A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study (CIBIS III) Trial
Advertisements

Cardiac Resynchronization Heart Failure Study Cardiac Resynchronization Heart Failure Study Presented at American College of Cardiology Scientific Sessions.
Effects of selective heart rate reduction with ivabradine on left ventricular remodelling and function: results from the SHIFT echocardiography substudy.
K Fox, W Remme, C Daly, M Bertrand, R Ferrari, M Simoons On behalf of the EUROPA investigators. The diabetic sub study of.
Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-Term Use Evaluation Results
Effects of losartan compared with captopril on mortality in patients with symptomatic heart failure: randomized trial -- the Losartan Heart Failure Survival.
Losartan Heart Failure Survival Study ELITE II Losartan Heart Failure Survival Study ELITE II A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel, Captopril-Controlled.
Purpose To determine whether metoprolol controlled/extended release
CHARM Program: 3 Component trials comparing candesartan with placebo.
Welcome Ask The Experts March 24-27, 2007 New Orleans, LA.
S ystolic H eart failure treatment with the I f inhibitor ivabradine T rial Heart rate reduction with ivabradine and health related quality of life in.
analysis from the SHIFT study
ICD FOR PRIMARY PREVENTION EVIDENCE REVIEW
Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial Presented at American College of Cardiology Scientific Sessions 2004 Presented by Dr. Gust H. Bardy SCD-HeFTSCD-HeFT.
May 23rd, 2012 Hot topics from the Heart Failure Congress in Belgrade.
Cardiac Arrhythmias in Coronary Heart Disease SIGN 94.
COURAGE: Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation Purpose To compare the efficacy of optimal medical therapy (OMT)
Heart Failure Ben Starnes MD FACC Interventional Cardiology
ATLAS Clinical Trial Commentary Dr Eric Topol Chairman and Professor, Department of Cardiology Director of the Joseph J Jacobs Center for Thrombosis and.
CHARM-Alternative: Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity - Alternative Purpose To determine whether the angiotensin.
CHARM-Preserved: Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity - Preserved Purpose To determine whether the angiotensin.
Clinical Impact of Adherence to Pharmacotherapeutic Guidelines on the Outcome in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure Suntheep Batra, M.Pharm Department.
Massie I-PRESERVE Trial Irbesartan in heart failure with preserved EF Co-PIs: Barry Massie and Peter Carson Executive Committee M. Komajda, R. McKelvie,
Effects on outcomes of heart rate reduction by ivabradine in patients with congestive heart failure: is there an influence of beta-blocker dose? Systolic.
Effect of ivabradine on recurrent hospitalization for worsening heart failure: findings from SHIFT S ystolic H eart failure treatment with the I f inhibitor.
BEAUTI f UL: morBidity-mortality EvAlUaTion of the I f inhibitor ivabradine in patients with coronary disease and left ventricULar dysfunction Purpose.
0902CZR01NL537SS0901 RENAAL Altering the Course of Renal Disease in Hypertensive Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy with the A II Antagonist.
CIBIS III Ronnie Willenheimer University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden, on behalf of the CIBIS III investigators Results of the randomized Cardiac Insufficiency.
Value of Endothelin Receptor Inhibition with Tezosentan in Acute Heart Failure Studies VERITAS Trial Presented at The American College of Cardiology Scientific.
Effect of ivabradine on recurrent hospitalization for worsening heart failure: findings from SHIFT S ystolic H eart failure treatment with the I f inhibitor.
S ystolic H eart failure treatment with the I f inhibitor ivabradine T rial Main results Swedberg K, et al. Lancet. 2010;376(9744):
Avoiding Cardiovascular Events through COMbination Therapy in Patients LIving with Systolic Hypertension The First Outcomes Trial of Initial Therapy With.
RALES: Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study Purpose To determine whether the aldosterone antagonist spironolactone reduces mortality in patients with.
