Breaking Ranks II: Leading and Supporting High School Reform Janice Ollarvia Distinguished Principal for Secondary School Reform.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Definitions Innovation Reform Improvement Change.
Advertisements

Glenbrook Middle School Restructuring Plan 2010 Transformation Model.
Center of Excellence in Leadership of Learning October 5, 2010.
Tennessee Board of Regents Developmental Studies Redesign Project ECS Annual Forum July 2007.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Your Local School District District Team Orientation Date Time.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
1 Presentation to USED Review Panel August 10, 2010 North Carolina Race to the Top Proposal R e d a c t e d.
Brandywine School District Race to the Top Scope of Work Overview Presentation.
Teacher: Decide what to teach Decide what to assign Decide how to assess Decide how to grade In the end, convey how the kids did compared.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
Foundations for Success Initial Findings and New Directions Jason Snipes Director of Research Council of the Great City Schools Defining the Achievement.
40. Overcoming Barriers to Transformation Through System-Wide Leadership Dr. Carol Johnson, Superintendent Central Dauphin School District.
Middle Level Best Practice and Student Achievement in Texas D. Michelle Williams AMLE Nashville, TN November 6, 2014.
Minnesota’s Lighthouse High Schools Connecting Action and Research.
1. KCS Strategic Goals: Focus on the student to ensure they excel academically and are prepared for life beyond the classroom. Recruit, select, induct,
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Session Materials  Wiki
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
KEYS to School Improvement Missouri National Education Association Teaching and Learning Director.
Archived Information INVENTING NEW JERSEY’S HIGH SCHOOLS Sponsored by the New Jersey Department of Education In collaboration with: the U.S. Department.
Bridging the Gap to Postsecondary Education Innovative School Solutions.
United Way of Greater Toledo - Framework for Education Priority community issue: Education – Prepare children to enter and graduate from school.
The Race to Future-Ready Dr. Rebecca Garland Accountability Conference February 19, 2009.
Core Curriculum for College and Career Readiness Staff Leads: Jeannie Johnson and Sarah Breed.
Strategic Planning Update Kentucky Board of Education January 31, 2012.
INSTRUCTIONAL EXCELLENCE INVENTORIES: A PROCESS OF MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Superintendent of Schools.
Hazlet Township Public Schools
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
Texas Science Technology Engineering and Math (T-STEM) Initiative Robin Gelinas—Texas Education Agency Director of Policy Initiatives.
Leadership training for supporting the implementation of the new KCF Training for improving governance, leaderships and school management in municipalities.
School Improvement Planning Process OSPI PSESD
+ Is your School's Instructional Program Ready for Common Core? Reach Institute for School Leadership.
AYP Changes for Percent Meeting Standard Elementary uniform bar (3-5)
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
©IRRE First Things First : A Framework and Supports For District and School Reform William Moore, Ph.D Institute for Research and Reform in Education Boston,
 Fast Facts – a quiz  What Works – for rural districts › Dialogue using the Broad Foundation Framework for Urban District Excellence  What works in.
LESSONS LEARNED IN PROMOTING EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING AND LEADERSHIP for CHSI 2 ND National High School Leadership Summit Archived Information.
Breaking Ranks Middle Level to High School Transitions.
Systems of Support for Urban High Schools. Key Role of Large Urban Districts There are approximately 17,000 school districts in the US Approximately 66.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
HANDOUT 3 Middle School Reform. 2 What does it take to prepare our middle school students for the 21 st Century? They must be able to … Work in teams.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Burlington Township High School Middle States Excellence By Design Faculty Update October 16, 2009.
EVAL Self Assessment (Adapted from LaConner School Improvement Presentation) Your Name Your District Your Date.
Learning-Centered Leadership Joseph Murphy Peabody College, Vanderbilt University.
Principal – Adriene Stephenson. Enrollment – 371 General Education – 83% SPED – 17% LEP – Less than 1% African American – 75% White – 22% Asian, Hispanic,
WASC Western Association for Schools and Colleges.
Middle School Math & Literacy Mapping Institute Standards Transformation and Realignment in Thompson.
Planning for Success Advancing district planning practices MASS/MASC Joint Conference November 5, 2014 Carrie Conaway, Associate Commissioner Planning.
AVID Leading College & Career Readiness Districtwide - Transforming Student Outcomes AVID's mission is to close the achievement gap by preparing all students.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
Breaking Ranks II: Strategies for Leading High School Reform Strategies for Ensuring Access and A Range of Options for All Students Jay T. Engeln Resident.
Education.state.mn.us Principal Evaluation Components in Legislation Work Plan for Meeting Rose Assistant Commissioner Minnesota Department of Education.
Santa Fe Public Schools Our Common Commitments Improving our lives through education.
Survey Results March We have become obsessed with the use of test data alone to drive school improvement and transformation efforts. “Culture drives.
External Review Report Westminster Public Schools April 24-27, 2016.
Breaking Ranks II: Leading and Supporting High School Reform Rosa Aronson Director, Office of Advocacy Archived Information.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
A Guaranteed, Viable, and Engaging Curriculum
School Leadership Team Conference: HQS 3
Colorado Department of Education
Presentation transcript:

Breaking Ranks II: Leading and Supporting High School Reform Janice Ollarvia Distinguished Principal for Secondary School Reform

Breaking Ranks II: Leading and Supporting High School Reform Developed for “Preparing America’s Future”-Regional H.S. Summits

School Leadership Services 3 Session Outcomes  Understand the need/rationale for Breaking Ranks II and how it differs from the 1996 Breaking Ranks report.  Review the program elements of Breaking Ranks II.

School Leadership Services 4 Session Outcomes  Identify and understand the challenges for Districts and States.  Identify and understand the ways that Districts and States can support Principals who “break ranks.”

School Leadership Services 5 How the Reports Differ:  BR I (1996): A manifesto, a series of 82 recommendations for high school reform.  BR II (2204): A hands-on field guide, 31 recommendations, examples, tools and tips.

School Leadership Services 6 BRII Outlines Strategies for Transforming H.S. In 3 Areas:  Collaborative Leadership and Professional Learning Communities  Personalization  Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment

School Leadership Services 7 Breaking Ranks II  Principals can use BRII as a guide to creating 21 st century high schools: more student- centered and more personalized in programs, support services, and intellectual rigor.

School Leadership Services 8 Why “Break Ranks” in Our High Schools?  High drop-out rates.  Widening achievement gaps.  Disengaged students.  Graduates unprepared for post-secondary education and/or training.  Lack of academic rigor for all except a few students.

School Leadership Services 9 Breaking Ranks II:  Calls on high school principals to take responsibility for increasing the academic achievement of all students.

School Leadership Services 10 Critical Point #1 All principals, not just a few early reformers, must accept responsibility for the task and for taking the steps to make it happen.

School Leadership Services 11 Critical Point #2 Relying exclusively on principals—no matter their commitment to or capacity for reform—will lead to the creation of a few high performing schools within systems that allow and even perpetuate mediocrity.

School Leadership Services 12 Systemic Improvement Of H.S.: The Challenge for Districts and States  Lack of Overall Capacity  Lack of Experience with High School Reform

School Leadership Services 13 Supporting Systemwide Change:  Recommendations for Districts, States and the Federal Government to Help High School Principals Break Ranks:

School Leadership Services 14 Supporting Systemwide Change :  Currently, “the district administrator is the single most important individual for setting the expectations and tone of the pattern of school change.”  Michael Fullan

School Leadership Services 15 Where should district and state administrators begin?  Focus on instruction, teaching and learning.

School Leadership Services 16 Where should district and state administrators begin?  Create conditions for collaborative teacher and principal professionalism.  Mobilize parents and community.

School Leadership Services 17 Where Should District and State Administrators Begin?  Ensure coherent articulation with middle schools and local post-secondary institutions.  Utilize data strategically.

School Leadership Services 18 Where Should District and State Administrators Begin?  USE DISTRICT RESOURCES TO HIRE, PROMOTE AND SUPPORT OUTSTANDING TEACHERS AND ADMINISTRATORS!!

School Leadership Services 19 Helpful Features of Breaking Ranks II  Multiple examples-urban, rural and suburban-of schools successfully implementing recommendations.

School Leadership Services 20 Helpful Features of Breaking Ranks II  Honest recognition of the implementation challenges paired with multiple strategies for success.

School Leadership Services 21 Helpful Features of Breaking Ranks II  Tools, rubrics and surveys to help principals and schools with self-assessment.