Anthony Sweeney Position Sensitive Detectors 9 Aberystwyth 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Applications of Nuclear Physics Applications of Nuclear Physics (Instrumentation) Dr Andy Boston Frontiers of gamma-ray spectroscopy.
Advertisements

NUCP 2371 Radiation Measurements II
M. JONES 1, A.J. Boston 1, H.C. Boston 1, R.J. Cooper 1, M.R. Dimmock 1, L.J. Harkness 1 D.S. Judson 1 P.J. Nolan 1, D.C. Oxley 1, B. Pietras 1 M.J. Joyce.
M. Jones, A. Boston, M. Chartier, B. McGuirk, P. Nolan, R.D. Page, P. Pusa, D. Seddon, J. Thornhill, D. Wells and the ALPHA collaboration Department of.
Single Planar Detector Monte Carlo Simulations Andrew Mather
D S Judson UNTF Forum Salford. Outline The Compton imaging process The PORGAMRAYS project What is it? How does it work? Detector description Spectroscopic.
Detector Characterisation Group
Advanced GAmma Tracking Array
Study of plastic scintillators for fast neutron measurements
INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN Fast Real-time SANS Detectors Charge Division in Individual, 1-D Position- sensitive Gas Detectors Patrick Van Esch.
Chapter 8 Planar Scintigaraphy
Semiconductor detectors for Compton imaging in nuclear medicine
SmartPET: A Small Animal PET Demonstrator using HyperPure germanium Planar Detectors R. Cooper 1 st year PhD Student
Pulse Shape Analysis with Segmented Germanium Detector Xiang Liu, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik 1.Motivation 2.Pulse properties 3.Analysis procedure 4.Some.
AGATA Introduction John Simpson Nuclear Physics Group.
Signal Processing of Germanium Detector Signals
Compton Identification Within Single ‘Pixels’ D. Scraggs, A. Boston, H. Boston, R. Cooper, J. Cresswell, A. Grint, A. Mather, P. Nolan University of Liverpool.
Signal Analysis and Processing David Scraggs. Overview Introduction to Position Resolution Induced Charges Wavelet Transform Future Work Discussion.
Signal Analysis and Processing for SmartPET D. Scraggs, A. Boston, H Boston, R Cooper, A Mather, G Turk University of Liverpool C. Hall, I. Lazarus Daresbury.
Signal Processing of Germanium Detector Signals David Scraggs University of Liverpool UNTF 2006.
Simulations with MEGAlib Jau-Shian Liang Department of Physics, NTHU / SSL, UCB 2007/05/15.
Radiation Sensors Zachariadou K. | TEI of Piraeus.
CANBERRA Nuclear Measurements Marijke KETERS Director Detector Product Management Hamburg DESY – 27th of March 2012.
Gamma Spectroscopy HPT TVAN Technical Training
Gamma ray spectrum, its acquiring and analysis
30 Ge & Si Crystals Arranged in verticals stacks of 6 called “towers” Shielding composed of lead, poly, and a muon veto not described. 7.6 cm diameter.
Depletion Region Dynamics of an AGATA Detector Steven Moon University of Liverpool UNTF 2010, University of Salford 14 th -16 nd April 2010.
Optimization of LSO for Time-of-Flight PET
AGATA 2 nd Prototype Detector Initial Measurements & Evaluation Andrew Boston, Matthew Dimmock, Laura Nelson, Sarah Rigby.
Why silicon detectors? Main characteristics of silicon detectors: Small band gap (E g = 1.12 V)  good resolution in the deposited energy  3.6 eV of deposited.
Wednesday, May 9 th 2007Torsten Beck Fast Pulse Shape Analysis for AGATA-Germanium- Detectors Torsten BeckWednesday, 9. Mai 2007 Student seminar Wednesday,
Gamma-ray efficiency of a HPGe detector as a function of energy and geometry of energy and geometry Mohsen B. Challan Physics Department, Faculty of Education.
