PARCC ELA Evidence Tables September 25, 2014. Today’s Outcomes Identify how Evidence-Centered Design informs the PARCC Summative Assessment. Identify.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding the ELA/Literacy Evidence Tables. The tables contain the Reading, Writing and Vocabulary Major claims and the evidences to be measured on.
Advertisements

Understanding the ELA/Literacy Evidence Tables. ECD is a deliberate and systematic approach to assessment development that will help to establish the.
Understanding the ELA/Literacy Evidence Tables. ECD is a deliberate and systematic approach to assessment development that will help to establish the.
New Approach to Designing Performance Level Descriptors: PARCC ELA/Literacy Summative Assessment.
ELA Common Core – What We Know So Far….
Understanding PARCC. Diagnostic Assessment PARCC Overview Mid-Year Assessment (MYA) Speaking and Listening Assessment Performance-Based Assessment (PBA)
ELA SAS Overview. Objectives Understand the key changes to the SAS documents and interim assessments and how these changes support.
Madison School District Governing Board Meeting March 19, 2013.
An Introduction to PARCC Design Principles and Evidence Tables for ELA and Math June 12, 2013 Tennessee Department of Education, Division of Curriculum.
THE ALLENDALE PARENTS AS PARTNERS SERIES PRESENTS: P A RCC AND THE COMMON CORE NOVEMBER 18, 2014.
Advances in the PARCC Mathematics Assessment August
Module 2 Text Comprehension
Joanne Kaminski Increasing Non-fiction Reading Levels the Easy Way.
A Look at the Future of Assessments - ELA Ron Bauman · January 29, 2014.
2 From NECAP to the Common Core and New Assessments English Language Arts & Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects Fall 2010,
Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Nevada Joint Union High School District Nevada Union High School September 23, 2013 Louise Johnson, Ed.D. Superintendent.
Stephanie Boyd CMAS: Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) English Language Arts and Mathematics.
Common Core State Standards Professional Learning Module Series
Instructional Implications for PARCC Assessment in the Science and Social Studies Classroom Maryland College and Career Readiness Conference Summer 2014.
Understanding PARCC. Diagnostic Assessment PARCC Overview Mid-Year Assessment (MYA) Speaking and Listening Assessment Performance-Based Assessment (PBA)
Systems of Professional Learning Module 1 Grades K–5: Focus on Instructional Shifts Activity 1.
Common Core Preparation: Literacy New Leader for New Schools Spring Foundations 2012 Claire Fisher, Cohort 9 c
Session 6: Writing from Sources Audience: 6-12 ELA & Content Area Teachers.
Session 6: Writing from Sources Audience: K-5 Teachers.
Foreign language and English as a Second Language: Getting to the Common Core of Communication. Are we there yet? Marisol Marcin
ELA and Mathematics 3 rd Grade New York State Exam Workshop.
Michigan Common Core Standards
Common Core State Standards and Assessments of Student Mastery 1.
PERFORMANCE TASKS. INTRODUCTION & PURPOSE Students create products or perform tasks to show their mastery of a particular skill Students select a response.
Educator’s Guide Using Instructables With Your Students.
WORLD LANGUAGES : A Year of Transition. Today’s Outcomes  Celebrate the start of the school year  Greet new teachers  Explore areas of focus.
California’s Common Core Content Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects.
How do we evaluate the quality of existing and newly created text-based lessons and units of study???? Please refer to the Tri-State Review Rubric for.
Eden Central School District CCLS Training Resources March 6, 2012
ELA Common Core Shifts. Shift 1 Balancing Informational & Literary Text.
10/11/2015MSDE1 PARCC Assessment Update PARCC Assessment Update Day 3, Session 4.
Understanding PARCC and Disciplinary Literacy November
Advances in the PARCC ELA/Literacy Assessment August
Funded by the Library of Congress.
Session 1: CCR Anchor Standards and Structure of the CCSS in ELA & Literacy ELA Educator Effectiveness Academy Summer 2011.© Maryland State Department.
 1. Common Core Standards for Reading, Writing, Speaking and Listening, Language  2. Literacy Standards for History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical.
Examining the Modules: Instructional Practices related to Finding and Using Evidence LT 2a. I can describe the impact of content-rich curriculum on students’
Introduction to Common Core State Standards and PARCC Assessment.
Common Core Reading Standards for Science. CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RST CITE specific textual evidence to support analysis of science and technical texts.
 Common Core catches up with the International Baccalaureate.
Common Core Reading Standards for Science. CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RST CITE specific textual evidence to support analysis of science and technical texts,
Anchor Standards ELA Standards marked with this symbol represent Kansas’s 15%
© 2015 The College Board The Redesigned SAT/PSAT Key Changes.
Common Core State Standards & Next Generation Science Standards Common Core State Standards & Next Generation Science Standards Grades Close Reading.
Putting the Pieces Together
School Start Time Adapted from a presentation by Tom Fox, National Writing Project (June 16, 2014) A Mini-Unit on Teaching Argument.
1 TEXT-BASED SYNTHESIS WRITING: INFORMATIVE / ARGUMENT OPINION NARRATIVE Silver Shores Elementary.
Using the PARCC Rubrics to Analyze Student Writing College Career Ready Conference 2015.
College and Career Ready Conference  Participants will be able to:  Review the design of the PARCC assessments.  Analyze the Literary Analysis.
EXAMINING THE MODULES: Instructional practices related to finding and using evidence LT 2a. I can describe the impact of content-rich curriculum on students’
Activity 1 Systems of Professional Learning Module 1 Grades 6–12: Focus on Instructional Shifts.
Test Design Read anchor texts around a topic. Answer evidence based questions. Write to demonstrate understanding and show comprehension. – Gather key.
Rhode Island Department of Education Diane Girard & Colleen O’Brien.
+ PSD, 11/5/15. + CELEBRATING WeBro SUCCESS! + WHAT DOES OUR DATA SHOW? Category % Score Curricular Areas to Build Capacity Key Ideas and Details74%Liberal.
Critical Vocabulary for Every Student Words that make or break student understanding 1.
New ELA Guidelines Shifts in ELA Common Core  Rise in Nonfiction Texts.  Content Area Literacy Close and careful reading of text  Increase Complexity.
STATE TESTING 2015 What Parents Need to Know. WELCOME PARENTS! Thank you for all that you do!
Exploring the Literacy Standards: CCSS & Main Idea.
+ PARCC Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers.
Common Core State Standards and Assessments of Student Mastery 1.
Winston - Salem / Forsyth County Schools ELA Module Two: Writing.
Instructional Implications for PARCC Assessment in the Science and Social Studies Classroom Maryland College and Career Readiness Conference Summer 2014.
RESEARCH SIMULATION TASKS DEMONSTRATING COLLEGE & CAREER READINESS.
PARCC Parent Night For Grade 8 Students
Understanding the ELA/Literacy Evidence Tables
Presentation transcript:

PARCC ELA Evidence Tables September 25, 2014

Today’s Outcomes Identify how Evidence-Centered Design informs the PARCC Summative Assessment. Identify the PARCC Evidence Tables and how educators can use them for meaningful professional learning opportunities. 2

Evidence-Centered Design for the PARCC Assessments Evidence-centered design is a deliberate and systematic approach to assessment development that will help to establish the validity of the assessments, increase the comparability of year-to year results, and increase efficiencies and reduce costs. 3 Claims Design begins with the inferences (claims) we want to make about students. Evidence In order to support claims, we must gather evidence. Tasks Tasks are designed to elicit specific evidence from students in support of claims.

PARCC Student Claims 4 Major Claim Subclaim

The tables contain the Reading, Writing and Vocabulary major claims and the evidences to be measured on the PARCC Summative Assessment. Evidences are attached to the Reading, Writing and Vocabulary claims presented by PARCC. Evidences describe what students might say or do to demonstrate mastery of the standards. An item on the PARCC assessment may measure multiple standards and multiple evidences. What are ELA Evidence tables? 5

Reading an Evidence Table Grade Claim Standards: RL –Reading Literary RI – Reading Information Evidences 6

Reading an Evidence Table for Grades Standards: In Grades 6 – 11 Literacy Standards for Reading History/Social Studies and for Reading Science/Technical are added RH – Reading History/Social Studies RST – Reading Science/Technical 7

SO... Two standards are always in play—whether items are focused on reading or writing. These standards are: – Reading Standard One (Use of Evidence) – Reading Standard Ten (Complex Texts) Students’ Command of Evidence with Complex Texts is at the Core of Every Part of the Assessment! 8

Standard 1 Always at Play Standard 1 Focused on a student’s ability to find text-based evidence for generalizations, conclusions, or inferences drawn 9 Evidence Point of View Summary Multi- media

