Charles Bon 19 May 2015. Two-Way, Randomized Crossover Study 12-80 + Healthy, Normal Adults -48 to -12 Hour Check-in Overnight Diet and Activity Restrictions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Applying Multilevel Models in Evaluation of Bioequivalence in Drug Trials Min Yang Prof of Medical Statistics Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit School of.
Advertisements

Design of Bioequivalence Studies Alfredo García – Arieta, PhD
Dale P. Conner, Pharm.D. Division of Bioequivalence
Bioequivalence Studies Anoop Agarwal
FACTORIAL ANOVA Overview of Factorial ANOVA Factorial Designs Types of Effects Assumptions Analyzing the Variance Regression Equation Fixed and Random.
FACTORIAL ANOVA. Overview of Factorial ANOVA Factorial Designs Types of Effects Assumptions Analyzing the Variance Regression Equation Fixed and Random.
Statistical considerations Alfredo García – Arieta, PhD Training workshop: Training of BE assessors, Kiev, October 2009.
Kamal K. Midha C.M., Ph.D, D.Sc College of Pharmacy and Nutrition,
1 Endogenous Substance Bioavailability and Bioequivalence: Levothyroxine Sodium Tablets Steven B. Johnson, Pharm.D. Division of Pharmaceutical Evaluation.
Kyiv, TRAINING WORKSHOP ON PHARMACEUTICAL QUALITY, GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE & BIOEQUIVALENCE Statistical Considerations for Bioequivalence.
Bioequivalence of Highly Variable (HV) Drugs: Clinical Implications Why HV Drugs are Safer Leslie Z. Benet, Ph.D. Professor of Biopharmaceutical Sciences.
Kyiv, TRAINING WORKSHOP ON PHARMACEUTICAL QUALITY, GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE & BIOEQUIVALENCE Introduction to the Discussion of Bioequivalence.
FACTORIAL ANOVA.
Pharmacokinetics of Drug Absorption
Dale P. Conner, Pharm.D. Division of Bioequivalence OGD, CDER, FDA
Development and validation of an in vitro–in vivo correlation for extended buspirone HCl release tablets Sevgi Takka, Adel Sakr and Arthur Goldberg Journal.
Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
Exercise 6 Dose linearity and dose proportionality
PK and PD Studies for Systemic Exposure of Locally Acting Drugs Industry View Lester I. Harrison, PhD Division Scientist 3m Pharmaceuticals.
WHO Prequalification Program Workshop, Kiev, Ukraine, June 25-27,2007.
Interchangeability and study design Drs. Jan Welink Training workshop: Training of BE assessors, Kiev, October 2009.
Qian H. Li, Lawrence Yu, Donald Schuirmann, Stella Machado, Yi Tsong
Documentation of bioequivalence Drs. J. Welink Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October 2009.
Bioequivalence Studies Dr Sanet Aspinall, PhD Managing Director AddClin Research Pretoria 20 March 2009.
regulatory requirements
Classification of clinical trials
Exercise 5 Monte Carlo simulations, Bioequivalence and Withdrawal time
Challenges in Bioequivalence Evaluation of Special Dosage Forms
Results from Replicate Design Studies in ANDAs Rabi Patnaik, Ph.D. Division of Bioequivalence Office of Generic Drugs Office of Pharmaceutical Science,
1 Bioequivalence of Highly Variable Drugs: Regulatory Perspectives Sam H. Haidar, R.Ph., Ph.D. Pharmacometrics Office of Generic Drugs.
Week 6- Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
Regulatory requirements Drs. Jan Welink Training workshop: Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009.
ACPS Meeting, October 19-20, 2004 BioINequivalence: Concept and Definition Lawrence X. Yu, Ph. D. Director for Science Office of Generic Drugs, OPS, CDER,
1 Axcan Public Presentation for the FDA Pharmaceutical Science and Clinical Pharmacology Advisory Committee Meeting July 23, 2008.
Highly Variable Drugs – Bioequivalence Issues: FDA Proposal Under Consideration Barbara M. Davit, J.D., Ph.D. Deputy Director, Division of Bioequivalence.
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November |1 | Prequalification programme: Priority.
WHO Workshop on Assessment of Bioequivalence Data Addis Ababa, 31. August – 3. September 2010 Artemisinin-based Products Dr. Henrike Potthast
