OICA HCV industry input to ACSF informal Group #1 Meeting 2015-04-29 & 30 in Bonn Informal Document ACSF-01-10.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Advanced Emergency Braking System / Lane Departure Warning System OICA POSITION 1 Informal document No. GRRF-S08-10 Special GRRF brainstorming session.
Advertisements

The necessity of New Regulations for New Technologies regarding R79 Japan September / 2012 Informal document GRRF (73rd GRRF, September 2012,
Evaluation of ACSF during periodic technical inspection Informal group ACSF # / 17 in Tokyo Informal Document ACSF
Proposal of Automated Driving from Ad- hoc group on LKAS/RCP Submitted by the Chair of the Special Interest Group on Lane Keeping Assist Systems (LKAS)
Automatically Commanded Steering Function
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Information on mandatory fitting of advanced safety systems in Japan Engineering Policy Division.
ACSF Informal Group Industry proposals 1 st Meeting of ACSF informal group April 29 and 30, 2015 in Bonn 1 Informal Document ACSF
Definition for Levels of Automation
Review of ITS/IG Activity March 15, 2013 WP29/ITS Informal Group Takao Onoda Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, Japan Document No.
General Safety Regulation ACEA discussion paper Renzo Cicilloni Director Safety Paris, June 2009 AEBS/LDWS
1 Different use cases for ACSF Prepared from the experts of OICA and CLEPA Informal Document ACSF
3rd ACSF meeting Munich, September 2-3 Industry proposals for ACSF status definition and HMI Informal Document: ACSF Submitted by the experts from.
Intelligent Transportation Systems Telecommunications and Transportation.
Outline of Definition of Automated Driving Technology Document No. ITS/AD (5th ITS/AD, 24 June 2015, agenda item 3-2) Submitted by Japan.
Presentation for Document ACSF-03-03_rev1 Oliver Kloeckner September rd meeting of the IG ASCF Munich, Airport Informal Document.
Difference for "Automatically commanded steering function", "Corrective steering function" and " Autonomous Steering System " Informal Document: ACSF
‘E-ROADS’ for managing the road chaos. Input information O You enter the place where you are now or just the number of your bus-stop O You enter the place.
Traffic Accidents caused by Lane Departure in Japan  Data of Traffic Accidents around Japan Transmitted by the expert from Japan Informal document GRRF
Vehicle Safety - (R)Evolution of Driving Assist Systems Jochen Schäfer Heiner Hunold Submitted by the experts from Informal document GRRF th GRRF,
Remote Control Parking (RCP)
Protective Braking for ACSF Informal Document: ACSF
Document No. ITS/AD (6th ITS/AD, 03 November 2015, agenda item 3-2) INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF MOTOR VEHICLE MANUFACTURERS Automated Driving Submitted.
Safety Distances and Object Classifications for ACSF Informal Document: ACSF
5 th ACSF meeting French views Bonn January 2016 Informal Document - ACSF Submitted by the expert of France.
ACSF - Traffic Jam Assist on all roads OICA and CLEPA proposal for the IG Group ACSF Tokyo, 2015, June Informal Document ACSF
MarketsandMarkets Presents Adaptive Cruise Control Market worth Million Units by 2018.
1 6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016 Requirements for “Sensor view” & Environment monitoring version 1.0 Transmitted by the Experts of OICA and CLEPA.
Date: 29 May 2013 Meeting: iMobility Forum Steering Group Meeting Speaker and organisation: Maarten Oonk, Joakim Svensson [ Automation in Road Transport.
OICA „Certification of automated Vehicles“
Regulatory strategy when voluntary systems become mandated
Informal document GRRF-84-32
DIRECTOR, ROAD SAFETY ANALYSIS
Road Safety Behaviour Symposium: New technology, new connectivity
Discussion paper – Major Issues
Lane Change Test for ACSF
7th ACSF meeting London, June 28-30, 2016
Presentation of ACSF C tests
Informal Working Group on ACSF
Initial project results: Annex 6 – 20 Sept 2016
Industry proposal Driver availability recognition system
Informal Document: ACSF Rev.1
ACSF-C2 2-actions system
Lane change driver reaction times
Lane change driver reaction times
ACSF-C2 2-actions system
Industry views on GRVA priorities and organization
Industry views on GRVA priorities and organization
مفاهیم بهره وري.
Comparison of Cat.C HMI solution and vehicle without Cat.C
ACSF Category B1 (LKAS) Concern with “Default-on” strategy
Chapter Number Five About Creative Brief
Signalling of information and warnings
Quintessences Proposal for Category C of Germany and Japan
ACSF B1+C functional description
Comparison of Cat.C HMI solution and vehicle without Cat.C
WP.29 and GRVA activities on Automated Vehicles
Industry input to ACSF 11th meeting March 2017, Berlin
Hands-off detection warning time for B1-systems
Informal Document: ACSF-10-08
Definition of aysmax Interpretation 1
Maximum allowable Override Force
ACSF B1+C functional description
Interpretation of CSF warnings #2
Driver initiated transition demand and system reaction
ACSF B2 and C2 Industry expectations from ACSF IG Tokyo meeting
13th ITS European Congress
Software Updates Current situation
Hands-off detection versus Start of Lane Change Manoeuvre
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Regulation ECE R79-03 ACSF C 2-Step HMI
Presentation transcript:

OICA HCV industry input to ACSF informal Group #1 Meeting & 30 in Bonn Informal Document ACSF-01-10

Safety Energy Efficiency Productivity Automation targets

Automation areas On Road Automation Automation in Confined Areas Automatic Manoeuvring

Automation areas Main focus of the ACSF informal group Automation in Confined Areas Automatic Manoeuvring On Road Automation

Degree of Automation Highway Autopilot LKAS & Traffic jam assist Platooning time Enhanced LK / LC & Traffic jam Assist Current Systems - LCS, LKS, ACC… - Active Steering - AEBS & LDWS mandatory

On Road Automation Degree of Automation Highway Autopilot LKAS & Traffic jam assist Platooning Enhanced LK / LC & Traffic jam Assist time CSF + ACSF < 10 Focus of the ACSF informal group Current Systems - LCS, LKS, ACC… - Active Steering - AEBS & LDWS mandatory ACSF > 10