the Session Initiation Protocol draft-ietf-ieprep-sip-reqs-01 Henning Schulzrinne Columbia University.
Chapter 12: Circuit Switching and Packet Switching
28 June 2015 Emergency services for SIP Henning Schulzrinne.
A “net head” view on SIP Henning Schulzrinne Columbia University IRT Lab Siemens Munich -- January 2003.
Academic Advisor: Dr. Yuval Elovici Professional Advisor: Yuri Granovsky Team: Yuri Manusov Yevgeny Fishman Boris Umansky.
Trade-offs and open issues with path discovery and transport or not all requirements are orthogonal… Henning Schulzrinne Columbia University
By Stephen Tomko H.323 vs. SIP. Internal PBX Call Extension number is dialed PBX receives extension Routes extension Routes call to the phone Call begins.
1 SIP WG meeting 73rd IETF - Minneapolis, MN, USA November, 2008 Return Routability Check draft-kuthan-sip-derive-00 Jiri
NG911 technology Henning Schulzrinne
DTMF & Universal User Key Input Skip Cave InterVoice-Brite Inc.
What is internet telephony?  IP telephony uses the Internet to send audio, video, fax etc between two or more users in real time, so the users can converse.
VIP-204 Programming. The summary page allows you to see a brief description of important information currently programmed into the VIP unit.
VoIP security : Not an Afterthought. OVERVIEW What is VoIP? Difference between PSTN and VoIP. Why VoIP? VoIP Security threats Security concerns Design.
IP Ports and Protocols used by H.323 Devices Liane Tarouco.
1 NGN Issues - Numbering and Addressing Peter Darling ACIF NGN FOG No. 3.
Quintum Confidential and Proprietary 1 Quintum Technologies, Inc. Session Border Controller and VoIP Devices Behind Firewalls Tim Thornton, CTO.
P2P SIP Names & Security Cullen Jennings
H.323 An International Telecommunications Union (ITU) standard. Architecture consisting of several protocols oG.711: Encoding and decoding of speech (other.
Appendix A UM in Microsoft® Exchange Server 2010.
1 Location Hiding Henning Schulzrinne Laura Liess Hannes Tschofenig.
CP-a Emergency call stage 2 requirements - A presentation of the requirements from 3GPP TS Keith Drage.
September 15, 2003FG3 Report FOCUS GROUP 3 Interoperability Report to NRIC VI Council September 15, 2003 Cliff Naughton (Boeing)
Media Gateway Figure 8-1 Comparing PSTN and VoIP voice call setup.
Call signaling/Media control
CSC 600 Internetworking with TCP/IP Unit 7: IPv6 (ch. 33) Dr. Cheer-Sun Yang Spring 2001.
Security, NATs and Firewalls Ingate Systems. Basics of SIP Security.
RSVP Myungchul Kim From Ch 12 of book “ IPng and the TCP/IP protocols ” by Stephen A. Thomas, 1996, John Wiley & Sons. Resource Reservation.
Switch Features Most enterprise-capable switches have a number of features that make the switch attractive for large organizations. The following is a.
MWIF Confidential MWIF-Arch Security Task Force Task 5: Security for Signaling July 11, 2001 Baba, Shinichi Ready for MWIF Kansas.
The mandate of this working group is to facilitate effective service interoperability utilizing SIP in heterogeneous network environments as noted below.
Core VoIP and 911 issues and alternatives Henning Schulzrinne Columbia University August 2003.
April 30, 2007 NYC network neutrality hearing Network Neutrality Prof. Henning Schulzrinne Dept. of Computer Science Columbia University.
CSE5803 Advanced Internet Protocols and Applications (14) Introduction Developed in recent years, for low cost phone calls (long distance in particular).
PTCL Training & Development1 H.323 Terminals Client end points on the network IP phones, PCs having own OS Terminals running an H.323 protocols and the.
Implications of Trust Relationships for NSIS Signaling (draft-tschofenig-nsis-casp-midcom.txt) Authors: Hannes Tschofenig Henning Schulzrinne.
Cooperation between stations in wireless networks Andrea G. Forte, Henning Schulzrinne Department of Computer Science, Columbia University Presented by:
SIP-H.323 Interworking Group RRR-1 IETF-48 SIP-H.323 Interworking Requirements draft-agrawal-sip-h323-interworking-reqs-00.txt Hemant.
17 February 2016 SIPPING - IEPREP Joint Meeting Fred Baker - IEPREP co-chair Rohan Mahy - SIPPING co-chair.
Call Completion using BFCP draft-roach-sipping-callcomp-bfcp IETF 67 – San Diego November 7, 2006.
The Session Initiation Protocol - SIP
D Janet Gunn, CSC Dennis Berg, CSC Pat McGregor, Nyquetek Richard Kaczmarek,
7-May-02SIP/SIPPING Interim Meeting1 Application Interaction Requirements Draft-culpepper-app-interact-reqs-01.txt.
ECRIT - IETF 62 (March 2005) - Minneapolis 1 Requirements for Emergency Calling draft-schulzrinne-sipping-emergency-req-01 draft-ietf-sipping-sos-01 Henning.
Draft-bryan-sipping-p2p-usecases-00 David A. Bryan Eunsoo Shim Bruce B. Lowekamp.
سمینار تخصصی What is PSTN ? (public switched telephone network) تیرماه 1395.
VoIP ALLPPT.com _ Free PowerPoint Templates, Diagrams and Charts.
IP Telephony (VoIP).
THIS IS THE WAY ENUM Variants Jim McEachern
Virtual Local Area Networks (VLANs) Part I
Computer Data Security & Privacy
MLEF Without Capacity Admission Does Not Satisfy MLPP Requirements
Where should services reside in Internet Telephony Systems?
Gary Thom President, Delta Information Systems, Inc.
Overview of ETS in IPCablecom Networks
Proposal for a Generic Emergency Call Support
OMA PoC Overview and draft-allen-sipping-poc-p-headers
TDR authentication requirements
Presentation transcript:

12 July 2015 Requirements for prioritized access to PSTN resources Henning Schulzrinne Columbia University superset of draft-schulzrinne-ieprep-resource-req-00

12 July 2015 Assumptions/Scope  SIP endpoint wants to access restricted (prioritized) resources on a circuit-switched network  Does not indicate request of IP resource priority –may not be available –may not be necessary  Examples: GETS, MLPP, eMLPP,...  Nothing to do with 112/911  Also, possibly call from PSTN into SIP network

12 July 2015 Scenarios INVITE INVITE tel: INVITE PSTN w/MLPP GETS,... ISUP GSM does not know destination network (type) SIP RP-capable gateway

12 July 2015 Assumptions  Call resource priority vs. call human priority –resource priority  indicated by caller (callee can't see) –priority of call to caller: indication ("Priority", content labeling) + callee call handling policy  out of scope  Resources: –IP-to-PSTN gateway channels –end-to-end PSTN circuits (PSTN network congestion, not access congestion)

12 July 2015 Assumptions  Call destination network type may be unknown to caller  Call destination does not identify PSTN resource priority  May want to reach "any of IEPREP type 1, type 2,..."  May have several orthogonal indications of resource priority (eMLPP + GETS?)

12 July 2015 System assumptions  What do we assume about the IP side? –purpose-built: require certain capabilities (signaling, resource reservation, security,...) –any network: use SIP application on standard platform or plug in own SIP phone no network changes firewalls  may not allow protocols beyond SIP and RTP –any SIP (pay) phone no modifications to SIP phone not much beyond two-stage dialing possible?

12 July 2015 General requirements  Not specific to one domain (e.g., GETS)  Not tied to existing PSTN authentication mechanisms  Use existing namespaces  different authorities that manage  Allow for default behavior  Separation of indication and policy –by reference (policy "flash"), not by value ("preempt all except class 'immediate', queue in relationship to GETS calls, but cut off after 3 minutes and only allow low-bit rate audio")

12 July 2015 Requirement: Discovery and negotiation  Caller must be able to discover PSTN resource priority capabilities –determines authentication "hat" –gateway needs for challenge "Resource priority FOO level 7 requires use of BAR authentication"  Network may disallow discovery administratively  importance of call routing

12 July 2015 Requirement: Testing  Must be able to test largest possible part of the system without ringing actual destination –Systems only used during emergencies are less likely to work –Exercise authentication and authorization –Exercise call routing

12 July 2015 Requirement: Call routing  Combine with call routing: –req: specify logical destination, not physical gateway –resource priority requirement may enlarge or constrain set of destinations e.g., additional special GETS-only gateway only certain gateways (carriers) are capable of particular calls –note:  TRIP property? –note: cf. SIP caller preferences

12 July 2015 Security requirements  End-to-end strong authentication and authorization of caller –not just theft of service, but system stability/performance issue  Intermediate (proxy?) authentication –delegate responsibility –not all VoIP gateways may be authentication-capable (many aren't) –harden authentication  DOS attacks

12 July 2015 Security requirements  Support authentication and authorization beyond existing PIN schemes  Authentication must be DOS-resistant  Allow "early" authentication  cannot wait until inside PSTN! –authentication consumes packets vs. circuits –minimize pre-authentication resource use authenticate call signaling, not just resource signaling

12 July 2015 Security requirements  Do not tie resource priority namespace to one authentication scheme –different hardware types hard/soft SIP phone SIM-equipped cell phone –from any black phone with dial pad to smartcard- and biometrics-equipped

12 July 2015 Security requirements  Cross-domain –IP endpoint may be in different admin. domain than gateway  Require secrets not to be pre-installed  useability from any device  Authentication of PSTN gateway –desirable; required?

12 July 2015 Privacy requirements  Call content –very likely  separate docs  Signaling (resource and/or call setup) –reveals communication relationships –cannot rely on hop-by-hop  Fact of IEPREP call –sensitivity likely same (or lower) as call signaling