© CDISC 2014 1 SHARE TA Research Concepts Pilot. © CDISC 2014 SHARE TA RC Pilot SHARE TA RC Pilot: Bringing together the TA Project RC experience with.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CLINTON W. BROWNLEY AMERICAN UNIVERSITY PH.D. CANDIDATE SEPTEMBER 2, 2009 BRIDGing CDASH to SAS: How Harmonizing Clinical Trial and Healthcare Standards.
Advertisements

© CDISC 2014 Rich Concept Layer Summary Proposal: Use Ocean’s ADL Workbench / Archetypes for RCs ADL Workbench is open source software that meets all requirements.
ARCHITECTURES FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS
Protocol Author Process People Technology
What’s New with CDISC Wayne R. Kubick CDISC CTO.
IPY and Semantics Siri Jodha S. Khalsa Paul Cooper Peter Pulsifer Paul Overduin Eugeny Vyazilov Heather lane.
OMG Architecture Ecosystem SIG Federal CIO Council Data Architecture Subcommittee May 2011 Cory Casanave.
e-Framework Components and Responsibilities.
Guoqian Jiang, MD, PhD Mayo Clinic
Requirements Engineering n Elicit requirements from customer  Information and control needs, product function and behavior, overall product performance,
Information and Business Work
CMDR Plan of Action Version 3 9 th October Note This slide set is designed to facilitate discussion on the project logistics and not discuss technical.
Knowledge Acquisitioning. Definition The transfer and transformation of potential problem solving expertise from some knowledge source to a program.
UML CASE Tool. ABSTRACT Domain analysis enables identifying families of applications and capturing their terminology in order to assist and guide system.
1 ECCF Training 2.0 Introduction ECCF Training Working Group January 2011.
Course Instructor: Aisha Azeem
FHIR/RfH.....What is it? And what’s next? Furore Ewout Kramer.
© 2003 Popkin Software & Systems Inc. TOGAF Tool Support Briefing – System Architect Matt Smith, Architecture Consultant © 2003 Popkin Software & Systems.
Harmonization of SHARPn Clinical Element Models with CDISC SHARE Clinical Study Data Standards Guoqian Jiang, MD, PhD Mayo Clinic On behalf of CDISC CEMs.
MDC Open Information Model West Virginia University CS486 Presentation Feb 18, 2000 Lijian Liu (OIM:
GSIM Stakeholder Interview Feedback HLG-BAS Secretariat January 2012.
OpenMDR: Alternative Methods for Generating Semantically Annotated Grid Services Rakesh Dhaval Shannon Hastings.
David Chen IMS-LAPS University Bordeaux 1, France
Requirements Analysis
Distributed Access to Data Resources: Metadata Experiences from the NESSTAR Project Simon Musgrave Data Archive, University of Essex.
Antje Rossmanith, Roche 14th German CDISC User Group, 25-Sep-2012
Assessing the Suitability of UML for Modeling Software Architectures Nenad Medvidovic Computer Science Department University of Southern California Los.
1st Workshop on Intelligent and Knowledge oriented Technologies Universal Semantic Knowledge Middleware Marek Paralič,
Standards Analysis Summary vMR – Pros Designed for computability Compact Wire Format Aligned with HeD Efforts – Cons Limited Vendor Adoption thus far Represents.
© CDISC 2011 Joint Initiative Council 18 October 2011 Bron Kisler, VP, Strategic Initiatives, Current JIC Leader Rebecca D. Kush, PhD, President and CEO,
Ontology Summit2007 Survey Response Analysis -- Issues Ken Baclawski Northeastern University.
©Ian Sommerville 2004Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 18 Slide 1 Software Reuse.
Effective Requirements Management – an overview Kristian Persson Field Product Manager, Telelogic Asia/Pacific.
Domain Modeling In FREMA David Millard Yvonne Howard Hugh Davis Gary Wills Lester Gilbert Learning Societies Lab University of Southampton, UK.
Dave Iberson-Hurst CDISC VP Technical Strategy
For Goal-Driven Business Process Modeling Saeed A.Behnam,  Daniel Amyot, Gunter Mussbacher SITE, University of.
Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0 Fall Networking and Health Information Exchange Unit 3b National and International Standards Developing.
Christoph F. Eick University of Houston Organization 1. What are Ontologies? 2. What are they good for? 3. Ontologies and.
SKOS. Ontologies Metadata –Resources marked-up with descriptions of their content. No good unless everyone speaks the same language; Terminologies –Provide.
1 ECCF Training 2.0 Introduction ECCF Training Working Group January 2011.
Slide 1Reproduction prohibited without permission from Computas AS © METIS An Open Architecture Toolkit ADM and ADML support Don Hodge Principle Knowledge.
1Mr.Mohammed Abu Roqyah. Database System Concepts and Architecture 2Mr.Mohammed Abu Roqyah.
The data standards soup … Is the most exciting topic you can dream of.
Chapter 6 – Architectural Design Lecture 1 1Chapter 6 Architectural design.
1 1 Developing a framework for standardisation High-Level Seminar on Streamlining Statistical production Zlatibor, Serbia 6-7 July 2011 Rune Gløersen IT.
Domain Modeling In FREMA Yvonne Howard David Millard Hugh Davis Gary Wills Lester Gilbert Learning Societies Lab University of Southampton, UK.
Metadata Common Vocabulary a journey from a glossary to an ontology of statistical metadata, and back Sérgio Bacelar
PLCS DEXs Trine Hansen DNV 20 April Content OASIS / PLCS Organization PLCS DEXs DEX architecture Process – define and verify capabilities Way forward.
WIGOS Data model – standards introduction.
NCI Enterprise Services (aka COPPA) CTRP and the Suite March 19, 2009.
Winter 2011SEG Chapter 11 Chapter 1 (Part 1) Review from previous courses Subject 1: The Software Development Process.
Aim: “to support the enhancement and implementation of the standards needed for the modernisation of statistical production and services”
© 2015 Akana., Inc All Rights Reserved. From Data to Knowledge Semantics & Implementations.
Concept Proposal Sixth Open Forum on Metadata Registries Semantic Interoperability between Registries To be held January 20-24, 2003 Bruce Bargmeyer
Semantic Data Extraction for B2B Integration Syntactic-to-Semantic Middleware Bruno Silva 1, Jorge Cardoso 2 1 2
International/Interagency Collaboration – IT for Environmental Information & Environmental Data Exchange Network Copenhagen, Denmark April 25, 2002 Bruce.
OMG Architecture Ecosystem SIG Enterprise Data World 2011.
Group Name: oneM2M WG1 Requirements Source: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR,
Slide 1 Wolfram Höpken RMSIG Reference Model Special Interest Group Wolfram Höpken IFITT RMSIG.
© CDISC 2014 Sam Hume Sept 16 th, CAC eSHARE Update.
Dave Iberson-Hurst CDISC VP Technical Strategy
Object Management Group Information Management Metamodel
Summary Report Project Name: Model-Driven Health Tools (MDHT)
Enterprise Data Model Enterprise Architecture approach Insights on application for through-life collaboration 2018 – E. Jesson.
Metadata in the modernization of statistical production at Statistics Canada Carmen Greenough June 2, 2014.
The Generic Statistical Information Model
Ontology-Based Approaches to Data Integration
Semantic Information Modeling for Federation
Item 7.3 (b) SDMX for UOE data collection
Object Oriented Design
Presentation transcript:

© CDISC SHARE TA Research Concepts Pilot

© CDISC 2014 SHARE TA RC Pilot SHARE TA RC Pilot: Bringing together the TA Project RC experience with the SHARE Approach to RCs to streamline and simplify the TA development process 2 CFAST TA Development Process Concept Maps and components SHARE Metadata display tables for 2 Tas Diane’s updated Metadata display tables. ISO based SHARE Metamodel NCI Concepts already in SHARE as building blocks for RCs Additional Information Science / Business Analysis Best Practices Research Concepts from other sources (Roche, Lilly) TA Project Experience with RCs SHARE Approach to RCs SHARE TA RC Pilot Top Down (from Concept Maps) Bottom Up (from Existing Standards)