10 Standard 10 Standard 10 Always at Play Focused on comprehension of informational and literary texts independently and proficiently. Focused on writing routinely for a range of tasks, purposes, and audiences. Reading Writing Literary Elements Comparison Information /Literary Structure

Each task can assess more than one standard and more than one evidence statement. For example…. 11

3rd Grade Sample Task Informational Text 12

PARCC Claim: PARCC Claim: Students read and demonstrate comprehension of grade level complex informational text. PARCC Subclaim PARCC Subclaim: Reading Informational Text Standards Assessed RI.1: Ask and answer questions to demonstrate an understanding….. RI.2: Determine the main idea of a text; recount the key details …. Evidence Statements: Evidence Statements: Provide an answer that shows understanding of a text. RI.1 Provides a statement of the main idea of a text. RI.2 Provides a recounting of key details in a text RI.2 Provides an explanation of how key details in a text support the main idea. RI. 2 Claim, Standards and Evidence Statements Assessed 13

You have read two texts and watched a video describing Amelia Earhart. All three include information that supports the claim that Earhart was a daring, courageous person. The three texts are: “The Biography of Amelia Earhart” “Earhart’s Final Resting Place Believed Found” “Amelia Earhart’s Life and Disappearance” (video) Consider the argument each author uses to demonstrate Earhart’s bravery. Write an essay that analyzes the strength of the arguments related to Earhart’s bravery in at least two of the texts. Remember to use textual evidence to support your ideas. 7 th Grade Sample Item (prototype) 14

Claim, Standards and Evidence Statements Assessed 15 PARCC Claim: PARCC Claim: Students write effectively when using and/or analyzing sources. PARCC Subclaim: PARCC Subclaim: Students build and present knowledge through research and the integration, comparison, and synthesis of ideas. Standards Assessed Standard W.7.2 Standard L.7.1 Standard W.7.2 (Informative) Standard L.7.1 (Conventions – grammar) Standard W.7.4 Standard L.7.2 Standard W.7.4 (Produce writing) Standard L.7.2 (Conventions – cap, punct) Standard W.7.7 Standard L.7.3 Standard W.7.7 (Conduct short research) Standard L.7.3 (Knowledge of lang) Standard W.7.8 Standard RL.7.1 Standard W.7.8 (Gather relevant info) Standard RL.7.1 (Cite several pieces) Standard W.7.9 Standard RL.7.8 Standard W.7.9 (Draw evidence from texts Standard RL.7.8 (Trace & evaluate claims) Standard RL.7.9 Standard RL.7.9 (Analyze 2 or more authors writing) PARCC Claim: PARCC Claim: Students write effectively when using and/or analyzing sources. PARCC Subclaim: PARCC Subclaim: Students build and present knowledge through research and the integration, comparison, and synthesis of ideas. Standards Assessed Standard W.7.2 Standard L.7.1 Standard W.7.2 (Informative) Standard L.7.1 (Conventions – grammar) Standard W.7.4 Standard L.7.2 Standard W.7.4 (Produce writing) Standard L.7.2 (Conventions – cap, punct) Standard W.7.7 Standard L.7.3 Standard W.7.7 (Conduct short research) Standard L.7.3 (Knowledge of lang) Standard W.7.8 Standard RL.7.1 Standard W.7.8 (Gather relevant info) Standard RL.7.1 (Cite several pieces) Standard W.7.9 Standard RL.7.8 Standard W.7.9 (Draw evidence from texts Standard RL.7.8 (Trace & evaluate claims) Standard RL.7.9 Standard RL.7.9 (Analyze 2 or more authors writing)

Using the Evidence Table to Plan Lessons: Part 1 For example, if one were to view the third grade evidence table for Reading Information Standard 2, he/she would view the following: To begin planning, one would need to first determine which of the evidences he/she would want students to be able to demonstrate. It is important to keep in mind that more than one evidence may be chosen. Next, when planning lessons it would be beneficial to determine the complex informational text(s) that the students will use as a basis for determining the main idea and/or recounting the key details and/or providing an explanation of how the key details support the main idea. 16

Using the Evidence Table to Plan Lessons: Part 2 For example, if one were to view the third grade evidence table for Reading Information Standard 2, he/she would view the following: Once text (s) have been selected it is important to consider what question(s) will be posed to the students that will be supportive of the evidences they will be asked to demonstrate. When considering the development of such questions it is important that the text dependent questions delve systematically into a text(s) to guide students in extracting the key meanings or ideas found there. 17

Evidence Tables