Compton Camera development for the imaging of high energy gamma rays 1 Martin Jones UNTF 2010 Salford – April 14 th Martin.
SPECT imaging with semiconductor detectors
Paul Sellin, Radiation Imaging Group Time-Resolved Ion Beam Induced Charge Imaging at the Surrey Microbeam P.J. Sellin 1, A. Simon 2, A. Lohstroh 1, D.
GERMANIUM GAMMA -RAY DETECTORS BY BAYAN YOUSEF JARADAT Phys.641 Nuclear Physics 1 First Semester 2010/2011 PROF. NIDAL ERSHAIDAT.
Pedro Arce Introducción a GEANT4 1 GAMOS tutorial Compton Camera Exercises
The ZEUS Hadron-Electron-Separator Performance and Experience Peter Göttlicher (DESY) for the ZEUS-HES-group Contributions to HES Germany, Israel, Japan,
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan BES III Luminosity Monitor Apollo Go National Central University, Taiwan September 16, 2002.
Experiment TGV II Multi-detector HPGe telescopic spectrometer for the study of double beta processes of 106 Cd and 48 Ca For TGV collaboration: JINR Dubna,
26 Apr 2009Paul Dauncey1 Digital ECAL: Lecture 2 Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
Development of a Segmented Planar Germanium Imaging Detector
PSD-V, London, September 1999 Two dimensional readout in a liquid xenon ionisation chamber V.Solovov, V.Chepel, A.Pereira, M.I.Lopes, R.Ferreira Marques,
Timing in Thick Silicon Detectors Andrej Studen, University of Michigan, CIMA collaboration.
Compton imaging with the PorGamRays Detector D S Judson Imaging 2010, Stockholm, 8 th -11 th June 2010.
Electron Spectrometer: Status July 14 Simon Jolly, Lawrence Deacon 1 st July 2014.
PSA: ADAPTIVE GRID SEARCH The Method Experimental Results Optimization aspects Roberto Venturelli (INFN Padova - IPSIA “Giorgi” Verona) SACLAY, 05-may-06.
Steven Moon, A.J. Boston, H. Boston, J. Cresswell, L. Harkness, D. Judson, P.J. Nolan PSD9, Aberystwyth, Wales th September 2011 Compton imaging.
PGRIS: Towards portable Compton Camera Imaging
Institute of Basic Science Rare Isotope Science Project PANGEA P hoton detector system for A stro-science and N uclear physics with GE rmanium A rray 2015.
Monte Carlo Simulation on Performance of Double–scattering Compton Camera J. H. Park a, H. Seo a, Y. S. Kim a, C. H. Kim a, *, J. H. Lee b, C. S. Lee b,
Andy Boston Imaging devices for medicine and security.
TCT measurements with strip detectors Igor Mandić 1, Vladimir Cindro 1, Andrej Gorišek 1, Gregor Kramberger 1, Marko Milovanović 1, Marko Mikuž 1,2, Marko.
Advanced Gamma Tracking Array Andy Boston The Advanced Gamma Tracking Array
Characterisation of a pixellated CsI detector for the Distinguish Project. 1 Martin Jones The University of Liverpool
Detector characterization overview of the AGATA scanning tables
AGATA Advanced Gamma Tracking Array
Development of a Compton Camera for online range monitoring
Status of 100Mo based DBD experiment
Thomas Woodroof Dr Jonathan Bridge, School of Engineering
Pre-Test-stands at MPI Munich
SIGMA: a detector for γ-ray spectroscopy & imaging Dr Laura AGATA/GRETINA Collaboration Meeting
Lecture 2—Associated Electronics and Energy Spectrum
Gamma-Gamma Correlations in Na-22
Preliminary Compton Imaging results of the AGATA C001 detector
AGATA week Uppsala, July 2008
MCP PET Simulation (7) – Pixelated X-tal
Why silicon detectors? Main characteristics of silicon detectors:
Implantation detector as active stopper Rakesh Kumar, P. Doornenbal, I
Presentation transcript:

Anthony Sweeney Position Sensitive Detectors 9 Aberystwyth 2011

Motivation Compton camera principles Pulse shape analysis Initial result Silicon Detector Future work

Homeland security Nuclear decommissioning Existing systems are limited

Compton scattering Major factors in Compton cameras:- Energy resolution Position resolution within the detector Doppler broadening

Compton camera Compton camera made up from two detectors, scatter detector and absorber. Energy of the incident gamma ray can be found by adding the energy deposited in both detectors. The position of interaction within the detectors are used to fix the cone apex. Opening angle of the cone is calculated using the Compton scattering formula. The source lies somewhere on the surface of the cone.

Compton image reconstruction x y z Units mm

Detectors used Two high purity germanium double sided strip detectors manufactured by Ortec with an active area of 60x60x20mm. 24 strips per detector, 12 on each side giving 144 voxels of 5x5x20mm. Individual charge sensitive preamplifiers for each channel. The preamplifier outputs are digitised through CAEN V1724 cards. Typical energy resolutions of 2 to 3keV are seen at 662keV for all strips of both detectors.

Detector and source positions Detectors are mounted 5.5cm apart with the centres aligned. Separation chosen as a compromise between data collection time and final image resolution. A 137 Cs point source of 0.26MBq activity was positioned 5cm away from the centre of the scatter detector. Trigger on a coincident event between both detectors within a 100ns time window.

Data selection: Fold Single interactions within the scatter detector and subsequently the absorber detector are needed for reconstruction. Fold is the number of strips which contain energy for one side of the detector. Only fold one events from both sides of both detectors are selected. Each event selected will now only have interacted within one voxel of each detector.  Fold 1 Fold 2 ACDC

Data selection: Addback Less energy is deposited in the scatter detector than the absorber. A spectrum can be created using the fold selected events. The photopeak seen in this spectrum can be used to identify the source. Only events within the photopeak of interest will be reconstructed. Here the 137 Cs 662 keV photopeak can be seen clearly with an energy resolution of 3.7keV.

Depth of interaction Typical charge collection times of 200ns are seen with the detectors used. Risetimes are dependant upon the time taken for charge carriers to be collected at their respective contacts. 30% of the total rise time provides information on the primary carrier (t30). 90% of the total rise time provides information on the complete charge collection (t90). Plotting t30 against t90 for all events on one side of one detector a depth of interaction can be measured. Voxel size reduced to 5x5x4mm after 5 regions are selected. A B C D E keV t30 t90 AC face DC face A B C D E

Image charge asymmetry Charge is induced in strips neighbouring those carrying pulses, these are image charges. The size of the image charges can be used to calculate an asymmetry factor. Plotting this factor, a position within the real charge carrying strip can be found in X and Y for each event. Using the assumption that there is equal probability for interaction at any point in the strip, the width of the strip can be subdivided into 3, 5 or as many divisions as required. keV

Compton image with depth of interaction Image with depth of interaction PSA applied. Voxel size 5x5x5mm. Resolution is taken as an approximate full width half maximum of a cut through the X and Y axis. Approximate image resolution is 19mm in X and 17mm in Y cones were used for this reconstruction.

Silicon Detector Manufactured by Canberra. Mechanically cooled. Circular wafer, 8mm thick with an active diameter of 66mm. Double sided strip detector, with 13 strips per side of varying sizes. 26 charge sensitive pre amplifiers. Average energy resolution across all strips is 1.5 keV at 60 keV. One strip is non functional. Raster scans have been completed on both detector faces and the edge. Energy (keV)

Future work Asymmetry pulse shape analysis will be applied to the data. New firmware is being tested for the CAEN V1724s. Compton data will be collected with the silicon detector acting as the scatter detector. A 5mm thick HPGe detector will be scanned and tested to provide an additional scatter detector opening the possibility of a three detector Compton camera system. Tests onsite at Aldermaston.

Contributors Andrew J. Boston a, Helen C. Boston a, John R. Cresswell a, Jamie Dormand a, Mark Ellis b, Laura J. Harkness a, Martin Jones a, Daniel S. Judson a, Paul J. Nolan a, David C. Oxley a, David P. Scraggs a, Mike J. Slee a, Amandeep Thandi b a Department of Physics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7ZE, United Kingdom b Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE), Aldermaston, Reading, RG7 4PR, United Kingdom

Data flow Counts% total% accepted% F(1,1,1,1) Total Accepted F(1,1,1,1) Photopeak Imaged (PSA)

Analogue results (collection time vs image resolution) Detector seperation (cm) FWHM X (mm) FWHM Y (mm) Cones per second