Aim To determine the effects of a Coversyl- based blood pressure lowering regimen on the risk of recurrent stroke among patients with a history of stroke.
BEST: Beta-blocker Evaluation Survival Trial Purpose To determine whether the β-blocker bucindolol reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with advanced.
COMET - Background, Rationale and Design Pharmacological Differences Within the  Blocker Class Agents currently evaluated for heart failure 
HOPE: Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation study Purpose To evaluate whether the long-acting ACE inhibitor ramipril and/or vitamin E reduce the incidence.
CIBIS II Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study
The Studies of Oral Enoximone Therapy in Advanced Heart Failure ESSENTIALESSENTIAL Presented at The European Society of Cardiology Congress 2005 Presented.
Influence of background treatment with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists on ivabradine's effects in patients with chronic heart failure Systolic Heart.
COMET: Carvedilol Or Metoprolol European Trial Purpose To compare the effects of carvedilol (a β 1 -, β 2 - and α 1 -receptor blocker) and short-acting.
Baseline characteristics. Patient flow Completed Completed Perindopril Placebo Randomised Not randomised Registered.
Heart rate in heart failure: Heart rate in heart failure: risk marker or risk factor? A subanalysis of the SHIFT trial on behalf of the Investigators M.
ELITE - II Study Design  60 yrs; NYHA II - IV; EF  40 % ACEI naive or  7 days in 3 months prior to entry Standard Rx ( ± Dig / Diuretics ), ß - blocker.
Relationship of background ACEI dose to benefits of candesartan in the CHARM-Added trial.
OVERTURE FDA Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting July 19, 2002 Milton Packer, M.D., FACC Columbia University College of Physicians.
CAPRICORN Adverse CV Events (Frequency ≥ 1.5%) in Either Treatment Group (Uptitration Phase)
Interim Chair, Medicine Brigham and Women’s Hospital Boston, MA
Rosuvastatin 10 mg n=2514 Placebo n= to 4 weeks Randomization 6weeks3 monthly Closing date 20 May 2007 Eligibility Optimal HF treatment instituted.
Early Eplerenone Treatment in Patients with Acute ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction without Heart Failure REMINDER* Gilles Montalescot, Bertram Pitt,
COPERNICUS: Carvedilol Prospective Randomized Cumulative Survival trial Purpose To assess the effect of carvedilol, a β 1 -, β 2 - and α 1 -receptor blocker,
Blood-Pressure and Cholesterol Lowering in Persons without Cardiovascular Disease (HOPE-3 trial) R4. 박은지 / PF. 정혜문 Salim Yusuf, M.B., B.S., D.Phil.,
TREATMENT OF ANEMIA WITH DARBEPOETIN ALFA IN SYSTOLIC HEART FAILURE Karl Swedberg, M.D., Ph.D., James B. Young, M.D., Inder S. Anand, M.D., Sunfa Cheng,
Effect of Spironolactone on Diastolic Function and Exercise Capacity in Patients with Heart Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction Effect of Spironolactone.
Ten Year Outcome of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Versus Medical Therapy in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Results of the Surgical Treatment.
Nephrology Journal Club The SPRINT Trial Parker Gregg
Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors / angiotensin receptor blockers and contrast induced nephropathy in patients receiving cardiac catheterization:
JOURNAL REVIEW HEART FAILURE MANAGEMENT – BETA BLOCKERS
NYHA III* or IV heart failure ACE-I + loop diuretic ± digoxn
HOPE: Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation study
The Anglo Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial
CLINICAL DILEMMAS IN HEART FAILURE:
EMPHASIS-HF Extended Follow-up
Jeff Macemon Waikato Cardiothoracic Unit
Section III: Neurohormonal strategies in heart failure
CIBIS II: Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study II
Section III: Neurohormonal strategies in heart failure
Systolic Heart failure treatment with the If inhibitor ivabradine Trial Effect of ivabradine on recurrent hospitalization for worsening heart failure:
The FAIR-HF Trial Reference
Presentation transcript:

A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study SENIORS Study of Effects of Nebivolol Intervention on Outcomes and Rehospitalisation in Seniors with Heart Failure A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study

BRING UP Reasons for not commencing -blockade SENIORS Background BRING UP Reasons for not commencing -blockade OR 95% CI P value Age 0.97 0.96 - 0.97 0.0001 NYHA class (III-IV v I-II) 0.62 0.51 - 0.75 0.0001 Systolic blood pressure 1.02 1.01 - 1.02 0.0001 Heart rate 1.01 1.01 - 1.02 0.0001 Ejection fraction (not available vs. available) 0.46 0.28 - 0.76 0.0022 Maggioni A et al. Heart 2003

Hillingdon study results baseline characteristics SENIORS Background Hillingdon study results baseline characteristics 296 (54%) Male Median age 76 years (90% range 55-89) 161 (29%) Clinic: 391 (71%) Hospital NYHA Class: II - 8%; III - 33%; IV - 59%

Women Men LV systolic function among elderly with CHF: The Cardiovascular Health Study SENIORS 12% 29% 41% 21% Women Men 67% 30% Kitzman et al, AJC 2001

SENIORS Study objective To evaluate the effect of nebivolol compared to placebo on mortality and morbidity in elderly CHF patients

Recruitment by geographic region SENIORS Recruitment by geographic region CENTRAL 543 EAST 827 WEST 765

SENIORS - Outcome measures Primary Outcome Time to composite of all cause mortality or cardiovascular hospital admissions Secondary Outcomes Time to all cause mortality Time to cardiovascular hospital admissions Time to cardiovascular mortality Time to all cause hospital admissions Time to composite of all cardiovascular mortality or cardiovascular hospital admissions Functional capacity by NYHA class and by 6 minute walk test

A clinical diagnosis of chronic heart failure (HF) and either of: SENIORS Inclusion criteria Age  70 years A clinical diagnosis of chronic heart failure (HF) and either of: a) documented LVEF  35% within previous 6 months or b) hospital admission within previous 1 year for congestive HF Written consent prior to enrolment into the study

Main exclusion criteria SENIORS Main exclusion criteria New drug therapy for heart failure Any change in cardiovascular drug therapy in the 2 weeks prior to randomisation Heart failure due primarily to valvular heart disease Contra-indication or previous intolerance to beta blockers Heart rate < 60 beats per minute Systolic blood pressure < 90mmHg

Study design Maintenance SENIORS Screening Observation Period Final Follow up Randomisation EOP Visit FFU Visit Up-Titration (mg) Down-Titration Maintenance 10 5 2.5 1.25 Up to 16 weeks 3 weeks 1 month 1 to 4 weeks Up to 40 months

Patient flow 2135 randomised 2128 evaluable 1067 assigned to nebivolol SENIORS Patient flow 2135 randomised Patients not in ITT: 7 6 from excluded centre 1 error in randomisation 2128 evaluable 1067 assigned to nebivolol 1061 assigned to placebo

A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study SENIORS Study of Effects of Nebivolol Intervention on Outcomes and Rehospitalisation in Seniors with Heart Failure A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study

* 7 patients with missing LVEF at baseline SENIORS Baseline characteristics 1 IV 19 (1.8) 24 (2.3) Age (mean, yrs) Male (n, %) Nebivolol 76.1 657 (61.6) Placebo 686 (64.7) LVEF  35 % (n, %)* 683 (64.3) 686 (64.8) LVEF (mean, %) 36.0 NYHA Class (n, %) I 32 (3.0) 29 (2.7) II 603 (56.5) 597 (56.3) III 413 (38.7) 411 (38.7) * 7 patients with missing LVEF at baseline