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November |1 | Prequalification programme: Priority.
Statistical considerations Drs. Jan Welink Training workshop: Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009.
Center for Professional Advancement Generic Drug Approvals Course Bioequivalence & Bioavailability Michael A. Swit, Esq. Vice President.
Population Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of Levosulpiride and Terbinafine in Healthy Male Korean Volunteers Yong-Bok Lee College of Pharmacy and Institute.
1-Compartment Oral Dosing 400 mg of moxifloxacin is administered orally to Mr BB, a 68 yr old male who weighs 75 kg. Blood samples were drawn following.
Area under the plasma concentration time curve. IMPORTANCE OF AUC Pharmacokinetics - measurement of bioavaibility absolute, relative Biopharmaceutics.
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - EAC/EC/WHO Training workshop / September |1 | Prequalification programme:
CHEE 4401 Definitions drug - any substance that affects the structure or functioning of an organism pharmaceutics - the area of study concerned with the.
1 EVALUATION OF BIOEQUIVALENCE FOR HIGHLY-VARIABLE DRUGS AND DRUG PRODUCTS Laszlo Endrenyi University of Toronto Laszlo Tothfalusi Semmelweis University.
WHO Prequalification Programme June 2007 Training Workshop on Dissolution, Pharmaceutical Product Interchangeability and Biopharmaceutical Classification.
Guidance Update: Average, Population, and Individual Approaches to Establishing Bioequivalence Mei-Ling Chen, Ph.D. Associate Director Office of Pharmaceutical.
Grade Statistics without Bonus with Bonus Average = 86 Median = 87 Average = 88 Median = 89 Undergraduates Average=88 MS Average=92.
Pre-qualification Program: Priority Medicines Interchangeability of Multi Source Drug Products SALOMON STAVCHANSKY, PH.D. ALCON CENTENNIAL PROFESSOR OF.
Using Product Development Information to Address the Bioequivalence Challenges of Highly-variable Drugs Lawrence X. Yu, Ph. D. Director for Science Office.
Introduction What is a Biowaiver?
Examples of deficiencies in submitted data Drs. J. Welink Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October.
Bioavailability and Bioequivalence L 10,11.  Bioavailability is a measurement of the rate and extent (amount) to which the active ingredient or active.
Exact PK Equivalence for a bridging study Steven Novick, Harry Yang (MedImmune) and Xiang Zhang (NC State) NCB, October 2015.
Bioequivalence Criteria Research Plan Stella G. Machado, Ph.D. Office of Biostatistics and the Replicate Design Technical Committee Advisory Committee.
Individual Bioequivalence: Have the Opinions of the Scientific Community Changed? Leslie Z. Benet, Ph.D. University of California San Francisco.
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November |1 | Prequalification programme: Priority.
Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 1 Statistical Considerations.
Interchangeability and study design Drs. Jan Welink Training workshop: Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009.
SOME ISSUES ON THE DETERMINATION OF BIOEQUIVALENCE FOR HIGHLY VARIABLE DRUGS Laszlo Endrenyi University of Toronto Laszlo Tothfalusi Semmelweis University.
In vitro - In vivo Correlation
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - EAC/EC/WHO Training workshop / September |1 | Prequalification programme:
Chapter 8 BIOAVAILABILITY & BIOEQUIVALENCE
Introduction What is a Biowaiver?
Dissolution testing and in vitro in vivo correlation of conventional and SR preparations Formulation development and optimization is an ongoing process.
Design and Analysis of Crossover Study Designs
Clinical Pharmacokinetics
Bioequivalence trials: design, evaluation, regulatory requirements
Plasma concentration-time profile after oral administration of a single dose. Plasma concentration-time profile after oral administration of a single dose.
Presentation transcript:

Charles Bon 19 May 2015

Two-Way, Randomized Crossover Study Healthy, Normal Adults -48 to -12 Hour Check-in Overnight Diet and Activity Restrictions Single Dose (1/2 subj. get Test & 1/2 get Ref) 10-Hour Pre-Dose to 4-Hour Post-Dose Fast Samples collected over 3-4 half-lives Adequate washout (crossover design) Crossover to Alternate Product (usual)

 Drug Concentration Time Profile

Measured Drug Concentrations AUC t = Area Under the Curve 0-t Sum ( ½ * (C 1 + C 2 ) * (T 2 - T 1 ) ) Calculated to C t AUC inf = AUC t + C t / Ke Proportional to amount absorbed Can calculate only if we have Ke

Measured Drug Concentrations AUCt, AUC  - Extent of Absorption Cmax - Rate & Extent of Absorption Tmax - Rate of Absorption Terminal Rate of Elimination (Ke, ß, z ) Terminal Half-Life of Elimination (t½)

Test of Equality (not of use for BE) Standard ANOVA (  =0.05) H 0 : New = Standard H a : New  Standard H 0 : New / Standard = 1 H a : New / Standard  1

BE Requires a Test of Comparability Two, One-Sided T-tests (  =0.05) H 0 1 : New / Standard < LL H a 1 : New / Standard  LL H 0 2 : New / Standard > UL H a 2 : New / Standard  UL

Average BE -  ≤ (  T -  R ) ≤   = Ln(1.25) -  = -Ln(1.25) = Ln(0.80) 2, 1-sided t-test (  = 0.05)  2-sided 90% CI Same As: (  T -  R ) 2 ≤  2 One-Sided 95% UCB

Highly Variable Drugs Narrow Therapeutic Index Drugs In-Vitro Population BE

Guidance for Industry Statistical Approaches to Establishing Bioequivalence U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) January 2001 BP

Analysis of Ln-Transformed AUC & Cmax  Mixed-Effects Linear Model  Each subject, j, provides µ Tj and µ Rj  µ Tj & µ Rj from Dist n (µ T ) & Dist n (µ R )  σ BT 2 and σ BR 2  Correlation, ρ, between µ Tj and µ Rj.  σ D 2 is related to these parameters

σ D 2 = variance of (µ Tj - µ Rj ) = ( σ BT - σ BR ) (1- ρ ) σ BT σ BR The total variances for each formulation are defined as the sum of the within- and between-subject components σ TT 2 = σ WT 2 + σ BT 2 σ RR 2 = σ WR 2 + σ BR 2 For analysis of crossover studies, the means are given additional structure by the inclusion of period and sequence effect terms.

A mixed-scaling approach was suggested for individual BE. Reference-scaled method if the estimate of σ WR > σ W0, constant-scaling otherwise, with σ W0 = 0.20 (σ WR 2 or σ W0 2 as denominator). The guidance recommends that  I = 0.05 The guidance recommends that sponsors applying the individual BE approach may use either reference- scaling or constant-scaling at either side of the changeover point.

First Problem (  T -  R ) 2 > Ln(1.25) Offset by (σ BT 2 - σ BR 2 ) Must Constrain (  T -  R )

Second Problem A subject-by-formulation interaction could occur when an individual is representative of subjects present in the general population in low numbers, for whom the relative BA of the two products is markedly different than for the majority of the population, and for whom the two products are not bioequivalent, even though they might be bioequivalent in the majority of the population. Must constrain σ D 2

Irreconcilable Problems  Industry Resisted 4-way Studies  FDA’s Influential Proponent Left FDA Kill the Concept

The Real Problem The equation for the statistic could be readily understood by non-statisticians

High Variability In a Drug 1.BCS Class III or IV (Low Solubility) 2.Formulation Effects (MR vs. IR) 3.Biological Variable (Oral Progesterone)

What Doesn’t Cause High Variability Analytics Var(A + B) = Var(A) + Var(B) Analytics = (0.18) 2 Biological = (0.35) 2 Var(A + B) = (0.39) 2 Analytics = (0.05) 2 Biological = (0.35) 2 Var(A + B) = (0.36) 2

Highly Variable Drugs Prior to 2008 (2009)  Don’t pursue product  Run huge two-way BE study  Run slightly less huge four-way  Replicate design/large study  Scaled Average BE (USA)

CV = 35%, T/R = 0.93 (1.075), Prob ≥ 0.80 ABE (2-way)N = 66 (132 SP sets) SABE (3-way)N = 30 (90 SP sets) SABE (4-way)N = 20 (80 SP sets)

Must Replicate Reference Product  Partial Replicate: TRR, RTR, RRT  Full Replicate: TRTR, RTRT CV WR determines BE method  ≥ 30% the SABE method is used  < 30% must use ABE method

Using ln (Test/Ref) = ln(Test) – ln(Ref) removes Subject Effect

References Guidance for Industry, “Statistical Approaches to Establishing Bioequivalence”, U.S. FDA, CDER, Jan Haidar SH, et. al. Bioequivalence approaches for highly variable drugs and drug products. Pharm Res 2008; 25: Haidar SH, et. al. Evaluation of a Scaling Approach for the Bioequivalence of highly variable drugs. Pharm AAPS J 2008; 10: Draft Guidance on Progesterone. U.S. FDA, CDER, Feb Draft Guidance on Warfarin Sodium. U.S. FDA, CDER, Dec Draft Guidance on Budesonide. U.S. FDA, CDER, Sep 2012.