Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0353r1 March 2015 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 OFDMA Non-contiguous Channel Utilization Date: 2015-03-10 Authors:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Discussion on OFDMA in HEW
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /1464r0 Submission November 2011 Yasuhiko Inoue (NTT), et. al.Slide 1 The better spectrum utilization for the future WLAN standardization.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0091r1 January 2015 Woojin Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 UL-OFDMA procedure in IEEE ax Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1225r1 Considerations on CCA for OBSS Opearation in ax Date: Slide 1Huawei Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1437r1 November 2014 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 Efficient Wider Bandwidth Operation in IEEE ax Date:
Beamformed HE PPDU Date: Authors: May 2015 Month Year
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/0550r0 May 2015 K. Yunoki and B. Zhao, KDDI R&D Labs.Slide 1 L-Preamble Issues for UL-OFDMA Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0354r1 March 2015 Woojin Ahn, Yonsei Univ.Slide 1 Bandwidth granularity on UL-OFDMA data allocation Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0091r0 January 2015 Woojin Ahn, Yonsei Univ.Slide 1 UL-OFDMA procedure in IEEE ax Date: Authors:
Multi-STA Block ACK Protection
Doc.: IEEE /0358r3 Submission March 2015 Daewon Lee, NEWRACOM Numerology for 11ax Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.:IEEE /1159r1 Submission Laurent Cariou Sept, 2010 Slide 1 Non contiguous additional bandwidth mode Date:
Doc.: IEEE 01-15/0035r1 Submission Scalable Channel Utilization Scheme January 2015 B. Zhao and K. Yunoki, KDDI R&D LabsSlide 1 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1431r1 Submission September 2014 Issues on UL-OFDMA Transmission Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE 11-14/1432r1 Submission Nov Minho Cheong, ETRISlide 1 Proposed ax Specification Framework - Background Date: Authors:
Uplink Multi-User MIMO Protocol Design
Discussion on OFDMA in IEEE ax
Submission doc.: IEEE /1208r1 September 2014 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 MAC considerations on ax OFDMA Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1228r0 Submission September 2014 xxx, NEWRACOM Issues on 256-FFT per 20MHz Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1303r5 Submission November 2010 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Overlapping BSS Co-Existence Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1126r0 Submission September 2012 Krishna Sayana, SamsungSlide 1 Wi-Fi for Hotspot Deployments and Cellular Offload Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /870r2 July 2015 Guido R. Hiertz et al., EricssonSlide ax in 2.4 GHz Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1153r0 Submission September 2013 Laurent Cariou (Orange)Slide 1 Simulation scenario proposal Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /430 March 2015 TGax MU ad-hoc groupSlide 1 TGax MU ad-hoc March 2015 Agenda Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1179r0 September 2014 Gwangzeen Ko, ETRISlide 1 Considerations for Partial Band Interference between WLAN Systems Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0068r0 Submission Discussions on the better resource utilization for the next generation WLANs January 2012 Yasuhiko Inoue (NTT),
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1395r2 Simultaneous Transmission Technologies for HEW Date: November 2013 Koichi Ishihara, NTTSlide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1288r1 November 2015 K. Yunoki, KDDI R&D Labs.Slide 1 An issue of wider bandwidth operation at real denser environment.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1097r1 September 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 Reducing Channel Sounding Protocol Overhead for 11ax Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1265r1 November 2015 Slide 1 RTS*/CTS* for UL/DL OFDMA Control Date: Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhone .
Discussion on ax functional requirements
Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1327r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Slide 1 Diversity Mode in OFDMA Date: Authors:
January 2016 doc.: IEEE /0095r1 Frequency Multiple Access in 11ay Date: Slide 1LG Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0384r0 Submission Discussion on DL-OFDMA Sub-channel Indication Method Mar 2015 Yu Cai (Lenovo)Slide 1 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0787r1 Submission MU with Frequency Domain Multiplexing July 2010 ChaoChun Wang et al, MediaTekSlide 1 Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1116r1 September 2015 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 Trigger Frame Channel Access Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0353r1 March 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 MU-RTS/CTS for TWT Protection Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0087r1 January 2016 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 NAV cancellation issues on MU protection Date: Authors:
DL-OFDMA Procedure in IEEE ax
Secondary Channel CCA of HE STA
Requirements Discussion
802.11ax in 2.4 GHz Date: Authors: July 2015
Non contiguous MHz mode for Europe, Japan and global
RTS*/CTS* for UL/DL OFDMA Control
Flexible Wider Bandwidth Transmission
January 2012 Discussions on the better resource utilization for the next generation WLANs Date: January 17th, 2012 Authors: Name Affiliations Address Phone.
BW Field in HE-MU Format
120MHz channelization solution
RTS*/CTS* for UL/DL OFDMA Control
Evaluation of the saturation of the 5GHz band
Joint Multichannel CSMA
Evaluation of the saturation of the 5GHz band
Fair Quiet for DFS Date: Authors: February 2008
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
Functional Requirements for EHT Specification Framework
Efficient Frequency Spectrum Utilization
Non contiguous MHz mode for Europe, Japan and global
Non contiguous MHz mode for Europe, Japan and global
Increased Network Throughput with Channel Width Related CCA and Rules
MU with Frequency Domain Multiplexing
Non contiguous MHz mode for Europe, Japan and global
Numerology for 11ax Date: Authors: March 2015 Month Year
Channelization for China’s Spectrum
Reserving STA Date: Authors: January 2011 January 2011
Joint Multichannel CSMA
Functional Requirements for EHT Specification Framework
TG ax Scenarios Proposed additions for frequency re-use
Enhanced Resource Allocation Schemes for 11be
Power Consideration for Multi-link Transmissions
Multiple RF operation for ax OFDMA
Presentation transcript:

Submission doc.: IEEE /0353r1 March 2015 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 OFDMA Non-contiguous Channel Utilization Date: Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE /0353r1 March 2015 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 2 Background OFDMA is adopted as an ax transmission scheme[1] OFDMA and channel utilization – Various new patterns of channel utilization for OFDMA have been discussed [2][3] Contiguous flexible & non-contiguous – Approaches in the past OFDMA related contributions Legacy channel utilization for STAs  Low complexity on STAs Extended channel utilization for AP OFDMA channel utilization has not been fully discussed

Submission doc.: IEEE /0353r1 March 2015 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 3 OFDMA Channelization 11ac channelization allows predetermined contiguous channel utilization on 5GHz band (except 80+80MHz) 11ax could enhance its performance via allowing new patterns of channel utilization New options of wider bandwidth operation – Contiguous flexible channel (e.g., 60MHz, 120MHz, etc) – Non-contiguous channel (e.g., 20MHz+20MHz, 20MHz+40MHz, etc) 20MHz 40MHz 80MHz Not allowedAllowed

Submission doc.: IEEE /0353r1 March 2015 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 4 OFDMA Channelization (Contiguous) Contiguous flexible channel [4] – Better performance for target BSS than 11ac channel utilization – Need to configure new sub-carrier allocation for new bandwidth – Or multiple contiguous segments (e.g., contiguous 40+20MHz) 11ac 40MHz11ax Contiguous 60 MHz New 11ax 60MHz sub- carrier allocation 11ac 40MHz+11ac 20MHz sub-carrier allocation

Submission doc.: IEEE /0353r1 March 2015 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 5 OFDMA Channelization (Non-contiguous) Non-contiguous channel utilization [4][5][6][7][8] – Much better performance for target BSS than 11ac channel utilization Non-contiguous channel utilization might be preferable due to better spectral usage – There are technical MAC & PHY issues e.g., Limitation on number of segments, Channel access schemes, etc. 11ac 40MHz11ax Non-contiguous 120 MHz

Submission doc.: IEEE /0353r1 March 2015 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 6 Non-contiguous channel utilization Supporting non-contiguous channels – Legacy (before ac) utilizes only one frequency segment of certain center frequency Frequency segment: a block of contiguous frequency bandwidth which has one center frequency – ac could utilize 2 frequency segments to utilize 80+80MHz bandwidth of different two center frequency VHT operation information element includes each center frequency of two segments Segment 1Segment 2