Baseline characteristics 2 SENIORS Baseline characteristics 2 Prior Revascularisation (n, %) PTCA Nebivolol 47 (4.4) Placebo 34 (3.2) CABG 101 (9.5) 94 (8.9) Medication for Heart Failure (n, %) ACE Inhibitors 880 (82.5) 884 (83.3) Diuretics 916 (85.9) 910 (85.8) Cardiac Glycosides 415 (38.9) 420 (39.6) Aldosterone Antag. 298 (27.9) 272 (25.6) Antiarrhythmics 91 (8.3) 119 (11.2) Aetiology of Heart Failure (n %) Ischaemic 812 (76.1) 809 (76.3) Idiopathic 166 (15.6) 167 (15.7)

Nebivolol Placebo Maintenance dose achieved Mean ± SD > 5 mg SENIORS Maintenance dose achieved Mean ± SD > 5 mg Nebivolol 7.7 ± 3.6 815 (76.4%) Placebo 8.5 ± 3.1 881 (83.0%) On 10 mg 688 (64.5%) 805 (75.9%)

No. of events: Nebivolol 332 (31.1%); Placebo 375 (35.3%) All cause mortality or CV hospital admission (primary outcome) SENIORS Event free Survival % Nebivolol Placebo Hazard Ratio 0.86 [0.74;0.99] p = 0.039 No. of events: Nebivolol 332 (31.1%); Placebo 375 (35.3%)

No. of events: Nebivolol 169 (15.8%); Placebo 192 (18.1%) All cause mortality (main secondary outcome) SENIORS Event free Survival % Nebivolol Placebo Hazard Ratio 0.88 [0.71;1.08] p = 0.214 No. of events: Nebivolol 169 (15.8%); Placebo 192 (18.1%)

Death or CV hospitalisation by subgroup SENIORS Favours Nebivolol Favours Placebo Nebivolol Placebo 125 (33.6%) 110 (28.9%) > 35 % LVEF 249 (36.3%) 219 (32.1%)  35 % 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 1.10 1.20 125 (33.3%) 101 (24.6%) Female Sex 250 (36.4%) 231 (35.2%) Male 199 (37.1%) 184 (34.8%) > 75 y Age 176 (33.5%) 148 (27.5%) 70-75 y 375 (35.3%) 332 (31.1%) Total Hazard ratio and 95% CI

Discontinuation Category Premature treatment discontinuations (other than death) SENIORS Discontinuation Nebivolol Placebo Patient Request Other Reason Developed Contraindication Mandatory Indication Intolerance Discontinuation Category

SENIORS Sub studies ECHO Neurohormonal

Conclusions Nebivolol significantly reduced death or SENIORS Conclusions Nebivolol significantly reduced death or hospitalisation in elderly heart failure patients The effect was similar regardless of ejection fraction, age or gender

Clinical implications SENIORS Clinical implications Advanced age should not be considered a contra-indication to beta blockade in chronic heart failure The SENIORS study indicates that beta blockade can be recommended for heart failure regardless of ejection fraction Nebivolol is an effective agent for elderly heart failure patients

Acknowledgements SENIORS Steering Committee: Philip Poole-Wilson (UK), Andrew Coats (AUS) (Co Chairs), Anker S ,Böhm M, Borbola J, Cohen-Solal A, Dumitrascu D, Ferrari R, Flather M, Lechat P,Parkhomenko A, Shibata M, Soler-Soler J, Spinarova L,Tavazzi L, Toman J †, Van Veldhuisen D, Clinical Events Committee: Thygesen K (Chair) Frenneaux M, Tendera M, Sinagra, G Data and Safety Monitoring Committee: A Zanchetti (Chair), Lewis B, Nieminen M, Sleight P, Thompson S Menarini Ricerche (Study Sponsor): Maggi CA, Capriati A, Koch I, Mordenti G, Schumacher K Parexel (CRO) All participating Investigators and all participating patients Slides available at www.cteu.org and www.menarini.com