© CDISC 2014 Current SHARE Thinking on RCs 3 Semantics Manager provides the place to house the RCs, but not the mechanism to develop RCs (Semantics Manager can do it, but its not really built for RC development). This pilot will aim for RC alignment with BRIDG rather than creating RCs starting with BRIDG (using a BRIDG-instantiated tool) since we already have experience with the BRIDG-instantiated approach (and we have candidate solutions that would work, e.g. ADL Workbench). This pilot will give us more knowledge about how SHARE will source and use RCs and what they look like in Semantics Manager

© CDISC 2014 SHARE TA RC Pilot 4 TO Concept Map How to get from Here Semantics Manager Here

© CDISC 2014 SHARE Research Concept Principles Meets the needs of the CDISC community first Research Concepts are standards Research Concepts exist in the SHARE Semantic Layer ISO based meta-model RCs can be represented independent of implementation Structure, not content focused Requirements driven approach / Test Driven Development 5

© CDISC 2014 SHARE Research Concept Principles RCs applied by Metadata Developers using a Methodology Feasibility matters Opportunistic support for healthcare interoperability CDISC standards model focused – filling gaps BRIDG alignment, not BRIDG instantiation One SHARE vocabulary (create a wiki page) 6

© CDISC 2014 What are RCs? Working Definition ISO Definition: A Concept is a unit of knowledge created by a unique combination of characteristics.  In general, for CDISC: Research Concepts are high-level building blocks of clinical research information that encapsulate lower level implementation details like variables and terminologies.  For SHARE: A research concept is a unique combination of SHARE Concepts and Rules that define the independent units of knowledge found within each CDISC class. 7

© CDISC 2014 Research Concepts are Hard to Define Wiki page: Definitions for Research Concepts  A quick review turned up about 15 proposed definitions Many attempts to define RCs include descriptions of a solution  Disparity in opinions on how RCs should be created is reflected in the definitions The breadth of RC scope has made a simple definition difficult  IMO, the lack of complete CDISC standards model, including the Conceptual Layer, confounds the ability to define RCs  RCs represent multiple parts of the CDISC model 8

© CDISC Support TA Standards Development Support the TA projects in developing concept-based standards for all new projects by early 2015  Faster, more effective way to develop TA standards  Development of standards that are consistent with the CDISC Model Enable SMEs to work with conceptual representations of the standards represented using natural language  Communicate without using the structural metadata (e.g. SDTM domain structures and variables) Support C-Map templates  Provide re-usable concepts as C-Map templates 9

© CDISC Support TA Standards Development Provide a methodology for transforming conceptual models into structural models  Process for converting conceptual models to structural models that represent standards like CDASH and SDTM  Include a process for verifying the conceptual models Represent clinical phenomena using a combination of Concepts and associated Rules  Using ISO

© CDISC ISO Concept System added to the SHARE Metamodel Concept Layer

© CDISC 2014 SHARE Metamodel Conceptual Layer using Asthma TAUG Metadata Display Worksheet 12 Allergen Skin TestWheal Diameter Allergen Skin Test Wheal Diameter

© CDISC 2014 The CDISC Model - Current 13

© CDISC 2014 TA Development Process 14

© CDISC 2014 RC Concept Spreadsheet 15 Wayne mentioned on 10/15/2014 Metadata Tools TC:  There may be many RC spreadsheets, but we need to have one that is completely human-readable.  The spreadsheet should have, at mininum: RC Name, in SME language RC Definition RC CUI/C-Code/UUID

© CDISC 2014 TAs to Pilot Labs for dyslipidemia Questionnaires for Schizophrenia Discussion:  Where are these projects in the process, e.g., do we have concept maps? 16