Submission doc.: IEEE /0353r1 March 2015 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 7 Issues on Non-contiguous channel PHY needs to handle non-contiguous bandwidth – Multiple RF(or multiple IF part) may be required to support non- contiguous channels [5][6][7] – Each frequency segment may require one IF [7] – Synchronous non-contiguous channel utilization is feasible [5][6][7] – Non-contiguous channel utilization could enhance 11ax throughput by increasing opportunity of wideband operation [4][7][8][9] Digital Signal Process DAC IF RF For Segment1 For Segment2

Submission doc.: IEEE /0353r1 March 2015 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 8 Issues on Non-contiguous channel Non-contiguous channel support with PHY restriction might be required – Utilizing all available channel is burden to PHY and could degrade spectral reuse on dense OBSS scenario – Therefore, restriction on numbers of segment need to be considered 11ac considered 2 segments at most Complexity and AP/STA capability needs to be considered Many legacy channel access schemes might be re-defined or enhanced for Non-contiguous channel – STAs’ capability for non-contiguous channel support might vary – CCA, contention and back-off and other channel access schemes might be required to be re-defined for non-contiguous channel

Submission doc.: IEEE /0353r1 March 2015 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 9 Issues on Non-contiguous channel Minimizing impacts on non-contiguous channel utilization – Secondary non-contiguous segment(s) might require a new control channel(s) – A new control channel utilizes same 11ax channel access schemes (CCA, wideband operation, etc.) as primary channel – By utilizing new control channel(s) STA does not need to listen to all possible channels Further performance enhancement with new control channel on non-contiguous segment – Secondary non-contiguous segment can be utilized even when a primary channel is busy

Submission doc.: IEEE /0353r1 March 2015 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 10 Issues on Non-contiguous channel Resource utilization comparison [9] – CH1 is Primary Channel – CH3 is 2nd segment control channel Channel (Colored means busy) LegacyAll available CH With 2 nd segment control channel CH1CH2CH3CH4CH1CH2CH3CH4CH1CH2CH3CH4CH1CH2CH3CH4 Case1 Bus y Case2 Bus y Case3 Bus y Case4 Bus y Case5 Bus y Case6 Bus y

Submission doc.: IEEE /0353r1 March 2015 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 11 Non-contiguous channel 69% 39% 108% 52% 119% 39%

Submission doc.: IEEE /0353r1 March 2015 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 12 Conclusions Non-contiguous channel utilization may improve 11ax throughput – All possible non-contiguous methods improve effective channel utilization Frequency segment might be restricted by PHY capability – If there are no restriction(using all available channel case), 4 non- contiguous segment need to be supported on 160MHz band – Numerous frequency segments might not be feasible due to PHY limitations Channel access schemes need to consider non-contiguous channel utilization – Allocating control channel to additional frequency segments could be one of possible solutions

Submission doc.: IEEE /0353r1 March 2015 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 13 References [1] IEEE /0132r2 "Specification Framework for TGax" [2] IEEE /1382r0 "Discussion on OFDMA in HEW" [3] IEEE /0035r0 "Scalable Channel Utilization" [4] IEEE /1058r0 "Efficient wider bandwidth operation" [5] IEEE /1037r0 "Considerations on Multi-Channel in TGac" [6] IEEE /1022r0 "Multi-channel Transmissions" [7] IEEE /0103r1 "Gains provided by multichannel transmissions" [8] IEEE /0385r1 "80MHz and 160MHz channel access modes" [9] IEEE /0132r2 "DL-OFDMA Procedure in IEEE ax"

Submission doc.: IEEE /0353r1 March 2015 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 14 Straw Poll 1 Do you agree to add the to the TG Specification Frame work document? – 3.y.z The amendment shall support non-contiguous channel transmission. Y N ABS